Riri🌿

Whilst I may posts some character meta pieces, share my thoughts on them, and share my own fanfics and ocs. Or even me complaining about something Ive noticed in media that I do not like for certain reasons, like my dislike for stories that are romanticizing abuse.

I will not argue over headcanons, ships, character or anything petty fandom related.

I might answer back in a friendly "OH yeah my thoughts/idea are..." in a friendly manner. But if I see someone get hostile over something like this, I will just ignore.

This doesn't apply to serious cases of any form of discrimination that I had been ignorant about, just petty fandom discussions, like "i think this character likes blue" where someone respons "likes blue?! Thats stupid! They obviously likes red, and you are wrong!"

"What if omegaverse was nature shifting due to the capitalistic patriarchal society driving the human species into a post apocalyptic hellscape, after years of said species not having children due to said driving forces putting them in that zoochosis state? It was meant to "correct" the damage done, but patriarchy reared its ugly head again, and began putting omegas at the bottom of the pyramid after said part helped fix things due to its matriarchal social structure. But after centuries of patriarchy putting alphas on a pedestal, they run into the same problem again. So omegas and betas who can have children fight back, and decides not to have children in a society that devalues them. So nature changes things again, by introducing Enigmas, Deltas and Sigmas as higher presentations that are meant to be all three presentations leaders and guides, but equal to each other in a way that poly relationships between the three becomes natural? But none of them are born as such, and are instead the result of a small group of alphas, betas and omegas, who are highly intelligent and natural leaders, presenting for a second time in early adulthood-"

My reaction to it were just: