please someone tell me how this is any different from cis transphobes going "you're so heckin valid (even though you're not a Real man/woman)"
i think telling trans men they're not men in a way that counts is heinously transphobic actually. all these people are obviously transmisogynists as well but atp i'm marking them red for their good old fashioned transphobia too
i've fought cis people who were dear to me for saying shit like this, why should i tolerate it from shitty dudes who, adding insult to injury, aren't just saying it because they're parroting the transphobic background noise of the world rn but to actively deny they benefit from transmisogyny??? fuck all the way off. i'm so tired of people on my asks telling me i should give more grace to ""my community"". these people are not my community and if i could i'd spit on every one of their faces until i died from dehydration
if you say or believe things similar to what's in the screenshot in the first post of this chain, i want you to know this is exactly the kind of people that rhetoric attracts. one would think receiving anons like these would be especially upsetting, but, as i said, this is simply the logical continuation of the arguments by oop. what else do you think "you might be the gender man but not the class men" mean? to my eyes, this terf here is not more transphobic than oop -they're saying exactly the same thing, hence my vitriol. anyway, speaking of oop and people defending them: these are your buddies! have fun!
