thank god they built a safe environment for the girls 🙏🏼
we're not kids anymore.


Kiana Khansmith

#extradirty
h

Andulka
Mike Driver

roma★

taylor price
Show & Tell

shark vs the universe
Monterey Bay Aquarium

PR's Tumblrdome

★

Origami Around
sheepfilms
Misplaced Lens Cap

Product Placement
seen from Germany

seen from Egypt
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from France

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Russia
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
@stelamaris
thank god they built a safe environment for the girls 🙏🏼

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
reminder to visit museums, even if you feel out of place. you feel out of place because there is an established concept of inaccessibility of "high culture" to the masses, purposefully developed to distinguish between social classes.
take up space, read the plaques, get the audioguides. you are just as entitled and right in being there. visit museums, boycott museums, be expressive about your opinions about museums.
a lot of museums are free, or discounted for youth and students. take advantage of that. check your local art museum. check your local history museum. museums are there for you, they are there to educate the public, not to distinguish between class. it isn't a private collection, it's a public exhibit.
GO TO MUSEUMS!!!!!!!
To ALL who own an Android phone, LISTEN UP!
Again, normally I wouldn't post anything and this isn't anything KOSA, AB 1043, AB 1709 related. But I think this is just as important for internet freedom. As of September 2026, all app developers must be registered by verified developers in order for apps to be installed on certified Android devices.
This means that if you want to install an app that isn't from the play store, you cannot unless the developer has verified through googles program. Not only does it effect consumers choice, it also effects app developers who focus on open source or community based software on android.
Now you can say that you can switch to apple and use their app store, but it will be a little more restrictive on which apps you can download (I assume, never used an Iphone). Plus, don't forget they have implemented age verification on their app store which is a huge problem in itself. Want to download an app from github, can't its not verified. Want to download a apk file, can't its not verified. You cannot download in android anything unless it approved by google!!!
Another issue for this is that android app developers have to follow these steps just to develop apps.
Not only will it drive developers to not create apps, developers overall will just give up, leaving users with less options for apps that fit their needs. Android whole deal is that its open and free for users, a distinction on the ios, now you're saying its not. This is just anticompetitive behavior. Yet again google enshittifying things and deciding what you do.
If you want any more information on this, heres a website on the situation, as well as what to do if you're a app developer and android user.
Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.
As of reading this, google has not backed down on its Android Developer Verification Program, still stating its stance on its description. Also please sign this petition. We have limited before this is implemented, fight back and don't give into google.
Stop Google from limiting APK file usage
The thing that’s always missing from the “women didn’t fight for the right to work they were already working they fought to get paid” is that many women also very much wanted to work.
Women wanted to be lawyers and engineers and chemists. They wanted to use their brains in challenging and interesting ways. They wanted to get the satisfaction from solving problems and inventing new shit and getting attention for it.
I know not everyone is born with intellectual curiosity or drive or determination but some people are and many of those people are women.
I’m gonna be so honest I do think it’s possible that even black women and poor white women had dreams and intellectual prowess and fight tooth and nail for the right to do meaningful work.
Like I don’t think the black women who worked as computers at NASA were only doing it for the paycheck, you know? I don’t think that curiosity or ambition are something that gets passed down along with wealth and a title.
Weirdly racist and classist to think only rich white women wanted to be educated!
This website loves the concept of universal basic income and argues that even if everyone got a living wage, we’d still have doctors and scientists and engineers and preschool teachers because people love the work itself, right?
Do women count as people in this equation. Did women count as people back in the 1800s?
There are 101 posts about women already working, they just wanted to get paid. Let’s say they were all given equal pay, would we currently live in a world with no female doctors or lawyers? I don’t think so.
The number of us in academia, a field which currently pays terribly and has shit job security, would suggest there are some people (and more women than men) who do this for love of the game more than paycheck.
Also, there are women who are bad at and can’t stand domestic work and wouldn’t do it even for pay. I know tumblr has convinced themselves that women who genuinely don’t enjoy anything “feminine” are privileged, but I would bet the whole fact that people with money pay others to do things like clean for them would suggest that in fact a lot of people despise these tasks and not all of those people are men.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
at least can all we agree that the original gay flag with the magic and sex colours is BEAUTIFUL and it should make a comeback
what’s more iconic than this
What about the final version of the flag by the original creator?
Gilbert Baker added a 9th stripe shortly before his death, with the new stripe representing diversity. He added this stripe in reaction to the 2016 US election. It’s unfortunately not as well known as the 8 and 6 striped versions.
Here’s an image of him sewing together the 9 striped rainbow flag.
Happy pride month everyone
Thats the context for this meme???
I feel like I've been robbed the whole time. This is magical.
I'm dying
are you elf pretty, dwarf pretty, or hobbit pretty
I'm Gollum
Shut Up, I Don’t Care
I think that Xena, for all of its ridiculousness and cheesiness, did a better job of conveying the allure of evil than just about any other series I've ever seen. Like it understands that violence, no matter how justifiably it starts out, is addictive, and that hatred poisons you until you can't feel real joy anymore, and it's strange to me that I've never seen it laid out so simply elsewhere.
...so THAT'S what sleeper cell activation feels like. Because yes, YES, LET'S TALK ABOUT THIS, because Xena is such an interesting lightning-in-a-bottle-case study! While I would never discount the work done by the writers, Xena as a show is almost perfectly positioned both historically and structurally to consistently explore that theme.
The first puzzle piece is that Xena was a syndicated show at the tail end of syndication's total dominance of a distribution model. For those too young to remember a time when ongoing plots and prestige dramas weren't the norm, syndication is big part of why older television shows almost entirely kept plots contained to one or two episodes rather than having them span seasons. See, when a show is syndicated, it is licensed out to individual television stations/affiliates to be aired as reruns. The individual station chooses when to air them and in what order, and whether to just skip episodes they don't like in favor of the ones most likely to draw eyeballs, etc etc. The more a show is licensed, the more money you make on it, so there is an incentive to make each episode standalone to make them appealing to each station by enabling them to toss on whatever episodes they like without it being a problem for the casual viewer. Also, before streaming, easy access to dvds and episode recording, and the like, a show could not assume that even its fans would have necessarily have seen every episode. "Catching up" was not an easy thing, and reserved for the most dedicated, doing shit like physically mailing bootleg tapes! Therefore, shows needed to have a consistent formula that didn't lock out the person who couldn't watch last week for whatever reason. Characters remained within more of a status quo. Xena is a "monster of the week" style show, like X-Files. I mention X-Files intentionally, because it was one of the first to really break that no-ongoing-plots structure, and that shift affected its contemporaries, like Xena, who also started to follow suit.
That alone doesn't account for Xena being so primed to explore those themes, of course. Even staying within the same fictional universe, Hercules (which Xena is a spin-off of) and Young Hercules don't even come close to Xena's complexity on the subject. But that's because Xena's premise is perfectly positioned to interact with those practical constraints for this outcome in a way those shows aren't. The status quo that syndication demands remain mostly in intact is that 1) Xena was evil and really good at it, 2) she is trying to do good in the world now as penance but can never undo what she has done. Every episode is about Xena trying to save people while dealing with the consequences of her actions as a warlord. The fact that she was evil cannot be changed or diluted nor can the fact that she must continue trying to redeem herself, otherwise the show is over or is unrecognizable to the casual viewer. But this is also an action show, sometimes cartoonishly so, so she must also be fighting consistently! The core spectacle is violence and the core story is why violence is often evil. There is an inherent tension there that the writers either needed to interrogate earnestly or ignore, and they chose the honest, interesting route. They gave Xena a costar who is innocent and principled but loves Xena, and had her always asking why and trying to understand how Xena could be that person, while being put under similar pressures herself. They had Xena continue to use the tools she has, including violence, for good ends, and wrestled with the answers as to why that was ok, why the violence she did then and the violence she did now were different—and sometimes decided they weren't. They showed Xena struggling with falling back into those old habits because they are seductive and easy.
If someone asked "are there so many episodes of Xena where you find out someone tried to get her to change her ways many years ago and failed because that is a really great standalone premise, or because violence as a tool and power and vengeance as motivators are corruptive and hard to stop using once you start," the answer is yes. The show is cyclical because violence is. But also because it is syndicated.
It's fucking rad and interesting.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
https://www.change.org/p/make-menstrual-language-inclusive-for-all-menstruators
Jesus Christ 🤦♀️🤦♀️
i can't believe she's indian and THIS is what she focuses on when there are over 98,000 schools in the country without a functioning girls toilet. or how only 13% of indian girls were aware about what menstruation is before they got their period. (it's a study from 2011 & i can't find a recent one but it definitely did not reach 100% by now.)
Ryan Gosling’s career has just been one long quest to climb the Warner Bros water tower
that man has been trying to climb this tower since he was 16. he has asked multiple times, and every time they said no, but now he’s famous enough & variety was able to convince them to do a shoot on the tower. it all led here. it was all for this.
I’m obsessed with the implication that this was a coming-of-age ritual where a boy becomes a man, like a bar mitzvah
Bad day to be a fan of Doctor Who but great day to be a fan of Steven Moffat aka the only one who seems to making it out of this show with a good reputation: vindication for ME.
David Shrigley (British, 1968) - I've Never Seen You (2020)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
mutual 1: end-of-the-rope suicideposting
mutual 2: the new dandys world event is mid as fuck
mutual 3: liveblogging a foursome
mutual 4: on lunch break
mutual 5: went missing 2 years ago
when i was a kid i was so mad all the time bc i thought someday i'd have to be somebody's wife i didn't know it was optional. is everybody reminding the young girls in their lives that it's optional.
AND SO IS BEING SOMEBODY'S MOTHER‼️
it is about being a woman. hope that helps!
reading comprehension questions for the notes:
is wanting to be a wife and mother a requirement for being a woman?
why might OP be annoyed with replies assuming that this post is about being aroace or transmasc if a woman doesn’t want to be a wife or mother?
are there reasons unrelated to sexuality and romantic interest that might make a woman not want to be a wife or mother?
are there reasons unrelated to gender identity and expression that might make a woman not want to be a wife and mother?
core concept: what is gender essentialism?
is it gender essentialism to imply that all women inherently want to be wives and mothers? could this be what OP is critiquing?
look at the notes OP responds to. is it gender essentialism to imply that being a wife and mother is so affixed to womanhood that to not want to be those things means you’re incapable of sexual/romantic feelings, or not a woman?
what trait are you perpetuating when you assume that women who do not want to be wives and mothers must be aroace or trans? is it gender essentialism?