FTA:Â âAfter more than a century on their own, Indigenous-created forest gardens of the Pacific Northwest support more pollinators, more seed-eating animals and more plant species than the supposedly ânaturalâ conifer forests surrounding them.
âWhen we look at forest gardens, theyâre actually enhancing what nature does, making it much more resilient, much more biodiverseâand, oh yeah, they feed people too,â says Armstrong.
The paper may be the first to quantify how Indigenous land stewardship can enhance what ecologists call functional diversityâa measure of how many goods an ecosystem provides. It joins a growing scientific literature revealing that Indigenous peopleâboth historically and todayâoften outperform government agencies and conservation organizations at supporting biodiversity, sequestering carbon, and generating other ecological benefits on their land. Leaving nature alone is not always the right course, scientists are findingâand the original land stewards often do it best.â
â âWestern science for too long has embraced the idea of primordial wilderness,â says Jesse Miller, an ecologist at Stanford and Armstrongâs coauthor. âWeâre seeing this paradigm shift to recognizing how much of what was thought of as primordial wilderness were actually landscapes shaped by humans.âÂ
The forest gardens Armstrong studied once supplied Indigenous villages with food and medicine, including plants that had been imported from elsewhere. âHistorically it was really important to have all the resources here,â says Willie Charlie, a former chief and current employee of the Stsâailes Nation of the Coast Salish people. âIf you had all that in your family, you were pretty self-sustaining.â
Willie Charlie, tirelessly explaining Indigenous practices to/with scientists
âIn other cases, however, government policy continues to diverge from both Indigenous knowledge and science. This spring, for example, the state of Wisconsin authorized a wolf hunt that both scientists and tribes had protested.
âPeople outside the tribal community tend to ⌠think a lot of our positions are culturally based. But I would argue they tend to align much more with science than the non-tribal worldview,â says Peter David, a wildlife biologist for the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission, which represents 11 Midwestern Ojibwe tribes.
Peter David, a wildlife biologist with the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission, hanging out with some wild rice
âThe tribal worldview says wolves ought to be able to establish their own population levels, and they do that at very low levelsâŚit aligns much better with the science.â
Despite an increasing convergence between science and Indigenous knowledge, the academy still has work to do, too, says Waller. âI would like to see forestry schools routinely sending forestry students, for example, to Menominee Tribal Enterprises,â he says. âI would like to see ecologists have an option to take an ethnobotany or traditional ecological knowledge course.ââ
