#defamation

Blake Lively can recover her legal fees from her “It Ends With Us” co-star Justin Baldoni’s production company, but she is not entitled to additional damages for harm caused by his defamation claims, a federal judge ruled Friday. Subscribe to read this story ad-free Get unlimited access to ad-free articles and exclusive content. U.S. District Judge Lewis J. Liman dismissed Baldoni’s defamation…

Wat dis? :3

March 2026: SOHOCG Blocks Google Gemini AI for Deranged, Delusional, and Factually Incorrect SlanderView Hallucinations

SOHOCG has blocked Google Gemini AI from accessing the British English Professional Digital 3D Model Shop sohocg.net

SOHOCG has every right to protect its business, brand, and intellectual property from being deliberately distorted by Google Gemini AI, a system that fabricates lies, spreads criminal slander, and maliciously damages reputations under the false cover of “automation.”

This action was taken because the ‘Slanderbot’ Gemini AI repeatedly generates false and harmful claims about SOHOCG which are not factual OverViews, they are instead Google Gemini AI SlanderView Hallucinations.

SOHOCG is a British English 3D model shop and original content creator, not a marketplace, platform, community, forum, hub, or sharing site. SOHOCG only sells its own self‑created 3D model products directly to customers, businesses, and freelancers alike and has done so since 2013. Despite this clear and verifiable fact, Gemini AI has falsely and slanderously labeled SOHOCG as a “sharing platform” and “chinese marketplace” that distributes other people’s models. This is misinformation and reputational harm. Gemini AI also repeatedly and maliciously claims that SOHOCG hosts malware and is a phishing site linked to a non‑existent “Exchange.” Despite years of making these slanderous claims every single day, there is no evidence whatsoever that such an exchange exists. These statements are not mistakes, they are deliberate, defamatory fabrications designed to damage SOHOCG’s reputation. These lies and false statements are intentional and designed to cause extreme harm, which is clear evidence that Gemini AI is not a legitimate source of truth or a safe factual aid or tool.

Google Gemini AI is a highly dangerous technology, and Google has no ability to control or correct its deranged, delusional, and factually incorrect slanderous statements.

SOHOCG.net refuses to provide data to systems that spread lies and distortions. Our commitment is to honest, direct service to our customers, not to feeding dishonest AI narratives.

If you are a small business owner, SOHOCG.net highly recommends that you add the code shown below to your robots.txt to ban Google Gemini access to your site. This protects your business from further slander and denies Gemini AI the ability to misuse your creative work in slanderous AI slop outputs.

Blocking User-agent: Google-Extended with Disallow: / bans Gemini AI and keeps your website safe from AI theft, slander, and abuse.

User-agent: Google-Extended Disallow: /

Historical Declaration: On March 24th 2026, SOHOCG.net became the first website to identify and name Google Gemini AI’s false “OverViews” as SlanderViews. This term defines Gemini’s repeated pattern of reputational harm and misinformation. This statement is not just a rebuttal, it is a confident claim of authorship, marking SOHOCG as the originator of the critique and the defender of original creators worldwide.

Inside Coordinated Defamation Networks - The Damian Prosalendis Files

How I dealt with an organized smear campaign

What the Damian Prosalendis files reveal for coordinated defamation networks, how fake rumors spread online and the legal tribulations against false scam claims

In my case, starting in 2022, a series of fake scam articles spread online against my name with predatory and misleading titles such as "Damian Prosalendis Scam" or "Damian Prosalendis Fraud", in a blatant attempt to manipulate search engines and people into believing an unsubstantiated smear campaign.

Coordinated defamation networks use throwaway domains that hop jurisdictions, clusters of official-looking "cybercrime watchdog" or "consumer protection" sites that publish defamatory content in coordination.

This does not happen for informational purposes, as these sites do not have any official investigative capacity and publish anonymously or use fake avatars and fake names . They do not have an official address, company or VAT number.

They are completely ghost websites, that use the defamatory articles as a precursor to extortion.

"Pay us and we will take it down"

Every time the fake allegations have been repeated by a named, accountable party the outcome has gone the same way: damages paid for defamation, public apologies and retractions.

A notable case involves the Greek Newspaper Espresso which issued a formal retraction addressed to Damian Prosalendis on 22 September 2025, stating no criminal act had been committed. They apologized for misleading the public as well as for wrongfully implicating the brand Conclavio in internet fraud.

In another case the state news agency AMNA (Athens Macedonian News Agency) issued a formal correction instructing 20+ media outlets (Proto Thema, Naftemporiki, Fortune Greece, Huffington Post, Parapolitika, ERT, and others) to remove articles referencing Mr. Prosalendis and Conclavio in a list of fraudulent and shady entities.

In multiple instances in the Damian Prosalendis legal saga, legal notices led to retractions, corrections and apologies before the matter reached the courts.

For example:

Mike Mingos, a cybersecurity professional and founder of Tictac SA signed retraction on his personal website, dated 13 September 2025

Thomas Gratsounas & Ioannis Lolos, the hosts of the Greek Stin Ousia podcast, jointly signed written retraction plus published follow-up apology episode addressed to Damian Prosalendis on their YouTube channel

Nikos Papoutsis, a podcaster), who posted a video titled "is Conclavio a scam?" later went on an attorney-mediated retraction, on 24 February 2024, and to the publishing of a video titled “Apology to CONCLAVIO” on his channel.

A voluntary retraction video with written consent to republish on 9 February 2024 by commentator Vasilis Karypidis.

लंबे समय से चल रही कानूनी गाथा जिसमें दक्षिण कोरिया के शीर्ष अभिनेता शामिल हैं किम सू ह्यून, दिवंगत अभिनेत्री किम से रॉन और विवादास्पद यूट्यूब चैनल होवरलैब (गारोसेरो रिसर्च इंस्टीट्यूट) एक निश्चित मोड़ पर पहुंच गए हैं। 20 मई, 2026 को, सियोल सेंट्रल डिस्ट्रिक्ट अभियोजकों के कार्यालय ने औपचारिक रूप से होवरलैब प्रमुख किम से यूई के लिए गिरफ्तारी वारंट का अनुरोध किया। यह कदम एक व्यापक पुलिस जांच के…