I get why whipping girl is so loved by so many trans women. It's primary purpose is to be 400 pages of gassing up trans women, and we are a demographic that often desperately needs something positive to counteract the hate we are attacked with constantly as a very visibly hated queer demographic. Encountering the "make trans women feel amazing and special and great" book when you are drowning in negativity has the potential to be a formative experience.
This isn't a bad thing. But I do think it's a bad thing to form the basis of your queer understanding on a book that is intended to connect on an emotional level and make you have a borderline religious experience about how you are awesome because you are a trans woman. It's good as a jump start to your self esteem but not as an ongoing source of self worth and certainly not a basis of theory. Because what happens then is anything that doesn't square completely with the book meant to make you feel good becomes a personal attack.
And, unfortunately, the book says some incorrect and even outright indefensibly ignorant things at times. The book is dedicated to building up trans women, and one of the techniques it uses to do so is tearing down others. It's not enough that trans women are great, they have to be better than everyone else. Many of the most famous quotes from the book focus on propping up trans women as specifically the best, which necessarily involves saying everyone else is worse. That is what the best means, and is why Julia Serano felt the need to specifically comment on other identities to compare them to trans women and declare trans women better.
And when some trans woman is really hurting reads the book and for the first time in her life actually feels really good about herself and hangs her self esteem on the ideas presented in the book, this attitude of comparing trans women to others becomes a core part of her basis for self esteem. And anything that challenges the narrative in anyway is perceived as a personal attack and transmisogyny, no matter how irrational that is. No matter how prejudice that is.
It's not just whipping girl of course, lots of trans women culture and literature is like this. But whipping girl is a convenient example for being so popular and visible.
And this is the part that's going to really get me in trouble.
I do not personally like whipping girl. Frankly, it creeps me out to read it. Those famous quotes that people love so much set off all sorts of warnings in the back of my head and I've only recently figured out why. The sections that are dedicated to building up trans women by putting them above others read like Mormon propaganda, and having been born into the Mormon cult I have a very bad reaction to this type of rhetorical technique. An aversion to "you are just better than other people" type propaganda earned the hard way through more than twenty years of this type of stuff being an integral part of the trap that very nearly killed me before I managed to get out.
Yes, I am drawing a direct comparison between parts of whipping girl and Mormon cult propaganda. I think the comparison is valid. Again, it's not just whipping girl, that is just a convenient example. There is an understandable significant cultural lean among many trans women to this type of rhetorical framing as push back against the constant storm of hate against us. But understandable isn't the same thing as right.