Something fizzled

the fact that they prioritise race either explicitly or more often implicitly, also means that they are in a sense, ethno-nationalists: they want ''their'' countries to remain predominantly composed of a certain ethnic group, which is by definition ethno-nationalism

Feminism doubled the workforce and men's wages never recovered. Now, almost every family is stuck in a two-income trap! YAAAAYY!

Mostly, women do a lot of the same things they used to do in the home. They're nurses, they're early childhood educators, they're retail workers, they're cooks, they're housekeepers. So now, instead of staying home with their kids and doing all those things for their family and for their community, they're doing everything....for a corporation. And they're paying income tax. They're also paying all the other taxes associated with having to work outside the home: gas tax because they're driving back and forth to work, payroll taxes, all that kind of stuff. And they're are away from their kids all day. Where do the kids go? They go to public schools, where the public school system then can dictate to them what their, morals, values and morays should be; what the worldview should be, instead of the parents.

First, their radical feminism is implicitly underlied by wanting to make men more datable, better desirers of women, not merely better human beings (because they see sex and romance as needs, so entitlements..proof: they make barely veiled suicide threats when other radfems tell them to stop dating men) which include things from "men should be/remain/become physically appealing to me" to ''men should not find women with armpit hair ugly" (sexual access). This is why make-up and other aesthetic concerns are so present in their activism: they want to improve sexual access for women who do not fit so smoothly into mainstream beauty standards. It's obvious, but it's denied

First, their radical feminism is implicitly underlied by wanting to make men more datable, better desirers of women, not merely better human beings (because they see sex and romance as needs, so entitlements..proof: they make barely veiled suicide threats when other radfems tell them to stop dating men) which include things from "men should be/remain/become physically appealing to me" to ''men should not find women with armpit hair ugly" (sexual access). This is why make-up and other aesthetic concerns are so present in their activism: they want to improve sexual access for women who do not fit so smoothly into mainstream beauty standards. It's obvious, but it's denied

I've seen many rape "Victims" say it made them stronger so, maybe rape is good? I just think we need to have an open mind here.

Rape is bad because it violates consent and bodily autonomy. It is a person forcing sexual access onto someone who did not agree to it. Strip away the inflammatory framing and that’s what we’re talking about: coercion, violence, and removal of choice. A society where that’s considered “maybe good” is a society where no one is safe.

Pointing to survivors who say they became stronger afterward doesn’t prove rape is beneficial. It proves humans can survive trauma and sometimes grow from it. People grow after abuse, war, illness, and loss too. That doesn’t magically transform the harm into a positive act. Resilience is not the same thing as justification.

The “my friend never got raped and she died” argument isn’t even an argument, it’s a non sequitur. Those events have no causal relationship. Random tragedy doesn’t validate unrelated harm.

If the goal is to provoke “radical feminists” or farm outrage, then this is just shock content built around a real-world trauma. And that’s the uncomfortable truth about trolling like this: it pretends to be edgy philosophy, but it’s really just using survivors’ experiences as a prop.

If someone genuinely wants to “question everything,” start with this: why do we value consent? Why do we believe people should have control over their own bodies? If you can’t defend those principles, you’re not being brave or open-minded, you’re just eroding the foundation that protects everyone, including you.

You can question systems. You can question ideologies. But questioning whether violent assault might secretly be good isn’t bold thinking. It’s either bad logic or deliberate provocation.

Catcalling still happens

It's still gross and still feels dehumanising and makes me feel unsafe. To the point in which it made me wear baggy mens clothes, cut my hair short, and be very masculine to avoid male attention.

It didn't work. Men will fuck anything.