Little comics and advice from critter-things sharing a brain. If sending an ask: please ensure that your ask is focused around one issue or question (if possible), and try to ensure that each ask is self-contained. We get too many asks to figure out which anons from yesterday were yours.
If you're about to send an angry or hateful ask or comment, then please do yourself a favor and block this blog instead. We will never answer these messages, and we will block those making them. Please enforce your own boundaries and save us both the trouble.
Common Questions
What is plurality? (See also)
Am I plural? (See also: Can I prove that I'm not plural?)
Am I really plural, though?
What if I'm unconsciously faking being plural?
What does plurality feel like?
Can I become plural?
Can I get rid of my headmates?
How do I learn who's in my system?
Am I (insert label here)?
A masterlist of other answered asks can be found here.
We do see and appreciate compliments, but we will not answer most of them, as we'd prefer to keep this blog relatively on-topic.
Resources about plurality and a list of this blog's tags are below the read more.
Resources:
Plurality 101
Understanding Multiplicity: A quick 101 primer on plurality/multiplicity from the Manchester Metropolitan University.
What Is Plurality?: Our own working definitions of plurality.
Hydra May 2025: A short zine introducing plurality to those unfamiliar with it.
Am I Plural?
Common Plural Experiences: A fairly well-rounded list of common plural experiences. Some of these experiences are common in non-plural folks, but if you're checking a lot of boxes or these things happen to you more intensely than seems typical, then it may be worth questioning further.
Plurality is not a checklist. You may have a lot of the experiences in the above resource, but that doesn't inherently mean that you are plural. There's no sharp line in the sand between plural and singular experiences.
Am I Plural?: Plurality is not a specific diagnosis or absolute thing, but a chosen framework for understanding your mind. If it works, then you get to use it.
On the topic of "is this a headmate or [something else]?": It's not necessarily about what it is, but what helps you live with and understand it.
Help, I'm Plural!
Advice from Those Who Came Before: for New Systems (pdf): Compiled advice for those who've recently realized that they may be plural.
We accidentally wrote a book (PDF, EPUB) covering most of what we've learned to work with ourselves. It's free, written in plain language, and broken up into very short sections for easier reading. Hopefully it helps.
A list of tools for plural folks.
Assorted links and books about plurality.
---
Tags:
Tags by Post Type
Plural Comic: All of our comics.
High Effort Art: Some comics, some drawings, all work that took more time than a 5 minute scribble.
Asks: Responses to inbox messages.
Essays: Long posts, usually not associated with a comic.
Metaposting: Posting about posting.
Tags by Topic
Amnesia: Memory problems and lost time.
Basics: Information about plurality for those unfamiliar with the concept.
Communication: Talking to each other and how to do it better.
Cooperation: Getting along with each other and building trust.
Denial: "I'm not plural, I just (textbook description of DID)"
Dissociation: Disconnection from identity, self, the world, feelings, sensations, etc.
Experiences: What's it like to be plural?
Getting to Know You: Learning about your system.
Labels: Words and their uses.
Masking: Hiding your system or coming out of hiding.
Passive Influence: Affecting behavior without taking full control.
Persecutors: When system members hurt you.
Questioning: "Am I plural?"
Relationships: Dealing with outside people (and occasionally each other).
Switching: Changing who's in control of your body.
Other
If you'd like to print some zines, then take a look at our itch.io page.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
âś“ Live Streamingâś“ Interactive Chatâś“ Private Showsâś“ HD Qualityâś“ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
If you experience any changes in body control (switching, possession, etc.), then establish some form of consistent, asynchronous external communication with your system. External communication has a major benefit: you can still talk to each other across switches (asynchronously) even if the inside of your mind is a mess.
You might set up a journal, whiteboard, calendar, a "single user, multi-account" app like Mytter or Antar, sticky notes, etc. Anything goes as long as your system knows to check it occasionally (or at the least, in an emergency).
We recommend choosing an analog method for your fallback communication method if possible, as a power outage could take out a lot of digital methods. A spur-of-the-moment piece of paper left on a table is better than nothing, but it's less likely to work than a pocket notebook or bulletin board that every system member knows to use for communication if needed. You can always add an app or program once everyone knows where to go for your analog fallback.
Discuss how you want to treat each other. Keep it loose and informal for now- don't make any absolute Laws just yet. Think of it more like the quick agreements that roommates make with each other for practical reasons: "I'll do the dishes if you do the laundry".
A few classics: "try not to die, don't kill anyone else, don't get any tattoos as an impulse decision, and don't throw out things that don't belong to you."
Don't force agreements on anyone. If someone disagrees, then stop and discuss their concerns to find a better agreement. See: Consensus Decision Making.
Map your system, if it feels right. This can help you learn about each other, but it can also be soothing to feel like you have some understanding of who's in your head when you're being flooded with new system members.
Again, keep it simple. What do you actually need to know? What would help you in a practical sense? Start there, then branch out if you'd like to get to know each other better.
Consider making a simple guide to your life. If someone had to handle a day in your life with little to no prior knowledge of it, then what would they need to know?
Where should they check to see if you have any appointments? Are they responsible for feeding any pets? Where can they find money if they need it, and how do they know how much to spend? Do you have a job, and do they need to work it? Etc.
Hopefully you never need this guide, but it's a lifesaver for any unexpectedly amnesiac system members.
Focus on building bridges and trust. Get to know the folks in your head. Find ways to talk and just get to know them. Listen as much as you talk, if not more.
Learn to lean on each other for support, if you can. Trust is one of the most valuable things that you can have in a system. Trust gets you through a lot of tough situations. Give your system members every reason to trust you, and try to learn to trust them in turn.
If someone is hostile, then ask what's driving the hostility. Do they feel under-represented in your life? Does peace make them feel unsafe because they don't know where the threats are? Are they bored, scared, frustrated, or routinely unhappy?
What can you do to support them? What do they need to feel comfortable?
Don't worry about knowing everything. You're just figuring this out- give yourselves some grace for not knowing as much as everyone else seems to. (Besides, they know less than you think. I've yet to meet a system without a single mystery left in it, including folks who've known for decades, and many systems are forever figuring things out in one way or another.)
Ask for information when you need it and let your system explain itself over time; let your system set the pace. You'll get better information that way, and your system will learn that they can trust you to respect them when they say "no, don't touch that yet."
Screw plural community labels for now. Seriously. Screw figuring out origins or consciousness or whatever the linguistic dividing line of the month is. Don't worry about it. These words come and go. Get to know yourselves first.
Why am I suggesting this? Community labels will still be there when you've figured out how to work with each other in a practical sense, and your stronger understanding of each other will make it much easier to find whatever words you wind up needing. Hunting for words now is likely to get you stuck trying to cram a bunch of shifting unknowns into someone else's categorization system, and it might cloud your situation more than it clears it.
Given that you're still settling into the idea of sharing a head at all, getting into the nitty-gritty of labels is probably going to be less helpful than figuring out how to handle doubt and denial issues (or getting communication going, or learning to manage switching, or...), hence the recommendation not to worry about it.
That said: do use labels if you need them. Just remember that labels are tools. Don't let the tools use you.
Also, screw the discourse. If you listen to any one item on this list, make it this one.
Plural community discourse tends to be a little bit rancid in the "debating whether your experiences exist meaningfully in our spaces" way, and it will fuck you up as a new system. Get past the worst of your denial or doubt issues first to avoid worsening the "oh my god, am I faking without knowing it" hell brainworms. Please. I am actually begging you. Avoid the discourse until you've dealt with your own existential doubts.
None of these things are obligations, nor is there any rush to do them. It's just a cluster of things that I tend to suggest to newly discovered systems, and I realized that I don't think we've actually rattled these off on this blog yet.
Hello ya all!!! I'm the same creature that during the month of June (precisely during the first few days of June) asked about if it was possible for my roomheads (yeh that's how I call my alters) to move precise part of my body.
Well now after so long just a few days ago (almost a week and half I think) I finally started to accept and metabolize the fact I'm probably plural and in within 3/4 days 3 ROOMHEADS JUST FUCKING SPAWNED IN WHILE I WAS IN ALL THREE TIMES READING COMICS OF A FEW ARTISTS I FOLLOW HERE IN TUMBLR AND ALSO INSTAGRAM
. . . After sayin all this my question for ya all is: Is it normal that in just a FEW DAYS 3 alters formed just after I started to accept my multiplicity more??? (And btw sorry for the long paragraphs)
I couldn't tell you if it's normal (normalcy is relative, not absolute- normal for what group of people, when?), but I can say that it seems to be pretty common in online plural communities for a system to have a sudden-looking change in headcount shortly after being discovered.
Sometimes system members hang back and wait until they feel safe to introduce themselves because it's more comfortable for them. They might be waiting to see if you accept other members of the system before taking a risk and introducing themselves to you. Wouldn't you be more comfortable saying hello to someone if your friends said that they trusted that person first?
It can also be a communication issue. A lot of newly discovered systems are figuring out how to get or keep stable communication between system members, and something about putting more effort or attention into making space for your system seems to open communication pathways that weren't there before.
A bit of advice: practice chatting with your system regardless of whether you think you have any barriers between you. Some systems find that they have an initial surge in chatter and headcount, but after a while, their system seems to go quiet until they put more effort into reducing denial or building communication skills with their system. Practicing now makes it easier to bounce back if there's a quiet period after the boom. Try a few different methods and see what sticks.
Sometimes, the new folks are actually new. It can be hard to tell, and sometimes it doesn't really matter when someone started existing. They're here now. If it's important to know whether they started existing five years ago or five minutes ago, then they'll probably tell you directly.
A surge of genuinely new system members seems to happen a lot in newly discovered systems too, at least anecdotally. I'm not entirely sure why. While I have my guesses, I don't have enough data to share them comfortably. All I can share is that I've noticed it happen often enough to remember it, which usually means that it happens decently often in our vicinity.
Funny how we tend to get things once we stop wanting or looking for them. It took so long to be diagnosed with DID that we started resenting the idea of diagnosis altogether (and still do).
But here we are. I have mixed feelings.
To future us: our therapist also kind of hates the DSM. Mutual "for the insurance" diagnosis motives here.
A little cartoon of Echo floats in the void and narrates. "It's like… you spend all this time being told off by psychiatrists, feeling unsafe in the office, the specimin of study. Given a thousand diagnoses. Only the meds you don't want- "we only treat anxiety with therapy", "you're personifying your emotions". Why am I here? Clearly something is wrong here."
The dog from the "this is fine" meme begs a doctor to do something about the fire, please, and the doctor says no. It's labeled, "for almost ten years." Below, a sea of diagnostic labels crowd into each other's space bubbles: major depression with psychotic features, seasonal affective disorder, unspecified psychotic disorder, borderline personality disorder, autistic, general anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, specific phobia, panic disorder, and almost crowded out of the panel is dissociative identity disorder. "So many words they gave us," narrates Echo. None of it is absolute truth.
If it took a decade to get an insurance label that doesn't mean much to me anymore simply because it took so long- "overly prescriptive, power structure reinforcing, often controlling-" why do I still feel something, even then? I don't want this, or do I? Rage? Grief? Tired? Surprise? Relief? Pain? Sadness? Worry? Smugness? Daunted? Nervous? Nothing, nothing at all?
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
âś“ Live Streamingâś“ Interactive Chatâś“ Private Showsâś“ HD Qualityâś“ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
part of being an adult is figuring out what eveyone else's definition of "going crazy" is. to you it is not sleeping for 60 hours, writing 80k words in one sitting and expiriencing enough anxiety to kill a horse. to beth from accounting its buying a ticket to Columbus, Ohio. and to your friend its consuming so much ketamine you lose all of your posessions and wake up with five broken bones in a ditch somewhere and then proceeding to do it again the next day. to your other friend its writing a letter to their favourite actress about how much they appreciate her work. to your neighbour its laughing loudly in a grocery store whilst in pajamas. maya from uni hears the voice of her dead father making jokes with no punchlines and she considers that to be quite normal - to her going crazy would be hearing her husband instead. your downstairs neighbour will take night walks naked sometimes and claim there is nothing weird about him. there are literally no rules to life and all meaning is in the eye of the beholder.
One of us stole our middle deadname, one of us named themselves after their favorite song at the time, one of us is associated so strongly with the concept described by their name that it became their name, one of us just went off vibes(? I don't actually remember beyond it feeling right) and one of us made me read a list of tree names out loud until one sounded right.
Other honorable mentions go to the people and names of the past: being named after their own mythological self-insert character, being named in the way most children name their plushies ("that one's Night Name! Because they come out at night!"), being renamed as an abbreviation of your own name because no one calls you the full thing, naming yourself after the nearest object... honestly, I think most of our names have had oddly specific stories behind them.
The folks who come and go don't usually choose names, though a few have.
Funny how we tend to get things once we stop wanting or looking for them. It took so long to be diagnosed with DID that we started resenting the idea of diagnosis altogether (and still do).
But here we are. I have mixed feelings.
To future us: our therapist also kind of hates the DSM. Mutual "for the insurance" diagnosis motives here.
With practice, it is possible to change your relationship with the distress that appears when adverse things happen.
Instead of becoming caught up in it, it is possible to learn to observe it, acknowledge it, let it move through you in its own time. The last part may not be pleasant. But if you can let go and allow it, then you are not creating an extra layer of distress: fighting it.
It is like being caught in a riptide. You did not choose this. You do not control it. You can only control your response, to whatever degree you have learned to do that.
If you have not learned what to do when caught in a riptide, you may try to swim against the current towards the shore. This would be the obvious choice. But the riptide is stronger than you, and will wear you out before you can reach land.
If you know what to do, you will either try to float without resistance and call for help if you are not a strong swimmer, or swim parallel to the shore until you are free of the riptide. Then you can either be rescued, or swim to shore.
Accepting that you are caught in a riptide doesn't mean you are happy about it. But denying it, or remaining unaware, or getting lost in distress about the situation, will cause additional problems.
what could it mean when you frequently feel the urge to go motionless and stare off? could that indicate switching orrrr
Freeze response
Bored
Daydreaming
No new stimuli exist that need your attention (highway hypnosis)
Sleepy or tired
Dissociating
Really calm and chill
You just ate a lot of turkey
You want some time to think
You're a cat
Overstimulated
Seizure aura
Your brain needs a break from Doing Things constantly
Seriously, are you sure you're not tired or overstimulated or overwhelmed? Brains like to pull the brakes by demanding some Do Nothing time.
Understimulated
Switching (check for other plural happenings before assuming that staring into space = switching in all cases; dissociation covers more than switching, and staring into space covers more than just dissociation)
It doesn't have to mean anything. It can just be something that happens sometimes, especially if it's not bothering you.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
âś“ Live Streamingâś“ Interactive Chatâś“ Private Showsâś“ HD Qualityâś“ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
On Water (people wonder what a hivemind would be like)
Content warnings: general unreality, vague discussion about egocide, musing about (mostly childhood) memories both pleasant and unpleasant, alcohol use, nausea, bad trip description
I catch her between the river and the sea, sit down next to her in the grass. "You been hiding out here the whole time?"
"I wouldn't call it hiding," she says, and she leans back to look up at the sky, hands behind her head. For a second, the air is brilliantly baby blue, but then it's the deep teals and grays of a lake's surface seen from underneath. Clouded with plant matter, it looms.
"What else would you call this?" she asks for me, words ghosting an echo before I can speak it into existence. "Searching, maybe. I don't know."
She pauses. "I can't move when you look at me like that. Why did you have to come looking?"
"What, and leave you brooding out here?" I laugh, stick my hand down to her. Somehow, I am standing again.
She grasps my hand and hauls her body, dripping, out of the grass, weight heavy down the length of my arm and through my shoulder, liquid pulling down.
A laugh lights her face as she spins off my arm and through the grass in a flurry of blooming flowers. She beckons. I consider, then yield / hold firm, bifuricated as one of me takes her hand with a laugh and another stands apart, arms folded, brows drawn, sternum heavy.
I'm warm in her arms, surrounded by magnolia and daffodils, sun bright and dancing in her eyes / I watch myself fall so easily to temptation and wonder why I persist in trying / I stand beside someone else who watches like a storm watches the hill it crests over, and she looks at me without ever looking away and asks,
"Why are you here? This is mine."
"This?"
Her head swoops a fraction of a centimeter towards the dance in the grass, features rearranging. "This."
I'm too distracted by the implications of her face reshuffling itself to process her answer, and I just stare at her while her face shifts in tiny swooping twitches in my periphery, never quite straight on, the impression of cloud-formed cheekbones bleeding off into nothing. The train of thought is gone.
I feel yin meeting yin while yang meets yang off to the right, in the land where there is no weight and water cheers along in fountains and streams and sprinklers in the summertime, and I feel the weight of a still pond of fog in my chest.
"I think it's theirs, not yours," I say, and I shrug. They are still dancing. There is no pain because the pain is somewhere else, somewhere away where the dirt and grit and itches live. Unimportant, inconvenient killjoys, they might say, these realities.
I get to my knees and I'm somewhere away in a creekbed, rocks and pebbles burrowed in the dirt beneath my legs, digging into my skin where my boots don't cover me, and I couldn't care less because I'm touching more tadpoles than I've ever seen in my life. They feel firm, like raw peas covered in mucus, and their bodies slip through my fingers by the dozens.
There must be hundreds here in this little creek, hundreds of tiny bodies in the mountains halfway through a road trip- it's always been my solace, that with every haul to somewhere unpleasant, I'd get to see something precious. One year it was tadpoles.
Another two years, we saw a cabin by a little mountain lake at Christmas, one of those rare places with the genuine sort of magic, somewhere I'd never find again if I tried. All away, somewhere else, on the way to or from having my arm pried open and skewered whether I wanted it or not. Some comfort.
But still, in this moment, there are my tadpoles, and she is back and crouching over my shoulder to look at their bodies in my hand.
"Whose is this?" she asks.
"I don't know," we say, bifuricated, waiting. "Both of us. All three. I don't know." They nod. It doesn't matter. We drop it and then I see bark chips in the woods, smell the pine needles, and suddenly I'm underneath the little tree in the front yard of the Last House our parents loved each other in, hiding.
I've hidden here before, a lot. It's a good hiding place for hide and seek, at least until the other kids learn that it exists. Yet again, I wonder in retrospect whether the other kids not finding us when we sat on a rock in plain sight was because they weren't looking for the obvious or because they just wanted an excuse to ignore us for an hour or two. My fingers clench around dirt.
I see people speculate about what a hivemind might be like, and as the tree's leaves shrouding my head begin to spin and peel and bleed color through me, I see someone looking back at me in a raincoat, plushie arm slack and bear body heavy in her hand.
A moment later, I am in the hallway of the Last House looking around a corner as my sister persuades my mom to do something that I convinced my sister she wanted. For the first time, I wonder if I am a bad person. I can't be older than ten years old, small and smooth with that awful bowl cut that we used to have. I've been thinking about growing it out again. It just gets in the way.
She leans out of the scene trailing globs of midnight, a lava lamp for the void. "Did you ever want to cease to exist?" she asks.
I blink. She laughs.
"I don't want to make any plans," she reassures me, "I'm not talking about that kind of death. Did you ever want to just... be someone else?" Another laugh. "Sorry, stupid question."
She's so close. I take a step back. She drips on me, and I try to flick it off without touching the droplet on my shirt. It's thick like oil. It stays. My spine crawls until she notices my discomfort and sucks it back.
"Who are you?" she asks. "Are you people, or not? I need an answer."
"I'm a person," I say.
"I know," she asks, "but what kind?"
"The kind who's not in the mood to be questioned by the drug woman," I snap / a wolf's maw snaps shut, narrowly missing her hand, a warning shot fired. Keep away, stay away, leave me alone. I don't want to hurt you but don't test your luck. She flinches. I back down, shrivel smaller, apologize for my physicality.
"You really don't have to do that for me," she says. An eyebrow raises. I'm not sure whose.
People wonder what a hivemind would be like, and I see them fear it or crave it, and I didn't understand the former until recently but we've always been the latter. Sometimes I'm less sure of that now that we've learned what existential terror feels like.
I'm standing at the kitchen sink, my fingers smoothly carving divots into the metal beneath them as the world wavers around me, my periphery drowned in psychedelic green and my central vision full of sweat and nausea. I retch once and nothing comes, and then the impulse is gone and I am repeating in my head, "I am at the kitchen sink" to carve this single moment back into reality and out of the hell that is everything and nothing all at once, blazing fractals stretched across the floor.
"Did you ever wish you could die?" she asks again. I pause. I nod, once, lick my lips, glance over my shoulder.
"Sometimes, I think it would be easier," I say slowly, "if we didn't bother with all the people business. And sometimes all I want is to vanish into myself and cease to exist. Implode into a naked singularity (physics)."
"Apparently we can say parentheses," laughs a third person, and in a flash I know who everyone is: the third, Echo; the goo, Gwen; myself, Red; with traces of Blue darting through the cracks and Hawthorne left home to answer the phone. But then the moment passes, and I am seated at two bars at once, and a pillar of goo serves me overlaid with the memory's bartender. Brass mug, Moscow Mule, sat on the corner of both counters to watch the room, never quite sure how a tab works but too exposed to ask.
I consider frowning in disapproval, and Echo actually does frown as I decide instead to shrug and chug my drink, not that it'll do much. It's placebo, every time.
"I can't believe you're still drinking in here," says Echo, looking down into its own swirling mug. Even then, it considers the offer before pushing the mug away, and it's left to sit on the tender's side of the bar in one place and further down our side of the bar in another. The memory-places bleed together, sometimes.
Two more bars edge in: a pizza place our mom went to as a child and a steakhouse where people threw peanut shells on the floor, the floor they left unswept all day. I don't envy whoever had to clean it to stop the shells from piling up past our ankles.
I wonder again why all our deepest memory-places involve liquid, and then I'm by the sea- not The Sea, but the Pacific ocean, Oregon coast, fingers in the sand. We found a crab, once. Large, glorious, alive. We watched and poked it for a while and then let it go in the way children sometimes do. Another time, we found jellyfish. We stayed well away.
In another moment, I am beside the river and lake near our campsite in the mountains, the one we visit most years in the summer until our parents divorce. Our mom can never afford it after that, and our dad stays busy traveling to Peru and rennovating his bathroom while our sister tries to find a second job to survive. Our mom calls him selfish. Sometimes we agree. The rest of the time, we remember how hard he worked to try to get us to be more independent, how he forced us to learn to drive, how it was always his way of trying to say he cared: he tried so hard to give the gift of success whether or not his kid actually wanted it. He won his kids both choosing to live with someone else.
I am by water, and my hands are in the ground, and water laps between my fingers as the night air cools my skin. I hear frogs, smell moss and river, remember the sound of the earth underfoot. We have never seen a firefly in person, but they flicker in the distance here, the idea of breathing lights.
People wonder what a hivemind would be like. Her hand is on my shoulder, and we look at the night. A lone car drives by in the dark.
Author(s): Mostly Red, with contribution from Gwen and Echo, and flickers of Blue darting about. Thanks to Hawthorne for facilitating this by typing all narration so that we didn't have to spend our focus finding the right letters. It's greatly appreciated.
distractions , distractions all day long , take half dozen courtiers to get this done - try to neaten up some of silliness , but might still see some . hopefully bearable !
do not think this will end up as some kind of formal series , but figure if no words even seem to be out there ... maybe need to take plunge on discuss !
It's really nice to see something about spiritual experiences of plurality that aren't just Many Worlds theory (which is a perfectly okay way to understand yourselves- it's just not the only way to be spiritual as a system!). It's doubly nice to see animism being talked about as a potentially plural or plural-adjacent experience.
While none of our group consider ourselves to be animism-based entities (unless you include the stuff we're made of- is considering neurons and cells to have autonomy in some sense a form of animism? Is considering awareness to be a property of matter a form of animism?), we do sometimes perceive presence, awareness, or selfhood from things not typically considered to have it. That perceived entity could be anything from a grain of sand to a planet- it's not limited by scale, though things tend to get weirder at very large or small scales.
We also sometimes interact with these beings as part of our spiritual practice. Once or twice, we've let them look through our eyes. I don't think we've experimented with any sort of full or partial body control with them yet, but talking to them can be interesting or surprising, and it's certainly felt plural-adjacent to us.
It's also led us to wonder about the border between inside and outside in the past, particularly after reading about the concept of the "porous self" in Robert Falconer's book on spiritual possession's intersections with IFS therapy. At this point, I don't think it's a harsh border between the world inside our head and the world outside, at least not inherently. I think it's more of a gradient.
We are a newly discovered system, which has actively changed things for us beyond the fact and might keep doing it. We fear our family seeing the changes and us being unable to explain. We are diagnosed schizospec and it could get chalked up to that and have us coerced into psychiatry and in general pathologized, and our new members experience some of our disability differently which we fear may affect things like readiness for accommodations from family. We're "a full adult" and dependent because of disability. We might be able to safely come out to our younger sibling, which may make things somewhat more bearable, but all the other things remain.
Hi, fellow "my parents are going to decide that my existence is a form of psychosis and try to force me into treatment that I don't want" situationers. We made the mistake of telling them anyway. It went almost as badly as we expected. Here's my advice:
Sometimes the Closet is Safer.
You don't have to tell people. It doesn't matter if they're family, friends, partners, or whoever else. They don't have to know. They especially don't have to know if telling them would put you at risk of abuse, homelessness, incarceration, etc. If telling someone would hurt you, then don't tell them.
Depending on where you live and who you know, there can be a lot of pressure to be 100% honest with people about who you are and how you experience life. This pressure can get more intense when it comes to being open with friends, family, and other close people.
It doesn't help that some social circles seem to believe that you must tell everyone about all of your identity labels with 100% accuracy immediately upon discovering them- if you're around those circles often, then it might seem impossible or even immoral to hide something about yourself from friends or family. (If you are in these circles, then it might also be worth considering what you think is important to keep private; you get to decide that for yourselves. Your friends don't decide what they "deserve" to know about you. You do.)
The truth is that sometimes, the risks of sharing information just aren't worth it for someone's situation. It's okay not to tell someone about your plurality, and carefully choosing which people you tell is often sensible.
This doesn't mean that you can't get your needs met, and it doesn't mean that you should deny anything that gets noticed. It just means that you don't have to explain it as plurality. There are a thousand ways to explain any given observation, and at least some of those explanations are going to be acceptable to a lot of people because a lot of common plural experiences still happen to singlets.
"Sometimes this is easy, and sometimes this is hard" doesn't need to be explained as two system members having different skillsets. Lots of people have some variability in how well they can use a skill. Ask any artist about their good and bad art days. Think about spoon theory's existence. People's skills fluctuate all the time, though they may fluctuate a bit less sharply on average.
"My memory is bad" doesn't need a diagnosis or label to answer someone's questions about why you forgot an appointment. A bad memory is reason enough. A lot of people have bad memories. Bonus: the older you get, the better this answer becomes.
(Some people can be a bit rude if you don't also say that you're at least trying to support your own memory with a calendar or other reminder system, but a mildly annoyed person is a lot easier to deal with than one who thinks that you need to be fixed.)
Honestly, you don't even have to give people an explanation in all cases. Tell someone what you need from them, and the fact that you need it can sometimes be explanation enough. "I need XYZ supports. Can we make that happen?"
TL;DR:
You don't have to tell anyone that you're plural. There is almost always another way to explain what's happening or get someone to change their behavior around you.
Example Situations:
Some questions and problems come up more than others. We've got a few answers on speed dial for these situations, so we're listing a few here as example scripts.
You need help with a task that's normally easy for you (because you're not usually the one doing it):
"I really want to get this done, but I just can't get past XYZ today for some reason- do you think you could do XYZ for me really quick? It would make it way easier for me to finish this. I might have to finish it tomorrow if not."
"I'm really struggling with this task today, and it's frustrating me. It's easier sometimes and harder other times, you know? And I wish it were an easy day, but it's not. Actually, do you think I could flag you down when I'm struggling so I can get some support?"
Someone is annoyed that you keep "changing your mind" about decisions:
"I get kind of annoyed at myself too- I don't like making people change their plans like that. I've been trying (describe a plausible thing you might be doing to prevent or reduce "changing your mind"; follow through afterwards if needed), but it might also help if you warned me about big decisions ahead of time so I have more time to make the decision. That way, I can just give you the final answer instead of giving you like five different answers first."
"Sorry- I've just got a lot of different feelings about this and it's kind of hard to reconcile them. Part of me thinks (opinion one), but I've also got concerns about (opinion one) because (opinion two), and then I've also got (opinion three) rattling around in here... do you have a few minutes to sit and talk it out? I might need help figuring out this decision."
(No one will clock "part of me". It's a common phrase for a reason- internal conflict happens just as much to singlets, just a little differently. People phrase their conflicts of opinion like this all the time.)
Someone is confused about changing preferences and doesn't know how to handle it:
"I like a lot of different things at different times- you know, like how people get in the mood for a favorite movie or type of food? Or how people sometimes really aren't in the mood for something, even if they usually like it? Yeah, I do that a lot. I know it can be tricky to predict sometimes- if it's an issue, then maybe we can come up with a way to flag what kind of mood I'm in so that you don't have to try to predict me."
(Seriously: "I'm in a weird mood right now" works as an explanation in so many cases that it's worth remembering. If you're really lucky, then the other person will nickname one or more of your "moods" and you'll be able to talk about them in a very plural way without ever mentioning plurality. In most cases, people just shrug and move on.)
Someone notices that your voice sounds different:
"Huh, I guess it does! Weird."
"Yeah, I didn't sleep too well."
"It does? How is it different? (Listen.) Huh. Does it just do this sometimes and I never noticed? (Listen, respond from here like it's mildly interesting but not that important. Works best if you can convince them that you actually didn't notice the change yourself.)
"I don't know, I guess I'm British now." (Very important: say this as a joke. The joke makes it clear that you're not concerned or bothered, which a specific subset of people might wonder about.)
Someone notices that you forgot something while working on a task they asked you to do:
"Oh shit, you're right! I totally blanked on that."
"I don't really remember it that well- can you remind me?"
"I don't know why I'm having a hard time remembering how I'm supposed to do this right now, but do you have a checklist or instructions somewhere so I can reference it? I really want to make sure I do this right."
Do you think it's possible to fake being plural even to yourself?
One or two genuine questions to you, anon, before I give my usual spiel on "I think I'm somehow faking it unconsciously and I think I should be ashamed because the fact that I can't stop faking it makes me morally bad":
What would it actually mean to fake plurality?
What does it mean to fake anything, in plain language (and ideally without moral weight attached)?
What makes a thing fake?
The usual spiel on secretly faking it:
First, if this is about you: try to turn it off for one week. Or a day, whichever feels better. All of it. I don't mean pretend that it doesn't exist, I mean stop doing it altogether. Just stop. Snap of the fingers, cold turkey, stop.
You are actively doing it, aren't you? Like, intentionally? You know you absolutely do not identify with the plural label or any plural experiences, that none of this has any possible application or interest to you, that plurality is completely and utterly irrelevant to your life... but you're putting in a large amount of intentional effort to appear as though you're plural for reasons that you don't understand whatsoever? Even if you really want to stop sometimes?
Why are you faking that instead of, I don't know, faking your way into a massive celebrity party or something? You must be talented, and this sounds like it would be exhausting to juggle. Compared to seeing the inside of a nuclear reactor or getting into a festival for free, this is pretty boring as far as pretending goes. Why keep it up? What are you gaining for all that work, especially when you'd be socially fucked if someone called it out?
It's not intentional? You keep trying to stop and you can't? It's not going away no matter how hard you try to change it?
You're probably not faking It. Sorry.
"fake", verb:
- tamper, with the purpose of deception (source)
- "counterfeit", to imitate or feign especially with intent to deceive (source, source)
- one does not fake without intent.
If someone is faking something, then by definition, they know. It's an active and intentional effort, something that they have to put energy and work into sustaining, something that's a relief to turn off. They can turn it off, and they know this because they are intentionally choosing to pretend to have an experience they do not actually, "objectively" have.
And here are the two important points:
Faking is an intentional act. If someone is faking something, then they know for absolute certain that they are faking something. Intent is required to fake something.
The concept of "fake" plurality relies on the idea of an objective state of the self/selves: some existential, absolute truth about whether someone is plural or not.
On point two:
We have no metrics to determine an absolute reality of the self for absolute certain. There are some physical characteristics that have been noticed in brain scans comparing DID systems against controls, but regardless of whether you believe in inherent differences in brain structure, most of us can't get a brain scan on a whim, and we don't have much of this kind of data yet for most other plural experiences. (Tulpamancy brain scan study when? Has that come out yet?)
We also have no idea why consciousness exists or where it's located, if anywhere. It's enough of a slippery issue for the concept of the philosophical zombie to exist: how do we know that anyone else is conscious? We don't. How do we know that plurality is an inherent or objective property of a body? We don't.
Do I believe that faking plurality is possible at all?
Sure. I think it could be done and I've seen it confessed to. I don't think that hunting for "fakes" or accusing strangers of faking their experiences is going to help anyone, though.
I do think sometimes that if someone were to fake this in the long run, then they would have to be very careful that none of it took on a life of its own. I've met a few accidental tulpamancers. It happens.
Do I think it's common to fake plurality?
No. It's a lot of effort for fairly little reward given that some people still think Split is basically a documentary.
Do I think that faking plurality can be done without knowing it?
No. A person might later find that another framework or explanation works better for them, but that doesn't mean they were secretly faking plurality. It means that they have an experience, and they found a different explanation for that experience that worked better for them. Good for them.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
âś“ Live Streamingâś“ Interactive Chatâś“ Private Showsâś“ HD Qualityâś“ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Do you have any advice on how to journal as a system. Thinking of doing it ourselves but struggling to figure out how to format, structure, and actually do it
Rule Number One of Journaling:
there are no rules.
Rule Number Two of Journaling:
you should ignore Rule One if having rules helps you journal.
So: take a moment and imagine a world where journaling is easy (or fun) and helpful for your system. Toss out all your notions of what journaling should be- remember Rule One? Start from scratch.
If journaling were easy, then what would your journal (and journaling process) look like? What do you each want from your journal(s)? What rules or structures would make those wants happen?
It sounds like a silly question, but seriously, sit down and try to answer it. That might give you some ideas to get started with.
About "Rules"
There are no rules for journaling, only guidelines and preferences. What do you want your journal to do for you? What structures would allow it to do that?
There are so, so, so many different styles of journaling out there, and no two people have quite the same setup. Some people swear by elaborate formatting that takes them an hour to set up before they can write the entry itself. Some people journal with a Bic ballpoint on looseleaf paper that they staple together sometimes. Some people prefer to write for an imaginary audience. Some people burn their finished journals. Some people do best with set journaling times, while others stick to an "if we think about it, we do it" tactic. I could go on.
If you keep individual journals, then your personal setup is going to be unique to you, but a big part of having a shared System Journal is finding ways to coexist despite different formatting preferences and/or journaling goals. The challenge comes in allowing your journal to change with you or in compromising on a shared format.
That's where Rule Two comes in: at any time, you all may agree to do something a certain way. That agreement might help keep the peace, make conversation easier, or otherwise help you get along in the journal, but it should help you journal in some way.
A rule isn't working? Remember Rule One: there are no rules. You can always try something else. Rules should help you share the space, not get in the way of using that space in the first place.
As for starting: As soon as you've gotten a thought out of your head somewhere vaguely reflective, you've successfully journaled. Keep going.
Our Journaling Setup
Your journal is probably going to look very different from our current setup, but I'm hoping that ours gives you ideas about what your own system journal(s) could be like.
We keep four journals right now:
One lined A5 journal that acts as a catch-all for thoughts and communication. We call it the "main journal" for a reason, and it was our only journal for a long time. When in doubt, check this one. (See footnote 1)
One blank A6 journal that lives in our pocket. Useful for work, going out, etc. Also great for brainstorming in. We added this journal when the main journal became impractical to carry in some situations, but we still wanted something to capture our thoughts with.
One chunky, specialized A5 journal designed to capture one four-line entry per day for ten years. Extremely useful for figuring out when something happened in the semi-recent past (or what happened at all). It's also proven its worth by making seasonal patterns in our mood obvious.
One orange three-ring binder that we leave on our desk when actively debating major or long-term decisions. Used to keep the debate somewhere that we can actually find it. Also contains printed copies of system agreements for archival/reference, brain-fixing documents in case of emergency, etc.
This setup is something that we've figured out by trial and error- if something snags, then we change our journaling habits to fix the snag and keep improving upon it as we go.
Our rules for our main and mini journals:
There are no rules. If a rule stops helping or being fun, then suggest changing or removing the rule.
No thought is too small, ridiculous, absurd, or out of context. If you think, "I should write that down," then write it down.
Do not write for future historians, potential snoopers, etc. Write for yourself or our system. Do not self-censor. (See footnote 2)
You are not required to identify yourself in entries, but it is appreciated if you're comfortable doing so. (See footnote 3)
Avoid censoring each other, but respect it when it happens. If we see something crossed out or blotted over, then we will assume that it would be destabilizing or dangerous to know, and we will not attempt to read it anyway.
You don't have to be nice, but you do need to be respectful. Insult someone all you want, but don't rip up the drawing that they spent four hours on, and don't deny their right to share the space. Let them speak.
Mark the first entry of each day with the date in YYYY-MM-DD format (see footnote 4). Days start at 00:00.
If two entries are separated by time or topic within the same day, then leave a blank line between them.
You do not have to use timestamps, but you may note the time if you would like to. 24-hour timestamps are preferred for clarity.
Doodling in the journal counts as journaling.
Taping things into the journal counts as journaling.
Sticking things into the journal's inside pocket for safekeeping counts as journaling.
Completed journals are archived for safe-keeping and future reference.
Our journaling setup might be pretty personal to us because everyone likes to journal for different reasons and in different ways. We journal to process the contents of our head, talk to each other, brainstorm, problem-solve, and keep a grasp on time passing.
Many of our rules are compromises that allow us to accomplish our goals while sharing pages with each other. Sharing space means that we have to respect that shared space. Someone else's entry can be written over or destroyed, for example. The physicality of the journal entries was something we had to account for.
I'd honestly say that sharing physical space in our earliest journals taught us the basics of getting along with each other. Crossing out someone else's entry tends to upset them, and we each eventually learned that leaving a snarky comment in the margin was given a lot more tolerance than crossing out someone else's entry. That opened space for snarky margin conversations where we could try to understand each other a little better, albeit in a slightly hostile way. Nowadays, we're talking in the center of the page, and the snark is considerably more good-natured.
I hope some of this helps you all figure out what you want your system journal to be like, Anons.
Footnotes
1: We put a lot of effort into making this journal feel like a consistent place or home. We use a journal cover to make it look mostly the same, we buy multiple of the same journal so it's not jarringly different, and we write a phrase on the first and last pages when starting and finishing the journal to pass the metaphorical torch. It really is the main journal because of this, the one that feels like relief to sit with.
You don't need a journal cover or luxury supplies to pull that sort of consistent journaling environment off, though. Many people swear by journaling in ordinary composition books or spiral notebooks. They're consistent, easy to find, and cheap. You reliably get the same thing every time. If you want a journal that stays essentially the same even when you replace it (especially one that's not likely to go out of production in the future), then you might want to consider your local generic school notebook.
2: The trouble with self-censoring yourself to look good for the imaginary future historians is that you might wind up avoiding any topic with much depth or roughness to it, tinting the whole thing to avoid judgement. This has a way of skirting around all of the things you'd get the most benefit from journaling about.
When we introduced this rule, we wrote everything that we wouldn't want a future historian to see on the front page of the next journal to ensure that we'd have no reason to self-censor. It was very effective. Why hide anything if you've put your personal brain garbage in the front for whoever reads it?
3: Various ways to mark who wrote an entry:
Writing utensil type (pencil, pen, crayon, marker...)
Color
Signatures and printed names
Name symbols, sigils, emblems
Doodles of your faces
Speech bubbles
Position on the page
Handwriting quirks (voluntary or involuntary)
Indexing it in the back or front
Marking entries is absolutely not required, and we actually don't do it too often at the moment. That said, if you like marking entries by using different ink colors, multi-color pens have gotten a lot better and some of them feel glorious to use. We like the Pilot Dr. Grip 4+1 personally. This isn't an ad, we genuinely just like the pen.
4: The actual follow-through on the date format is still inconsistent; someone has yet to get the memo on the format, and we have no idea who. We'll get it across to whoever it is eventually, and they're using a format we can parse in the meantime, so it's no big deal.
hi! I'd like some advice. not on whether im plural but more just on the problem solving and communication side of this debate. everyone agrees on what we're experiencing but nobody agrees on whether the word "plural" would describe it well. part 1 says yes, part 2 says no, part 3 says probs. part 3 would be good at helping the concerns of part 2 but 2 and 3 don't communicate. id like to decide one way or the other bc as it stands we are in a weird middle which is way worse than either conclusion
Have you considered agreeing to disagree?
I know this sounds like absurd advice when we're saying, "have you tried disagreeing on whether you're going to call yourselves plural?". I think a lot of folks would read that as "you should disagree about whether you exist!" That's not the intent.
You really, really can't force most people to see themselves as plural even if you personally think it's obvious. Often, this still applies to your own brainmates. The harder you push the framework, the harder they'll resist. The more that you insist on agreement, the more likely that someone is to double down (especially if they're afraid of any ramifications of other opinions being more practical or honest).
On top of that, folks do have the right to choose their own language for their experiences, and it can feel really frustrating when someone else pushes their framework or language on you when you don't want them. Frustrating each other over language isn't going to help you decide what to do with your experiences in a practical, daily life sense.
Sometimes getting agreement really, truly matters. We reach for tools like Consensus Decision Making to figure those conflicts out. Sometimes it doesn't actually matter as much as it seems to matter initially. There are a lot of very important-seeming things that turn out to have very little impact on your actual life, and figuring out which important things will actually affect you later is a useful skill to develop.
Personally, I think that trying to push for total agreement here is more likely to cause pressure and upset than it is to get The One True Answer. There is no One True Answer; plurality is subjective. So are labels. There's no objective test to tell you whether you're XYZ community term. There may not even be a right answer.
You've already said that you all agree that whatever is happening, it's happening a certain way. You are having an experience. You agree on that, and I'd argue that's more important than agreeing on what to call that experience. Everything else starts from deciding that something is happening.
There's no inherent reason that you all have to call yourselves the same thing or see yourselves the same way to try working with your actual experiences.
I find myself wondering what Part 2 prefers to call your experience, if anything. Have you heard them out, even a little bit? Did they make any good points or raise concerns you could address? (And if you can't reach them either: have you tried establishing external communication by leaving a note or other signal?)