Is it a separatist action to work for a man? No. But most of us don't have the option to make good money under a fully woman-owned/staffed company.

Is it a separatist action to spend spare energy to prioritize developing relationships and skills with your female coworkers over male ones? Yes, that's a good compromise. That's a degree of separatism that doesn't involve retreating from the benefits of current society.

Concerning boyfriends and husbands -

Men don't get into relationships with women for love but for real tangible benefits.

Even if you don't know what he gets out of you, he knows. If he wants something out of you he will try to force or coerce, or trick you into giving it to him. If he had no benefit from you he would dump you.

A woman who’s seemingly aware of the dangers men pose, of how violent and strong they are, of how much they lie and manipulate to get what they want, to have such a woman still think she’s special enough to pick well? It’s naive and arrogant all at once. It’s not mentally sound either. The man is the predator, the oppressor.

Most women who have been murdered by their male partners, whether it be romantic or solely sexual ones, also thought they picked well. They did not pick these men knowing or even imagining that their end would one day be at his hands.

An oppressor using the class placed under them in society will never be comparable to the seemingly aware oppressed person still refusing to part ways, as much what is in their control, with the person with power over them.

Saying all that and I hadn’t even gotten into the difference in female and male promiscuity. Women sleeping around is not and never will be the same as men doing so. Not only are you perceived much differently for doing so, the risks are also higher once again physically even if he is not turning violent one day. Some STDs hit women more severely and then there’s also the fact that pregnancy can potentially happen, unless the woman or man in question is sterile(though that still doesn’t remove all the previously mentioned risks).

I think women can do what they want, if they wanna make stupid choices, that’s on them. But it does make it basically impossible for me to feel bad because ‘misandrists’ are usually pretty well educated in statistics, general dangers and male depravity and to then still choose to put themselves at risk the way some of them do? Well..

The bodily fluids expelled during the orgasm are not special. They're just as toxic as all other forms of human waste, which is why sexuals need habitual testing, protection, and medication.

The problem is, sexual women want to play in sewage, but get offended when people think they're dirty and stinky.

And sure, people will judge a woman for being dirty, while exalting the man who soiled her. This is logically inconsistent.

But just because someone is being logically inconsistent doesn't mean everything they're saying is false. It just means they've yet to reconcile two contradictory ideas they hold.

(87dvhnk on Tumblr, deactivated)

─────────────

both men and women know "love" is not real but they keep playing pretend to feel better about themselves. all foids want is to feel "fuckable" enough and all moids want is to fuck. "desirability" or "fuckability" is very important for bihet foids, it's the reason why they spend most of their money and time on trying to make themselves look better and younger and judging other women's appearances (intra-sexual competition). moids spend time and money on whores, the more he is attracted to a whore the more money he spends on her and women know this. males only get offended at a woman who doesn't want to split the bill if he doesn't think she's "fuckable" enough, foids know this too and it's why they get offended when males don't spend their money on them

males complain about "gold diggers" because they can't afford them. foids complain about "beauty standards" because it's what's stopping them from being "spoiled". once a woman becomes "fuckable" she no longer cares if other women suffer, she doesn't even care if she herself suffers at the hands of a man, because she already "won" for being "desirable"/"fuckable" and that's enough for bihet foids

not sure if it's okay to send you this but i wanted to share my thoughts with a fellow minded woman. i don't know many blackpill accounts yet

anyway it's a bleak reality we live in

I agree with you. These women say so themselves. They want to feel desirable. It makes them feel "empowered" because they think being fuckable and desired makes them have power over men.

It seems like the ultimate goal for other sex attracted people is to find someone they want to fuck and have a relationship with. Sex is what a relationship is for, for them. Incels and these women are pathetic.

Love is not real, true. They conflate love with finding someone attractive.

It's bleak, but it's true.

Choice feminists are like "you can't ever criticize women because everything a woman does is feminist" and radical feminists are like "you can't ever criticize women because everything they do is actually a man's fault". Damn y'all both stupid as fuck thinking women are inherently innocent beings that can do no wrong.

Then I finally discover black pill feminism and actually find the truth that nobody wants to say, thank God. Too bad that there's practically barely any blackpill blogs on here, but it makes complete sense, almost nobody actually wants to know the truth so it's never popular.

That was me at 17. Staying in radfem circles for a while and the moment I started advocating for total separation from men, bioessentialism and antinatalism, which was THE LOGICAL conclusion to me, I was met with pushback and "misogyny" and "NLOG" accusations, no real arguments, no logic, just impotent vaginal seething. And the whores were also like "you can't be angry at your mom even if she abused you because she was a victim of le patriarchy too!" Everything is someone else's fault, it's never their fault.

libtards are like

>I have all the choices and bear no responsibility!

and radtards are like