Percy Jackson & The Curse of Achilles
Namely, why it isnât talked about enough, and why it should not have been dismissed so easily.
Firstly, some reminders on what the curse of Achilles actually is, and why itâs such a big deal:
You get the curse of Achilles by bathing in the River Styx. The River Styx forms the boundary between the Underworld and the Earth. In Greek mythology, it symbolizes the passage of life to death. Swearing on it is the highest form of an oath that you can make in Greek mythology, partly because the goddess Styx sided with the gods during the Titan War and it was how they honored her for that, but mostly because you donât mess with the buffer between life and death.
The River Styx sucks your soul out of your body. If you drown in the River Styx, your soul ceases to exist. Since the Styx is between life and death, if you drown in it, you get trapped between life and the afterlife, which, in Greek mythology, is a zone that souls canât exist between.
But, if you can survive the River of Styx trying to rip your soul out, then you get a reward: invincibility⌠or, at least, conditional invincibility.
You need one spot on your body to remain vulnerable, because thatâs where your mortality, otherwise known as your soul, is anchored. True invincibility is considered a form of immortality, because humans die in one of two ways: aging (which, for this purpose, includes illness), or they get injured. So if you canât get injured, youâre partially immortal. And, in Greek mythology, immortals donât have souls. So, if you want to avoid losing your soul in the river, then you need to anchor it to a spot on your body.
In the Last Olympian, Achilles explains this to Percy: âHero, if you must do this, concentrate on your mortal point. Imagine one spot of your body that will remain vulnerable. This is the point where your soul will anchor your body to the world. It will be your greatest weakness, but also your only hope. No man may be completely invulnerable. Lose sight of what keeps you mortal, and the River Styx will burn you to ashes. You will cease to exist.â
The point is, essentially, no man can be completely invulnerable because then he isnât really a man anymore. And, since there are divine rules about achieving immortality, you arenât allowed to obtain it without the godsâ consent. Thatâs actually a huge part of the Achilles story: the reason his mother dipped him in the Styx in the first place is because she was trying to make him a god, but she wasnât allowed to do that, so the heel remained vulnerable.
The problem is, thereâs only one vulnerable spot. Other than that, you are completely invincible. So, if you lose sight of that one mortal point, you become arrogant, and begin to behave as an immortal, because, for the most part, you kind of are.
Think about it. You act more recklessly if you know youâll come out unscathed, but without risk factor, life quickly becomes mundane. Thatâs why the immortals are so bitter. Thereâs a quote that Achilles says in Troy: âThe gods envy us. They envy us because weâre mortal, because any moment may be our last. Everything is more beautiful because weâre doomed.â And the reason why he says this quote is because he sympathizes with how the gods feel, and he understands this concept on a personal level. Because heâs fought battles his whole life, watching his comrades and enemies die, and he always, always comes out fine, because he cannot be killed.
The myth of Achilles is commonly told as a cautionary tale: donât lose sight of your weaknesses, or theyâll be your downfall. And Achilles did lose sight of his mortality⌠because itâs incredibly easy to do. And this is what he tries so desperately to warn Luke and Percy of before they decide to take the curse. Thatâs why his warning is so significant: he lost touch with his own mortality, and it cost him his life.
Taking on the curse of Achilles is a radically life altering event, which is reinforced by Hestia, Chiron, Nico, and Achilles himself. Because not only is the process of bathing in the Styx incredibly dangerous, but because bearing the curse totally changes the way you fight, think, and view the world. By taking the curse, youâre right on the edge of immortality, which can cause recklessness, arrogance, and even boredom, since you cannot die in battle.
The curse of Achilles has a lot more to do with immortality than it does invulnerability. Last Olympian makes a lot more sense when you look at it in this light. The reason Luke needed to bathe in the Styx before hosting Kronos is because Kronos cannot be contained in a mortal body. And the reason Percy needs to bathe in the Styx is because he canât fight an immortal in a mortal body. The curse of Achilles kind of gets treated like a wicked edge in battle, but itâs a lot more complex and important than that. Now, the theme of immortality is hugely, insanely relevant in Last Olympian. As is the concept of learning to yield. Thatâs the entire point of the book.
And we see that the pull of immortality has an effect on Percy. He is a very humble person (and very prone to self-loathing and insecurity, which is not the same thing, but it definitely prevents him from getting a big head), which is probably the only reason that he doesnât immediately become arrogant. And even Percy has some less-than-humble moments, although they are fleeting: laughing while he fights the army on the Williamsburg Bridge, and being tempted to wipe out the whole army on the bridge, even though he knows he should pull back. He literally almost dies on the bridge, because heâs already lost track of his mortal point (and also because he didnât have time to get armor and was literally fighting in jeans and a t-shirt, but).
Thereâs also a very interesting moment in Last Olympian when Percy is thinking about the hopelessness of the war, and suddenly feels strange about bearing the curse: âThere was hardly a single demigod who hadnât already been wounded⌠except me.â
The curse is shown to have an impact on Percy and Annabethâs relationship, because there are a few moments where Annabeth finds that⌠she really canât keep up with him anymore. This comes up on the Williamsburg Bridge, when he tells her to help the Apollo cabin set traps while he holds off the army. It also comes up before Percy goes to visit the East and Hudson river gods, while Annabeth sits on shore twiddling her thumbs, and is far from happy about it.
Of course, Percy still desperately needs Annabeth, maybe more than ever. Sheâs his anchor, after all. Itâs not a coincidence that Annabeth is Percyâs anchor to the mortal world and sheâs also the one to take the knife that would have killed him. Sheâs his anchor for precisely that reason. He relies on her to keep him grounded, and keep him in check (he does the same for her, which is why their relationship works).
The really interesting component to Last Olympian, which was an excellent touch, is that even though Percy is more powerful than ever, in the end, the most important thing he does is step back when necessary. This is the significance of Rachelâs, âPerseus, you are not the hero,â prophecy. This is also what Hestia teaches Percy, particularly when she says, âNot all powers are spectacular. Sometimes the hardest power to master is the power of yielding.â In the end, it doesnât come down to a grand, spectacular fight, but instead, to a single moment, when Percy hands Luke the knife.
The book also really hones in on how to use power responsibly. Percy challenges three separate gods to help defeat Kronos: Leneus, Poseidon, and Hades, all of whom wanted to focus on their own realm. And all three of them join the fight. Percy also challenges the gods to treat their children better, which we see realized in the oath.
Immortality comes up again in the end, however: because Percy is asked to become a god. And he turns it down, because thatâs not what Percy wants. Itâs why heâs the best suited to bearing the curse of Achilles, because heâs the least likely to be tempted to lose touch with his mortality.
The real key is that Percy doesnât want to be immortal, but he almost is. Percy just wants to be normal, and now he never can be. It shows just how much heâs willing to sacrifice for this world, and, more specifically, for the people he loves. Percy is actually afraid of taking the curse; he calls Nicoâs idea scary, and puts it off for an entire year, because he doesnât like it. He does end up taking the curse, but not because heâs thirsty for power, but because, âI have to. Otherwise, I donât stand a chance.â Heâs willing to sacrifice a part of his own mortality to keep these people safe, despite the fact that his highest ambition in life is to be a normal man.
Sacrificing part of your mortality isnât something that can just be undone. Itâs a seriously intense decision, and thatâs why Achilles personally comes to issue a warning. Because itâs life-altering, and could potentially end in disaster. So although Percy doesnât want it, he needs to live with it now. He needs to learn how to live with it, because thatâs how life works.
Except, Percy doesnât have to learn to live with it, because he gets it conveniently removed a few months later. This is by far the most ridiculous part of Son of Neptune, and represents a major fall out of series-to-series continuity.
Curse of Achilles in Last Olympian: radical, life-altering, dangerous, costs you part of your mortal life.
Curse of Achilles in Son of Neptune: oh, that old Greek blessing? The Tiber will wash away, no biggie.
If you go straight from Last Olympian to Son of Neptune, you can see that this is some seriously ridiculous bullshit. I mean, just think about it from an analytical perspective. Seriously, are we supposed to believe that had Achilles himself walked across the Tiber, he, too, would have lost his invulnerability? The curse of Achilles doesnât come with a warranty. Itâs a life deal. It costs you a piece of your mortality. Thatâs not something that can be overlooked. Does the Tiber have powers to restore your mortal soul back into your physical body? Does the Tiber have the power to remove your physical anchor to the mortal world? How does that even make sense? Itâs literally explained that you canât hold onto the curse because the Tiber is Roman, and the curse is Greek, andâŚ. and why in the world should that be true? Itâs not true about anything else. It makes no sense. Itâs not even explained.
The loss of the curse isnât explored at all. Percy doesnât even think about it once itâs gone. It never comes up again.
Youâd think that Percy would care more? He hasnât been injured in months? Heâs been fighting with it for months? His fighting style adapted, and now he has to quickly figure out a way to revert to his old style, because, oh, yeah, now he bleeds and gets broken bones and bruises. If you canât be injured, then your fighting style would be all offense, simply because it makes sense. Now, suddenly, heâs back on the defensive. Except thereâs no learning curve, thereâs no mention of this process at all.
Does Annabeth even know? I mean, she was upset that the gray hair was fading because she felt like she lost a symbolic bond. Imagine how much more of an impact the loss of the curse would have. She was his anchor to the mortal world, and he trusted her with his only weakness, and then itâs just taken away, and they donât even discuss it. Sheâd also have to adapt too, because Iâm sure she was a lot less worried about him when she knew he couldnât be injured. I bet they fought back to back more, so she could defend his only undefended side. I bet sheâd started to work it to her advantage, because itâs a massive fucking advantage and youâd be stupid not to utilize it. But again, no learning curve, no compensation for this at all.
Most significantly, though: there was absolutely no reason to remove the curse.
The only, the only, reason I can conceive of to remove the curse is so that Percy would have less of a wicked advantage over the rest of the seven. Namely, Jason.
It essentially boils down to, oops, I accidentally made my main character way too powerful, and now I need to think of a very convenient way to take this power away, and then not explain it!
Itâs called Diabolus ex Machina: the introduction of an unexpected new event, character, ability, or object designed to ensure that things suddenly get much worse for the protagonists, much better for the villains, or both. (this happens a lot in Heroes of Olympus, but it would take me far too long to get into it here).
Ironically, the removal in Son of Neptune also makes the curse seem like a Deus ex Machina solution in Last Olympian. Deus ex Machina is when some new event, character, ability, or object solves a seemingly unsolvable problem in a sudden, unexpected way. Now, the curse in Last Olympian was handled really well, but since it was removed after it had served its purpose, it essentially turns into a shiny new ability that has no lasting impact on the characters or the plotline.
If youâre gonna give a character an ability like that, then you have got to go all out. If you take it away for convenience, youâre cheapening the storyline, and cheapening the character. There need to be repercussions from such a monumental decision, or youâve lost all sense of continuity. There is a way to take power away, but this isnât it.
The most hysterical part of this whole mess, and by hysterical I mean fucking infuriating, is that Percy doesnât even get injured in a way that the curse of Achilles would have protected him from. He gets poisoned, suffocated, and restrained, all of which were perfectly viable options while the curse was still in place. The only significant time he draws blood is a fucking nosebleed, and even that could still have been done with the curse of Achilles in effect. (Frankly, though, thereâs absolutely no reason that Percyâs blood has to be the one to wake Gaea, and I think itâs ludicrous that Annabeth is the only one who got wounded in that battle. Itâs also never explained why Percy and Annabethâs blood would be âpreferableâ to wake the goddess, so that whole scene is fucking bullshit to begin with.)
But, truly, the most ironic part is that the series would have been so much better if the curse was left in place.
Listen up: I think itâs generally agreed upon that Percyâs character was dumped on in Heroes of Olympus, in order to make the other characters (namely Jason and Leo) shine brighter by comparison (if youâre unfamiliar with that, thereâs a little bit about it here, here, and here).
Short version is that Percy is given a bunch of new issues that he doesnât really have (his weird Alpha Male personality switch in Mark of Athena that is wildly out of character for him), or, has skeletons pulled out of his closet (everything in Tartarus basically) and then conveniently shoved back in the closet to focus on the other characters. The problem is Percy had already grown up and undergone well-handled character development in PJO, and so what essentially happened is that fake development was forced by creating new issues (you can read a really good example of that here).
But if the curse of Achilles would have remained present, that wouldnât have happened. Because that was the one loose end of PJO: Percy really didnât have the curse long enough to fully understand it by the time the book ended. So, since he didnât get that chance in PJO, that would have been the perfect thing to explore in HOO. But itâs not explored.
Can you imagine how much more intense everything would have been with the curse of Achilles? The scene with Jason in Kansas would have escalated that much more (did i mention that the only reason the curse was removed was so this scene could happen), and Percy would have been that much more unsettled over who the winner would have been (if we ignore the fact that this alpha male thing is massively ooc for him).
Imagine how insanely heartbreaking and intense the scene with the Arai would have been, since it had been so long since Percy felt pain. Imagine how much more disturbing it would have been, and how much more distressed Annabeth would have been.
The Romans would have feared him that much more, giving even more opportunity for Percy to feel like an outcast
Imagine Percyâs guilt when the rest of the seven keep getting injured and he is always fine??????
Percy would have had to deal with the concept that even though it seems like a blessing sometimes, it really is a curse, because he can never get back to the way he was. Fully coming to understanding, and eventually acceptance, of the curse could have been an incredible plotline.
Percyâs struggle for acceptance and normalcy is the most significant area that requires development, and keeping the curse would have been an incredible way to explore that.
I shed a tear for its potential. Someone write me an au, pretty please.
dailybridgerton
kianamaiart
discoholicmusic
amandla
pixelskylines
