super old art in light of the finale! i drew these for my gomens zine but never posted them.
art blog(derogatory)
Mike Driver
Peter Solarz

⁂
occasionally subtle

let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Discoholic 🪩
$LAYYYTER
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
🪼
ojovivo
sheepfilms
dirt enthusiast

JBB: An Artblog!

#extradirty

if i look back, i am lost
Cosmic Funnies
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

seen from Türkiye

seen from Australia
seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from Serbia
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@notthomas
super old art in light of the finale! i drew these for my gomens zine but never posted them.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
If you're writing anything involving cons, scams, heists, or morally questionable characters who are very good at lying, here are some free resources I've been using for research. Saving you the "why is this in my search history" anxiety.
1. The FBI's Famous Cases & Criminals archive (fbi.gov/history/famous-cases) has detailed breakdowns of real fraud cases, Ponzi schemes, and confidence operations. The language they use is clinical and precise, which is perfect for getting the procedural details right.
2. The FTC Consumer Sentinel Network publishes annual reports on the most common fraud tactics in the US. Great for understanding how modern scams actually work and what makes people fall for them.
3. The Smithsonian's American Art Museum has a free digital collection of forgery case studies. If your character forges documents or art, this is gold.
4. Court Listener (courtlistener.com) is a free legal database where you can read actual court transcripts from fraud trials. Want to know how a real con artist talks under oath? This is where you find out.
5. The Internet Archive's collection of old newspaper crime sections. Search for "confidence man" or "swindle" in papers from the 1920s through 1960s and you'll find incredible real stories that would feel too dramatic for fiction.
Bonus: The Psychology of Fraud section on the Association for Psychological Science website has accessible articles about why people trust, how deception works cognitively, and what makes someone a convincing liar. Essential reading if you want your con artist characters to feel psychologically real.
Reblog to save for later. Your WIP will thank you.
My partner and I noticed you from across the bar and uhh... give us the amulet
show: "And with this incredible technology, these characters' consciousnesses are transferred to a virtual body." me when I have the chronic affliction: "Does the character's chronic affliction come too? Does it come too or does the virtual body cure it."
show: "This character is immortal. Watch as their entire destroyed body rebuilds itself via immortality." me when I have the chronic affliction: "Does immortality cure the chronic affliction? Do they come back together and the affliction is just fixed? Is that part of immortality healing?"
show: "In a cyberpunk world, people actually build new bodies and place their minds inside--" me when I have the chronic affliction: "Do they still have the affliction"
clowngirl getting an orchiectomy and the surgeon just keeps removing ball after ball after ball after ball after
clown nurse standing by solemnly adding each successive ball to the ones she's already juggling

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
i know most leftists agree that everybody should have a right to food, water, shelter, and healthcare but i think a vitally important fifth pillar is privacy. people should not be compelled to be tracked, monitored, or to share personal space with others to access their other essential rights
Carnivorous plants doin this is so funny to me
They don't wanna eat their pollinators :(
what I mean: "sexual intercourse" is as much a social construct as "romantic courtship," and you discover this very quickly as a queer person if you try to talk to able bodied straight cis people who literally think the only thing that counts as Actual Sex is penis-in-vagina penetration, like they call oral "foreplay" it's so dire. various people have a lot of vested interest in cleanly defining "sex" vs "not sex" for a whole slew of reasons (ex. censorship dodging and enforcing, conferring the social clout of virginity and prowess, finding and closing loopholes about premarital sex, deciding what relationships "count" as serious partnerships, ligating what is general assault vs sexual assault vs Something That's Definitely Probably Fine And Not Sexual At All, Actually, etc.), and it's really not something you can just fall back on as obvious common sense that people are dumb for questioning.
what I say: sex isn't real and you can't have it
Yeah, you support people who want to be rape-I mean, roughly fucked and abused until they're broken. But are you normal about people who want to roughly fuck and abuse them until they're broken?
Yeah, you support people who want to be fucked while they age regre-I mean, while they're cute little, innocent babbling toys. But are you normal about people who want to fuck them when they're cute little, innocent babbling toys?
Yeah, you support people who want to be fucked while they're drunk or unconsc-I mean, while they're asleep and high. But are you normal about people who want to fuck them while they're asleep and high?
Yeah, you support people who want to be beat up and cut-I mean, bruised and marked. But are you normal about people who want to bruise and mark them?
Yeah, you support people who want to be fucked while they're dogs and anim-I mean, while they're puppyboys and kittygirls. But are you normal about people who want to fuck puppyboys and kittygirls?
Yeah, you support people who want to be fucked by their parents and sib-I mean, by their pretend siblings, step bros, step sisters, mommies and daddies. But are you normal about people who want to be their pretend siblings and parents?
Yeah, you might support people having fucked up, dark, disgusting kinks, but are you actually ok with the people who will do fucked up, dark, disgusting things to them?
Or is it only wrong when those people are transfems?
People with 'daddy' kinks are very quick to point out how "disgusting" it is that there are people with "gross incest kinks." They feel the need to loudly state how they "don't support incest." What's the difference between you calling the person breeding you 'daddy', and someone calling their partner their 'dad', exactly? Where is the line?
To these people, it's all about meeting the threshold of what's socially acceptable. They will even pretend to be supportive of the 'fucked up, dark, disgusting kinks', except "the Actually Bad Ones."
They will share these kinks as long as the language used to talk about them is sanitized enough, as to distance the kink from its problematic aspects. It gives them leeway to say "I'm not into this gross, depraved thing. They are. I'm 'normal' about it, unlike those freaks who call someone their dad, or the people that babble like babies and use diapers, or the people who bark and pretend they're animals, or those who cut and want bruises on their bodies."
The self-censoring of darker kinks to make them appear more palatable is a response to the disgust (and maybe shame) of being into things that are considered socially immoral. So, they have to make it so what they're into is "not that disgusting, depraved thing", but something that's normal.
It's a lot of internalized shame, societal conformity, and fear of embracing that which will make u an outcast and a social reject. It's also the need to be being more morally righteous, and impure.
"It's ok to want to call the person breeding you daddy, as long as you don't call it incest, which is disgusting and depraved."
Using your disgust to shame and denounce people who engage in kink in a way that you don't find acceptable is not sexual liberation. It's being a fucking hypocrite
here's your daily reminder that if you've ever identified as a brat or called/been called mommy/daddy in bed, you are in fact an ageplayer and incest freak and that's actually okay and not a moral ill. believe it or not, playing make believe with your adult consenting partners does not in fact make you a pedo. just like pretending to be or being into a bottom who is a kitten or puppy or any other animal does not in fact mean you're into bestiality. it really is that simple.
happy glorious 25th of may

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
OKAY!!!!
One hot and cool writing tip that I wish more people knew is... you don't have to write out people's accents phonetically. You just don't. You are not Dickens. You are (hopefully) not Rowling. There are so many other ways you can make someone's speech feel authentic to their background, or just make it clear that they're speaking in a certain accent, not limited to:
literally just saying 'he spoke with a Welsh accent'; sure, it's a bit blunt, but it gets the job done in a pinch. "He's completely drunk," he said, his southern drawl lingering on the final syllable as if to highlight the extent of the offence. Y'know, something of that ilk, but not as shit.
learning the specific vocabulary and syntax that someone with that accent might use. Sticking with the Welsh theme, because it's objectively the best accent*, there's a bunch of things that differentiate a colloquial South Walean accent, outside of our famed tendency to elongate a vowel to the point of death. The way we use prepositions (where to by is he?), the vocabulary borrowed from Welsh - saying that someone daft is twp, or something small is dwty - can easily signpost our speech as being from that specific area, without needing to type something like "'e's absolutely 'angin', man, pissed as a faaht 'e is!" Something less jarring, such as "He's absolutely hanging, he is." is just as clear. A character who says "Do you want a cuppa?" is coded or located very differently to one who says "You'll have a cup of tea, so you will."
ditto if there are specific ways that someone from a certain area might refer to a well-known concept. Regional words for mother and father, for example, or words that are class-specific; your character who calls his parents 'mater and pater' is likely inhabiting a different socioeconomic strata than your character who calls them 'mam and dad'. See if there's a colloquial way of saying 'yes' and 'no'; a lot can be signposted if your character says 'nah' rather than 'no', or 'aye' rather than 'yes'. A character saying 'couch' is inherently coded differently to one who says 'sofa'.
The reasons that writing accents phonetically is Generally Ill-Advised, In My Opinion are as follows:
quite simply, you're probably not being as clear in conveying the sounds of the accent as you think you are. Taking JK Rowling's work as the best possible example of this, her attempts at writing a Cockney accent phonetically come across like someone is chewing a mouthful of cheese curds and struggling to contain them. There's no consistency, no proper understanding of how to transcribe syllables into writing in a way that coherently conveys the accent she's trying to portray. I mean this so seriously, but what the flying fuck is: 'Well, 'e 'ad these 'ead pains and 'e was def'nitley nervous. Depressed maybe.' It's a crime, is what it is.
it's just plain hard to read. Trying to wade through sentences full of apostrophes and elision, parsing what's actually being said, gets tiresome. It asks the reader to do work that you're actively making harder for them. And that's not always a bad thing! Making readers Put Some Fucking Effort In can be very fruitful! But do you really want them to be struggling to understand every single thing that your Character B is saying for 350 pages?
which leads me onto the last point, and the most important in my mind: writing out accents like this always, always affects accents that are already in some way Othered. They're either racialised or working class, or associated with certain local regions that have negative stereotypes - think the deep South of the US, or the Welsh Valleys. They're never the 'default'. And this raises thorny questions about what the default is, what the standardised accent is, the accents that do and do not merit differentiation from the norm. You're relegating Character B to being hard to read because he's from, idk, Sunderland. You've decided that he isn't speaking 'properly', and therefore the reader needs to understand that other people think he's speaking weirdly. That, to me, is the principle issue. Because returning to JK Rowling (a sentence I hoped never to type), the only characters who speak like this in her work are working class, or they're from other countries. They're never from, you know, Surrey. Wonder why that is. And it's easy to be glib about it, but I do think it reifies class and regional boundaries in a way that's ultimately harmful.
This isn't to say that there's never a place for eye dialect in writing - Trainspotting, for example, wouldn't be what it is without it, and there's definitely a different conversation to be had when it's your own accent and you're making a deliberate point about identity by differentiating through eye dialect - but I think that the blanket assumption of 'oh shit, my character is from Ireland, I'd better type that out phonetically!' can actually be both damaging to your writing and to your character representation, and I think that instead doing the work to really understand the vocabulary, speech patterns and unique aspects of a language or dialect always makes a work feel more authentic and lived-in.
To wit, less of this shite:
There’s mony a slip, an’ I’m no losin’ sight o’ any o’ my suspectit pairsons, juist yet awhile. (Peter Wimsey, if you were wondering, and yes, that's supposed to be Scottish)
and more of this:
"Are we straight so?" "Aye, we're straight," said Jim. "Straight as a rush, so we are." (Jamie O'Neill, Irish, from At Swim, Two Boys)
*objective determination made via a sample size of one: me, in an elaborate hat.
Rocky has a mother of pearl inlay on one of his back legs!!
Source
Feels bad man.
6/3/2026
the "came back wrong" trope except like... they didnt. like this mad scientists wife died, and so he studied necromancy, brought her back, and she came back and it all worked. like she came back exactly the same as she was before with literally no difference. but the scientist guy is like "oh no... what have i done.... shes Different now!!!! she came back Wrong!!!!" and shes just like. chilling. reading a book. cooking dinner. shes just so so normal but in the guys mind hes like "oh shes soooo weird" but shes just normal
Peer reviewed tags from @somanyofthekids
NO its a JOKE and YOU DONT GET IT. ITS NOT THAT DEEP
While she was dead he put his memory of her on such a high pedestal that she could never live up to it alive
alternatively‚ she came back perfectly fine but he thinks she came back wrong‚ because the tragic reality is that he never actually knew his wife
im going INSANE thats MY POST.
It's your post but the journey to posting it changed it to such a degree that even its closest intimacies are now foreign to you. Sorry dude.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
happy pride month
they got married btw
oh you’re not kidding