Was just reading this meta from a big name in the fandom: “Jon and Dany and Tyrion are practicing politics now, but their successes and failures are highlighted in part as object lessons, and the education, I feel and believe, is Sansa’s. That’s her meta-arc: from cliche-ridden afterthought to, one day, the best answer to the question “who should rule?” Well done, m’lady.”
Are they really convinced that SANSA of all people is the one who’s going to learn from Dany’s/Jon’s/Tyrion’s mistakes and successes and do better??? That’s just another way of saying that she must inherit what’s not hers (in this case, political achievements). That’s why they like to call her “political heiress”, because nothing is actually hers, it wasn’t earned. It never is. It’s like when noobs think she’ll inherit Nymeria because she’s entitled to it for some reason. Jon, Dany and Tyrion went through all the trials of ruling so other character can succeed… offscreen. They really don’t like her story so they need to steal all the accomplishments of other characters.
I was curious which bnf wrote this pure idiocy, googled that line you quoted, read their post and ...
I love how he calls the OG outline as the 'Stink Letter'. Sansa fans hate, hate the leaked outline because it highlighted what a lot of us already knew - that Sansa was not a tier I main character. That she was created to be the one member of the Stark family of dubious loyalty. After the leak, anytime Sansa stans got to interact with GRRM at cons, the question they would always ask is - 'Is Sansa a main character as well? Is Sansa important as well?'
And of course GRRM would say - 'Yes, Sansa is also a main character, Jaime is also a main character, they are all main characters!' He would consider Ned and Catelyn to be his main characters as well.
After all that's what GRRM is famous for - killing off his main characters! That's his shtick. That's what made the TV show famous after Ned Stark was executed at the end of season one and viewers were shocked.
And while he gave Ned, Robb and Catelyn the main character treatment, these characters were always doomed - as the 'Stink Letter' makes clear. In fact all the characters who die in the OG outline end up dying in ASoIaF - which does not bode well for Sansa Stark.
GRRM even touches on this in his leaked OG outline letter (There's a reason he was angry this got leaked!)
The cast will not always remain the same. Old characters will die, and new ones will be introduced. Some of the fatalities will include sympathetic viewpoint characters. I want the reader to feel that no one is ever completely safe, not even the characters who seem to be the heroes. The suspense always ratchets up a notch when you know that any character can die at any time.
Except, as he explains in his letter, there is actually a cast of whom he considers to be his 'central characters (who) will make it through all three volumes, however, growing from children to adults and changing the world and themselves in the process.'
He further writes that at it's core ASoIaF is about these 5 characters
In a sense, my trilogy is almost a generational saga, telling the life stories of these five characters, three men and two women. The five key players are Tyrion Lannister, Daenerys Targaryen, and three of the children of Winterfell, Arya, Bran, and the bastard Jon Snow. All of them are introduced at some length in the chapters you have to hand.
Naturally this was hugely annoying to the stans who thought they were reading A Song of Sansa and Sansa, like the bnf you quoted who actually thinks that Jon, Dany and Tyrion's arc is all about Sansa being a leader.... How do you even write nonsense like that and be considered an Asoiaf expert?!
Only in this fandom can you package such garbage as expert asoiaf meta and have it be swallowed by the wider fandom in the name of neoliberal feminism. Let's celebrate Sansa's unearned path to being a queen - on the back of other characters - because she's a real girl who likes songs and fairy tales! Isn't it wonderful?! Isn't that what the TV show did as well and we got a thousand gifsets of GirlBoss Sansa in a crown as the 'queen who did not bend'.
It's not even like Sansa is there in Jon, Dany and Tyrion's vicinity when they are performing politics. Yes, even Tyrion. Despite them being in KL, Tyrion is not political near Sansa.
It's not like Sansa - who is married to Tyrion - ever says, 'No, I would do this better than Tyrion'. She thinks that way about Cersei and yet when she observes Margaery being much beloved by the people (as opposed to Cersei) she fails to even understand why this is so and why a hungry people would love a leader giving them food.
How will Sansa learn from Jon's 'mistakes'? By not giving a fuck about the Freefolk and Arya and refusing to help her? Well, that's already the status quo where Sansa and Arya are concerned. Since the Freefolk are not highborn and she would consider them to be smelly and savage, she's not going to help them either.
How will Sansa learn from Dany's 'mistakes'? By focusing only on one's personal ambitions and not being involved in abolition campaigns to help the downtrodden? Again, Sansa is way ahead of Dany on this, being entirely selfish in the way she does not give a damn about issues affecting the Smallfolk. Contrast Dany engaging in trade deals and initiating policy for irrigation ditches to bring in water and develop Meereen's agricultural industry with Sansa holding a sumptuous 64 dish feast in a starving Westeros where Winter has come, especially in the North. So yeah, Sansa would not make Dany's 'mistake' of trying to help the little guy.
How will Sansa learn from Tyrion's 'mistakes'? By not making marriage alliances, getting rid of sycophant back stabbers like Slynt, defending his house and family? Again, she already trusts everyone and throws her family under the bus to become queen. She's certainly no Tyrion.
The problem I have with asoiaf bnfs, including the one you quoted, is their pretense that Jon, Dany and Tyrion failed big time because they were bad rulers/commanders/hand of the king instead of acknowledging that the system is set up against these characters from the start and they are fighting an uphill battle.
Tyrion had to work against the prejudice and hatred towards him from the start of his tenure as Hand. No amount of publicity of his good deeds and political campaigns were going to help. Whatever he did, Cersei was always going to hate him, the Tyrells was going to use that to frame him and his abusive father never valued him. His downfall was not because of is mistakes but because of the prejudice and hatred against him from his own family.
And finally from the bnf you quoted:
That’s her meta-arc: from cliche-ridden afterthought to, one day, the best answer to the question “who should rule?” Well done, m'lady.
If after reading all 5 books and even the sample TWoW chapter, one's answer to the question of who should rule, is Sansa Stark, then that's the point where I stop taking any blog, blogger or book reader seriously. At that point, the TV show would be more suited to one's tastes than GRRM's books.