Is the moment where a trained character not being able to control their āfight reflexesā or whatever ends up hurting an innocent bystander or loved one a real thing? Like somebody sneaks up on you from behind and you just elbow them in the groin or something? Or flip them over? Then youāre like, āOh shit babe, donāt scare me like thatā.
I did this to my now ex-boyfriend when I was fifteen and a freshman in high school. We were at my house, in my kitchen. He came up behind me with the plan to hug me (bear hug style) and, before his arms had even gotten around me, I elbowed him right in the gut. Full strength strike with a full extension and he walked right into it. The arm went out and came right back into his stomach, aimed at his diaphragm. He coughed, bowled over, and it took about five full minutes before he recovered.
After asking if he was okay, my exact response was: āYou canāt come up behind me like that.ā
The one aspect youāre missing in this whole scenario is you think this is a fear based response. It isnāt. I wasnāt scared, and neither are the characters youāre describing. Fight reflexes are hardwired responses to specific movements occurring within your environment, movement happening or beginning within your peripheral vision. I actually had the widest peripheral vision out of my entire science class when we measured in the eight grade due entirely to my martial arts training. The goal of this training is to see the movement coming before the motion begins. Youāre trained to see it before it starts and respond immediately. In a fight scenario you have tenths of a second between blocking a hit and getting struck. If you want to stop a blow, you need to go when they do and get there before they reach extension. You donāt wait, you just go.
The key to understanding what happened with my ex was the bear hug.Ā He was behind me, his arms were out and coming around my body. My training dictates a response before his arms get a chance to lock in, so my reflexes kicked in. There was no emotion involved, it happened because thatās what Iād spent ten years training my body to do. The training worked exactly as intended, the only difference was the person it happened to. What we got was a false flag, but in the same scenario where I was actually in danger Iād have responded the same way. Iād have started the fight with the would be attacker bowled over, unable to breathe, derailed by what happened, and at my mercy. The battle over before it had a chance to begin, which is what weāre training to do.
Starkeās had a few of them himself, but has been able to stop himself before following through. His friendās father, a Vietnam vet, once grabbed one of their mutual friends by the throat when he failed to announce himself before walking into the room. Starkeās friendās father was up out of his chair, turned around, and had his hand around his throat before he registered who he was looking at. According to Starke, he didnāt apologize.
This isnāt PTSD or mental illness. This is the training we were given working as intended. When youāre in a situation where you need to move without consciously ordering your body to do so, which is the beginning of most fights, your reflexes take over. The difference between victory and defeat lies in the first initial tenths of a second before the fight begins.
The only difference here is context. You go flashing your hand in the peripheral vision of someone with combat training and you may end up with a response you werenāt expecting, even when that person is someone you love and who loves you. (And you shouldnāt be flashing your hand in their peripheral vision if you love them.)
The fear response is going to come for your significant other. Thereās a vast gap between consciously knowing your loved one can hurt you and experiencing it first hand. My ex-boyfriend was a jock who played soccer. He used to overpowering other male teens if he got into a brawl. However he justified it to himself afterwards, he got wrecked by his 128 pound girlfriend without ever having the opportunity to defend himself and he had to live with the knowledge she could do it again if she wanted to. He didnāt look at me the same way after that. It is one thing to consciously understand, another to know they can hurt you, really hurt you in the blink of an eye, and another after to know they just might on accident. Your safety is gone, and you might experience the vertigo of being unable to exert control over your situation. There are plenty of real life relationships which end due to this problem.
If youāve never been thrown before, you might not understand how terrifying it is. If youāve never been thrown full force into a hardwood floor, you definitely arenāt going to grasp how much it hurts and how out of control you feel when youāre significant other is standing over you going, āoh, hey.ā
The response youāre going to get is not, āoh my god, what have I doneā either or intense remorse. Itās more āoopsā and ādonāt do that.ā We all knew exactly what we were doing when we did it, we just didnāt remember who we were doing it to. For the person without these trained reflexes, this response can seem cold and unfeeling. Like their significant other doesnāt care they just hurt them. From the combat SOās perspective, their significant other did something incredibly stupid and theyād rather they didnāt do it again. They worked very hard to develop these reflexes and incorporate them into part of their identity. There is no switch to turn them on or off. Theyāre always on.
Now, these ingrained fight responses are avoidable if you recognize that theyāre there, they will happen, and you take steps to avoid triggering them. This can be as simple as āplease say something before you walk into the roomā or ālet me know youāre there before you tap me on the shoulderā or ātap me on the waist insteadā and ādonāt hug me from behind.ā The more serious the personās experiences, the more necessary this becomes. The reflex can be consciously restrained, but it takes genuine effort to cut yourself off at the pass before you follow through. Thereās mental pain involved, and you spend a great deal of time after the fact fighting the ingrained reaction off.
This is part of why itās easier for two people with combat training to date each other than date someone without combat training. Their SO is aware of the situation, shares it, understands their limitations, and will work to circumnavigate without needing to talk about it.
Starke and I do this with each other, and we havenāt ever had a problem.
Media will often play this trope for laughs, which is a problem. Or roll these fight reactions into PTSD or mental illness, which is also a problem. Or theyāll have the combat SO be disingenuous in their reactions like you were suggesting to show how dangerous they are.
The mixed up part of this conversation thatās difficult for non-martial artists or combat veterans to understand is itās much easier for you to avoid tapping me on the shoulder than it is for me to avoid throwing you if you try tapping me on the shoulder when a hand moving in that specific way within my peripheral vision is a motion Iāve spent ten years re-training my response to.
If you care about your SO, you shouldnāt ask them to fight themselves in order to be around you.
Remember, the non-combat SO initiated the situation. They acted first. They violated their SOās boundaries. The only difference here between a combat and a non-combat SO is the ability to preemptively physically stop someone from violating their boundaries without requiring a verbal response. The combat SO wouldnāt have responded the way they did if the other person hadnāt initiated. If you are in a relationship with someone, you need to respect their boundaries and what they are comfortable with.
If your SO is someone whoās ingrained response is to throw someone when they sneak up behind them, then you should not only know not to sneak up on them but have enough empathy to understand this action is a violation of their personal space. This is also a violation of the trust their combat SO places in them. The non-combat SO is not the victim of their partnerās uncontrolled violence or experienced an intentional desire to do them harm. They acted first. They shouldnāt treat their combat SOās combat reflexes like a light switch where exceptions can be made. In this situation, the non-combat SO is actually the one not respecting their partner and in the wrong.
The moral of this story is that when I was fifteen my then boyfriend violated my physical boundaries, did not let me know his intentions before acting, did not ask if his action was okay with me, and took an elbow to the gut for his trouble. I didnāt feel remorse at the time for knocking the wind out of him, I still donāt now. Ultimately, the response stuck with me. The action convinced fifteen year old me that maybe I didnāt want him touching me after all, which is what led to our break up. And, in the end, I was the one who broke up with him.
That said, in my whole life, Iāve only ever experienced my combat reflexes getting triggered in a way where the response was immediate three times.
People arenāt props. The main issue with this trope in fiction where the set up is supposed to lead to intense remorse from the combat SO which results in a cute scenario after is that the non-combat SO violated their SOās boundaries. They donāt really care about them, or not enough to respect the other personās experiences. If they repeat, they definitely donāt.
If your knee-jerk response is ābut I shouldnāt have to change my behaviorā then you shouldnāt date them, period. If theyāre out there intentionally hurting you thatās different, you should run away fast. However, everyone has their boundaries. Learn to respect them before intentionally triggering someone with combat training.
This blog is supported through Patreon. If you enjoy our content, please consider becoming aĀ Patron.Ā Every contribution helps keep us online, and writing. If you already are a Patron, thank you.
Q&A: Wired Reflexes was originally published on How to Fight Write.