i remember you from hive.,,,
i'm so fucking scared... (who were you?)
Game of Thrones Daily

pixel skylines
NASA

JVL
dirt enthusiast

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
trying on a metaphor
h
todays bird

blake kathryn
Xuebing Du
Peter Solarz
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

@theartofmadeline
KIROKAZE
🪼
almost home
styofa doing anything

Kiana Khansmith
Claire Keane
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from Belarus
seen from South Africa

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
seen from France

seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Türkiye
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Ukraine
@mikuzoid
i remember you from hive.,,,
i'm so fucking scared... (who were you?)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The art vs the artist
erm.... you're too woke.... I'm gonna have to unfollow you and vague post about you till the day I die 😔😔🙀😿
Ur so mean to me im gonna make a call out post!!1!1!1!!! 😭 😭😭😭😭😭
I will make a fancily worded yet avoidant response post but I will not tag you because I will say "I don't want to keep doing this drama thing" and then drag it out
i’ll make a psa telling people to mass block you 😈 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈
well I'm gonna get my hoard of rabid fans to send you threats while saying "please don't threaten or interact"
i’ll pretend to take a hiatus but a day later a mysterious new user with a similar typing style to me will appear
it did take me until just now to realize people might think my username is referencing the word foid ITS NOT it just sounded cool to me and like robot/dehumanizing in a cool way
art versus the artist!
Not quite used to how this website works… but behold!
art by yours truly, please do not repost or steal :)
@moonbee- on scratch, art posted there too <3

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
This is my favorite screenshot
art vs artist
rainbow chuzzle
recently atari made a post about not liking people lumping the managers together as "the managers" but brook is encouraging the lumping of "the curators" and "faccfc" and making them out to be enemies, and seems to have the intention to "gossip" when matt, a new manager, said she did not "side with" the managers but whateverrrr whatever. idk its just so odd.
Please ask for context from managers before posting stuff like this, because there is literally a normal explanation. Matt doesn't have tumblr or discord or any of the offsites in which all of this stuff happens, so Matt literally just didn't know about what's been happening the past few days. And so I said that we need to like, fill her in.
that was more of something i tagged on with less thought. i was trying to explain the fact that there is an exaggerated divide? idk it came off as really weird to me especially with how youve said certain things are "because youre a manager" and with the fact many curators are also not in on things, or many curators are "on the managers side". i dont think the. sides are as black and white as that. i dont hate all the managers. i dont love all the curators. i dont support evrrything or hate everything either does. i havent posted about like bo or xen or xy because i myself do not have issues with them and am really neutral on how they manage the studio? im really disoriented right now and kind of just posted because that in that moment bothered me and that is kind of what i do with this account
also ajax isnt a manager why does ajax need to be told if the case is just managers need to be filled in
ajax is a personal mate who doesnt really hang on the hive anymore so i talk to him about hive stuff. I dont shittalk . he's a friend it's literally like telling your mate about something that happened the other day . hes my friend and hes left the hive and checks in once a month or once every few weeks hes not a curator to shittalk other curators to
it's nice to have a friend who isn't in the hive anymore or involved in the stuff that still understands the gaehive so i can talk to them
i'm really confused why this is an issue, curators can talk to other curators about what happened and they literally do
im sorry for posting this i think i was just reeally on edge last night and you and vio's comments both rubbed me the wrong way and i reacted in an overly defensive way. i can delete the original post and my replies if youd like
recently atari made a post about not liking people lumping the managers together as "the managers" but brook is encouraging the lumping of "the curators" and "faccfc" and making them out to be enemies, and seems to have the intention to "gossip" when matt, a new manager, said she did not "side with" the managers but whateverrrr whatever. idk its just so odd.
Please ask for context from managers before posting stuff like this, because there is literally a normal explanation. Matt doesn't have tumblr or discord or any of the offsites in which all of this stuff happens, so Matt literally just didn't know about what's been happening the past few days. And so I said that we need to like, fill her in.
that was more of something i tagged on with less thought. i was trying to explain the fact that there is an exaggerated divide? idk it came off as really weird to me especially with how youve said certain things are "because youre a manager" and with the fact many curators are also not in on things, or many curators are "on the managers side". i dont think the. sides are as black and white as that. i dont hate all the managers. i dont love all the curators. i dont support evrrything or hate everything either does. i havent posted about like bo or xen or xy because i myself do not have issues with them and am really neutral on how they manage the studio? im really disoriented right now and kind of just posted because that in that moment bothered me and that is kind of what i do with this account
also ajax isnt a manager why does ajax need to be told if the case is just managers need to be filled in
It was a comment I replied to without thinking too deeply into it. Won't happen again.
I'm confused on how what Jace said is relevent. Ajax is a friend of Jace's. Jace can tell Ajax how he feels about his manager position if he wants. Things can be shared with friends. Ajax also isn't even on the studio anymore
I'll be so fucking real, I'm tired of every comment and every reply I make scrutinized, speculated and talked about in the hiveblr tag. If it is that concerning, please just bring it to us directly. Because it just leads to words getting twisted and misunderstandings
im sorry for posting this i think i was just reeally on edge last night and you and atari's comments both rubbed me the wrong way and i reacted in an overly defensive way. i can delete the original post and my replies if youd like

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
most euthanizable mutuals of 2026
@thepoolisdead
THE FUCK DID I DO
i think i saw a bracket get mentioned recently and i maybe missed it im kind of sad it was really fun when princette hosted the character bracket
im holding a bracket on my next shift if it's on the weekend im happy to let you know when that happens
ooh okay yay
i think i saw a bracket get mentioned recently and i maybe missed it im kind of sad it was really fun when princette hosted the character bracket
recently atari made a post about not liking people lumping the managers together as "the managers" but brook is encouraging the lumping of "the curators" and "faccfc" and making them out to be enemies, and seems to have the intention to "gossip" when matt, a new manager, said she did not "side with" the managers but whateverrrr whatever. idk its just so odd.
Please ask for context from managers before posting stuff like this, because there is literally a normal explanation. Matt doesn't have tumblr or discord or any of the offsites in which all of this stuff happens, so Matt literally just didn't know about what's been happening the past few days. And so I said that we need to like, fill her in.
that was more of something i tagged on with less thought. i was trying to explain the fact that there is an exaggerated divide? idk it came off as really weird to me especially with how youve said certain things are "because youre a manager" and with the fact many curators are also not in on things, or many curators are "on the managers side". i dont think the. sides are as black and white as that. i dont hate all the managers. i dont love all the curators. i dont support evrrything or hate everything either does. i havent posted about like bo or xen or xy because i myself do not have issues with them and am really neutral on how they manage the studio? im really disoriented right now and kind of just posted because that in that moment bothered me and that is kind of what i do with this account
also ajax isnt a manager why does ajax need to be told if the case is just managers need to be filled in
recently atari made a post about not liking people lumping the managers together as "the managers" but brook is encouraging the lumping of "the curators" and "faccfc" and making them out to be enemies, and seems to have the intention to "gossip" when matt, a new manager, said she did not "side with" the managers but whateverrrr whatever. idk its just so odd.
i don't like "lumping" because every time i get lumped together with the managers it's because they want to disregard my ethnicity that's why i made the post. It's because the whole group gets stereotyped as white and people overlook my perspective as a mixed-race person who is Arab, Aboriginal, Indian and white so that they can say "look at managers with their white opinions omg they don't understand POC". And also Brook and I are different people. What I say in regards to being lumped with other managers doesn't automatically equate to what Brook says and I have made every effort to refer to people on individual basises, clarify who said what, and say "some members" instead of all of faccfc
It's not "gossip" it's talk between managers. Matt hasn't been told anything from our perspective and has literally only just been promoted and didn't know half the stuff that's happened [which I just informed her of]. Please stop twisting my words and information in order to paint Brook in some evil light.
that makes sense. i thought i saw brook reblog that? i dont feel like rechecking at the moment. and interpreted that as fae also applying it to daerself, and thats what i meant when i brought up you saying it
i used the term gossip because thats a term thats been used about sharing information by vio before, and used quotation marks to like show that it was sort of ironic. and i also said it was weird, not evil
i added screenshots of this conversation to like. have a visible reason on why i read the conversation that way

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
recently atari made a post about not liking people lumping the managers together as "the managers" but brook is encouraging the lumping of "the curators" and "faccfc" and making them out to be enemies, and seems to have the intention to "gossip" when matt, a new manager, said she did not "side with" the managers but whateverrrr whatever. idk its just so odd.
Please ask for context from managers before posting stuff like this, because there is literally a normal explanation. Matt doesn't have tumblr or discord or any of the offsites in which all of this stuff happens, so Matt literally just didn't know about what's been happening the past few days. And so I said that we need to like, fill her in.
that was more of something i tagged on with less thought. i was trying to explain the fact that there is an exaggerated divide? idk it came off as really weird to me especially with how youve said certain things are "because youre a manager" and with the fact many curators are also not in on things, or many curators are "on the managers side". i dont think the. sides are as black and white as that. i dont hate all the managers. i dont love all the curators. i dont support evrrything or hate everything either does. i havent posted about like bo or xen or xy because i myself do not have issues with them and am really neutral on how they manage the studio? im really disoriented right now and kind of just posted because that in that moment bothered me and that is kind of what i do with this account
!! trafficking + rape + suicide mention !! be warned ⚠️⚠️⚠️
the double standards placed on the managers are actually insane. brook calling himself a dictator is bad, but it's totally fine if people call him netanyahu or compare him to any other dictators. you can compare the studio's management to REAL horrible events with no consequence, but the managers joking about fake situations is awful. having matching epstein profile pictures is fine, along with many other horrible people, but having presidents as your profile picture is bad (to be clear, i don't think either is okay). in that same vein, it's okay to send us uncensored torture, cuss us out, and tell us to kill ourselves over doing something that hurts you due to what you experienced, but when i as a victim of trafficking & rape get upset about turning epstein into a joke i'm being unreasonable. and i dare anyone to act like they "weren't minimizing his actions" by having a profile picture of him, because i have screenshots of someone else with their name set to "epstein island system". since setting your name to "dictator" is minimizing actions, so is that. there's so much hypocrisy and if the managers were the ones doing the things you're doing i GUARUNTEE you'd all be calling for our demotions. if i were to tell someone to kill themself i'd be unforgivable and everyone would want me to step down.
also, none of you know us. you don't know our experiences and you don't know if we can "relate". there are people on the management team who have had similar if not the same experiences as you. there are people on the management team who have been raped, and tortured, and have families involved in war and genocide. don't act like you know us, or that we're all the same exact white transmasc athiest template. you don't and we aren't. i'm so so so sick of the hypocrisy and monolithing. you genuinely know nothing about us
this is going to be sort of messy, i have thoughts.
Nobody is defending Chalavya for sending gore nor telling you all to kill yourselves. I've seen the images sent, they are bad. What we are defending is the statement Chalavya was trying to say.
However, this response is failing to account for the person calling themselves a dictator is white, and has not lived through a genocide. Chalavya has. That is why he was upset. Once again, not defending the actions, but I do think Chalavya was justified in being upset. And most of the stuff you are pointing out was in response to things managers did first (example: the profile pictures.
Also JT was the one for both, it wasn't two different people. JT is still on rule 6 as far as l am aware.). There is a difference between managers and curators in the power they have, so yes, the standards are going to be different. I don't agree with comparisons to dictators, but l am tired of the "they did this so we can do this" attitude. I am not trying to discount your experiences at all, nor say your feelings aren't valid, but some of the information left out in this is appalling. I have screenshots of the messages, so I do have the context. I don't agree with sending gore. It shouldn't have been sent, and it's understandable why Chalavya is under rule 6, but some of the managers are not innocent in this situation. You are one of the managers who I think is 100% justified to be angry and upset in this case, I just want to clarify. I have nothing against you as a manager and I think you are doing a great job, if that means anything at all. And I'm not trying to be mean or dismiss the impact it had, Please tell me if it comes across that way. If this makes you uncomfortable, feel free to block me!
no there definitely are people doing that. i understand that it isn't the majority and i never thought it was, but there was someone calling it "just a mistake" earlier and i take that as a very clear defense of chalavaya's actions. i think everyone in that groupchat that wasn't a manager not telling him to stop are almost as, if not equally as, guilty.
i know why chalavaya was upset and i mentioned it in my original post ("over doing something that hurts you due to what you experienced"). i also already agree that brook and others (i'm not sure which managers exactly) shouldn't have been doing that. chalavaya is perfectly justified in being upset, but not in what he did. i'm talking about what he did, not his upset or whether he was correct or not.
if they thought the manager's president profile pictures were bad, making their own profile pictures horrible people only makes them hypocrites. they also stated they don't think it's that bad that the managers had presidents as their profile pictures, so i don't think that is something they did in retaliation.
the managers have little to no power over curators. we can close comments, and that's about it. we can put people under rule 6, but as stated by someone today, "we'll interact with them anyway because faacfc members are more well liked than managers", and by you, "i won't follow rule 6 when it comes to political things". people have no problem not listening to us. we do not hold as much power over curators as it's made out to be, we barely hold any at all.
i don't hold a "they did this so we can do this" attitude. most if not all of the things both parties did that i listed were wrong. i agree they were wrong. but the fact we're being held to such a higher standard, that we're in so much more hot water for it, is insanely hypocritical. a lot of the things we've had to apologize for, they've done too, with no apology or sign of improvement, and people respect and trust them so much more. i don't think they're in any place to point out so many of our faults that they themselves are guilty of. not that they shouldn't be pointed out, but that they specifically are in no place to, at least not without self-improvement first.
what information was left out? i'd like to know. i know some managers aren't innocent in the situation and i don't think that negates my point. i appreciate that you think i'm doing well and i appreciate even more your willingness to communicate and try to see both sides, it's been extremely helpful and i value your opinion on things quite a bit
I think we mostly agree on this, and are just approaching it from different sides. I disagree with the whole "well we will just ignore it" stuff, the reasoning for doing so is stupid. And I am not denying that it was hypocritical for both sides in the profile picture matter. I REALLY wish scratch team would give you all better moderation tools, it's actually insane that they haven't. For information left out, I had missed your part about Chalavya, so that was actually covered, I just can't read. There is definitely room for improvement on both sides, with taking accountability, and I acknowledge that you all have gotten better about it, which I GREATLY appreciate. I think a lot of my takes on this are biased from both my own experiences and the fact that I am connected with some of the people involved. Clarifying my comment regarding rule 6, I mentioned before hand that I'd follow it in all other situations, but I do still hold the belief that if it's a comment regarding current events, or a comment meant to educate then rule 6 shouldn't apply as harshly. Though my comment was made out of frustration so I could have articulated that better (which I will try to do in the future, I acknowledge that I need to get better at like stepping away when I'm frustrated.) I am not trying to criticize the managers every moves, and I do respect you all for what it's worth. I'll probably respond to some of the more specific parts of your reply later, I am far too tired right now to say anything meaningful.
(note: i'm an idiot and forgot to add like a whole second part to this. i'll fix it later </3)
i agree and i wish they'd give us better moderation tools as well. i agree with most everything else you've said here and i understand why you'd want rule 6 to be less harsh when about current situations. the way i see it is that if we are lenient with the rule, people can just constantly talk about serious things to get around their rule 6 entirely, and the rule becomes entirely useless. we might be able to add, when reminding people of rules (especially if they're asking a question about something serious to a rule 6'd user), to ask it on the person's profile instead or provide information if we know, but i'm not sure how good of an idea that would be. i respect you as well and it's totally fine if you need time or to sleep before responding, i don't have much meaningful to say either at this point