
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Japan
seen from China

seen from Russia
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Pakistan
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
so ticked off when I hear "the youth is too leftist" or "young people are radicalized". bitch if we were, we'd be seizing the means of production. i personally think we aren't left and radical enough
More proof they don't actually give a fuck about children, women, and working families as they claim:
ÂżDo you think Sirius and James felt entitled to bully Snape because he was an easy target, being half-blood and poor, while they belonged to pure-blood families?
Yes, and Iâve talked about this many times before too. Sirius and James werenât just from a higher social class, they were at the very top of the privilege pyramid within Hogwarts: both wealthy, from prominent families, both pure-bloods. Thereâs an entire social web at play that meant not only did they feel entitled to bully a boy below them both economically and socially, but they also knew â whether consciously or not â that their actions would have no consequences.
And Iâm not just referring to the fact that, if they were at risk of being expelled, their families could step in and exert pressure. Iâm talking about the economic security they had. If they had been expelled, it wouldnât have mattered: they had money, they came from affluent backgrounds, they werenât going to end up on the streets, they werenât going to lose everything. If Severus had been expelled, he wouldâve had to go back to a slum in a deprived area, with an abusive father, in an environment where he couldnât even afford proper clothes. Going home wasnât an option for him, going home meant losing any chance, no matter how small, of doing something with his life.
Sirius and James didnât have to worry about that. They had options. So of course, it was much easier to go after the boy who not only already came from a disadvantaged situation â and was therefore a more vulnerable target â but also couldnât defend himself with full force because doing so could get him expelled, and that was a risk he simply couldnât afford. That played a major role in the whole dynamic. Sirius and James were a pair of privileged, aristocratic brats, and their true colours showed when they found the perfect victim, someone they felt entitled to bully for his ideas or his friendships. But regardless of Severusâs views, the truth is that this was a situation involving two boys with power targeting a boy with no support. Thatâs not just abusive, itâs profoundly classist.
If James and Sirius had any real courage or genuine political ideals, they wouldâve gone after Mulciber, Avery, or Rosier, but those three werenât easy targets, and messing with them wouldnât have come cheap. So, well⌠better to go for the poor kid, right?
Defending that kind of behaviour is defending abuse of power, classism, and bullying based on social prejudice. And it absolutely disgusts me that there are still people out there trying to justify or sugarcoat the actions of James and Sirius â because they were vile.
Vivid fail.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
it annoys me how much of "x people of y time period did z" is just the way the RICH done this things, I wanna see the common people's way!
Opinions on the whole chav thing, like some people hate it and think its classist because it stands for council housed and violent, but I'd argue the opposite because going to a public British secondary school I was around tons of chavvy girls and idk about council housed because I didn't know much about their lives but they were DEFINITELY violent and not particularly clever either
Donât come at me with that classist nonsense. What youâre doing is taking a group that already has fewer resources and fewer opportunities, and then framing the effects of that as if they were inherent traits.
When you say theyâre âviolentâ or ânot particularly clever,â youâre ignoring the fact that those things are often linked to material conditions: underfunded schools, lack of support, fewer opportunities, social marginalisation. Itâs not that people âare like that,â itâs that theyâre dealing with a system that gives them less to begin with. Reducing that to personal failings is exactly how class prejudice sustains itself.
And âchavâ isnât neutral, itâs a label thatâs been used in the UK to mock and stigmatise working-class people. So your argument doesnât just describe, it reinforces a stereotype and keeps that stigma going, without actually engaging with the root of the problem.
Also, letâs be real: I went to a posh school and it was full of idiots too. The difference is they had money, tutors, extracurriculars -every possible advantage- and still managed to be thick. So maybe the issue isnât âwhat chavs are like,â but how quick you are to judge them for circumstances they didnât choose.
i think it's bizarre that people do not understand how class division/classism works within the england, and the uk as a whole.
the popularity of far-right and right-wing parties is fueled by the class division and billionaires claiming they work for the working people. the resurgence of racism, xenophobia, transphobia, homophobia, ableism etc. is also to do with classism. punching down because the government doesn't care about ANY of us and the ultra-rich use that to turn attention away from them: it's class division.
south london boroughs (think croydon, sutton) are considered 'shitholes' because they're full of the disadvantaged working class, where the crime rates are higher, the houses are cheaper, the council tax is higher because the problems that the working class face aren't solved by shelving it and avoiding the area, they're solved by investing time and energy into the problems in our communities (like kids being groomed into gangs because they don't have anyone to help them out of it, security chasing loiterersâkids!â out of shopping centres because all the youth centres have been underfunded for years). this happens all across the country, in major cities that get treated as dangerous shitholes because they are inhabited by the disadvantaged.
and not only that
our accents are so fucking intertwined with class, not only do they locate you on the island but they also tell others what class you are from. we see people switching between their normal accent and a more 'refined' posh accent because they get treated differently depending on which they use. i have about three different accents i use, my normal, slightly more refined, and then the toned down RP. all of which i will use in different situations and i have done so since i was very little. growing up on a council estate taught me that people treat you like shite on the bottom of their shoes if they even perceive you as council estate trash, but if you can mask that and sound less working class, they actually look at you with more respect. people on the streets, in schools, in the workplace, all fall into this trap. this class division is fucking everywhere.
when USamericans (in specific because i see this a lot) make fun of 'british accents', which are usually ones associated with the working class, they do so without the knowledge of how that exact thing has shaped our country. classism is rampant everywhere, but people tend to underestimate the amount that it has affected how our country works to this day.