Titled

"um people have definitely mentioned that out loud before lol you are young and therefore stupid and entitled and though i'm not saying it i'm also implying that you (trans woman) are being overly sensitive and nitpicking and nobody cares lmao"

Made this post about 15 minutes after the repair guy who fixed the pump on my dishwasher packed up his tools and left, as the dishwasher was whirring along doing my dishes from that morning.

Also additions from @peelerofpotatoes and @tvtimaeus that are good

I would still take estrogen on a desert island. If that doesn't describe you, then good for you!! But dismantling gender norms would still not alleviate bodily dysphoria for all.

I'm sorry but this is another "status quo take that acts like it's the underdog". I mean yeah I guess we can't be CERTAIN certain of this, because we don't have a society-free control group of humans. But I've personally spent a decent amount of time in isolated wilderness and I've still had bodily dysphoria then. I've still had bodily dysphoria after years of trying to deconstruct the concept of what bodies go with what people.

My weird anecdote here is that I was raised in a prudish environment and learned about normal genital anatomy kinda late (around like 8ish yo). I don't remember much that far back, but I have some memory of bottom dysphoria before I never knew that opposite sexed genitals existed. I knew something felt wrong about me having a penis before I knew what a vagina was, when I was a young kid.

Like yeah I guess you can't be 100% sure what a genderless society would do for bodily dysphoria. But as it stands it just reads as annoying and dismissive to claim this about anyone who does experience bodily dysphoria. And it's even more annoying to see this take pop up EVERY time someone mentions bodily dysphoria. It is genuinely kind of what I'm complaining about initially, or rather a prelude to the mentality I'm complaining about initially. This "controversial take" is the initial statement you have to accept before saying something like "we just need to deconstruct gender instead of letting people transition" when the reality of that statement is that the premise itself is flawed. And that flawed premise is what you're saying.

So I honestly could not disagree more.

so much cheap generic medication. reverse engineering compounds would be even more financially profitable.

fewer people dead of vaccine preventable illnesses in the global south bc the greatest barrier to distributing some vaccines like hpv is their ip

plant seeds and grafts that come from the plants instead of licensing them. don't invest so much in preventing cross contamination. more localised experimental breeding.

library of the world: every book and journal article in the world could be digitised and be searchable for every person in the world to read regardless of where they live. cheap reprint runs and local translations everywhere.

an online interface where every citation could actually lead to the text in question

freedom from the hell that is DRM software

everytime someone reverse engineered your shitty proprietary software we would all be freed from it instead of them getting DMCA'd

so much hardware would be opened up & therefore made so much cooler.

so many more songs that riff off and sample and interpolate shit from this decade instead of like 70 years ago and more analysis of music that didn't keep getting nuked off the internet

preserving movies and tv shows and games as long as someone, somewhere has the desire to host them

just go publish your fanfic/art/vid as is instead of all us pretending it isn't fanwork or begging the corporation for mercy / licensing

I hate the unearthly sound my phone makes when the weather service issues a tornado harbinger.

Types of Tornado Alert [Explained]

Transcript Under the Cut

It's ok, I still have some nice, cool gas clouds that aren't collapsing. As long as nothing ionizes them, I can continue to enjoy their ... HEY! NO!!!

Star Formation [Explained]

Transcript Under the Cut