⚢

Thank you for reading :)

but… not all men, right?

Just cuz you were a meangirl in highschool and weren’t liked enough to be invited to one, doesn’t mean women didn’t and don’t talk about men like they’re pieces of fuckmeat too. XD

why do you think women grow to resent/hate/fear men in the first place, you lobotomized myspace user? minus the obvious sexual assault and harrassment, it’s because we were exposed to the things men said about us when they felt comfortable enough to let us in on their “jokes.” it’s probably because, like me, other women who were friends with boys in high school went on to watch the ones who were especially edgy in their rape jokes and discussions of women as fuckmeat (as you so eloquently put it) actually assault women/girls, whether it be them or their friends, and the ones who didn’t assault anyone stood idly by and didn’t say a word. i don’t know what cesspool of the internet you were plaguing back in the day to make you this stupid, but someone who still uses XD at the end of every attempted own in 2022 isn’t the first person i’d listen to talk about high school popularity. thanks for your input though

Um this woman is living the dream

No I’m not. Again, you need to understand that having a trait does not mean you are nothing but that trait.E.g. “All dogs have four legs” does not mean dogs are nothing but legs.“All elephants have big ears” does not mean elephants are nothing but a set of giant-ass ears.“All male lions have manes” does not mean male lions are nothing but a walking pile of long hair.This is not that hard you guys.You’re interjecting a whole bunch of shit into that simple sentence but really, I’m not saying any of that.If I say “All people with pale skin have a lack of melanin in their genes”, is that reducing all pale people to nothing but the lack of melanin in their genes? Fucking no lol. Stating a scientific fact - that to be part of class or group X, you must possess trait Y, is not reducing anyone down to being nothing but trait Y. It’s simply saying for you to qualify as a part of this group, you must have this specific trait. That’s it. The qualification of being female (which is what women are) is that you have XX chromosomes and the anatomy necessary for producing ova. That does not mean that’s all women are, nor, by any fucking stretch of the imagination, does that mean that the only important part of a woman is her XX chromosomes or female sex specific anatomy. Like come on. All it says is that to be a woman, you must be female, and to be female, you must have XX chromosomes and female sex specific anatomy. Everything above and beyond that makes you 100% as valid as a living, breathing, living, experiencing, loving, laughing, working, struggling, thriving woman, just like any other woman on the planet. But you are still female, you are still a woman. And that is not something you can opt in or out of because biology is unchangeable.You seem to be thinking that a person’s identity as a man or woman is the ultimate totality of their identity as a person, that there is no identity outside of being a man or a woman, or that the identities of men/women as men/women, respectively, encompass all we are and all we’ll ever be. So to you, reducing the definition of a woman down to biology means to reduce the entirety of your personhood down to biology. But that is a false and misinformed perception. We are more than our respective sexes or the gendered expectations that come tied to those. The fact that you have knit your personality and your gender into one uniform identity is not the fault of radfems or science or biology itself. And just because it threatens your perceptions/conceptions of yourself and your political movement does not mean it is inherently untrue or that it is actually the threat you perceive it to be. Womanhood is not the sum of a person’s personality or identity. Womanhood is simply the lived experience of females, in all their multifaceted diversity.Saying “whether or not they experience womanhood” in regards to females is meaningless. There is no womanhood but that which is experienced by females. Womanhood is not a subjective experience that can be opted in or out of. It is the experience of female people, plain and simple. Any experience of womanhood by a female is a valid experience, because it is simply that - the female experience. That’s all it is.Now, you wanna know what does reinstate the notion that the only important part of a woman is her sexual or reproductive anatomy?“Uterus havers”“Birthers”“Bleeders”“Vagina people”“Pregnant people””Period havers”Etc.And that’s all on you guys.

She was shocked… and her and her bf got angry at me for implying pimps or johns would ever approach her, because I was obviously trying to say she looked like a whore and not trying to warn her so her naive ass won’t get kidnapped or worse.

literally this

cool what if I came to your house and killed you

y'all post shit like this and think like this and then wonder why actual homosexuals don't want to be part of the LGBT community anymore and why public opinion of gay people is statistically getting worse

Emotions are not the problem here. Control and misogyny are. Do you think they'd snap at their boss ? At someone they see as superior to them ? This is deliberate. They know what they're doing. They do it because they think it's justified and they can get away with it.

You CAN do deep squats, my friend!

this man’s a pure blessing for breaking these exercises down to easier steps

if you think its “wholesome” for a man to hire a woman to let his disabled brother to rape her you should fucking kill yourself