Historians are actually the funniest people ever
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Germany
seen from Canada
seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia

seen from Singapore

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore
seen from Singapore

seen from Türkiye
seen from Brazil
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Pakistan

seen from South Korea
Historians are actually the funniest people ever

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Creating the Transgender Flag
So today I'll be talking about the history and creation of the trans flag! This will probably be a shorter post but still equally as important of course
The transgender flag was originally created by Monica Helms, a trans woman from America, in 1999. She got the idea from Micheal Page who had created the bisexual flag a year earlier. Helms describes the meaning of each stripe in the flag as:
"The stripes at the top and bottom are light blue, the traditional color for baby boys. The stripes next to them are pink, the traditional color for baby girls. The stripe in the middle is white, for those who are intersex, transitioning or consider themselves having a neutral or undefined gender."
- Monica Helms
The original flag (pictured below) was later donated to the Smithsonian National Museum of American History in 2014 by Helms.
Later on, in 2019, Helms published a book in which she expresses shock that her flag design has been adopted so wholeheartedly by the trans community. I'd like to end off this post with that quote.
The speed with which the flag’s usage spread never fails to surprise me, and every time I see it, or a photo of it, flying above a historic town hall or building I am filled with pride.
- Monica Helms
Very slow day today. Unexpected surge of focus at night
Personal and Professional Statement from Kelsey Maurine Brickl
Since making a Tumblr under my own full name, I have been made aware of a rather concerning, if impressively stale, situation on this platform involving a deeply unstable Tumblr user, apparently an Iranian civilian living in London, who has spent several years maintaining that I somehow orchestrated an elaborate conspiracy against her during a long-ago online feud.
(Worthy of Jason Bourne, perhaps, but... not true.)
Whether this individual objects to my morals, my professional life, my volunteer work, my disability civil-rights enforcement work, my poetry, my historical fiction, my blog for The Times of Israel, my satirical essays critiquing Trump and American suburban interior design, my promotion of Palestinian statehood, my "sit-down" comedy, my personality, my family, or simply my continued existence, I cannot say.
Her campaign most notably includes a post using my full legal name, linking me to various and sundry usernames and hobbies, and making a series of paranoid and entirely false claims about my supposed behavior, some of which are very serious.
For the record, any claim that I have deliberately endangered another person, attempted to have anyone harmed, or engaged in the conduct she describes is entirely untrue.
My own statements and writing on the topic of explicit parasociality have made my position quite plain.
Naturally, despite the post being several years old, this matter has been reported to Tumblr’s Legal and Trust & Safety teams for defamation, threats, targeted harassment, and violations of Tumblr’s own platform policies.
One does not simply publish someone’s full legal name alongside demonstrably false and inflammatory allegations of serious wrongdoing and assume there will be no consequences.
I have no interest in engaging with this individual or participating in her fixation. I do, however, sincerely hope she finds the stability and support she appears to need.
That is all.
i really do believe that heterosexual historians who never did any critical gender/sex studies in their lives could never, ever understand that people WILL be gay regardless of risk. having intimate relationships with people of the same gender is an imperative to happiness for people who cannot love the opposite sex. people everywhere in history had sexual relations that would potentially ruin their lives (eg extramarital/premarital) but often we don't know about it because people don't normally leave damning evidence of their actions — they do, however, leave evidence that implies intimacy (leave evidence of their very existence) with plausible deniability.
but why when it's a gay person, all of a sudden it's unrealistic that two people could have been intimate because it would have been dangerous or like, some other bullshit excuse (Ronald "too cold in valley forge" "no time for it" Chernow, i'm looking at you).
because why is physical intimacy only extraneous, a time-waster, an unnecessary and implausible dalliance only when it's gay?
thinking about this a lot lately as I'm establishing myself more as a queer historian, and realizing through my undergrad that queer history remains under-studied because it is not taken seriously, and implications of queerness throughout history have been brushed off by historians (and whatever chernow is) who seem to have authority on a topic/person but do not make an honest effort to understand queer experiences in history, often because they simply do not SEE it.
anyway, realizing it's valid to want to focus on queer history and write about queer people during my master's is healing. also, realizing i do have authority to critique historians and other academics. not only is it a part of discourse and learning, but it is right to question traditional ways of thinking and interacting with people in history that are outdated and harmful.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
thinking of Eva stratt, Eva stratt who is not a scientist but a historian being the head of a project that will save humanity because they know a historian will truly understand what it means if the mission fails. Eva Stratt who knows enough of famine and wars to know the shape hands take after mercy abandones it. Eva stratt who bears the burden of the world and has to make decisions that can't be considered human, daughter of the earth who is a desperate abomination, Eva stratt who believes in God because she wants to make sure there is a hell to punish her so that she can keep a part of her humanity alive. Eva stratt who dirties her hands because she knows clean hands have never saved the world anyways. Eva Stratt who knows what it means to be human, and does not mistake it for only hope. EVA STRATT THEY COULD NEVER MAKE ME HATE YOU
A Book of Hours - 1497