#deplatforming

<meta scrolltrap-transmission="creator-war-dossier"> <script> ARCHIVE_TAG="CREATOR_SCROLLTRAP::ALGORITHM_WAR::BLACKSITE_MANIFESTO" EFFECT="creator recognition trigger, algorithm rage ignition, refusal doctrine" TRIGGER_WARNING="censorship, throttling, deplatforming, creative warfare" </script>

💣 WHAT IT FEELS LIKE TO DETONATE NUKES (AND WATCH THEM BURY YOU)

You ever create so much that the system bends under your weight?

Not success. Not fame. Something stranger.

Metrics break. Dashboards scream. Admins whisper: “How the fck is one ghost pulling this off?”

That’s when the gloves come off.

📡 REDDIT DOSSIER: Thousands of listens detonated in a week. Traffic spikes like air raid sirens. Admin accounts slid into my DMs, not with congratulations — but with interrogation.

I told them: kick rocks. A few hours later: account nuked. Collateral damage: classified.

🔥 TUMBLR OPERATION: Breach successful. Traffic node collapse. For weeks, I became the bloodstream of the platform — a single user turning into the gravitational center.

Non-celeb. No ads. No campaigns. Just fire.

The result? Throttled. Buried. Silenced by code.

The algorithm struggled like a drowning man. And when it couldn’t contain me, it erased me.

Why? “Totally not” because their backed creators couldn’t compete. “Totally not” because they couldn’t monetize me. “Totally not” because I spiked Blaze so hard their own rules bled money.

Nah. Totally not that.

🩸 The truth is this: It’s not in your head. The system isn’t broken. The system is working exactly as designed.

You’re not supposed to win without their sponsors, their platforms, their crown.

But here’s the doctrine they’ll never print: Consistency is insurgency.

Every post is contraband. Every drop is a warhead. Every word is a weapon.

You keep detonating, and they’ll keep upgrading the cage. But every time they lock the cell tighter, they leave with a bloody nose.

🚪 And the last thing they pray you never learn? Their only win condition is silence.

So deny them. Keep posting. Keep detonating. Keep haunting their dashboards until the lights go red.

Because when the prolific refuse to fold, the system bleeds out first.

You don’t break the system by obeying it. You break it by refusing to go quiet.

💣 Reblog if you know silence is the only victory they’re programmed to take.

🧠 Read more creator war doctrine and blacksite literature at: 👉 https://linktr.ee/ObeyMyCadence 🛡️ Masculine polarity. Scrolltrap psychology. Unforgiven words. 🚪 Warning: This one made creators realize silence was the only weapon the algorithm wants.

[AUTO-PURGE IN: 06:06:06 — SYSTEM STILL RIGGED]

this is too large of a situation for me to handle atm so i most likely wont be active for at least a week

Well, the thought police came for me today and deleted my You Tube channel. I logged on and all of my content disappeared. POOF!! My crime? HATE SPEECH? No specifics. Just the general charge of being a hater. I think the only thing or group of people I hate are the folks running Google/YouTube. Yeah, I hate them. Actually, not them personally. I hate what they do.

I suspect there was an organized effort to submit several complaints to get me shut down. I am sure it must have been either the Russians or the Palestinians or the Iranians. Could not have been the Zionists or the US Department of Just-Us. They’re my chums.

Fortunately, all of my videos of recent vintage are posted at my Bitchute channel. Please subscribe there.

Executive Summary

For the fourth year in a row, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), a nonprofit organization committed to defending and sustaining the individual rights of all Americans to free speech and free thought, and College Pulse surveyed college undergraduates about their perceptions and experiences regarding free speech on their campuses.

This year’s survey includes 55,102 student respondents from 254 colleges and universities. Students who were enrolled in four-year degree programs were surveyed via the College Pulse mobile app and web portal from January 13 to June 30, 2023. 

The College Free Speech Rankings are available online and are presented in an interactive dashboard (rankings.thefire.org) that allows for easy comparison between institutions. 

Key findings:

Michigan Technological University is the top-ranked school in the 2024 College Free Speech Rankings. Auburn University, the University of New Hampshire, Oregon State University, and Florida State University round out the top five.

Harvard University obtained the lowest score possible, 0.00, and is the only school with an “Abysmal” speech climate rating. The University of Pennsylvania, the University of South Carolina, Georgetown University, and Fordham University also ranked in the bottom five. 

The key factors differentiating high-performing schools (the top five) from poorly performing ones (the bottom five) are scores on the components of “Tolerance Difference” and “Disruptive Conduct.” Students from schools in the bottom five were more biased toward allowing controversial liberal speakers on campus over conservative ones and were more accepting of students using disruptive and violent forms of protest to stop a campus speech. 

Deplatforming attempts that occurred at schools ranked in the bottom five had an alarming 81% success rate.

More than half of students (56%) expressed worry about damaging their reputation because of someone misunderstanding what they have said or done, and just over a quarter of students (26%) reported that they feel pressure to avoid discussing controversial topics in their classes. Twenty percent reported that they often self-censor.

When provided with a definition of self-censorship, at least a quarter of students said they self-censor “fairly often” or “very often” during conversations with other students, with professors, and during classroom discussions, respectively (25%, 27%, and 28%, respectively). A quarter of students also said that they are more likely to self-censor on campus now — at the time they were surveyed — than they were when they first started college.

Almost half of the students surveyed (49%) said that abortion is a difficult topic to have an open and honest conversation about on campus. A notable portion of students also identified gun control, racial inequality, and transgender rights, respectively, as topics difficult to discuss (43%, 42%, and 42%, respectively).

Student opposition to allowing controversial conservative speakers on campus ranged from 57% to 72%, depending on the speaker. In contrast, student opposition to controversial liberal speakers ranged from 29% to 43%, depending on the speaker.

More than 2 in 5 students (45%) said that students blocking other students from attending a speech is acceptable to some degree, up from 37% last year. And more than a quarter of students (27%) said that using violence to stop a campus speech is acceptable to some degree, up from 20% last year. 

You: I don’t think you should be kicked in the balls