itās a so frustrating because greasersĀ were originallyĀ Mexicans or other latinxs, or Italians - either by subculture reclaiming, or slur.Ā āGreasersā started out as the object of white fear.Ā
Ethnically, original greasers were mostly composed of mostly Italian Americans in the Northeastern United States and Chicanos in the Southwest. Since both of these peoples were mostly olive-skinned, the āgreaserā label assumed a quasi-racial status that implied an urban lower class masculinity and delinquency. This development led to an ambiguity in the racial distinction between poor Italian Americans and Puerto Ricans in New York City in the 1950s and 1960s.[6] Greasers were also perceived as being predisposed to perpetrating sexual violence, stoking fear among middle class males and arousal among middle class females.[8]
What most people remember is NOT the actual era of the greasers, but instead the 60ā²s and 70ā²sĀ āsanitizationā of who they were, why they were stereotyped against, and why they were used as villains.Ā
Hell, before greaser was ever recognized as aĀ āsubcultureā it was explicitly used as a derogatory term against mexicans.Ā (That link references The Greaser Act, and lots of Hollywood movies which used the word.)Ā
Ā so before the 40ā²s-50ā²s, greaserĀ was heavily used to portray a racist stereotype of a Mexican/Chicano man as violent/aggressive. (at least in media). This term also got used against some other latinxs in general, as well as Italians and sometimes Greeks. At least in hollywood thisĀ āgreaserā type promoted mexicans as bad/dangerous and while also promoting latin lover stereotypes:
The Mexican Government soon objected to Hollywoodās portrayal of its citizens as ābandits and sneaksā and threatened to ban all films produced by companies which offended its people. This 1922 threat caused screenwriters to treat their neighbors to the south with more care. The āgreaserā swiftly lost his Mexican nationality in the attempt to diffuse potential complaints, but his ghost still haunted new screenplays which concerned Hispanic characters.
Clever subterfuges often placed an unnamed āgreaserā in a new locale. Rather than use the name of an actual country and risk offending its inhabitants, screenwriters began to create mythical cities and nations. āThe Doveā (1928) provided an obvious example. The film concerned Don Jose Maria y Sandoval (Noah Beery), who considered himself āthe besā damn caballero in Costa Roja.ā Costa Roja, as the title cards explained, was situated in the Mediterranean!
The flimsy guise fooled scarcely anyone. The Times critic commented: āTaken by and large, Jose is perhaps a screen character to which the Mexican government might have objected, for he is greedy, sensuous, boastful, cold-blooded, irritable, and quite a wine-bibber, but he does dress well. He hates to have his luncheon spoiled by the noisy victim of a firing squad.ā
(movie image, and its sound remake)
those images donāt look super like what youād think of asĀ āgreaserā subculture, butā¦when you go forwards a decade or two, and then look at the actual people:
Zoot Suit(er) after arrest during the 1943 Zoot Suit Riots in LA. The Anglo police officer is inspecting his hair.Ā Ā
Wikipedia mentions that the Mexican American community was thenā¦investigated to see if they had ties to the Nazis. (Yeah.)
On June 21, 1943, the State Un-American Activities Committee, under state senator Jack Tenney, arrived in Los Angeles with orders to ādetermine whether the present Zoot Suit Riots were sponsored by Nazi agencies attempting to spread disunity between the United States and Latin-American countries.ā Although Tenney claimed he had evidence the riots were ā[A]xis-sponsoredā, no evidence was ever presented to support this claim. [ā¦] In late 1944, ignoring the findings of the McGucken committee and the unanimous reversal of the convictions by the appeals court in the Sleepy Lagoon case on October 4, the Tenney Committee announced that the National Lawyers Guild was an āeffective communist front.ā[15][27]
so that 1940ā²s look becomes this over time:
three Cholos showing off their outfits (1950ā²s). why? because zoot suits were deemed horrifically unamerican andĀ āwastefulā during WWII.Ā
Ā but then ofc bitch ass racist white boys and motorcyles co-opted the look, add in a little bit of Travolta white washing of the radical pushback against racism in the origins of this stuff, and now weāre here.
kianamaiart
izzy806
tangentwithtanner
gummygunk
areudirty
blakekathryn
andulkaphoto
