Ubisoft is experiencing a nifty little thing called "the consequences of their actions".

if i look back, i am lost

ellievsbear
macklin celebrini has autism
d e v o n

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
EXPECTATIONS
taylor price
ojovivo
YOU ARE THE REASON
Jules of Nature
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

★

titsay

Product Placement
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Not today Justin

🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

Andulka
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
seen from Ukraine

seen from Sweden
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Iraq
seen from Malaysia
seen from Venezuela

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
@sansoncelertale
Ubisoft is experiencing a nifty little thing called "the consequences of their actions".

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Abstinence education MUST be based on a foundation of respect for self and others, and a sense of responsibility towards sex and how it can affect you and others. It can NOT be based on fear of sex, making sex an activity that “dirties” you, or something that turns virginity into a prize that makes you “pure.”
Scrolling through Tumblr, seeing tons of gofundme's about Gaza, and just wanna remind everyone:
Go Fund Me is not supported in Gaza. These are scams.
Here is a list of countries that GoFundMe is supported in. Gaza is not one of them.
I get wanting to help people. I do. But don't give your money to scammers, that won't help anyone. There are actual on the ground humanitarian groups you can donate to if you really wanna give monetary aid.
There are currently 20 countries where we can send funds, and the person withdrawing the funds must meet the withdrawal requirements from th
I Just want to add for clarification because, Yes. Some of these ARE scams.
Some of these posts, however, are organized by relatives who live in countries where Gofundme is supported. Countries like US and UK, etc etc.
The BEST THING TO DO IF YOU ARE UNSURE IS TO CHECK THIS GOOGLE SPREADSHEET OF VETTED FUNDRAISERS HERE. There's almost 300 fundraisers listed and it frequently updates.
how are they vetting those fundraisers? because i have seen people use the term "Vetting" when they say "yeah i know a guy he says this is legit."
Jews are indigenous to Israel. Period.
Today is a good day to remind the Islamists and their supporters that Jews are from Judea (Israel) and the Islamists are the invaders and occupiers, not the other way around.
In 70 CE, Romans destroyed the Jewish temple and attempted to banish the Jews from Jerusalem. Simply because the Jews would not go silently into the night, dared fight back, and attempted to thwart the most technologically advanced army the world knew at that time.
We Jews commemorate this Roman invasion and colonization, by observing the Tisha B'Av annual fast.
This proof of Jewish indigeneity is literally carved in archaeological artifacts and in this case, carved in stone, depicted the Frieze on the Arch of Titus in Rome. This arch depicts Roman soldiers carrying the relics and loot, stolen from the Jewish temple. Look at the Menorah. Jews still use the same candlesticks and symbols.
So what is "Palestine"? Roman Emperor Hadrian renamed the land (Judea) to "Palestine", to attempt erasure of any connection with the Jews.
Muslim identity and religion was created more than 500 years later (in 600 CE). And Muslims started calling themselves "Palestinians" only much much later.
There is absolutely no way to twist history so that Palestinians appear before Jews. But it doesn't stop some people from trying...
Does indigeneity matter? Do Native Americans deserve their own land, or that might makes right, and European colonizers should be allowed to displace them? Native Americans have 56.2 million acres of land, governed by Native American Tribal nations that own them. This colored to about 4.8 million acres of land administered by Israel.
If you do not believe that indigeneity matters, if you believe who co where'd last is what counts, then guess what? We still arrive at the same place.
"jews arent indigenous"
well we've been fasting and mourning the destruction of our first and second temple...IN JERUSALEM for over 2,000 years. so.
The Usual Suspect
Nuclear power W
Hydroelectric just humming away at a steady pace in the background
Hydroelectric, while cool is extremely location dependant(even moreso than light water reactors) and comes with its own massive ecological considerations.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Goyim you do realize that going "all zionists ahould be killed" allows people who move the goalpost on what is considered a zionist, kill jews for being jewish, right?
Like Yuval is a perfect example of moving the goalpost. He has described himself as an antizionist, helped raise money for people in Gaza - more than the average person too.
Yet he is being called a zionist online for speaking out about holocaust denial, which is antisemitism, as well as the jews control the world trope, which is also antisemitism.
To a fuck ton of people online, he is considered a zionist, despite literally not being one. Therefore, to a fuck ton of people, he deserve to die.
Whether or not you yourself, want all jews dead, if you think all zionist jews should die, you are at the very least enabling those who move the goalpost to include all jews, in who they want dead, to A) think it's okay to want all jews dead and B) to act on their thoughts.
And like, this is ignoring how zionists should not even be subject to being killed as it is low-key facist to kill someone for their political opinion + 80% - 90% of the Jewish population are self identified zionists so even wanting the majority of jews dead for virtue of political opinion is also fucked.
People need to realize how dangerous this thinking is.
I have little hope they will, sadly. But here's hoping I'm wrong.
Follow the science
Well duh.... It's like the carbon capture plants. Trees and plants do a much better job at removing CO2 for free.
Isn't it wild how every single "green" innovation, without exception, turns out to be massively worse for the environment than what we were doing before?
Almost like God knew what He was doing when He created the world in the first place
"The soviet union wasnt that bad, youre just poisoned by american propaganda" BRO THERE WERE GULAGS
Ah yes, stalin killed 9 million people, the official response to political opposition was an ice pick to the brain stem, an entire country was starved by force with the explicit intent of genocide-as-punishment, they did forced imperialism, had a direct hand in the establishment of north korea, and the soviets took the flag in berlin because they originally allied with nazi germany in WW2 until hitler betrayed them and the allies let them have their revenge. But yeah the USSR was a beacon of a communist utopia and everything bad ever said about them is just fake news because if america was bad in the cold war surely the soviet union had to be good
It’s maddening to find out that the scholar who first developed the idea that “Zionism is Settler Colonialism”, Fayez Sayegh, was a member of the Syrian Nazi Party during and immediately after the Holocaust, was an active participant in the Red Scare, using it to demonize Israel as a manifestation of a Global Communist Threat™️ through the height of the Cold War (true to his Nazi roots, accusing Israel of Judeo-Bolshevism) before switching to a Colonialism narrative when Post-Colonialism came in vogue in the 60s. And yet, the people I hear parroting the talking points of this anti-Communist, Ultranationalist Fascist-turned-scholar are the people who are constantly talking about how Liberal Progressives aren’t Communist enough and actually enemies because “Liberals will always side with Fascists”. Maddening.
If you’ve ever noticed how the “Zionism = Settler Colonialism” narrative eerily shares the core components of the far right’s Replacement Theory (that there are 1. Jews 2. conspiring to invade a given place and 3. replace the population with Jews), this is why; it’s because the idea that Zionism is Settler Colonialism came from a literal Nazi.
It is very literally Nazi propaganda.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
How many times must Hamas be proven (or admit to be in this case) to be lying for pro-palestine idiots to understand you can't trust terrorists and they've been spoonfed a false version of these events by the media in Gaza since the start?
We all know Hamas are evil murderers who don’t even try to hide the fact that they’re inhumane as they broadcast their sickening acts for the world to see.
But can we all take a moment to appreciate sanctimonious Tumblr terrorist-sympathisers?
How many instances are there of comments or messages from this platform’s best and brightest that threaten someone pro-Israel with violence?
How many comments are there telling supporters of Israel to kill themselves or some other wildly inventive iteration of the insult? Even on posts that are mourning the deaths of the innocent, and condemning the brutal murders of men, women, children, and animals, these people are relentless.
I do often wonder what they think comments like that achieve relative to their larger cause. It doesn’t solve anything at all, and if anything, hinders support for their side if the only meaningful additions they can make are death threats.
It’s very telling that they can’t make any coherent arguments or rebuttals and they resort to aggressive ad hominem attacks. They don’t have anything significant or mature to contribute to the discourse. They don’t want to engage in the conversation.
It’s almost as if their instincts are to just automatically attack someone for their beliefs and call for violence against them… like terrorists…
Birds of a feather, eh?
Hamas fanbois operate solely on hatred and rage.
Pathetic, really.
The Florida Senate Education Appropriations Committee unanimously approved a revised bill that mandates teaching the history of communism in
Kindergarten may be a bit early, but it's good that they're finally doing this.
*dies from frustration*
*gets up on a stage*
*takes a deep breath*
*screams*
PALESTINE WAS NEVER A COUNTRY!
This is historically incorrect.
The British Mandate for Palestine (1918-1948) was created looooong after Shakespeare wrote the above play (Othello the Moore) between 1567 and 1616. Palestine has ALWAYS been and will ALWAYS be a country.
Ooh, this is gonna be fun.
Okay. First: if a certain region is called in a certain name, it doesn't mean it's a country.
Secondly:
Israel (1948-now)
Before that, the British Mandate on Palestine (1920-1948):
Not a country.
Before that, the Ottoman empire (1516-1918):
Not a country.
Before that, the Mamluk Sultanate (1258-1516):
Not a country.
Before that, the crusades (1096-~1250)
Not a Palestinian country.
Before that, the Muslim conquest (~600-1074):
Not a Palestinian country.
Before that, the Eastern Roman empire - the Byzantine empire (390-634):
Not a Palestinian country.
Before that, the Roman empire (64BCE-390):
And before that, there are even more empires, but it isn't important, because there was something else in this area in that time:
Kingdoms of Israel and Judea
Before that were the Canaanites, a few minority nations that lived in the area that are now extinct (nobody really knows what happened to them).
So, no. No Palestine.
The name itself, Palestine, was given to the region during the Roman empire. They named it as some sort of a "fuck you" to the Jews that lived in Judea in that time, in an act that was meant to erase the history of Jews in Judea.
It was named after the Philistines, a small nation that lived in the area as well. And no, nowadays Palestinians aren't descendants of them. The Philistines are gone.
The Jews, on the other hand, are most certainly not.
Now, a point to think about:
If Palestine existed as you claim, can you tell me when it was established? What was the name of the prime minister/king/whoever else that ruled it? What were the borders? What was the army? Coin? Passport?
There was no Palestine. It was never a country.
Do your fucking research.
Also, facts: "Palestine" is derived from the Hebrew biblical word for "invader".
So, there's that.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I see a lot of posts saying "teach boys about consent".
While that is true, a lot of parents will do that and fail to see how their own actions are the problem.
If you've spanked him, he's less likely to understand consent.
If you've forced him to sit on Santa's lap, he's less likely to understand consent.
If you've forced him to give hugs and kisses to family members, he's less likely to understand consent.
If you've grabbed him in order to force him to sit still, he's less likely to understand consent.
If you've labeled him as "too sensitive" for not wanting to be touched, he's less likely to understand consent.
If you've assumed he's okay with something because he technically allowed it even though he felt pressured, he's less likely to understand consent.
If you're only going to criticize his actions but not your own, it won't work.
I am a firm believer that it's not just what he experiences in his life, but what he witnesses too. Okay so you don't do any of those to him but you do those things to his sisters? His cousins? His mom? He is learning consent is for him hut not for women.
One of my sisters has young children, both of whom are some flavor of neurodivergent. She is too, and as a result she often lost patience quickly with some of their quirks. The biggest offender is that her kids are extremely wary around anyone they deem to be a stranger, making social connection very difficult for all participants.
When I first met her daughter, she was 3 or 4, and was extremely reluctant to come and meet me. My sister began to shame and push and pull her towards me and I stopped her. I said "don't force her, don't teach her that she has to let men she doesn't know touch her, she doesn't need to hug me"
My sister froze in place, processed it for a moment, and let her daughter go. She went back to hiding behind mom. We continued our conversation and her son slowly approached me, hugged me, and climbed up onto the chair I was in to sit beside me and partially in my lap. After a few minutes, her daughter joined him. She didn't hug me, but she came over to touch and talk to me.
My sister was speechless. Her kids DON'T do that. I've heard many complaints from many family members about how antisocial they are. All I did was stick up for their right to offer or withdraw consent- and really just her daughter's, as her son had met me pre-covid and had already gotten over the hurdle at 2 years old, but her daughter was born during covid and thus it made her severe distrust of strangers even worse.
Now her kids are in elementary school and making friends easily and I regularly get stories from her about how she witnesses them connect with other socially withdrawn kids and stand up for both themselves and their quieter friends. She took my advice to heart and started allowing them to voice whether they consented to something and now her little boy will approach a crying kid on the playground and say something like "do you want to play, or do you want me to just sit with you, or do you want to be alone?" and then actually listen to what the other kid tells him.
My niece has an incredibly traumatized boy in her class who escaped war with his family, and he doesn't talk to anyone. But he visibly relaxes when my niece goes to sit next to him when he's too scared and curled up in the classroom's Quiet Corner. She reads to him and shows him her toys and holds his hand on field trips and yells at anyone who is mean to him. I'm told she's the only person who can approach or touch him without causing a meltdown besides his family, and it started because the first time she sat with him she asked if it was okay if she did so and she waited several minutes for him to nod before she sat down.
But they still avoid the family members that forced them to interact even when they were uncomfortable. I still hear those complaints, hundreds of miles away, and the jealousy that I've only met the kids a few times but they talk incessantly about me. If I call one of my family members and the kids are over, I can hear them in the background trying to talk to me if they figure out it's me on the other line.
Anyway. Long story short I didn't have to advocate for my nephew the way I did my niece, but advocating for my niece in front of the both of them dramatically changed the way both of them were taught to manage social interaction. Consent isn't just about teaching the boy. It's also making sure he sees that consent being practiced with everyone.
Parenting 👏 Done 👏 Right!