#math tricks

Always remember the proper order of operations when doing simple maths using SPAMED!

S - Subtraction

P - Parentheses

A - Addition

M - Multiplication

E - Exponents

D - Division

In the previous post I set up the rules of arithmetic for addition, subtraction, multiplication, and addition. If you paid really close attention you would have seen one thing pop out that wasn't ever described, which was an exponent. It just shows up all of a sudden in my explanation of the multiplicative inverse. In the post before that, I gave a very basic explanation of what an exponent is, but then said I'd be covering it in more depth. This is that, at long last.

I: Couple Bits of Terminology

We label mathematical statements with some terminology in order to more accurately communicate what we're talking about.

In an addition problem, like 3 + 5 = 8, 3 and 5 are the addends or the summends (some people differentiate the numbers as: 3 is the addend and 5 is the summend, because 5 is "being added to" 3 like it was an action). Generally people will just refer to both numbers as the addends. The result, 8, is the sum.

In a subtraction problem, like 8 - 5 = 3, 8 is the minuend, 5 is the subtrahend, and the result, 3, is the difference.

In a multiplication problem, like 8 ⋅ 5 = 40, 8 and 5 are the multiplicands or the factors (again, most people are gonna use just one of those words, and the word most commonly chosen is factor because, let's face it, multiplicand is a mouthful; so, from now on IMPORTANTLY!!! we will only use the word factor to mean "a number we're multiplying with another number"), and the result, 40, is the product.

In a division problem, like 40 ÷ 5 = 8, 40 is the dividend, 5 is the divisor, and 8 is the quotient.

And finally, in an exponential problem, like 2³ = 8, 2 is the base, 3 is the exponent, and 8 is the product -- just as it is with multiplication, because exponentiation is multiplication:

BASEᵉˣᵖᵒⁿᵉⁿᵗ = PRODUCT

II: Exponents/Powers

I'm aware that this is going to be repeating myself a bit, but I think it'll be good to read through anyway!

In the same way that multiplication is repeated addition, exponentiation (raising a number to an exponent or power) is, at first glance, repeated multiplication. We'll say it that way because there's some complication later and even then it's basically true, but it's absolutely good enough for your first exposure.

We write exponents as a superscript number, meaning we are writing it smaller and above where we normally would write, kind of at the top-right corner of the thing before it: in 2³, the 3 is the exponent. The number it follows, 2, is the base that the exponent is attached to.

The exponent tells the base that there are that many factors of itself in this term; in this case, 2³, there are three factors of 2, like so: 2 ⋅ 2 ⋅ 2

There can be more than one base in a term, and not every base will have a visible exponent. If there is a base with no exponent attached, assume its exponent is 1, meaning there is just that one factor of that base in the term. Some examples:

5⋅2³ has one factor of 5 and three factors of 2, making it 5⋅2⋅2⋅2

7³⋅5 has three factors of 7, and one factor of 5, making it 7⋅5⋅5⋅5

2⋅3⁴⋅5² has one factor of 2, four factors of 3, and two factors of 5, making it 2⋅3⋅3⋅3⋅3⋅5⋅5

IIa: How to Read Exponents

So how do you say 7³ -- you know, like, out loud, so other people can understand what you're telling them?

First, we can say "7 raised to the exponent of 3." But that's a bit stuffy. We can replace that word "exponent" with "power," as we saw briefly above.

So now we can say "7 raised to the power of 3." Still stuffy. Change the ordering a little and we can then say that it is "7 raised to the 3rd power."

But if we're only ever "raising" a number to a "power," do we have to say that it's being "raised" every time? No. So, we can then say it is "seven to the third power."

But when else do we ever say something is a power? Never! So, finally, we can reduce this to "seven to the third."

7³ - Seven to the third

2⁵ - Two to the fifth

etc.

Also, we have a couple of shorthands for the specific 2nd and 3rd powers, which is useful since these are the exponents you will end up using the most often!

When something is raised to the second power, like 9², we can just say that 9 is being squared -- "nine squared." This is because if you find the area of a square whose sides are a length of 9, you would do 9⋅9, which is 9².

Likewise, if something is raised to the third power, like 5³, we can just say that 5 is being cubed -- "five cubed." This is because if you find the volume of a cube whose sides are all a length of 5, you would do 5⋅5⋅5, which is 5³.

IIb: Raising to the Power of Zero

This is actually one of my favorite lessons to teach!

So, when we have 5³, that means we have 5⋅5⋅5, which is 125. In the following, think of the left side as the exponential form of the term, the middle side as a demonstration of the factors in the term, and the right side as the value of the term.

5³ = 5⋅5⋅5 = 125

If we take one factor of 5 away, we now have two factors of 5, which makes it 5².

5² = 5⋅5 = 25

Now we'll take another factor of 5 away, so we now have one factor of five, which makes it 5¹.

5¹ = 5 = 5 --- WAIT!!!!

Something is funny here. If you didn't notice, our middle section, our demonstration of the factors in the term, has a subtle issue. And that's the word "factors." What are factors? Remember from earlier in I: Couple Bits of Terminology, I said, "IMPORTANTLY!!, that factors are numbers that multiply with other numbers." So, uhhhhhhh.... what number is 5 being multiplied with?

Well, remember way way back in the previous post when I was talking about the Properties of Arithmetic? There was one there that was kind of important: the Identity Property. This states that any number multiplied by the multiplicative identity remains unchanged -- anything times 1 is itself. And any equality in mathematics that works in one direction, must work in the other. This means that if you have a number, it is secretly being multiplied by one.

Every number. All the time. Even the ones you're multiplying by secretly, are secretly multiplied by one.

We just don't write them because, wow, what a hassle it would be to write literally infinite multiplications of 1 every time we want to do math. We'd (literally) never get anything done.

So that 5? Is actually 1⋅5. And, to be honest, the 5¹ is also 1⋅5¹

1⋅5¹ = 1⋅5 = 5.

And this holds true for every row above as well!

1⋅5³ = 1⋅5⋅5⋅5 = 125

1⋅5² = 1⋅5⋅5 = 25

1⋅5¹ = 1⋅5 = 5

This important bit of setup will help us understand what's coming.

Because what if we take another factor of 5 away? Well, we now have zero factors of five: 5⁰

And if we take that factor of 5 away from our demonstration of the factors in the term, we just lose the five from our 1⋅5 leaving us with... 1.

1⋅5⁰ = 1 = 1

Every number (except for zero -- math nerds fight me! we'll see more about this later) raised to the power of zero is 1. This is the zero property of exponents:

x⁰ = 1 while x≠0

IIc: Raising to a Negative Exponent (Pt. 1)

Continuing our trend:

1⋅5³ = 1⋅5⋅5⋅5 = 125

1⋅5² = 1⋅5⋅5 = 25

1⋅5¹ = 1⋅5 = 5

1⋅5⁰ = 1 = 1

What if we take another factor of 5 out? Well, there aren't any other factors of 5 in the term, so how would we do that?

If we look at the results of our experiment so far, from one row to the next (top to bottom), we might see that removing a factor of 5 is effectively the same as dividing by 5:

125 ÷ 5 = 25, 25 ÷ 5, = 5, and 5 ÷ 5 = 1.

So the process of removing a factor is the same as dividing by that factor. What's more, we know that every time we remove a factor, the exponent reduces by 1. So, from 5⁰ to the next row where we remove a factor, we'll get 5⁻¹, and we'll have to divide by 5 to get what that is!

1⋅5⁻¹ = 1 ÷ 5 = 1/5

So we get the fraction one-fifth as the result. We'll talk more about why this becomes a fraction in a moment, but first! Notice that this means that 5⁻¹ = 1/5, whereas 5¹ = 5. 5 is actually a fraction whose denominator is 1: 5¹ = 5/1. Comparing the results from 5¹ and 5⁻¹, which are 5/1 and 1/5, we see that these are fractions that have the same numbers but are sort of upside down.

When you take a fraction and flip it over like that, you have found its reciprocal. So:

A negative exponent is the reciprocal of the result you get from a positive exponent!

Okay, so, why would any of that be? Well...

III. Some Facts About Division

Fractions are division problems. Whenever you see a fraction, you are actually looking at a division problem. Reading 6/2 as "six halves" or "six divided by two" makes no mathematical difference; these two things have the same value, which is 3.

IIIa. Division Sign

You ever wonder why the division sign looks like that? I mean. Probably not, right? Why does the addition sign look like that? We made it up! But it turns out, there's a specific reason for the division sign's appearance!

It turns out the division sign, ÷, is just a way of formatting a fraction on a single line! We can do that too with the slash, like in 1/5, but 1÷5 is in fact the same thing! It turns out the dot on the top of the horizontal line in the division sign is the numerator of a fraction, and the dot on bottom is the denominator! So it's telling you to take the number to the left and put it on top, and the number on right and put it on the bottom!

So, yeah, you can think of the fraction line (the "vinculum") as the actual division sign, and the commonly-used division sign as a formatting shorthand to make it easier to write on, for example, a printing press or typewriter.

IIIb. The Word "Negative"

What does the word "negative" mean?

The first instinct of most people is, "less than zero." This is not correct. That is the definition of a "negative number." But that's not the definition of "negative."

The root of "negative" is "negate." To negate something is to reverse the effect of that thing; to cancel, undo, reverse, or revert. A negative stands in opposition to a positive. Simply put:

"Negative" means "opposite"

A negative number is the opposite of that number. What do we mean by that? We mean that it stands on the opposite side of the number line, with zero being at the center. 6 and -6 are both 6 away from zero, but in opposite directions from zero.

Subtraction is negative addition -- the opposite of addition. To subtract is to add a negative number. 9 - 5 is the same as 9 + -5. Here we can see the concept of "negative" can affect operations, and the negative operation is always the inverse operation. The inverse of addition is subtraction.

IIIc. Negative Exponents

Likewise, the inverse of multiplication is... division! But in what way is it negative? It's not that the numbers we're dividing become negative. Remember we have described negative exponents as "removing factors." This is the thing that is becoming negative: the exponent on the divisor!

6 ÷ 2 = 6 ⋅ 2⁻¹ = 6 ⋅ (1/2)

So this is where we get to finish our "table" from earlier:

1⋅5³ = 1⋅5⋅5⋅5 = 125

1⋅5² = 1⋅5⋅5 = 25

1⋅5¹ = 1⋅5 = 5

1⋅5⁰ = 1 = 1

1⋅5⁻¹ = 1÷5 = 1/5

1⋅5⁻² = 1÷(5⋅5) = 1/25

ok so my favorite numbers are 3 and 13, why? because with 3, its perfect: peak organization, peak amount of choices, and peak visuals.

ten, ONETEEN TWOTEEN THREETEEN fourteen FIVETEEN sixteen SEVTEEN eighteen nineteen

TWOTY THREETY FOURTY FIVETY sixty SEVTY eighty ninety

ONEDRED TWODRED THREEDRED FOURDRED FIVEDRED SIXDRED SEVDRED EIGHTDRED NINEDRED

ONESAND TWOSAND THREESAND...

Best regards Can The Gravitational Waves Produce A Light Beam?

Abstract

Paper hypothesis

The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field

The hypothesis explanation

The question asks

Can The Gravitational Waves  Produce A Light Beam?

Let's summarize the answer in 5 points

(I) The FACT

The Gravitational Waves Produce A Light Beam

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsnHYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"ei=83

This new article tells - the gravitational waves can move by high velocity motion and can produce A Light Beam–

Shortly- the article answers our question tells (YES) (The Gravitational Waves Can Produce A Light Beam)

We know the light beam is produced by the value (C^2)

Means, the article tells

The gravitational waves can move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) and that enables the gravitational waves to produce the value (C^2) and produce A Light Beam! 

(II) The FACT RESULT

I suppose the sun rays are produced by this method and not by any nuclear fusion,

Means, The Sun Is NOT Doing Nuclear Fusion To Produce Its Rays, instead, the sun rays are produced by the gravitational waves motions energies  

Here is important moment of the science history, No longer the nuclear fusion process will be used as the reason for the star rays production- instead- the gravitational waves motions will be used in place of it –

Clearly- we see the change in the mechanism

The sun nuclear fusion uses the nuclear fusion process to produce the sun rays from the sun mass as the source of energy- where the sun mass is changed into the sun rays by the nuclear fusion process- But the gravitational waves use the motion energy to produce the light beam (the sun rays)– means- the sun rays production method is changed- shortly- the production mechanism is changed (from nuclear fusion process) into (the high velocity motion) – and the source of energy is changed from (the sun mass) into (the gravitational waves motion energy)   

(Notice, I refuse to suppose there are many methods to produce the light beam, I suppose the light beams are produced by one method only)

That force us to analyze the gravitational waves production and Nature- let's do that in following- 

(III) The FACT REASON 

Let's ask

(1) (its source)

How Are The Gravitational Waves Produced?

Means

By What Method and from what energy The Gravitational Waves Are Produced?

(2) (its nature)

How Can The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light?

And - Can The Gravitational Waves Move By Less Velocity Than Speed Of Light?

(3)

Are there proves for this fact (the gravitational waves move by speed of light)?

(4)

Can We Follow The Gravitational Waves Motions Trajectories In The Solar System?

(5) 

Can The Gravitational Waves Be Reflected? And Why Is The Wave Reflected?

And

What Effects Are Produced By The Gravitational Waves Reflection?

(6) (its result)

How Can The Gravitational Waves Produce A Light Beam?

Means - If the gravitational waves move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s), how can the value (C^2) be produced to enable the gravitational waves to produce the light beam? This discussion aims to answer these questions in details. 

(IV) THE GRAVITATIONAL WAVES SOURCE

Let's ask (Where's Planet Motion Energy?)

Any moving body produces motion energy (1/2mv^2), but where's the planet motion energy? The planet can't store its motion energy inside its body because it would raise its temperature, and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- so- again (Where's The Planet Motion Energy?)

Logically, Planet motion energy must be stored in the space in waves form-

The space is similar to the sea of water and planet motion in space is similar to a fish swimming in water- the fish motion creates waves in water and the planet motion energy creates waves in the space- means- Planet motion energy is stored in the space in waves form. 

Let's see this picture accurately- we observe one swimming fish in the sea- the fish hits the sea water by its tail and pushes some water and by that the fish swims and moves- we conclude the water moves by a velocity Equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- means- the fish swimming creates wave in the water and this wave moves by the fish motion velocity-  

Similar to that-

Mercury motion energy creates wave in the space- this wave velocity equals Mercury velocity (47.4 km/s) -means– while Mercury moves, its motion creates waves move by the velocity (47.4 km/s)- 

Shortly- All planets motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move by these planets velocities- The space waves are similar to the water waves, they move far from their sources and can be reflected-

The Conclusion

I suppose the gravitational waves are these space waves, they are produced by the planets motions energies and NOT by the Sun gravitational field 

We should notice that- the article tells (the gravitational waves can move by a speed of light) but the article believes the gravitational waves are produced by the sun gravitational field- BUT- I refuse this idea- the gravitational waves are NOT produced by any gravitational field but by the planets motions energies as I have explained.

(the discussion proves this fact by the analysis of the gravitational waves nature)

(V) THE SUN RAYS SOURCE OF ENERGY

The sun rays is created from the gravitational waves motions energies and the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies-

Based on that 

The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions

And

The Sun Is NOT Doing Nuclear Fusion To Produce Its Rays- instead- The Planets Motions Energies Total Is Used To Produce The Sun Rays

Means

The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion – means

The Planets Are Created And Moving In Their Orbits Around A Point Of Space Before The Sun Creation- And The Sun Is Created On This Point Of Space around which the planets revolve - And

No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity (Newton is Wrong) - And

The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field (Einstein Is Wrong)

And

The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions– means-The Sun creation and death depends on a cycle – means – after this current sun death another sun will be created for the solar system.

The logical idea summary

We agreed that, the planets motions produce energies and the motions energies are stored in the space in waves form- simply- the stored energy should be used- by that this stored energy is used to produce the sun rays- means- the sun is the outlet for the stored motion energy in the solar system and without the sun the stored energy can cause a continuous risk of explosion for the solar system. 

Notice

This analysis explains why (the sun nuclear fusion theory is wrong logically) because the solar system is rich in the motion energy- the planets move and produce motion energy continuously and this energy is stored in the space – that tells – there's massive motion energy stored in the space- the logical idea tells this energy should be used to produce the sun rays- but – the scientists created very artificial reason for the sun rays production (the sun nuclear fusion theory)- the theory is wrong in principle because the theory left the stored motion energy without using in the space and created the artificial idea (which doesn't depend on any cycle or motion), while everything in the solar system depends on motions and cycles

Thanks a lot – please read

Can The Gravitational Waves  Produce A Light Beam?

or

or

or

or

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Physics Department-  Physics & Mathematics  Faculty 

Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow   (2010-2013)

Curriculum Vitae                  https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c

E-mail                            [email protected], [email protected]

                                      [email protected]                   

ORCID                          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147

Facebook                        https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous

VK                                 https://vk.com/id696655587

Tumblr                           https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges 

Researcherid                   https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/

Google                                https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en

Livejournal                     https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile

Pocket                                                                     https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar

PUBLICATIONS

box                                 https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv

Academia                       https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous

List of publications         http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous