didn’t want to derail from oomf’s awesome post, so i made a separate one— but (puts on nerd glasses) i really hate when people say the knives out franchise takes Too Many Shots at conservatives/that it’s Too Political and should Focus On The Murder. i don’t think a lot of people realise that 90% of golden-age murder mysteries are actually never about the murder.
the murder acts as a vessel by which to deliver some kind of political commentary or moral message to the audience— largely stuff like, “government corruption is bad”, “be nice to marginalised people”, “the legal system sucks”, and so on. for obvious reasons, a lot of these messages in the 18-1900s focused on classism, financial abuse, and corruption in high society— which is why we HAVE the modern murder-mystery stereotype of A Bunch Of Rich People In A Big Mansion House Killing For Money. even in terms of detectives, there has always been political commentary— poirot and marple specifically are always dismissed by others on account of them being foreign and old respectively, and holmes and watson meet in the first place because they’re both poor and the latter was WIA. this stuff gets played for laughs a lot in modern adaptations, but it’s actually a big part of their personalities and the stories the authors are trying to tell.
murder mysteries have ALWAYS reflected the modern political climate, because they have always had to answer the question “in this day and age, what would people kill for?”. some constants remain— money, love, etc.— but a lot of the environmental context changes with age. good modern mysteries recognise this; i’m sure the killers in the thursday murder club, for example, would not be given half as much mercy in the 1900s as they are by modern viewers— and yet in today’s world, where we can recognise their pain as something that exists within the context of modern society and its disregard towards the vulnerable, WE, the audience, feel that their actions are justified and that they should be allowed to remain above the law.
it’s why a lot of contemporary hollywood mysteries don’t work. so many modern authors try to return to “the good old days” by copying the 1900s formula— tossing a ton of rich people in a house and saying something vague about money— without realising that the appeal has always come from the tackling of real, relatable issues, and in justice for those who deserve it. it’s the reason why murder on the orient express, widely considered one of the greatest mystery stories of all time, HAS to end the way it does— because having it end any other way would completely undermine everything the story is trying to say about the legal system. in a similar way, there’s a reason why knives out CAN’T end with fran surviving/ransom getting away with it, why glass onion CAN’T end with miles being arrested normally, and why wake up dead man CAN’T end without jud taking martha’s confession— because those endings miss what the films are trying to say about the very real modern issues at the centre of them.
sorry for how ranty this was— what i’m trying to say is that the knives out films’ focus on “wokeism” and their insistence on taking shots at right-wing radicalism, political corruption, etc. is what makes them good films, because good contemporary murder mysteries are inherently reflective of modern society, and those things are increasingly prevalent within modern society. murder mysteries are political; they have ALWAYS BEEN political. THE WOKENESS IS THE POINT OF THE MEDIUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 🙏🙏🙏‼️‼️‼️