hi, i'm berry/k-angel, the co-host of the sadissystem ! i'll likely be the only alter posting here, so keep in mind the rest of my system has separate accounts
i wish to be a source of love, comfort, and happiness to every being ! everyone deserves to be loved and safe, and it pains my heart that there are so many people suffering . i am always open to making friends or just being a person to talk to !
tag guide below
#โ. ๐ หmeow meowโน เฃช ห - random posts
#โ. ๐ หfruit splatterโน เฃช ห - art
#โ. ๐ หsad strawberryโน เฃช ห - venting
#โ. ๐ หcutie marksโน เฃช ห - self-harm
#โ. ๐ หlets justr say my peanitsโน เฃช ห - horny-posting
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
โ Live Streamingโ Interactive Chatโ Private Showsโ HD Qualityโ Free Actions
Free to watch โข No registration required โข HD streaming
What's your opinion on someone being pro - contact/leaning towards being pro-c?
I have a somewhat complicated opinion on being pro contact.
First I would like to say, I think that pro-c folks are 100% a part of the radqueer community, and if you participate in harassing pro-c radqueers, you are not radqueer.
I think contact stances are inherently flawed. I label myself complex contact, because my opinions are complex. And stances like anti, neutral, and pro contact do not describe my opinions.
The idea that someone could possibly fit into the categories of strictly anti or strictly pro contact is insane. For example, most people who say they are anti-c are only talking specifically about paraphilias that cannot be consensual, not paraphilias like objectum or other "non harmful" paraphilias. And people who are pro-c, usually are also explicitly pro-consent, so therefore are most likely anti-c for a specific set of paraphilias that cannot be consensual.
I will state now, that I do not in any way support xenosatanism. But being pro-c is not the same as being a XS (I have seen people get them confused...)
I also do not like the term "harmful paraphilia" because no paraphilia is inherently harmful, most people who use that term mean harmful contact (aka: paraphilias that cannot be acted upon in a non-harmful way.)
TL;DR I support all contact stances, as long as you are anti abuse, and strictly pro consent.
im unsure about this. is just ramblings and unformed opinions, but here
due to the legally and societally created power disparities between the classes of child and adult, children can't consent. it shall be considered false/invalid consent due to reasonable assumption of implicit coersion
this is not an inherent quality of children, but a product of the conditions they exist under
this also seems adjacent to theory about power disparities with proletariat/bourgeoisie probably
whtv seems reasonable. gon think about it more. im such a smart puppy
I like to view myself as someone who a strong sense of morality. Someone who is repulsed by anything slightly abnormal. Naturally, this would lead me to hate you, as you're a messed up person.
But I can't deny that I find the ideas your posts bring to mind is appealing. To be entirely reliant on someone who has full control over me, to be harmed over and over, I find it... oddly comforting in a way too.
You give me a lot to think about -๐ฟ
i always have the urge to tease the hell out of those who are disgusted by me yet still find some sort of sick pleasure in my content , but this is incredibly genuine , so i will hold back for just a bit. iโll get you next ask , ๐ฟ anon . . <3
let me offer another perspective ; taking time to understand these abnormal sides of humanity instead of instantly hating them will give you a stronger sense of morality . a person acting on their first instinct of repulsion will never be as morally correct as a person who is acting on logic , even if they both come to the same conclusion . the first person will often end up being morally inconsistent , as theyโll be morally against the things theyโre repulsed by and morally accepting of the things that donโt personally bother them , even if both things are on the same level of harmless or harmful .
this is especially problematic when you imagine the other side . iโm the opposite of repulsed by many harmful paraphilias , would it be morally acceptable for me to ignore consent and do whatever i want regarding them ? of course not . as a hardcore clinical sadist it scares ME when peopleโs reason for not doing something is that itโs โ disgusting โ . . because ironically , thatโs an admission that , if you were me , you would be an offender .
i consider myself a person with a strong sense of morality because i consider morals before my initial reaction , and morals before my own pleasure . i only pursue my harmful paraphilias within fiction , role - play , or consensual contact , if applicable . i donโt harass people for their thoughts , urges , desires , and identities , even if they personally make me uncomfortable ; i judge purely based on their actions and the harm they cause . i judge how important they view consent when pursuing their pleasures . at the very least , iโm morally consistent .
anyways , i promise youโre not a bad person for finding pleasure and even comfort in that fantasy . conabuse fantasies and relationships can be especially comforting to those who are used to non - consensual abusive relationships . our brains are complicated , liking something in certain contexts doesnโt mean condoning it in general .
ok i have never talked about discourse on this account back to my normal self uhm . antis are soooo hot they turn me on . ooo donโt you want to stick around my blog and let me corrupt you into the perfect victim for my sick fantasies ooo ( teasing )
( seriously , send another ask if you want less serious and more sadism . just wanted to be real for a second )
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
โ Live Streamingโ Interactive Chatโ Private Showsโ HD Qualityโ Free Actions
Free to watch โข No registration required โข HD streaming
If so how do you feel about like. Contact stances n such
My beliefs align best with the redefined terms of xenosatanism updated in 2024 (linked here.)
Iโm complex-c in the way that I would be pro-c in an ideal worldโ I do not support abusing children or animals in this worldwide society where children are unaware and uninformed; and where people are against and uninformed about animal liberation. I will not touch, and therefore harm, any child or an animal because of this.
So yesโ I lean mostly towards pro-c; but Iโm comp-c. I think all contact stances are valid and I follow the core belief of being radqueerโ anti-harassment.
I have a post defining my stance a little further from a while ago. I wonโt fuck you up unless and until you unconsentualy abuse me, or mineโ thatโs my harassment stance. If you DO: I will kill you. And thatโs not just an empty threat.
hi. im fish/anchor (or other nautical names). it/vir/he and any nautical etc themed neos.
transDID (transitioned) transpolyfrag. will mostly use this acct to blog about our transition goals (for polyfrag, since we're pretty much 'done' with DID)
radqueer transID para. comp leaning pro c. discord is i.am.just.a.fish feel free to send frqs, just mention you found us on tumblr (in DMs or smth).
i identify as comp-c for two reasons: i have different contact stances for different paraphilias, and i give more nuance to each than just "good" or "bad".
it means something different for everyone, but that's my short reasoning. more in-depth explanation under the cut.
chronophilias
chronophilias include any paraphilia that has to do with age, including infanto-, nepio-, pedo-, hebe-, ephebo-, teleio-, meso-, and gerantophilia. for chronophilias specifically, i think we should undermine chronological age and think solely on brain development. obviously, if a being's brain hasn't developed to the point that they can make a decision about consent, they should not be involved in any sexual or romantic activity. despite this, i wouldn't say "children can't consent," given there are plenty of chronological adults with fully developed brains that identify as children and have no problem with giving or denying consent. for this reason, i think the age of consent should be abolished, since there will always be a permainfant somewhere with a fully developed brain and they should not be denied romantic connection or physical pleasure due to their transage identity. we should always focus more on whether or not a being has the developmental capabilities to consent rather than an imaginary number, which i think is different for every being. at least in my opinion, some beings will be able to consent once they are chronologically teenagers, while some might not be able to until they are well past chrono20. it also depends on what their body can handle. for example, chronoteens have much smaller bodies compared to chronoadults, so even if both parties are able to give consent, there's still safety measures to make sure the smaller being isn't harmed.
there's also the question of whether or not romantic map4aam relationships can be consensual, which i also believe is up to brain development. obviously, even in the case of a mature minor, there will always be an imbalanced power dynamic between a chronominor and chronoadult. because of this, i think it's very important for map4aam relationships to be clear-cut with well-discussed boundaries, guidelines, and safety precautions. within today's society, i absolutely would not encourage chronominors and chronoadults to have any kind of romantic or sexual relationship, but i think if the future truly is radqueer and we add youth liberation to go along with it, it could be just fine with proper safety.
zoophilia
like i said with transage beings and chronophilias, there are bodily humans that identify as animals. that being said, obviously humans and transdogs can have a consensual relationship, but what about bodily humans and bodily animals? in my opinion, it is harder to get an animal's consent since they cannot verbally give it, but there's still signs that an animal consents. for example, at least for sex, if you stick your pelvis in the air and an animal willingly humps you, it is obviously consensual. if an animal comes to you first, like a dog humping your leg, it is obviously consensual. however, even if the animal does give consent, if they try to get away or express pain of any kind, it is your responsibility to immediately move away. you can tell if an animal consents, and you can tell if an animal withdrawals said consent. if your partner expresses pain or the want to get away, you get off. and, like i said with chronominors, some animals will be harmed by penetration, so it is extremely important to research your partner's species and what could harm them beforehand. if you do intend on having sexual relations with an animal, always prioritize the animal's consent and safety.
for romantic zoophilic contact, it's the same for me as asking an animal for permission to pet them. reach your hand out, and if they comes to you, pet them. if you want a kiss, don't just press your lips against them, put your face by them and wait for them to come to you.
necrophilia
this one is simpler, in my opinion. if a being consented to you having sex/a relationship with their corpse before they died, it is okay. if they did not give explicit consent, it is not okay. there's also the case of transdead beings, in which they can just give or deny consent.
consang
i honestly see nothing wrong with sexual/romantic relationships between family members, as long as everyone involved has the brain development to be able to consent. though, i wouldn't encourage reproducing.
i still think everyone has the right to their own bodies, so if a consanguinamorous couple wants to have a baby, i think they should be allowed to, even if i'm personally against it. saying they should absolutely be forbidden from procreation is eugenics.
biastophilia
genuine rape is immediately a no. i do not support ANYTHING non-consensual. however, for roleplay like cnc or non-con in fiction, i think it's perfectly okay to indulge, as long as there is no genuine sexual assault.
if there's a different paraphilia anyone would like me to cover my contact stance on, feel free to ask. i enjoy ranting like this.
