Dark Matter Bright Thoughts

However, this is a slightly different way to explain how one particle exists in two places at the same time. All these seem so simple if you read further about our universe where according to Vera Rubin up to even 90% (app. 5/6 of known universe) consists out of dark matter which is subtly mixed with known matter. So dark matter is all around us, and we call it dark, because we can't measure or see it with any instruments or observation technology we have. The youngest galaxy collision 5 billion years away in direction of pisces directly proved the existence of dark matter because collision separated dark matter from matter. In quantum psychics they speak about other worlds and in multiverse theory they speak of ever faster expansion of our universe, and they question how gravity can be ever stronger. 

Hah. Let's stop for now. 

What follows is again the question if there are the worlds beyond, without or with different type of gravity? Should we hold on to gravity, or can we even imagine what means no gravity what other gravity consists of? For now the gravity idolizers are proposing fixed number of parallel realities for the sake of keeping the Newton law.

However, I personally feel more free in infinity of consciousness, in infinity of knowledge, in irrelevancy of the power.

So truth or what just happened to you is both at the same time. To give just one simple example: if you are so good and smart, it means you can be like that just because you are as well bad and stupid. For genius to exists the price would be some stupid person exists somewhere else. And because this is annoying I personally rather live in the world with funny people and without geniuses. So whatever exists, it exists because its opposite. One day we will speak of more dimensions, but now 2 are enough, succeeding the previous one - 1 dimension. And because of that basic principle it is so important to say this is bad, not ok, it sucks. Because for the price of something so great, honest and fair is able to happen (on some other place at some other time), since (at least) opposite dimension exists per se. Further on for these really sucking things or fuck off doings doesn't mean they are good for something. Not at all. Somewhere something related to this is absolutely good.

All what is left in such situation is being aware of the price of things just to easier and sooner find something you can get out of it, some unpredictable and very precious profit. Yes, we can all profit out of the worst, but to do it in tune with the universe is usually something in the context of altruistic act of forgiveness. 

I had an abortion when I was 19, and at 25 I dismissed all the contraception. Ready or not from now on: kids welcome! Ever since having sex for the first time I try to make this ritual a routine. Regular or often, rare but for sure. When I started to enjoy my life as a drifter, the pregnancies at 38 and 40 came as WOW and OOH.

PROVOCATION INSPIRATION.

Theosophy is not just some science, it is an overwhelming attempt of getting insight into the cosmological, spiritual, psychological and ontological essence of human existence. They are one of the founders of space- and neuro- science. The other end of smart is stupidity, the yin-yang quantum mechanics, thus being everyone’s curse. The theosophy’s stupidity is in condemning abortion - regardless their in-depth relational knowledge of human soul vs. networked consciousness.

CONCLUSION SIMPLE FUSION.

If you want birth, you need death. If there is death there must be birth. Once this cycle is over, the entropy increases and everything flattens out, ceased to move and consequently it all melts into one big nothing. Hence, that something is life and for life you need death. Hope everyone agrees on that, in addition to those who wants to live forever. Eternal life here and now forever means dying in the other dimension and never even been given a chance to cross or go over. And out.

ABORTION IS NOT KILLING A SINGLE SOUL, EVEN LESS SO IT MEANS KILLING OF A HUMAN BEING. ABORTION IS JUST GETTING RID OF SOME EXTRA CELLS IN YOUR BODY. AS YOU KNOW BY NOW - OUR SOUL IS A PART OF A GREAT SPIRIT. OUR INDIVIDUAL CONSCIOUSNESS IS A SMALL PARTICLE OF THE ONE META-CONSCIOUSNESS, WHOSE UNIVERSE - IN THIS CASE OURS - IS JUST ONE MATERIALIZATION OF A KIND. TO PUT IT MORE PRECISELY, OUR UNIVERSE IS JUST ONE OF THE VISUALIZATIONS OF THE GRAND CONSCIOUSNESS - THE SPIRIT.

THE SPIRIT’S SOUL WILL BE BORN TO YOU, OR TO SOMEONE ELSE. ANY SOUL WHO IS INTENDED TO BE BORN IS GONNA BE BORN, ISN’T IT?

YOU CAN DO AS MANY ABORTIONS AS YOU LIKE, BUT YOU CAN’T KILL THE SOUL OF THE SPIRIT. EACH SOUL, EACH SPIRIT PARTICLE WILL ALWAYS FIND A WAY FOR CONSCIOUSNESS TO RELEASE ITS PROJECTION - OUR WORLD AND WE WILL ALWAYS EXIST. MAYBE WE WILL HAVE A DIFFERENT SHAPE, THE MORPHOLOGY MIGHT DRASTICALLY CHANGE, BUT AN ABORTION CAN’T STOP THE SOUL WHO WANTS TO COME OUT. EVEN IF WE THINK WE KILLED THE PERSON, WE JUST KILLED SOME CELLS, THAT ARE TO BECOME HUMAN ONLY WHEN THE BABY IS ACTUALLY BORN.

A NEW BORN IS LIVING THE LIFE OF THE WORLD AS ONE. FOR A BABY THERE IS NO ME, YOU, THEM - IT IS ALL JUST US - ONE SPIRIT IN MANY FORMS. IT IS PIXELATED WORLD WHERE PARTICLES ARE NOT YET DETERMINED AS IN OBSERVER’S INFLUENCE. ALL IS ONE, THAT’S WHEN HOLDING  MY BABY FOR THE VERY FIRST TIME I WAS AMAZED AT HER INNOCENT AND AT THE SAME TIME, A REALLY OLD AGE VIBE. GROWING UP ACTUALLY MAKES HER YOUNGER AND YOUNGER - WHEN AT HER FIRST BIRTHDAY SHE FINALLY BECAMES THE CHILD, THE CITIZEN OF OUR PLANET.

ABORT AND DO AS MANY ABORTIONS AS YOU LIKE, CAN OR HAVE TO. NEVER WORRY! FOR EACH OR ANY SOUL WILL SOONER OR LATER MATERIALIZE AS A BEING OR A THING.

IN OUR CASE AS A BEING READY TO EXPERIENCE A GAME OF LIFE AND AT SOME POINT READY TO REUNITE WITH THE SPIRIT’S ENERGY MASS, TO AGAIN DETACH AND EXPLORE.

What if....

Gravity is not a force, gravity is a substance - the meta mega matter composed out of two components, time and space. On the other hand we and everything we can see, touch or observe are forces, vibrations, strings. The scale (or the number) of their interactivations, formations, harmonizations or signals (...) is defined by entropy and it is constantly evolving. It is finite and evolving. This is our so called material world. Our used to be matter. Remember, our used to be force was gravity, but actually the truth is quite the opposite, like it is not the Earth which is in the center of the galaxy, but the Sun.

Evolution is not a progress, it is a constant optimal state of various formations at each certain moment (within space and time).

Force is something that happens between two ends. A force can only be seen, felt, or touched when the situation with transmitter and receiver occurs.  The most accurate way to imagine anything be it on a macro or micro level is a curve, a fold, or a circle. Because nothing is static, straight or linear, it can often be perceived as straight or static.

That being so when observing the micro world the substance of macro world is invisible, so gravity is the outer material which is simultaniously formed out of forces and is forming the forces. The micro world is the world of invisible strings connecting two visible ends. Gravity is a substance in which all our world is created by forces.

The universe known as Dark Matter is according to our measurements more than 90% larger (or they express as it occupies more than 90% of the universe). It could be that we can not identify it because it is not made within gravitational substance, or at least if in some parts time and space are building blocks, for sure they are in different constellation as in our gravity substance.

Because gravity gives us birth (by folding space and time so forces can increase or decrease the state of entropy), we  can’t observe it, but we can trace down its effects. Hence comes the illusion of its force like nature, while actually it is more like a “field energy” - the substance.

-----

What if ...

Tesla’s ether is dark matter.

Tesla never referred to "space-time" directly, referring instead to the concept of the "primary substance". He also never used this relativistic "twin" term. He considered time as a mere man-made "measure" of the rate at which events occur such as a distance traveled, in miles or kms, in a certain period of time, for a frame of reference. He considered the "curving" of space to be absurd (putting it in gentle terms) saying that if a moving body curved space the "equal and opposite" reaction of space on the body would "straighten space back out".

Exactly this is what is going on. Bubbling universe. As me, you, Einstein, Tesla and all is as much right as wrong. Everything is in circular opposition or superposition. Strings, curves, folds, waves, membranes, moving particles.

YIN YANG again.

By-the-way did I ever tell you, that we have to re-think, re-configure and update not only Wikipedia, in today’s post enlightenment quantum paradigm we have to define new moral and all other dichotomies and qualities, in dictionaries we have to rewrite all antonyms, to get new synonyms - to exchange thoughts  using words with adequate meaning. This is the only way our common life, our life together will make sense again. 

As unconsciousness doesn't exist and it means nothing, also soul and body don’t make a match. There is only consciousness, will/force, and soul.

Our brain equals network and thoughts/actions/life are sending electrical signals over endless network channels - over the neurotransmitters. Those used often are not necessarily the best, the ones used less might even get untraceable, but remember all and every way of neurological transmission can be re-discovered or re-invented.

So if the soul is another side of consciousness, what is it? A soul is the central point, it is a singular event, created when two forces collide, when two branes touch each-other, or two ethers become one. Our universe is the soul of two (or more) branes existing next to each-other. Human soul is born each time matter and consciousness forces collide, when a unique body is united with unique brains. However, since the soul materializes and communicates through/with/via/by ether, it does spin around and stay at the point of collision, simultaneously.

Soul is similar to spacetime, it is something already there, but for feeling the soul, body and brain particles need to form an entity, in which a soul can splash as waves of the ancient future wisdom. 

If we use reasonably logical thinking process for all sorts of making of or so to say production, with emotions leading us at all points of making decision, if rationality is a highway and emotions are the crossroad, a soul is something that connects all that among itself and with all the rest. A soul is something that connects us with each-other, among all and everything. The space travelers of the quantum era are not astronauts traveling on rockets with obstacle such as body or helmet. In quantum universe our consciousnesses travels and soul is the guide, while our body is left in the dimension, called home.

The heart is the place of soul - brains can live freely without any-other organ. Biologically more complex life form for being alive need just two things - a brain and a heart. And because brains are where rationality and emotions take place, heart is the soul’s place. What makes us us is DNA, a program code, a software with basic instructions how all this is gonna be running - this time, as this specific being, or as you for example.

First of all I am amazed there is absolutely no-one except them that has something, anything, a detail or whatever positive to say about them. There must be something. All the discourses - mainstream and alternative, at cafe bars or at academia - are united: ISIL are pure terrorizing evil. The only excuse-like remark on ISIL is a debate about those who - after enabling their existence - now act as their no. 1 enemy; mimicking? powerlessness in stopping them.

Lets roll over again.

As you know today’s Europe - the center of the ‘oh so outdated Eurocentral world’ - is a direct result of the victory by BARBARIANS over christian post Platon civilians. The greatly civilized egocentrics of today were yesterday’s barbarians. They ended up building corporations for deceitful promotion of christian values masked as market values taking over our personal/public bodies/life.

On the symbolic level ISIL’s fanatic promotion of Muslim values actually uncovers the importance of values, positioning values beyond Political and beyond Economy. These values are not excuse for something else, they are fixed and concrete. It is some interpretation of Muslim values, not adequate as argued by many, but it is undoubtedly interpretation of values for values or values into values.

And although Christianity prevails in our imperialist states Christian values are not some fixed and open norm, but more suppressed and mostly misused as unconscious tool for moral judgements; so allowing dishonest and commodified behaviors. Yesterday’s Christians invasions in the name of their god are countless and bloody. Before they became Americans, Australians etc. Europeans have been killing, raping and dehumanizing immense number of native settlers all around the globe. For all of the natives to imagine they would need to live in the white male world - was surely more desperate and scary than for a  contemporary European to imagine to live in kalifat!

In global world corporations are forces of peace; investments, profit and loses merge in shaking hands of representatives of any religion or culture. They all speak constantly of values, although they all know the only value their system allows is the value of profit.

This is the meaning of infidel - being dishonest.

And yes - we are all infidels - no matter religion. Exponential constant growth economy equals (and produces) deceitful mode of functioning - anyone can say this and that while something truly else is bluntly obvious to everyone and all around.

What we are left with, faced with, forced into is a total non-sense.

No matter what you think you think, ISIL actions in the society of factual, communicative, emotional and legal deceit represent sense. They as well play with deceit - but in reverse way. They are fighting for justice - justice for all, who believe in it. For them justice is represented by god. They don’t pretend to be anything or anyone else - expect fighters for justice. They don’t pretend they are mercy full, they don’t pretend their business is not dirty, they don’t pretend they are politically correct or kind in any sense - they just want justice, even if this means kalifat societal organization or destroying elitist cultural heritage.

So the question indirectly and brutally posed is not which god - but what is justice?

Most ISIL leaders are young and cute, simply beautiful guys and girls - mostly under 40. Recent killings in Paris were beautiful people killing beautiful people. Young killing young. 

Lets analyze 4 symbols of Islamic state:

1. RELIGION

What is the greatest misery of ultra - capitalist global village - the greatest misery is that in everyday and in legal systems - there are no more values.

The legal system of the capitalist world sustains the world without any moral values other than values of the exponential market grow. We all know legal system does not function according to human rights or human sense for justice - but according to profit. Profit in whatever kind of sense.

For to make the world sense full again - a system, a community of people -  some kind of ideology is needed - because ideology is related to hope - and as hope or belief it can transcend into moral values. Moral values are those giving meaning to our lives in public. if we are to think in the framework of solidarity, we can not only stick to our privacy and intimacy (where every thought and feeling is possible), we need to accept our public act.

But, as Bekim sais you can not fight the dragoon with  being correct, the only way to fight the dragoon - is in a fanatical, extreme, exaggerated mode.

So forget about peace-full easygoing dilution of capitalism - this dragoon can only be succeeded, if - with something very extreme, be it complete and total lazyness (in all and every sense, aspect and emanations) or hardcore ideology.

ISIL choosed ideology. They claim it is in the name of Allah. But remember Allah is nothing like human, it is a pattern like software, Allah is something unimaginable, something beyond, something under, a mechanism - a big perpetuum mobile. Allah is the ultimate value we - either Atheists or Christians, Buddhist or Hindus - all have, at least in our private lives.

Like contemporary theoretical psychics still can’t claim the precedence of mind or matter, for contemporary psychics god hides in the “eternal quest after the clue of existance”.

God is (the symbol for) the theory of everything.

To fight in the name of god, is to fight in the name of ideology. Ideology as a term needs to be reclaimed - all the great thoughts, ethical truths and emphatic believe systems are based on ideology. In praxis, and in our everyday life we use scientific truths as ideology, because they are nothing else but temporary ideologies that are framing certain period and its mindset, up until the new paradigm, the new discovery, the new so call total fact. But since science is evolving, you can not fight the dragoon with something infinitely processing - you can only fight the dragoon with another dragoon - with something hardcore stable and strong. Religion makes sense, and at the end of the day ISIL are fighting in the name of ideology - in the name of belief system, a set of moral values, thus in the name of meaningful life.

2. WHAT ABOUT THE VICIOUS AND BARBARIC KILLINGS?

All killings are barbaric. Especially power killings. As long as we will deal with killing, we wont be able to deal with the living. Slow, in-disguised power based killings are more damaging and further from the truth than the straightforward, seemingly cruel ones. What is cruel? To be killed or to live as killer or with killers? In part 1 you can read about my opinion on human killing human, where I try to explain how peace movements stuck with killings are allowing peaceful lives becoming empty non-sense - resulting in ego-driven lonesome fancy freaks or fighters, all accepting variously in-disguised humiliations after humiliation.

I still think we should stop simply judging killing, and if we would handle killing as our honor right, and not as a vice, if everyone would affirm the right to kill, we might be much more precise of who to kill and why, because s/he has the same right. Can killing automatically become obsolete once everyone has right to it anyway.

Fuck killing. But if you already kill, don’t pretend as you don’t. While the whole world does that, ISIL is not. They kill as your leaders kill as well, just they do it openly in straightforwardly. They kill, because as long as we think we need to help the others for their sake, and are not aware that by helping others you even-more help yourself - thus making an emphatic act not as something to be praised and honored but as a necessity for surviving - killing each-other is minor aggression as letting each-other live in normative and big Fake.

3. BUT HOW THEY TREAT WOMEN?

I am a feminist, and as we all know the true questions is not how we treat women, but how we treat all who are supposedly, seemingly and rather temporary less powerful than us.

Maybe they are not aware but I am sure their extreme reaction is the reaction on extreme exploitation of female body in the west.

Our world is the world of Shame (Steve Mcqueen), and their world is the world of veil in the public. Our world is naked, their world is covered. There is no factual difference in the message - our world has undressed women, their world overdressed women. And it is all just our public body we are talking about, with affects on our private bodies.

But if you can wear a gun and a veil at the same time, the private life cant be so bad after-all.

It is not how we dress, it is how we feel when standing naked and alone in front of the mirror.

The veil is more than neglecting women symbolizing the respect for them - it is not the outside that makes you a (wo)man, it is on the inside. Everyone a bit acquainted with the veil fashion, knows that it is all about what you - as a magic women - dressed under, today.

4. DESTROYING ARTIFACTS

Instead of genocide and using atom bombs they rather, with the same impact, here and there destroy something that has supposedly some inexplicable cultural value. Honestly, everything what is made by men can be destroyed by men, especially in the world of abundance, where there are definitely too many things to keep. 

And above all - they are not only destroying - mostly they are just distributing it around the world. It is on those who buy this, to show the oh so noble humanity, to make it accessible to the world public again and to store it in the proper way. It might be that some artifacts are now even better off, from the perspective of preservation and proper archiving.

ONCE AGAIN - THE STRONGEST WEAPON AGAINST ANY TERROR IS TO STOP FEARING IT AND TO REFINE THE SYMBOLICAL ELEMENTS, which can be respected. Only without vicious fear of death we will be able to face our humble needs.

The 99% of us wants more justice for everyone.

The 99% of us wants life dance not death disco.

If you kill me, if I kill you - there will be no-one left to dance with.

And dancing alone is death disco for sure.

LOVE.

DEATH.

LOVE.

BEAUTY.

Lets play a game to uncover new ways of thinking. The contemporary thinking process doesn’t belong to enlightenment paradigm of reason and logic, instead it resonates within quantum reality and multidimensionality.

Only after we synchronize our thinking process with quantum reality, we might find the harmony, peace and sense again. Up until our natural science creates the quantum world, our social science simply has to adapt. To move on is not necessarily forward, it is more moving away from frustrations, feeling stuck, or in-capable.

First of all lets think in more dimensions or in folds (not in straight clear lines i.e), either or is replaced by both. In such binary thinking mode 1 dimension becomes 2 at least, with the awareness that 2 is not the final number.

In quantum world the matter behaves simultaneously as a particle and a wave, one thing can exists at more places at the same time, the Schrodinger cat is alive and death, there is no distinction between mind and matter, everything and all is compiled out of 2 at least, so that 2 becomes 1.

This means that everything you say exists and is only because it has at least one opposition, like a positive and negative (strictly in the photographic terminology). Supersymmetry, they call it. And because positive exists to have its negative, the negative looses its pejorative moral connotation.

And now be strict for whatever you think, whatever judgement you make, whatever opinion you claim - construct it on the basis of its binary value.

Being inhabitant of this universe within an observable dimension, any kind of fear is senseless. Fear exists mostly because of its opposite side, more interested - with its many facets, lets call it all the fearlessness.

If I said anykind of fear is senseless, when I become the inhabitant of the universe, I still must pose a question, again and again, why there is fear after all. I think the only positive and usefull function of the fear (because there needs to be some to be able to pronounce it totally useless otherwise) is its instinct character. Like all else, also the fear and fearlessness exist in the domain of finite and infine. With fear strictly taking the temporal position, and fearlessness as something infinte and endless. Fear protects life in the dispositif of chance or accident, fearlessness enables life in the dispositif of harmony and sense.

The greatest defect of homo-sapiens, of this inhabitants of the Earth is her, his and theirs fear of death, or fear of dying. Our civilization is not based on the cycle of birth and death, but on the fear of dying. By reading this, you as individual don’t feel like you fear death, because you know you will die anyway. So which form does this so called fear of death takes?

The catch is that any fear you have, on daily basis or on more general basis - all the fear there is, is actually just the fear of death. Because death is a singular event, and it is something (seemingly) definite, and as we said fearless is infine, the fear is finite and temporal.

Because no matter what is going on with you, it can’t go worse than death. No matter what shit you are going through, the worse, which can happen to you is that you die.

So to change our fears we need to change our view on death. We all agree death is inevitable and noone knows what comes after. Like all the particles in whole vast universe are constantly dying off and are being born, or rather everything since ever is and have been, but since morphology is changing it appears / or disappears as living / dying momenta. Time has no beginning or end, but everything else has.

Our civilization is build on the fear of death. The most clear signs for that is when we feel sorry for those who die, but it is actually us who are hurt, the one who are death, I am sure they don’t safer, because those left on this side are the ones who suffer, so simply can't be them. It nothing wrong we suffer for the lost, it is wrong that we judge it in any kind of way.

I think the structural change of our society is only possible if we completely change our view on death, and if we start to value human life not according to its expiring value but because it lasts. We need to move our focus away from definite to infinite. From death, back to life. It is not important how, where and when you die (because it is inevitable), it is important how you have been living up until the day you died.

So if we are truly equal and non-judgmental, the only right human has is the right to kill human. All the rest are needs or responsibilities, but not the rights. Because you can only destroy your equal opposites; as in this way you are actually destroying yourself. So killing others is like killing yourself, it is a total non-sense, it is the ultimate entropy mechanism.

Although total non-sense, it is still the only right that exists. All other things, we call human rights exists only on paper, they can never emanate, because for them to function we need to reformulate them as responsibilities - and the rights will follow.

As long as we want the concept of the right to exists we need to accept its parent directory. And the parent directory of all the rights is the primary of all the rights - the right to kill akin.

So basically, human right is to kill human, and no-one and nothing else. But now - if the concept of the right "a human right to kill human" is based on the domain of equality, also human killings, like animal killings among the same race should be based on equality.

As long as all our moral and legal system is based on the premises that no human has the right to kill human, all the dirty power games resulting in power killings are possible.

Once we realize how sacred and unique is our right to kill another human, we will become very cautious whom we kill and why.

For any of our rights to get restored, we firstly need to re-position and re-formulated function and value of the parent directory of the right.

The society in which its subjects are killing because they fear they will be killed is possible only if killing has a jugdemental value, oh so domesticated allover. Yes, in our society killing is judged as something cruel, while - in its core - it shouldn't be judged at all. We should judge only how we care about the life, the ones who live and how they live.

So now lets play further - if the only right that human has is to kill another human, the complete opposite is true as well. Human has no right to kill another human. But not in the world as it is. Hah heh ou yeah, lets continue this reverse thought in some other post...

The affirmation of the human right to kill a human evolves into a mechanism which deals with living and not with killings. Once we accept the death as we accept the birth, and we stop judging it in all its sense, we might start taking care of our lives, how we live, how we share among, how we care about each other, and above all how we show, express and materialize this care into something which will enable us to feel life as something valuable and sense-full again. Something which will make us happy not only in front of the others, online and offline - but above all in front of ourselves.  Something which will make us happy, even in most miserable and sad moments, in moments we have lost our dearest, and we are left alone.

POWER KILLINGS ARE THE EVIL KILLINGS AND THEY ARE POSSIBLE ONLY BECAUSE WE FALSELY JUDGE THE KILLING ACT AS ACT TO DESPISE, AS ACT TO BE PUNISHED.

Once again, the one who killed you is not to be punished because s/he killed you, but because how s/he treated, handled or care for you while you were still alive.

These two generations are: hippies and baby-boomers, those who hardly still posses the power but are owners of the capital, or better the ones who built the world as it is today.

The second generation Antichrist addresses are their kids - us - who are slightly taking over the power, but are acting like we believe all what their parents said, although we all protest how this is not true. But when taking over power or raising kids, we for the sake of senseless and un-satisafying safeness and security repeat and recreate the value system of the elders. So today generation, which means my generation, at the end of the day ends up teaching and promoting same old and oh so outdated one-dimensional and dysfunctional moral values, knows as virtues - subtracted as: work a lot, love yourself and only after you will be able to love the others, don't steal acctually meaning don't share, look after your things, promoting honesty even if you lie to yourself, just be honest, get marry, end all schools, find a job, earn money, have a lot of things, and above all - all what I am telling you is because I love you more than anything.

This bizarre and so senseless moral value system is contaminating the third generation, the generation of my kids. And I HONESTLY DESPISE IT, so when writing 'we' in previous paragraph, I actually point at majority of my colleagues.

So again I am re-starting where I ended up - at love.

The first one who said it loud, so loud that even I heard it, who spent most of the time at home, not doing anything particularly interesting. And because all ideas are always common, and as they never erupt only at one place at once - these thoughts must be in the air.

However, with the Antichrist Lars Von Trier was screaming out loud: LOVE AS SUCH DOESN'T ONLY BRING BIRTH, REBIRTH or HAPPINESS, IN THE SAME AMOUNT IT ALSO BRINGS DEATH AND DARKNESS.

Again we can all feel that, but no-one admits it, or affirms it as it is. Everyone is endlessly deceiving themselves and everyone else around by framing it in "Don't worry, because I love you so."

In the Antichrist, the main referential points for its comprehension are early-christian and medieval paintings, known as frescoes or illuminated manuscripts. His films are not to fall into atmosphere and ride along, but to confuse yourself in order to re-think about all pre-assumpted knowledge.  Everything in this movie, and in some others, is built on the symbolic order. What we are seeing in the film is not what it looks like, since we have to read it through symbols and codes, and only in the process of decoding we can embrace the meaning of its true message.

In the early-christian and medieval times, people couldn't read and a lot of knowledge had to be, and later on intetionally was hidden. So in exemplary samples like frescos are the narrative was not straight-forward but it was based on the symbolic meaning. It was all a pictogram of or for something. A symbol can only be made with deduction and abstraction processes - a general icon representing something very particular. Mother with a child - is actually Virgin Mary with a Christ, and so on and so forth, up until very complex frescoes based on the Bible, New Testament and apocrif gospels.

And because medieval art was done by artists, the way to read and understand frescoes depends on ones personal acquisition of hidden and legal knowledge. Being an artist is about triggering the offcial meanings and normative thinking by promoting new meanings and open-minded thinking. Sometimes they achive that with symbolic disguise, enabling to deny or reveal it, depending to who it was addressed and for whom it was made.

The movie Antichrist is supreme medieval painting made in 21st century. And the problem of todays divided and desperate world, Lars doesn't see in the fact of too much hate and constant war, on the contrary his diagnose reveals that the solution for bitterness and unfair darkness is not in the christ-like praising for more love, but on the contrary in anti-christ paradigm, in the era of abundance of love.

So we don't live in the world where there is not enough love, but in the world where there is too much love.

And yes, the question is not which love do you mean here, it is about this very love you dive into when falling in love with someone or when admiring your peace-ful sleeping child.

This love that we so falsely promote and overate also kills, so again - be aware of how much you love, because too much love addressed to present co-beings KILLS.

It is true that love is also endless, be this endless love is not to share with co-beings cause it will kill them, endless love is to share with universe, past, present and future - now, with humanity as a whole.

Lets roll again - into multidimensional world of all and everything - the inherent multi-dimensional meanings of all and everything we can think of.

At the end of the day, I am trying hard not to love my co-beings too much - instead I rather respect and support them, be it people, partners, animals, flowers or stones.