Very annoying to me how publishers have:
Begun describing high fantasy novels with romantic side plots as "romantasy," and
Started to apply the "romantasy" label to YA books.
One of my favourite books, To Gaze Upon Wicked Gods, was published as romantasy. It was labeled and marketed as such. It is not that. It is a high fantasy novel that has an unhealthy colonizer/colonized romantic subplot that is sufficiently portrayed as unhealthy. 99% of criticism toward the book would go away if people did not go into it through the lens of "this is a romance" and continue to take the incorrect assessment approach of believing the book is romanticizing the plotline.
Books like this are HIGH FANTASY. High fantasy focuses more on world building, interpersonal relationships, political intrigue, and magic systems that are not based in our own world. Any romantic sideplot is a sideplot. ROMANTASY is a romance that uses the fantasy world as a backdrop - world building/politics/magic systems are secondary to that romance.
Romantasy is also pretty much widely accepted as a steamy genre. YA novels should not be as steamy as romantasy gets. (Of course, we do have SJM - whose books should never be published as YA and are now getting repackaged, but I digress.)
Perhaps there's something to be said for "YA romantasy" as a seperate, independent genre to romantasy itself, or as a romantasy subcategory.
But publishers should not be holding up books like Divine Rivals, a favourite of mine, and calling them "romantasy." Yes, it's romantic! Yes, it has fantasy elements! But it does not have any spice, nor should it since it's a YA novel.
The way I see it is that romantasy is a genre where the fantasy world is set up as a mechanism for the romance which is the main plot but I don’t like to call books that I enjoy romantasy even when they are because I have a negative opinion of a lot of the romantasy books I see and so I conflate the genre with those opinions. I would classify Divine Rivals as a romantasy because the main plot is the romance and the magical elements are all set up to serve the romance but it’s done well in my opinion and has mote substance than the standard romantasy. I don’t necessarily think all romantasy have a lot of smut but I think a lot of them do so I can see why the genre might be associated with smut.



















