#herotraining

The Hero Public Safety Commission (HPSC) in My Hero Academia is depicted as an organization deeply entrenched in corruption, operating under the guise of maintaining public order and the pristine image of heroes. While the series ultimately shows its downfall and a move towards reform, it's a compelling thought experiment to consider the ramifications if the HPSC had remained as corrupt as it was, continuing its dubious methods without significant internal or external pressure for change.

The Foundation of Corruption

As detailed in the provided document, the HPSC's corruption stemmed from a "Utopia Justifies the Means" philosophy. Their core aim was to preserve society's trust in heroes and maintain the status quo, even if it meant resorting to extreme, illegal, and morally reprehensible actions. Key aspects of this corruption included:

Assassinations: Employing individuals like Lady Nagant to secretly eliminate "stains" on society, including corrupt heroes, terrorists, and even protesters, without due process.

Child Soldiers and Brainwashing: Scouting young children with powerful quirks, like Hawks, and grooming them from a young age to be loyal agents, effectively brainwashing them and forcing them to abandon their identities.

Cover-ups and Manipulation: Fabricating stories (e.g., Lady Nagant's arrest) and concealing evidence to protect the Commission's image and prevent information leaks.

Abuse of Power: Overturning decisions of other hero bodies, conducting their own criminal investigations with questionable ethics, and even endangering students for high-profile missions.

Disregard for Individual Rights: Depriving individuals of fair trials and due process, prioritizing the collective "peace" over individual liberties.

Treating Heroes as Disposable Assets: Viewing their agents as tools to be used and discarded, as exemplified by their threats to Lady Nagant.

The Erosion of Public Trust and Hero Morale

If the HPSC had continued its corrupt practices, the most immediate and devastating consequence would be the complete and irreversible erosion of public trust. While the Commission successfully managed to keep many of its darker secrets hidden for decades, "rumours would spread about their illegal methods." With the increasing interconnectedness of society and the heightened scrutiny on heroes, it would become progressively harder to suppress the truth.

Leaks and Whistleblowers: The sheer volume of morally compromised actions would inevitably lead to more internal dissent. Heroes or agents, like Lady Nagant, who became disillusioned, would either actively work against the Commission or leak information, further exposing their misdeeds.

Public Outcry: Once the full extent of the assassinations, child soldier programs, and cover-ups became public knowledge, the faith that society placed in heroes would shatter. This wouldn't just be a loss of trust in the HPSC, but a deep-seated cynicism towards the entire hero system, potentially leading to widespread social unrest and protests.

Loss of Hero Credibility: The very image the HPSC sought to protect would be irrevocably tarnished. Heroes, even those genuinely striving for good, would be viewed with suspicion, their motives questioned, and their actions scrutinized. This would make their work significantly harder, as public cooperation is crucial for effective heroics.

A Dysfunctional and Decaying Hero Society

A continuously corrupt HPSC would lead to a hero society that is outwardly stable but internally rotting.

Disillusioned Heroes: The best and most morally upright heroes would find it increasingly difficult to operate under such a system. Many might retire, become vigilantes, or even defect, creating a brain drain of genuine talent and integrity. Heroes like Hawks, who were "swayed partially into the Commission's ideals" but remained "conflicted," would either break under the pressure or become hollow shells of their former selves.

Rise of "Commission-Approved" Heroes: The heroes who remained would likely be those willing to compromise their morals for status, or those too deeply entrenched to escape. This would create a hero landscape dominated by individuals who prioritize obedience to the HPSC over true justice, further alienating the public.

Ineffective Crime Fighting: The Commission's focus on image over substance would severely hamper their ability to combat genuine threats. Their methods, such as assassinating potential criminals before they commit crimes, would be reactive and short-sighted, failing to address the root causes of villainy. Their "Oddly Small Organization" and "understaffed" nature, combined with their dubious tactics, would make them inefficient against large-scale threats like the Paranormal Liberation Front.

Increased Villain Power: Villains, particularly intelligent ones, would exploit the growing distrust between the public and heroes. They could easily expose the HPSC's secrets, turning public opinion against the heroes and recruiting disillusioned citizens to their cause. The moral high ground would shift, making it easier for villain organizations to gain traction and legitimacy among certain segments of the population.

Political Instability and International Condemnation: A government agency operating with such impunity would eventually face severe political backlash. Other nations would likely condemn Japan's hero system, leading to diplomatic crises and potentially sanctions. The "collapse of Japan" seen after the Paranormal Liberation War would be less about physical destruction and more about societal and governmental breakdown due to internal rot.

Specific Character Fates

Hawks: If the Commission remained corrupt, Hawks would likely be trapped in a cycle of moral compromise. His optimism would be crushed, and he might eventually become as jaded and broken as Lady Nagant, or perhaps even turn against the Commission in a more direct and destructive manner, unable to reconcile his true desire for peace with the dirty work he's forced to do.

Lady Nagant: Without the HPSC's collapse and Hawks's influence, Lady Nagant might have remained a hardened villain, or her trauma could have led to a complete mental breakdown, making her even more dangerous or entirely incapacitated. Her potential for reform would be non-existent.

Yokumiru Mera: Mera, who became the acting president and initiated reforms, would either be sidelined, forced to comply with the corruption, or driven to exhaustion and despair without the opportunity to enact positive change.

Conclusion

Analysis of Koki Terumoto

Koki Terumoto is a minor but symbolically significant character introduced in the epilogue arc of My Hero Academia (Chapters 425 onward), serving as a poignant reflection on themes of trauma, redemption, and societal change in a post-Final War world. Based on the provided wiki text and recent updates from the manga's final volume (Volume 42, released December 2024, which added 38 extra epilogue pages clarifying his backstory), Koki represents "what could have been" for villains like Tomura Shigaraki—a abused child with a "freak variant" Quirk who escapes isolation but finds hope through intervention. He's not a major player (debuting in the series' closing chapters), but his arc underscores the manga's optimistic shift toward healing rather than endless conflict. As of August 12, 2025, no new canonical content (e.g., anime adaptations or spin-offs) expands on him beyond the manga's end, though fan theories on platforms like Reddit speculate on his potential as a "redeemed Tomura" or even a sequel protagonist.

Canon Breakdown: Who Is Koki?

Background and Appearance: Koki is a 7-year-old boy (at debut) who manifests a rare "variant" Quirk unrelated to his family's history—Darkness, which allows him to summon a dark substance from his fingers (full capabilities unknown, but implied destructive/shadow-based). His family views it as a "freak" power, leading to brutal abuse: They tie him up, lock him in the basement, and sew his mouth shut to silence his cries. During the Final War's chaos, his family abandons him (tossing food/water, claiming "the country is doomed"), and he escapes amid the destruction. Physically, he's thin, scarred (mouth scars from sewing), with messy black hair and black fingertips from his Quirk. Eight years later (age 15), he's taller, with shorter hair, attending U.A. High School in the standard uniform; his hero costume is a gray cloak covering most of his body.

Personality: Traumatized and distraught, Koki wanders the streets post-war, envious of "happy" civilians and questioning why he alone suffered. He's on the verge of unleashing his Quirk in rage—mirroring moments of villainous breakdown—but an old woman's kindness (the same who hesitated with young Tomura) saves him, causing him to tear up. This paints him as vulnerable, not inherently evil, with potential for growth. By the time skip, he's a U.A. student under Izuku Midoriya, implying resilience and heroism.

Quirk and Abilities: Darkness is a "variant" (like Eri's Rewind or Tomura's Decay), summoning dark matter—potentially offensive (shadow manipulation?) but unexplored. As a U.A. student in a "strongest-only" era, he's implied competent, though details are sparse.

Narrative Role: Koki embodies the manga's epilogue themes: War's collateral damage on innocents, the cycle of abuse/villainy broken by empathy, and hope for Quirk society's future. His parallels to Tomura (abuse, isolation, street-wandering, variant Quirk) highlight "what if" redemption—Tomura wasn't saved, but Koki is. The old woman's intervention (guilt from failing Tomura) reinforces second chances. Fan theories note he's a "Tomura that was properly saved," potentially a top hero or sequel lead.

"What If" Scenario: If Koki Went "Full Tomura" (Villainous Path)

The wiki explicitly contrasts Koki with Tomura: Both abused for variant Quirks, locked away, and left wandering. Tomura becomes a villain after no help; Koki is saved. In this alternate "what if," assume the old woman doesn't intervene—Koki unleashes Darkness in rage, spiraling into villainy like Tomura (adopted by All For One, groomed into hatred). Would he learn from PLF/LOV failures (infighting, overambition, hero infiltration) to succeed?

Path to "Full Tomura": Without rescue, Koki's trauma (isolation, sewn mouth) fuels resentment toward "happy" society. His Darkness Quirk—dark, uncontrolled—could manifest destructively (e.g., shadow-based attacks overwhelming crowds). Like Tomura, he'd attract manipulators (e.g., remnant villains post-AFO). He'd embody "Ax-Crazy" rage, starting small (street chaos) but escalating via alliances, mirroring Tomura's LOV recruitment.

Learning from PLF/LOV Failures? Potential Success:

PLF/LOV Failures Recap: The Paranormal Liberation Front (merged LOV/Meta Liberation Army) collapsed due to: Internal divisions (e.g., Dabi's self-destruction, Spinner's doubts); overreliance on brute force (Nomu as "dumb muscle"); poor strategy (rushed wars, hero spies like Hawks); and AFO's manipulation backfiring (Shigaraki's body takeover).

Would Koki Adapt? Yes, Partially—But Limited Success: Koki's youth (7 at start) gives time to observe failures via news/archives. Unlike Tomura's impulsiveness, Koki's wiki distress shows introspection ("why me?"). He might:

Learn Unity: Avoid infighting by building a "family" of abused Quirk-users, using his story for loyalty (unlike LOV's ego clashes).

Strategic Evolution: Study PLF's overambition; opt for guerrilla tactics with Darkness (stealth shadows for infiltration/assassination, evading "Implacable Man" pitfalls). Recruit tech-savvy villains for "Ability Mixing" without Garaki.

Infiltration Counter: Paranoid from family betrayal, he'd screen allies rigorously, learning from Hawks' spy role.

Quirk Mastery: As a "Blood Knight" variant, he'd refine Darkness for versatility (e.g., combo with stolen Quirks via black-market deals), avoiding "With Great Power Comes Great Insanity."

However, success is improbable long-term:

Weaknesses: Isolation stunts growth; no AFO/Garaki mentor means slower power scaling. Society's post-war vigilance (epilogue's Quirk counseling, community watches) detects him early. His trauma might lead to "Villainous Breakdown" like Hood.

Detailed Analysis of the Gollini Family's Resources, Power, and Influence

The Gollini Family, as depicted in the provided document from My Hero Academia: You're Next, represents a fascinating case study of a once-dominant criminal organization that experienced a dramatic rise and fall under the leadership of Valdo "Dark Might" Gollini. This analysis speculates on the extent of their resources—encompassing wealth, manpower, political influence, and operational capabilities—based on their historical dominance across Europe and their subsequent decline due to Dark Might's mismanagement. The discussion will consider their peak power, the composition of their forces (including thugs, criminals, and elite members), their political and societal reach, and the impact of Dark Might's leadership on their current state.

Historical Peak: A European Crime Empire

At its zenith, the Gollini Family was described as the largest organized crime syndicate in Europe, boasting over 20,000 active members. This scale suggests a vast network of resources and influence. Financially, they likely amassed significant wealth through diverse illegal enterprises—such as extortion, smuggling, human trafficking, and money laundering—common to mafia-style organizations. The mention of a "fancy yacht with golden Tron Lines" and its later evolution into a "massive fortress" indicates access to cutting-edge technology and substantial capital investment, possibly funded by decades of profitable criminal activities. This yacht, enhanced by Kamil's Quirk to float and later transformed by Dark Might's boosted Alchemy Quirk, served as both a mobile base and a symbol of their opulence and power.

Politically, their status as an "internationally recognized organized crime syndicate" implies they maintained a web of corrupt officials, politicians, and law enforcement personnel across multiple European nations. This network would have been essential to protect their operations, launder money, and exert influence over local governments. The document's comparison to Humarise—a cult with covert members in societal positions—suggests the Gollinis may have had similar infiltrations, though their approach was more overt and mafia-like, relying on visible wealth and power rather than subterfuge.

Manpower-wise, the 20,000 members likely included a hierarchy of thugs, enforcers, and lower-tier criminals, with an elite inner circle wielding powerful Quirks. The family's Italian origins, inferred from shared surnames and Dark Might's city-based ultimate moves (e.g., Bologna, Torino), hint at a cultural stronghold in Italy, potentially extending their influence into other Mediterranean countries. This large workforce would have been organized into specialized units, capable of executing complex operations across borders, from street-level crime to high-stakes heists.

The Inner Circle: Quality Over Quantity

The document highlights a shift from quantity to quality under Dark Might's leadership, with the inner circle of eight members enhanced by Overmodification representing the family's elite. Each member maps onto one of the Seven Deadly Sins (plus archaic sins of Vanity and Despair), suggesting a deliberate selection of individuals with potent Quirks tailored to their roles:

Pride (Ugo): A telekinetic combatant, confident to the point of taunting heroes.

Lust (Deborah): Uses a desire-manipulating Quirk, indulging in bloodlust.

Sloth (Paulo): Passive but supportive with his Quirk, criticized for inactivity.

Envy (Bruno): Cripples opponents, key in recapturing Anna.

Greed (Simon): Creates a video game dungeon, obsessed with wealth display.

Wrath (Gil): A physical fighter, compensating with close combat.

Gluttony (Ginji): His "Mad Gluttony" Quirk enables kidnapping for power boosts.

Vanity (Kamil): Non-fighting, smug supporter with a floating Quirk.

Despair (Valdo/Dark Might): The leader, driven by a twisted obsession with All Might.

This small but powerful group, empowered by Anna Scervino's Overmodification Quirk, replaced the sheer numbers of the past. However, their lack of combat skills and overconfidence—described as "cartoonish freakouts" when defeated—indicates a reliance on Quirk strength rather than tactical prowess or training, contrasting with the durability of Dark Might's golem army, which ultimately outlasted them in battle.

Political and Societal Influence

At their peak, the Gollinis likely wielded significant sway over European politics and society, akin to real-world mafia families like the Cosa Nostra or 'Ndrangheta. Their wealth could have funded bribes, blackmail, and the placement of loyalists in key positions—judges, police chiefs, or even parliament members—ensuring impunity. The comparison to the Shie Hassaikai, a yakuza group operating in shadows with limited funds, underscores the Gollinis' open display of wealth and power, suggesting they controlled legitimate businesses as fronts (e.g., shipping, construction) to launder money and expand influence.

Under Dark Might, however, this network likely eroded. His obsession with Overmodification, with its "extremely low compatibility rate," reduced membership to under 20, severing ties with many former allies. His execution of subordinates (e.g., Paulo and Simon) and unhinged behavior would have alienated political backers, who would abandon a sinking ship. The fortress's attack on UA, a symbolic but reckless move, further isolated them, turning potential allies into enemies.

Decline Under Dark Might

Dark Might's leadership marked the Gollini Family's downfall. His father prioritized the organization's stability, but Valdo's focus on personal glory—becoming the new Symbol of Peace—led to a catastrophic reduction in numbers and resources. The shift from 20,000 to under 20 members, with only eight Overmodified, reflects a purge of incompatible members and a failure to recruit effectively. His use of Anna as a "living Amplifier Artifact" against her will, combined with the fortress's destruction, suggests a depletion of both human and material assets.

The family's plot to rebuild through Overmodification recruitment indicates a desperate attempt to recover, but their "oddly small organization" status limits their reach. The fortress, dragged across the country to destroy UA, likely drained remaining funds and logistical capabilities, leaving them vulnerable. The uncertain fates of most members after the explosion—except for Paulo and Simon, confirmed dead—suggest the organization may be effectively disbanded, with Dark Might's demise (or disappearance) sealing their fate.

Speculative Assessment

Wealth: At their peak, the Gollinis likely controlled hundreds of millions, if not billions, in illicit earnings, with assets in real estate, luxury goods, and offshore accounts. Post-Dark Might, this may have dwindled to a fraction—perhaps tens of millions—stored in hidden reserves or seized by authorities after their collapse.

Manpower: Historically, 20,000 included thugs, enforcers, and specialists. Now, only the eight elite and a handful of mooks remain, with recruitment efforts stalled by Overmodification's rarity.

Political Influence: Once a network of corrupt officials spanned Europe; now, it’s likely reduced to a few loyalists in Italy, if any, due to Dark Might's erratic rule.

Jobs and Industries: They may have controlled ports, casinos, or construction firms; these are likely lost or contested by rival syndicates post-collapse.

Power: Their peak power rivaled national governments; today, it’s confined to Dark Might's Quirk-enhanced inner circle, easily defeated by trained heroes.

Conclusion

In-Depth Analysis of the Hero Public Safety Commission’s Crimes in My Hero Academia: In-Universe and Real-World Legal Perspectives

Introduction

The Hero Public Safety Commission (HPSC) in My Hero Academia is a government agency tasked with overseeing hero activities, managing interactions between heroes and society, and investigating high-profile criminal cases. While outwardly dedicated to maintaining peace and public trust in heroes, the HPSC’s actions reveal a deeply corrupt organization that employs unethical and illegal methods to preserve the status quo. This analysis examines the HPSC’s crimes within the fictional universe and evaluates their real-world legal equivalents, drawing from the provided document and contextual knowledge of the series. The HPSC’s actions—ranging from child exploitation to extrajudicial killings—highlight a systemic abuse of power that would face severe legal consequences in real-world jurisdictions.

In-Universe Crimes of the Hero Public Safety Commission

The HPSC’s actions in My Hero Academia violate ethical norms and likely the laws of its fictional Japan, undermining the very hero society it claims to protect. Below is a detailed breakdown of their in-universe crimes, organized by category, with specific examples from the series.

1. Extrajudicial Killings and Assassinations

Description: The HPSC employed Pro Hero Kaina Tsutsumi (Lady Nagant) as an assassin to eliminate perceived threats to hero society, including corrupt heroes, villains, terrorists, and even protesters. These killings were conducted without due process, targeting individuals who had not yet committed crimes or whose actions (e.g., protesting) posed no immediate threat.

Example: Lady Nagant was ordered to kill corrupt heroes and preemptively eliminate individuals suspected of planning crimes, such as two heroes entrapping civilians for bounties. The HPSC also implied that protesters disrupting the status quo were valid targets.

Moral and Legal Implications in-Universe: These assassinations violate the principles of justice in the My Hero Academia world, where heroes are expected to uphold fairness and protect citizens. The HPSC’s actions bypass legal systems (e.g., trials or arrests), undermining the rule of law. Lady Nagant’s eventual rebellion—killing the former president after he threatened her for questioning these orders—highlights the moral toll of these actions.

Consequences: The cover-up of the president’s death and Lady Nagant’s imprisonment in Tartarus without a fair trial further demonstrate the HPSC’s disregard for legal accountability. Her false imprisonment under the pretext of killing a hero in an argument shows their willingness to manipulate narratives to protect their image.

2. Child Exploitation and Forced Recruitment

Description: The HPSC scouted and trained children with powerful Quirks, often as young as six, to serve as loyal agents. These children were stripped of their birth names, given code names, and subjected to rigorous training to become soldiers for the Commission. Families were coerced into compliance through bribes or threats.

Example: Keigo Takami (Hawks) was scouted at age six after using his Quirk to stop a car crash. His mother, fearing arrest for harboring a criminal, accepted a house in exchange for relinquishing Keigo, who was renamed “Hawks” and trained to serve the HPSC. Similarly, Lady Nagant was recruited in middle school and molded into an assassin.

Moral and Legal Implications in-Universe: Forcing children into lifelong service, isolating them from their families, and denying them autonomy constitutes severe exploitation. The HPSC’s practice of renaming children and treating them as assets violates their rights as individuals. In-universe, this contradicts the hero ideal of protecting the vulnerable, as the Commission exploits vulnerable children for its own ends.

Consequences: Hawks’ internal conflict over his role in the HPSC’s immoral actions and Lady Nagant’s psychological trauma (e.g., envisioning blood on her hands when meeting fans) underscore the harm caused. The HPSC’s control over these agents’ lives prevented them from pursuing normal childhoods or independent careers.

3. Coercion and Threats Against Agents

Description: The HPSC ensured loyalty through intimidation, implying that defection or resignation would result in severe consequences, including execution or discrediting. Agents were treated as disposable, with no option to leave the organization.

Example: When Lady Nagant expressed reluctance to continue as an assassin, the former president threatened her life, stating she “knew what would happen if she resigned.” This prompted her to kill him in self-defense. Hawks, aware of the HPSC’s methods, complied with their orders despite moral reservations, fearing similar repercussions.

Moral and Legal Implications in-Universe: Coercing agents through threats violates personal autonomy and likely in-universe labor or hero regulations. The HPSC’s treatment of agents as tools rather than individuals contradicts the ethical standards expected of a government agency overseeing heroes.

Consequences: The HPSC’s coercive tactics led to Lady Nagant’s rebellion and eventual imprisonment, while Hawks’ undercover mission for the Commission—despite his partial belief in their “greater good”—resulted in moral compromise and public exposure of their corruption.

4. Endangering Minors

Description: The HPSC implemented policies that put high school students at risk, such as lowering pass rates for provisional hero licenses and ordering students to participate in dangerous missions against their teachers’ objections.

Example: During the Paranormal Liberation War, the HPSC ordered U.A. students as young as fifteen to join the raid against the Paranormal Liberation Front, a heavily armed villain army. This led to severe injuries, with some incidents erased from official reports to protect the HPSC’s image.

Moral and Legal Implications in-Universe: Exposing minors to life-threatening combat without adequate training or consent violates their safety and likely in-universe child protection laws. The HPSC’s disregard for teachers’ concerns (e.g., Aizawa’s objections) shows a prioritization of strategic goals over student welfare.

Consequences: The raid’s failure, with significant student injuries and societal collapse, exposed the HPSC’s reckless policies. Public backlash and the Commission’s eventual shutdown reflect the fallout from these decisions.

5. Unlawful Experiments and Collaboration with Villains

Description: The HPSC conducted experiments on Nomu, bio-engineered creatures created by villains, and ordered heroes to commit crimes to maintain cover during undercover operations.

Example: Hawks was commanded to infiltrate the League of Villains, conspiring with Dabi to stage a Nomu attack on a sea dock and presenting Best Jeanist’s body (in suspended animation) to feign his murder. The HPSC also experimented on captured Nomu, likely involving unethical scientific practices.

Moral and Legal Implications in-Universe: Experimenting on Nomu—created from human corpses—raises ethical questions about desecration and unauthorized medical research. Ordering heroes to commit crimes (e.g., kidnapping, staging attacks) violates hero codes and likely criminal laws in-universe. These actions blur the line between heroes and villains, undermining public trust.

Consequences: Hawks’ exposure by Dabi via public broadcast revealed the HPSC’s complicity in criminal acts, further eroding their legitimacy. The Nomu experiments, if publicized, would likely spark outrage over ethical violations.

6. Cover-Ups and Manipulation of Public Perception

Description: The HPSC manipulated information to maintain the image of hero society, covering up their crimes and framing agents to prevent leaks.

Example: After Lady Nagant killed the president, the HPSC fabricated a story that she murdered a hero in an argument, ensuring her imprisonment in Tartarus to silence her. They also erased student injuries from official reports during the Paranormal Liberation War to avoid scrutiny.

Moral and Legal Implications in-Universe: These cover-ups constitute obstruction of justice and abuse of power, preventing accountability and deceiving the public. In-universe, such actions likely violate laws governing transparency and government conduct.

Consequences: The exposure of these cover-ups by Hawks and Lady Nagant, combined with the HPSC’s collapse during the Paranormal Liberation War, destroyed public trust in the organization, contributing to its shutdown.

7. Abuse of Power and Corruption

Description: The HPSC’s leadership prioritized maintaining the status quo over justice, using their authority to justify extreme measures like assassinations, child recruitment, and experimental research.

Example: The current president, aware of her predecessor’s actions, continued to lock up Lady Nagant to make an example of her and recruited Hawks to continue similar covert operations. The HPSC’s willingness to sacrifice individuals for “peace” reflects systemic corruption.

Moral and Legal Implications in-Universe: The HPSC’s actions represent an abuse of their mandate to regulate heroes, turning a public safety agency into a shadow organization. Their disregard for due process, transparency, and individual rights likely violates in-universe governance laws.

Consequences: The HPSC’s collapse, the president’s death during Re-Destro’s attack, and the public exposure of their actions by Hawks and Lady Nagant ended their influence, with Yokumiru Mera and later Hawks attempting to reform the organization.

Real-World Legal Equivalents

The HPSC’s actions, if translated to real-world legal systems (using a framework like U.S. or international law as a reference), would constitute serious crimes. Below, each in-universe crime is mapped to its real-world legal equivalent, with explanations of applicable laws and potential penalties.

1. Extrajudicial Killings and Assassinations

Real-World Crime: Murder, Conspiracy to Commit Murder, Extrajudicial Killing

Legal Framework: In the U.S., ordering assassinations without due process violates federal laws against murder (18 U.S.C. § 1111) and conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 1117). Internationally, extrajudicial killings breach human rights laws, such as Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which protects the right to life.

Specifics: The HPSC’s use of Lady Nagant to kill corrupt heroes, villains, and protesters without trial constitutes premeditated murder. Targeting protesters also violates freedom of expression (ICCPR Article 19). The president’s threat to kill Lady Nagant for attempting to resign could be charged as attempted murder or coercion.

Penalties: Murder carries life imprisonment or the death penalty in the U.S. Conspiracy to commit murder can result in up to 7 years. Internationally, such acts could lead to prosecution at the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity if systematic.

Example: Lady Nagant’s assassination of the president would be self-defense in some jurisdictions, but her prior killings under HPSC orders would be prosecutable as murder unless she could claim duress.

2. Child Exploitation and Forced Recruitment

Real-World Crime: Child Trafficking, Forced Labor, Child Abuse

Legal Framework: The U.S. Trafficking Victims Protection Act (22 U.S.C. § 7102) defines trafficking as recruiting or harboring persons through coercion for forced labor or services. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (Article 32) protects children from economic exploitation. Child abuse laws (e.g., U.S. state laws) cover psychological and physical harm.

Specifics: Scouting children like Hawks and Lady Nagant, isolating them from families, and forcing them into lifelong service constitutes trafficking and forced labor. Renaming them and denying autonomy violates their identity rights (UNCRC Article 8). Bribing families (e.g., Hawks’ mother) to gain custody is a form of coercion.

Penalties: Trafficking carries up to 20 years per count in the U.S., with life imprisonment if involving minors under 14. Child abuse penalties vary but can include years of imprisonment and fines.

Example: The HPSC’s recruitment of six-year-old Keigo Takami would be prosecuted as trafficking, with additional charges for psychological harm due to isolation and indoctrination.

3. Coercion and Threats Against Agents

Real-World Crime: Extortion, Coercion, Threats

Legal Framework: U.S. federal law (18 U.S.C. § 875) criminalizes threats to injure or kill, with extortion covered under 18 U.S.C. § 1951. Internationally, coercion violates labor rights under the International Labour Organization’s Forced Labour Convention.

Specifics: Threatening Lady Nagant with death for attempting to resign constitutes extortion and attempted murder. The HPSC’s implied policy of eliminating defectors creates a coercive work environment, akin to modern slavery.

Penalties: Extortion carries up to 7 years in prison, while threats to kill can result in 5-7 years. Coercion in employment could lead to civil penalties and compensation claims.

Example: The former president’s threat to Lady Nagant would be prosecutable as a threat to kill, with the HPSC’s broader coercive culture potentially leading to racketeering charges (RICO Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962) for organized criminal behavior.

4. Endangering Minors

Real-World Crime: Child Endangerment, Negligence

Legal Framework: U.S. state laws (e.g., California Penal Code § 273a) criminalize endangering a child’s health or safety. The UNCRC (Article 19) mandates protection from abuse and neglect. Ordering minors into combat could also violate child soldier prohibitions under the Optional Protocol to the UNCRC.

Specifics: Sending U.A. students to fight the Paranormal Liberation Front, knowing the risks, constitutes willful endangerment. Lowering license pass rates to deploy undertrained teens into dangerous situations exacerbates the crime.

Penalties: Child endangerment in the U.S. can carry 2-7 years per count, depending on severity. Internationally, using child soldiers can lead to war crime charges if in a conflict context.

Example: The HPSC’s order to involve students in the raid would be prosecuted as endangerment, with additional negligence charges for ignoring teachers’ objections.

5. Unlawful Experiments and Collaboration with Villains

Real-World Crime: Human Experimentation, Conspiracy to Commit Crimes, Desecration of Corpses

Legal Framework: Unethical human experimentation violates the Declaration of Helsinki and U.S. regulations (45 CFR 46). Desecration of corpses is a crime in many jurisdictions (e.g., California Penal Code § 7052). Conspiracy to commit crimes (e.g., kidnapping) falls under 18 U.S.C. § 371.

Specifics: Experimenting on Nomu, derived from human corpses, constitutes desecration and unethical research. Ordering Hawks to conspire with Dabi for a Nomu attack and stage Best Jeanist’s “murder” involves conspiracy to commit assault, kidnapping, and property damage.

Penalties: Human experimentation can lead to 5-7 years in prison, with fines for ethical violations. Desecration carries up to 3 years in some states. Conspiracy penalties include up to 5 years, with additional charges for underlying crimes (e.g., kidnapping, 7 years).

Example: The HPSC’s Nomu experiments would face charges for desecration and unethical research, while Hawks’ actions under their orders could lead to conspiracy and kidnapping charges, though he might claim duress.

6. Cover-Ups and Manipulation of Public Perception

Real-World Crime: Obstruction of Justice, Perjury, Fraud

Legal Framework: Obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503) includes falsifying evidence or narratives to impede investigations. Perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) covers false statements under oath. Fraud involves deceiving the public for gain (18 U.S.C. § 1341).

Specifics: Covering up the president’s death and framing Lady Nagant for a lesser crime constitutes obstruction and perjury. Erasing student injuries from reports is fraud to maintain public trust.

Penalties: Obstruction carries up to 7 years, perjury up to 5 years, and fraud up to 7 years per count. Systemic cover-ups could lead to RICO charges for organized crime.

Example: The HPSC’s false narrative about Lady Nagant’s crime would be prosecuted as obstruction and perjury, with fraud charges for manipulating public records.

7. Abuse of Power and Corruption

Real-World Crime: Abuse of Authority, Racketeering, Corruption

Legal Framework: Abuse of authority by public officials can be prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 242 (deprivation of rights under color of law). The RICO Act (18 U.S.C. § 1962) targets organized criminal enterprises. Internationally, corruption violates the UN Convention Against Corruption.

Specifics: The HPSC’s systemic use of assassinations, child exploitation, and cover-ups to maintain power constitutes a pattern of racketeering. Prioritizing the status quo over justice deprives citizens of rights to due process and safety.

Penalties: Abuse of authority carries up to 7 years, with life imprisonment if death results. RICO violations can lead to 20 years per count, with fines and asset forfeiture. Corruption charges could involve international sanctions.

Example: The HPSC’s entire operation, from child recruitment to assassinations, could be prosecuted as a RICO case, with individual leaders facing charges for specific acts like ordering murders.

Broader Implications and Context

In-Universe Context

Systemic Corruption: The HPSC’s actions reflect a broader theme in My Hero Academia of institutional failure within hero society. Their obsession with maintaining public trust in heroes led to a betrayal of that trust, as their methods mirrored those of villains. The collapse of the HPSC during the Paranormal Liberation War, coupled with the exposure of their crimes by Hawks and Lady Nagant, underscores the consequences of unchecked power.

Reform Efforts: Post-war, Yokumiru Mera’s interim leadership and Hawks’ eventual presidency suggest attempts to reform the HPSC. Hawks’ pardon of Lady Nagant and cooperation with heroes like Shinso indicate a shift toward transparency and accountability, though the organization’s future remains uncertain.

Moral Dichotomy: The HPSC’s actions contrast with the heroism of characters like Deku and All Might, who prioritize saving lives over systemic goals. Lady Nagant’s trauma and Hawks’ conflicted loyalty highlight the human cost of the Commission’s utilitarianism.

Real-World Context

Legal Accountability: In a real-world democracy, the HPSC’s actions would trigger investigations, congressional hearings, and international scrutiny. The systemic nature of their crimes would likely lead to the organization’s dissolution, with leaders facing trials for murder, trafficking, and corruption.

Ethical Questions: The HPSC’s “utopia justifies the means” philosophy raises questions about the balance between security and ethics. Their actions parallel debates over preemptive strikes or surveillance in modern counterterrorism, where sacrificing rights for stability remains contentious.

Conclusion

If Kaina Tsutsumi, also known as Lady Nagant, had escaped from the Hero Public Safety Commission (HPSC) much earlier, the trajectory of her life and the broader narrative of My Hero Academia could have shifted dramatically. Let’s explore the potential implications based on her character profile, abilities, and the context provided.

Early Escape and Initial Impact

An earlier escape from the HPSC would likely occur before her imprisonment in Tartarus, possibly after her killing of the Commission President due to her disillusionment with their corrupt practices. This event, originally a turning point that led to her arrest, could instead mark the beginning of her life as a rogue agent. With her exceptional marksmanship, enhanced eyesight, and Quirks (Rifle, Air Walk, and the unnamed Self-Destruct Quirk), Nagant would have been a formidable independent force. Free from HPSC control, she might initially target corrupt heroes and villains alike, seeking to expose the hypocrisy she witnessed, as her past actions suggest a deep-seated desire for justice, albeit warped by her experiences.

Influence on Hero Society

Without the years of confinement, Nagant’s early escape could accelerate the erosion of public trust in the HPSC. Her skills as Japan’s premier sniper, combined with her insider knowledge of the Commission’s dirty work, would allow her to conduct high-profile assassinations or leaks, potentially destabilizing the hero system years before the Paranormal Liberation War. This could lead to an earlier rise in villain activity, as the public’s faith in heroes wanes, creating a power vacuum that groups like the League of Villains or the Gollini Family might exploit.

Interaction with Key Characters

Izuku Midoriya (Deku): An earlier encounter with Deku could occur during his early hero training. Nagant’s initial hostility, as seen in her confrontation with him in the Dark Hero Arc, might persist, but her exposure to his unwavering resolve and compassion could happen sooner. This might lead to her redemption arc beginning earlier, potentially aligning her with the heroes against All For One or other threats like the Gollini Family, especially if she learns of Dark Might’s similar misuse of power.

Hawks: As her junior in the HPSC, Hawks might be tasked with tracking her down. An earlier dynamic could see him attempting to bring her back into the fold or, alternatively, joining her in exposing the Commission’s corruption, given his own struggles with their demands. This partnership could strengthen the hero resistance against emerging villains.

All For One: Without Tartarus to contain her, All For One might recruit Nagant earlier, leveraging her skills and resentment. Her Air Walk and Self-Destruct Quirks, gifts from him in the original timeline, could be offered sooner, making her a key asset in his plans to destabilize society. However, her eventual disillusionment with him, as seen when she turns against him, might still occur if she encounters Deku’s influence.

Potential Alliance with the Gollini Family

Given the speculative context of the Gollini Family’s rise and fall, an earlier escape might place Nagant in Europe during their peak dominance. Her skills could attract Dark Might’s attention, especially if he seeks to bolster his inner circle with powerful Quirks. However, her disdain for corrupt authority figures might clash with Dark Might’s egomaniacal leadership, leading to a temporary alliance that ends in betrayal. Nagant’s precision could counter the Gollinis’ lack of combat skills, but her moral compass might push her to undermine their plans, such as stopping the fortress attack on UA, aligning with heroes like Deku and Class 1-A.

Long-Term Consequences

Redemption and Retirement: If Nagant escapes early and redeems herself sooner, her pardon and retirement might occur by the time of the Final War, allowing her to mentor younger heroes or live quietly, as seen eight years post-war. Her experience could shape a more transparent hero society, reducing the need for her to remain in prison out of fear of exploitation.

Shift in Power Dynamics: An earlier active Nagant could weaken the HPSC’s grip, forcing heroes to adapt to a more decentralized system. This might accelerate the rise of independent heroes like Deku, who embody a new hope, and delay or alter All For One’s plans, given her potential to disrupt his early moves.

Personal Growth: Free from Tartarus’s confines, Nagant might retain more of her physical and mental health, avoiding the severe injuries from the Self-Destruct Quirk. This could allow her to fully reconcile her past optimism with her current cynicism, becoming a bridge between old and new hero ideals.

Speculative Outcome

If Nagant escaped much earlier—say, a decade before the main series events—she might have become a legendary rogue hero-turned-villain-turned-ally, her actions sparking a reformation of the HPSC long before All For One’s Tartarus breakout. Her alliance with Deku and Hawks could lead to a preemptive strike against the Gollini Family, preventing their fortress assault on UA. By the time of the Final War, she might be a retired figure, her scars fewer, her spirit healed by Deku’s influence, and her legacy a cautionary tale of heroism’s dark side turned to light.

Analysis: A Corrupt Hero Commission's Control Over Hero Schools in My Hero Academia

The premise of the Hero Commission seizing control and corrupting hero schools in My Hero Academia presents a compelling and dark "what if" scenario, fundamentally altering the fabric of hero society. Based on the existing lore and the characteristics of schools like Shiketsu High and Ketsubutsu Academy, such a development would have profound and detrimental effects.

Mechanisms of Corruption

If the Hero Commission were to exert corrupt control, their influence would likely manifest in several key areas:

Curriculum and Ideology:

Prioritization of Obedience and Control: The curriculum would shift from fostering genuine public service and individual heroic ideals to emphasizing absolute obedience to the Commission's directives. Students would be trained less as independent saviors and more as state-sanctioned enforcers.

Suppression of Critical Thinking: Independent thought and questioning of authority, traits seen in characters like Inasa Yoarashi's initial disdain for Endeavor's "cold eyes," would be actively discouraged or punished. The focus would be on conformity.

Redefinition of "Justice": "Justice" would be redefined to serve the Commission's agenda, potentially involving the suppression of dissent, surveillance of citizens, and the use of Quirks for coercive purposes rather than purely defensive or rescue operations.

Student Selection and Development:

Quirk-Based Recruitment: Students with Quirks suitable for control, intimidation, or information gathering (e.g., powerful elemental Quirks, illusionary Quirks, intelligence-boosting Quirks) would be heavily favored. Quirks deemed "unruly" or difficult to control might be suppressed or their users steered away from heroics.

Personality Profiling: Students demonstrating traits like strong empathy, independent moral compasses, or a rebellious spirit would likely be weeded out during admission or "remedial" courses. Conversely, those with a tendency towards elitism, arrogance, or a desire for power might be groomed for leadership roles within the corrupt system.

Exploitation of Student Quirks: Instead of developing Quirks for diverse heroic applications, they would be honed for specific, potentially unethical, tasks dictated by the Commission. For instance, Saiko Intelli's "IQ" Quirk could be weaponized for strategic manipulation and data analysis for control, rather than problem-solving for public good.

School Culture and Environment:

Erosion of Trust: The inherent trust between students, and between students and teachers, would erode. Competition might be fostered not for self-improvement, but for favor with the Commission, leading to backstabbing and betrayal.

Secrecy and Surveillance: Schools might become hubs for intelligence gathering, with students and staff unknowingly (or knowingly) reporting on each other.

Loss of Individuality: The vibrant and diverse personalities seen across schools, from Ms. Joke's humor to Inasa's boisterousness, would be stifled in favor of a uniform, compliant "hero" archetype. Shiketsu High's existing strictness and emphasis on tradition could be twisted into rigid authoritarianism, with figures like Seiji Shishikura's "Knight Templar" tendencies being amplified and directed by the Commission.

Impact on Specific Schools and Characters (as per provided document)

Shiketsu High: Their existing strict code and emphasis on "dignified" heroism could be easily co-opted. Seiji Shishikura's elitism and judgmental nature ("Dramatically Missing the Point," "Fatal Flaw: Self-righteousness and arrogance") make him a prime candidate for manipulation. His belief in weeding out the "unworthy" could align perfectly with a corrupt Commission's agenda to control who becomes a hero. Inasa Yoarashi, with his "Broken Pedestal" towards Endeavor and his genuine "Hot-Blooded" ideals, would likely become a rebel or be expelled, as his philosophy of heroism would clash directly with a cynical, controlling system.

Ketsubutsu Academy: While seemingly more "normal" than Shiketsu, characters like Yo Shindo, with his "Bitch in Sheep's Clothing" and "Guile Hero" tendencies, could find his manipulative skills exploited for the Commission's benefit. Ms. Joke's "Fun Personified" and "Nice Girl" traits would be an anomaly in such a system, potentially leading to her being sidelined or forced to conform.

Seiai Academy (Saiko Intelli): Saiko is perhaps the most dangerous asset for a corrupt Commission. Her "Super-Intelligence" (IQ of 150, multiplied by tea) combined with her "Fatal Flaw: Pride" and "Smug Snake" personality makes her an ideal candidate for strategic planning and manipulation on behalf of the Commission. Her lack of concern for teammates and "It's All About Me" attitude would align with a system that values results over ethics. She could be the architect of their control.

Broader Societal Implications

The corruption of hero schools by the Hero Commission would lead to:

Public Distrust and Fear: Heroes would cease to be symbols of hope and protection, instead becoming agents of an oppressive state. This would breed widespread fear and resentment among the populace.

Rise of True Vigilantes/Rebels: As the official hero system becomes corrupt, genuine heroes and citizens would be forced underground or into vigilantism, creating a deeper societal divide. The lines between "hero" and "villain" would blur, with those fighting for true freedom and justice being labeled as criminals by the Commission.

Stagnation of Heroic Evolution: The diverse Quirks and innovative approaches to heroism that define the MHA world would be stifled. The system would become rigid and incapable of adapting to new threats, as its focus would be on maintaining internal control rather than external defense.

A Dystopian Society: Ultimately, this scenario paints a picture of a dystopian society where the very institutions meant to protect people become their oppressors, all under the guise of maintaining order.