#(accusatory)

I knew it!

Self-righteous, accusatory, virtue signaling people and media are a contemporary version of Frollo from The Hunchback of Notre Dame. 

Like Frollo who hides his sins in the name of God, many of these “woke” people hide behind the “common good” or take religion in vain. By masking their true reasons, they think it absolves them of their guilt or it somehow proves their point. In reality, it comes off as sanctimonious and dishonest, especially since they don’t actually believe in the common good or God. 

Additionally, entitlement, lack of self-awareness, and pride obscure their reasoning. This results in a mentality where the end goal justifies the means, no matter the cost. "Woke” people often claim to be part of a virtuous movement or group but they abuse this affiliation or power purely for self-interests, similar to Frollo who was part of the church. And whatever they claim to be against, whether racism or inequality, they often use to carry out their preconceived prejudices for their own goals, becoming hypocrites.

Lastly, the destruction aspect - nearly all “woke” people will destroy lives and property if they don’t get their way just as Frollo torched houses and part of Paris. Some on-line methods include doxxing, trolling, and harassment in order to validate their point. In-person methods include rioting, arson, vandalism, and murder. By committing these acts of violence, they invalidate their point completely and lessen the strength of their supposed cause. 

Hellfire (Modernized):

Beata Politic You know I am a righteous one Of my group think I am justly proud

Beata Politic You know I'm more committed than The common, vulgar, weak, intolerants

Then tell me, Politic Why I see their reasons there Why their smold'ring thoughts still scorch my soul

I feel them, I see them The sun shines on their own free will Is blazing in me out of all control

Like fire Hellfire This envy in my skin This burning Desire Is turning me to sin

It's all their fault I'm not to blame It is the free thinkers My foes who sent this flame It's not my fault If in God's plan He made rationale much Stronger than placemen

Protect me, Politic Don't let liberty cast her spell Don't let her ideas sear my flesh and bone Destroy Individuals And let them taste the fires of Hell! Or else let it be mine and mine alone

So, by this point, most people have heard of the accusations against “Jack” from an unnamed show by the woman Ayissha Morgan. There is also an accusation against a woman called “Carol,” which is mentioned in Ayissha’s videos.

These are my thoughts on the videos. Beware if differing opinions offend you, or if you could be triggered by mentions of (sexual) assault.

I will also be using “Jack” and “John’s” real names, because, let’s be real, we know who she’s accusing.

1. I find it quite weird how long Ayissha talks about being financially secure. I get saying you’re looking good money wise, because these videos can definitely bring in some money, but a sentence or two would suffice. To me, she goes on just a bit too long.

2. The behavior described is implied to have been happening for a while. The cast had said that Nev excessively flirting happens frequently. It allegedly got so bad with Ayissha that Max stepped in and told him to back off. Why would not one guest or crew member try to catch this behavior on camera? Of course, just flirting and being an asshole isn’t a crime, but it’s still proof that Nev isn’t a saint.

3. Why in Hell would you continue choosing to hang out with a person who is essentially harassing you? If you’re filming, you don’t have too much of a choice, but why go back to his room, have him in yours, or go to a bar with a crew that isn’t helping you? I don’t understand that.

4. Nev blowing up her phone with notifications. If people aren’t supposed to know someone is on the show while you’re filming, why would you potentially out them? I heard somewhere Nev used a “private” account to do this, but even that would bring attention to Ayissha’s accounts. It would make people ask questions, and put her in a tough spot. Why do that?

5. Not showing the “receipts,” and possible contradictions. She mentions taking screenshots of the activity one her social media accounts, but then she doesn’t show it. Even if Nev did indeed use a “private account,” wouldn’t that evidence be better than no evidence? And how would this work with her phone being “broken?” She says the WiFi isn’t the best (or something along those lines) and that she had to download an app, but then how did she know her social media was blowing up? This could, of course, just be a misunderstanding, but she could have clarified a little better if that is the case.

6. Nev is the “poster boy” when it’s actually “Carol” that harmed her. What she’s saying Nev did is definitely gross, but it’s “Carol” who potentially sexually assaulted her. (Paraphrasing here, but, “When I came to, she was on top of me.” And then refusing to go into more detail because she wasn’t ready to talk about it.) Why put Nev in the limelight if it’s someone else who really hurt you? Maybe for the clicks?

7. “500 likes for part 2.” Need I say more?

8. Nev’s behavior changes in the story. He goes from explicitly saying he has a huge dick, then asking her on a passed slip of paper if she finds him attractive? This is me being picky, but that’s such an abrupt change.

I’m sure there’s more, but these are some of the biggest things that I find sketchy about this story. Of course, we don’t know the truth right now. These are allegations, and Nev has denied them. That’s all we have so far.

If he is guilty, then he needs to face some kind of punishment. If she is lying, she needs to face some kind of punishment. And if “Carol” did what was alleged, she needs to face some kind of punishment.