#creationism

The Anthropic Principle:

When I searched for "evidence against creationism," let's just say the results were disappointing. Here's a list of the first fifteen videos that came up:

What’s the evidence for a 6,000 year old Earth? (pro-creationism)

The Definitive Guide to Debunking Creationists Part 1: Cosmology/Planetary Science (anti-creationism)

Shortest Scientist vs Creationist debate ever. (stance unclear)

"Creation Scientist Shocks Joe Rogan with Mind-Blowing Evidence Against Evolution!" (presented as pro-creationism)

Why Evolution Is FALSE (pro-creationism)

SIX Biological Evidences for Creation - Pt.1 (pro-creationism)

Richard Dawkins: One Fact to Refute Creationism (anti-creationism)

Creationist Stumps Evolutionary Professors with ONE Question! (pro-creationism)

7 Scientific Reasons why Darwinian Evolution is a Myth (pro-creationism)

Oxford Mathematician DESTROYS Atheism In Less Than 15 Minutes (BRILLIANT!) (clickbait title, video is of a theistic scientist talking about his beliefs)

6 Reasons Not to Believe in Evolution | Proof for God

How old is the Earth --- 6,000 years or 4.5 billion? (anti-young earth creationism, though the creator claims Egyptian mummies are 200,000 years old, so...)

Evolutionary Biologist Reacts to Young Earth Creationist Arguments (anti-creationism)

This Is the Absolute BEST Evidence for Biblical Creation | Ken Ham (pro-creationism)

We Challenge All Evolutionists to Watch This Video! (pro-creationism)

So out of the first fifteen results for "evidence against creationism," only two of them have any actual relevance. Nine of the videos are straight up antiscience propaganda pushing young earth creationist pseudoscience.

The trend continued to hold after this, with some relevant videos here and there but most of the content promoting young earth creationism.

This is bad. Very bad. The purpose of young earth creationism is to turn people into Christofascists and to deny the reality of anthropogenic climate change.

So what do we do?

We make noise.

These are all verified in recent scientific papers:

Adam and Eve are the progenitors of all humans alive today.

No buried fossil with aDNA can be 10's of millions of years old.

Flood palo-hydrology is geologic fact, Noah's flood was real.

the Universe is not growing or expanding, God finished that work on day 6.

Evolution is human imagination, proof is in the Genomes.

Atheists often argue for evolution, and creationists argue for the Bible —but the difference between them isn’t just about belief, it’s about storytelling. Evolution talks about humanity like an observer behind glass: “Our ancestors did this, our species evolved that way, we learned to survive.” It’s distant, almost clinical. It explains the mechanics of life, but not the heart of it.

The Bible, though — it breathes. It speaks like someone who knows us. It doesn’t just say, “Humans form social bonds.” It shows us Jesus wept. It tells of love, betrayal, redemption—how individual choices ripple out and affect others. It’s not a data set. It’s a living story.

Even when science tries to trace back our behavior — like saying yawning helps us bond or that males evolved to compete for mates—it still feels hollow. There’s no “true story” there, just a collection of detached facts about what we do, not who we are. “Survival of the fittest” might explain violence, but it can’t explain mercy. It can’t explain why we cry for others or why sacrifice moves us so deeply.

And when people try to apply those biological “truths” to morality — like claiming that men are naturally stronger, therefore women should submit — it warps everything further. That’s not divine design; that’s sin twisting what God made good. The curse in Genesis wasn’t permission for domination — it was a warning about brokenness. Yet so many have mistaken one for the other.

Evolution describes life as a loop: live, reproduce, die, repeat. The Bible describes life as a journey: fall, struggle, redeem, worship, hope. One tells of instincts; the other tells of souls.

We’ve lost sight of meaning because we’ve traded revelation for observation. We’re trying to understand sin through mud-streaked lenses — studying the dirt and calling it the whole story. But Scripture lifts our chin higher. Beneath even the long lists of names and “begots,” there’s heartache, devotion, and the relentless hand of God weaving redemption through it all.