Be careful about which Amazon products you buy. It seems that Amazon doorbell cameras will potentially let the police spy on your home.

Law enforcement agencies will soon have easier access to footage captured by Amazon’s Ring smart cameras. In a partnership announced this week, Amazon will allow approximately 5,000 local law enforcement agencies to request access to Ring camera footage via surveillance platforms from Flock Safety. Ring cooperating with law enforcement and the reported use of Flock technologies by federal agencies, including US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), has resurfaced privacy concerns that have followed the devices for years. According to Flock’s announcement, its Ring partnership allows local law enforcement members to use Flock software “to send a direct post in the Ring Neighbors app with details about the investigation and request voluntary assistance.” Requests must include “specific location and timeframe of the incident, a unique investigation code, and details about what is being investigated,” and users can look at the requests anonymously, Flock said. “Any footage a Ring customer chooses to submit will be securely packaged by Flock and shared directly with the requesting local public safety agency through the FlockOS or Flock Nova platform,” the announcement reads. Flock said its local law enforcement users will gain access to Ring Community Requests in “the coming months.” Outside its software platforms, Flock is known for license plate recognition cameras. Flock customers can also search footage from Flock cameras using descriptors to find people, such as “man in blue shirt and cowboy hat.” Besides law enforcement agencies, Flock says 6,000 communities and 1,000 businesses use their products. For years, privacy advocates have warned against companies like Flock.

Jeff Bezos is an official MAGA ass-kisser broligarch whose sole motivation is greed for even more wealth. It shouldn't surprise people that he would assist with the Trump police state.

i would win about half the time. the other half of the time i would lose with effort on their part.

whether i would win or lose, the fact that i was physically stronger than they anticipated i would be would always make them strangely angry. these men were nominally my friends growing up. i engaged them in these challenges out of a desire to bond through friendly competition. but after losing to me, there were always these comments. about how they could have beaten me easily if they were allowed to break my wrist. of course, that's true. but why, my friend, are you talking about breaking my wrist? that seemed such a shockingly violent thing to imagine doing to me for the sake of winning a friendly spar. even when i would lose, but they had to exert greater effort than they imagined would be necessary, the anger with which they would slam my hand into the table was more than i expected. my knuckles were bruised. i wanted to ask why they would hurt me on purpose over a game.

That one anon wanting to spread a woman's nudes🤢

Calling women/females "cuntgirls"🤢

Source

"Perry allegedly confessed to killing nine prostitutes "because she couldn't breed and the women had the ability to have children and they were wasting it being 'pond scum.'""

"This doesn't seem like a transgender issue to me," she said. "The media loves this kind of case. If this were a minister, it wouldn't be framed that way. This is not about that part of [Perry's] identity, it's about being a murderer."

But... she said herself it does have to do with her identity. Her whole defense is built around being transgender. Aren't we supposed to listen to trans women and let them define their own experiences?