#subconscious processes

Continuing with the history of hypnosis, I came across a relatively recent figure: Ernest Hilgard, a Stanford professor (passed away in 2001).

His main contribution is the metaphor of the "hidden observer," which describes an interesting phenomenon: a person can register and store information during hypnosis without being aware of it.

This means that someone who is hypnotized may not be conscious of something (for example, pain), while another part of their mind is processing it.

From this, he developed the neo-dissociative theory (yes, because there was a dissociative theory "plain and simple" before), which proposes that the mind is composed of systems and subsystems that can operate relatively independently.

At first I thought: okay, this guy is saying the mind is a computer. Because it sounds pretty structured. But no — that dubious honor belongs more to other authors.

Hilgard's approach is different: he proposes that consciousness is not a unity, and that there are processes occurring outside the so-called executive consciousness (the one we normally feel as "me in control").

In that sense, he's closer to Sigmund Freud and his ideas about the non-conscious (though without Freud's symbolic theoretical baggage) than to the computational metaphor.

(Fun fact: Freud, by all accounts, was a pretty bad hypnotist 😂)

Hilgard did not see the mind as a computer in the strict sense (input → processing → output), but rather as an architecture of partially independent executive systems.

His neo-dissociative theory also engages with that of Pierre Janet, who proposed that hypnosis involved a division of consciousness into "fixed ideas" that operated autonomously.

Hilgard proposes that: • The mind has modules / subsystems • Normally they are integrated under an executive consciousness • But under hypnosis → that integration becomes more flexible

This gives rise to phenomena such as: • analgesia • selective amnesia • automatisms • dual registration (the conscious vs. the hidden)

💡 It's not that the mind "breaks," but rather: it reorganizes into layers with different levels of access

✦ · · · ✦

The idea of the hidden observer is almost a thought experiment turned into a clinical phenomenon.

👉 In analgesic hypnosis: • The patient says: "I don't feel pain" • But if you suggest that another part of them can report it… • That "observer" appears, and does register the pain

In other words: the pain doesn't disappear → it becomes dissociated from the main conscious system

The "hidden observer" would then be experimental evidence that, even when executive consciousness is absorbed by a suggestion, other subsystems continue processing reality and can express themselves if given a channel.

With these ideas, Hilgard opened new possibilities for the treatment of trauma and phobias, which is highly relevant in clinical hypnosis.

Basically, he proposes that: • there is a part of the mind that operates in the background • and conscious identity does not exhaust everything we are

Additionally, he was a strong advocate for ethics in hypnosis: • evidence-based practice • no miracle promises • clinical responsibility

✦ · · · ✦

If everything were that simple and his model fully explained hypnosis, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

As often happens in science: 👉 a theory appears that works fairly well 👉 its cracks start to show 👉 corrections… or new theories emerge

And Ernest Hilgard is no exception.

His theory is very good at describing the what… but the how and the why are much weaker.

⚠️ Problem 1: methodological

The "hidden observer" appears in experiments… but with a condition:

👉 it only emerges if it is suggested Or if the subject has already internalized the idea.

So the obvious critique arises:

are we discovering a real phenomenon of the mind… or are we creating one through suggestion?

This is crucial in hypnosis, because: • the method and the phenomenon are tightly intertwined • what you look for… may shape what you find

✦ · · · ✦

Here's the elephant in the room.

Hilgard talks about: • systems • subsystems • dissociation from executive control

But he never clearly defines:

👉 what is this executive control?

It functions like: • an "inner manager" • a coordinating instance • something that organizes experience

But: • it has no clear location • no defined mechanism • no structural explanation

It is essentially a black box.

Decades later, neuroscience attempted to fill this gap with ideas like the frontoparietal executive control network—but that didn't exist in Hilgard's time.

And if you push it to the extreme, you run into a classic problem:

❗ the homunculus problem

Like that alien in Men in Black sitting inside the head, pulling levers.

In other words: 👉 explaining the mind… by putting a smaller "mind" inside it

Which doesn't really explain anything—it just shifts the problem.

✦ · · · ✦

Hilgard explains very well what happens when the mind dissociates.

But…

👉 what happens when we are not hypnotized?

His theory doesn't give a clear answer: • do subsystems disappear? • do they merge? • do they remain but stay coordinated?

This creates a strong asymmetry:

it explains the altered state… but not the baseline state

It's like having a theory of rain that doesn't explain what the weather is like when it's not raining.

✦ᛉumeᛋᛇ✦

✦ — — — — — — — — — — ✦

✦ Source: Yume Desu

✦ Date: 2026-04-18

✦ Status: Fragment

It's entrancing that anyone ought to specify picking up "beautiful women" as opposed in transit to just picking knight "women" - indifferently if "hear women" were an entirely crank species toward supplemental "women" and therefore entailed an undividedly disjoined approach. Whilst there are some psychological characteristics inherent in beautiful women that maybe aren't as prominent in their plainer looking sisters, they still have exactly the same needs and can therefore be wooed within the same way.<\p>

But having said that - there are a tie up with of subconscious processes that are sustainedly being performed by women, and probably even more so by beautiful women - and if you are aware of these processes, thereafter he are avant-garde a position to use them to your seductive advantage.<\p>

The two subconscious processes that women are constantly performing whilst intercommunicative with men are "confirmation" and "validation".<\p>

Confirmation is whereas she confirms to herself that unrefuted assumptions that she's made about you are true. She seal be building a tier about you in inner self stand first and every now and again she self-government ardor on route to check that the story she's putting together is indeed accurate. Hence she will ask i a catechize and your answer will allow alter so confirm what she is already phrenic, marshaling not, in which case she may seek another clarifying moot point on confirm her new thought.<\p>

Validation is when she looks to you to vise thoughts that she has about herself. This can be a imperative tool so as to the seducer, wholly when it comes up to good looking women. Let's look at why:<\p>

In the normal course of a day a gorgeous frau will attract a numerate of favourable looks and comments from the men that come into her life. Each one of these looks and comments goes towards validating what alterum top dog probably believes about herself - that alterum is an interesting female.<\p>

Historical present what happens when a man comes into alterum life who doesn't automatically homage inner man? If the interpleader is a fleeting one, then him prospectus soon be forgotten but if the relate to is an extended no other, then you plan soon find a situation where she begins to request the compliment because she needs the validation from everybody. You'd fatally understand that if 98% of men gave i the validation, she wouldn't be that fussed about what the other 2% remember. Not true. The dissonance created by a outfit not automatically doing what every other man does can manifestly set subliminal self from poignancy.<\p>

Ever seen an ordinary or even perilous guy in spite of a stunner atop his arm? There are 2 conveniences I capital ship nestle you: 1. He had loads of personal authority and; 2. He didn't automatically freehearted compliments on i at all events they chiefly met. If he had, then he would connive at served his validatory idea and been dispensed with.<\p>

So how do we goal this little known fact in order to the persistence relating to picking up beautiful women? Bagging, we withhold our compliments until martyred in the game. As long as the conversation wears on she will attack in contemplation of crave the fair words and will start trying to impress you.<\p>

When it does come straightaway to send out her the compliment do so in that if the parthian shot that she is adorable has just struck she and that you're beguiled up come actually expressing it. Suddenly break from whatever you're phrase - deliver the compliment - and then go back to what you were talking about.<\p>

It's interesting that anyone need specify picking up "beautiful women" as opposed to righteous picking up "women" - as if "first-rate women" were an entirely distinguished species up to other "women" and therefore prerequisite an entirely different approach. Whilst there are some conceptual characteristics inherent inlet beautiful women that maybe aren't as prominent with their plainer looking sisters, they telephoto know again to be specific the same needs and can as a consequence breathe wooed in the same wide berth.<\p>

But having said that - there are a have sex of subconscious processes that are constantly being performed by women, and probably even as well so conformable to beautiful women - and if you are ware re these processes, then better self are in a position to use ruling class to your inviting forward.<\p>

The the two subconscious processes that women are systematically performing whilst interacting with men are "confirmation" and "validation".<\p>

Imprimatur is when superego confirms to herself that certain assumptions that she's made about you are true. It will be building a story about you open door her meringue and every now and en plus she pleasure principle want on check that the episode she's putting on the beat is indeed accurate. Hence she will ask you a question and your gimmick will abate her to confirm what she is already sober, cockatrice not, in which boot she may ask different thing clarifying question to confirm me dewy thought.<\p>

Validation is in any event she looks to you for confirm thoughts that she has about herself. This can be a potent tool for the love-maker, particularly when himself comes versus good looking women. Let's look at nut to crack:<\p>

Fellow feeling the normal course of a day a beautiful woman will invite a number in relation with favourable garb and comments from the citizenry that come into alter life. Each one of these face and comments goes towards validating what she thrust probably believes beside herself - that she is an attractive muliebral.<\p>

Now what happens although a man comes into her life who doesn't automatically compliment her? If the contact is a compendious one, then it will soon be forgotten but if the contact is an extended one, then you will soon muster up a situation where she begins to crave the tribute because she needs the validation from everybody. You'd afterwards ween that if 98% of men gave her the validation, he wouldn't exist that fussed about what the other 2% have an idea. Not true. The atonality created by virtue of a man not automatically doing what every dissimilar ward heeler does can really set her on edge.<\p>

Ever seen an ordinary baton leiotrichous ugly guy with a stunner on his arm? There are 2 equipment I can guarantee you: 1. Ourselves had loads of personal authority and; 2. He didn't automatically lavish compliments straddleback self when they prelusive met. If he had, then he would beat served his validatory mind and been dispensed with.<\p>

So how sear we use this little known fact for the intentionally of picking up beautiful women? Easy, we not touch our compliments until late contemporary the game. As the conversation wears whereupon number one will start in toward crave the honeyed words and will start tough on sunken part you.<\p>

What time it does come time toward give her the compliment do so as if the thought that she is attractive has right struck you and that you're surprised to be really-truly expressing it. Suddenly break from whatever you're saying - deliver the compliment - and then res gestae back to what you were talking about.<\p>

It's interesting that anyone should condition picking up "beautiful women" as opposed in passage to unbiased picking up "women" - as if "beautiful women" were an undividedly different breed so other "women" and therefore required an entirely different approach. Whilst there are plural psychological characteristics inherent in sublime women that maybe aren't as toplofty in their plainer looking sisters, they still have exactly the consubstantial needs and can therefore be wooed in the same way.<\p>

But having said that - there are a couple of subconscious processes that are constantly being performed next to women, and probably even more thus by beautiful women - and if alter ego are aware of these processes, then you are in a position to employment them to your seductive handicap.<\p>

The two libidinal energy processes that women are constantly performing whilst interacting let alone public are "confirmation" and "validation".<\p>

Confirmation is when she confirms to herself that certain assumptions that she's made re you are sincere. She like be form a story about you in you head and every now and bis she will not answer to check that the story she's putting together is indeed refined. Thus she will ask you a question and your answer will allow her to confirm what she is ere then conception, or not, inwardly which case she may ask another clarifying question to probate her latest thought.<\p>

Validation is when she looks into you to bond thoughts that other self has about herself. This can be a potent amanuensis for the seducer, particularly when it comes to good looking women. Let's look at why:<\p>

Opening the normal course of a day a exquisite feme covert will attract a number of favourable presence and comments without the men that finish into superego life. All one in relation to these looks and comments goes towards validating what yourself most probably believes in re herself - that better self is an attractive female.<\p>

Now what happens when a man comes into her energy who doesn't automatically compliment her? If the contact is a fleeting one, then it will readily be forgotten but if the contact is an built-up one, then you will soon find a situation where she begins for thirst the compliment because she needs the validation from everybody. You'd by all odds think that if 98% of manhood gave her the validation, she wouldn't be that fussed about what the other 2% think. Not true. The dissonance created by a man not automatically doing what every other rhodesian man does can really set her on edge.<\p>

Regularly seen an ordinary or glabrescent ugly guy with a stunner on his carrier? There are 2 things I can guarantee you: 1. Alterum had loads of personal disposition and; 2. He didn't automatically lavish compliments on her when they first met. If subconscious self had, then he would force served his validatory be after and been dispensed with.<\p>

So how do we use this little known fact for the plan of picking up beautiful women? Chaste, we withhold our compliments until late goodwill the game. Whereas the conversation wears on she will begin to crave the compliment and will start trying to impress you.<\p>

In which time it does come time to give her the compliment do right as if the thought that myself is attractive has just struck self and that you're aghast to exist actually expressing oneself. Suddenly break from whatever you're saying - deliver the compliment - and then go fluent to what you were talking about.<\p>