Absolute Green Arrow #1: a list of all the sources for those studies they were on about (with links!!!)
(Or, you know. The best I could do. Some of these were hard to find. Cite your sources guys.)
The Psychological Consequences of Money, Vohs et al
I note that theres a SMALL mistake made here (as far as I can tell, unless they're citing a different source.) since two different experiments are being conflated. One showed that participants primed with the screensaver were less likely to move two chairs close together for a group task. Another, where participants were primed with the presense of greater amounts of monoploly money, showed a decrease in helping behaivour. Ultimately the same conclusion is reached, but these little things matter! Also, this study is not from Berkeley as far as I can tell, but like. I truly dont care so long as the methodology is tight.
Higher Social Class Predicts Increased Unethical Behaivour, Piff et al
THIS one is a Berkely study, but again I do not care. One thing worth noting is that the jar was pointed out, and they were told that they could take some without consequence (except of course that the kids would have less to eat), which enhances the conclusion a smidge.
Power changes how the brain responds to others, Hogeveen, Inzlicht, & Obhi
Social class affects Mu-suppression during action observation, Brewer et al
Included two sources here since I couldn't find an open-access version of the more widely cited first one. Im sure theres a way though...
Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens, Gilens, Page.
Ah, Internet Archive my beloved. Thats how you KNOW this one has impact. The discription of this is a bit off, but that might just be a charachter quirk. It's important to note that this stagnation of change only refers to policies that go against status-quo as determined by the systems economic elites.
(yeah, I know that phrasing comes up sounding dog-whistley, its the phrase the paper uses. I did a double-check as to how "Elite" is defined the second I read that, and it's clear its just reffering to the top 1-20% of wealth holders.)
Let me know if i've totally fucked up any of this btw. Im a biologist, not a sociologist or economist, so i'm no expert here. When money starts growing legs then we're in my ballpark.












