fictional stories involving cloning and the âmoral dilemmaâ of whether a cloned human should be considered a person are so fucking obnoxious to me, like from the earliest possible age it never made sense to me why people would hand-wring about the personhood of a clone. thatâs just a human being baby, donât be so weird about it
âbut do they have SOULS???â
good question but hereâs a better one, are you hungry for a knuckle sandwich
My favorite rabbit trail to drag the âlife begins at conception! The moment the sperm meets the egg, a new soul is created!â crowd down is to start theorizing at length about identical twins, naturally occurring clones that divide⌠after fertilization. It always takes them off guard and completely derails the rant.
Does each twin have half a soul? Is there one full-souled twin and one soulless twin? Did you know that in a lab you can cut a freshly fertilized embryo in up to eight pieces and they will all develop completely? Would this produce seven extra lab-created soul or one lab-created Lord Voldemort split seven ways?
And then we move on to the opposite problem: what about naturally occurring human chimeras, a pair of fraternal twins that collide and merge into one organism with the DNA of both⌠after fertilization. Does a chimera have two souls? Two half-souls that donât match? Does one soul kill the other? Both sets of DNA survive, so what determines which soul lives and which dies? Does that make the surviving soul a murderer before it even develops a heartbeat, let alone awareness?
And given that both identical twins and human chimeras are psychologically indistinguishable from anyone else, what does a soul actually do? What are the theological implications, if your theory of soul-at-fertilization requires drastic soul weirdness when confronted with biological reality, but that soul weirdness ends up producing⌠no effect whatsoever?

















