An example of such an argument would be taking a random topic, such as "red roses are red," and stretching each fact until it morphs into something else entirely. The roses are red because they're called "red roses"? That's boring and unimaginative, and also agreeing with mainstream media. How lame and conformist. Actually, red roses are blue. The word "red" is found in the name of a synthetic food dye known as Red 40. When you add 2 to 40, you get 42, which is the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything. Life is a cereal brand made by Quakers Oats, whose company logo displays a man wearing a navy blue hat. Old Navy is a clothing store, often located near shopping centers marketed toward middle-aged people with families. The word "families" contains the letter 'l'. The word "blue" also contains the letter "l". Therefore, red roses are blue.
These kinds of arguments would be funnier, though, if they didn't so closely mirror real-life arguments