LESBIANS!!!
occasionally subtle
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
$LAYYYTER
noise dept.

Origami Around
Sweet Seals For You, Always
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă

Kiana Khansmith
Jules of Nature
Xuebing Du
Monterey Bay Aquarium

if i look back, i am lost
Today's Document
Three Goblin Art
AnasAbdin

#extradirty
DEAR READER
cherry valley forever
sheepfilms
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Singapore

seen from France

seen from United States

seen from Brunei

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Netherlands

seen from China

seen from Russia

seen from United States
@mcbeardymullet
LESBIANS!!!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
hi guys outsourcing opinions here this is the same badge. right. the one that says um. the love of my life. which could mean nothing.
I'm going to have to be buzzkill but I promise itâs in the name of love and truth and beauty.
This looks to me like John's "exciting new offer" button he wore throughout the July 1967 Greece trip, which is a very similar color. You can see him wearing it on his jacket and pinned on his hat:
At one point Paul got ahold of the hat, as seen in the Anthology director's cut:
I couldn't find any pictures of John wearing The Love of My Life button, but in my quest for button pics I found other instances of Paul wearing the LOML button throughout 1967. Paulâs special button!!!!
Which could still mean nothing
these hips don't lie, and those hips don't tell the truth. how do you navigate out of this labyrinth
that time when Paul was having a real hard time concentrating on anything other than the pretty tv show host
PAUL MCCARTNEY + that hair thing

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
JOHN AND PAUL
forgetting where they are for a moment
The Beatles - Till There Was You
Recording from Hamburg. John echoes every word from Paul and Paul tries not to laugh. Itâs adorable.
cinematic parallelsÂ
oscillating wildly between saving pics of john lennonâs hats, thinking about george martin x all beatles, researching every mention of the let it be story n writing a 80s uk politics mclennon au
31 years old just sitting here like âoh gee i hope everyone likes the porn i wroteâ đđ¤đ¤˛
this is how paul mustâve felt releasing band on the run

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
hello. i wrote some smut, if that's your thing.
i think weâre alone now (6042 words) by mcbeardymullet Chapters: 1/1 Fandom: The Beatles (Band) Rating: Explicit Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply Relationships: John Lennon/Paul McCartney Characters: Paul McCartney, John Lennon, George Harrison (The Beatles), Ringo Starr Additional Tags: Plot What Plot/Porn Without Plot, Smut, Blow Jobs, Oral Sex, Sex Games, (unintentional) Orgasm Denial, Coming Untouched, 1966, Beatles in Japan, Swapping Clothes, John Lennonâs Wanking Games, interrupted coitus Summary: Tokyo, June 30th 1966 He should have known better. He could blame the jet lag from travelling more than halfway across the world to Tokyo, or even the underlying stress of the upcoming activities planned for their time in Japan. Yeah, Paul could think of about half a dozen good and acceptable reasons why his judgement was impaired. Truthfully, however, the problem was John. Johnâs eyes. Johnâs looks. Johnâs games. ---- In which John and Paul engage in a bet twenty minutes before a press conference.
Inspired by this:
every person that reblogs my silly research and puts little comments in the tags has my undying love i am reading all of them with heart eyes
in this thread i will explore the Disgusting Hambu(r)gs, aka, just how Digusting were those Beatles in Hamburg? (part ii: the crap)
(part i: The Thing)
for the SECOND part of this DISGUSTING exploration, weâre now moving onto other shit. this lesser known tale is closely related to the vomitus, as displayed in Howard Sounes, 'Fab...' (p. 61, 2010)
yeah thatâs right, theyâre shitting in the gaff now. MERCIFULLY, this anecdote has not made the rounds as much as The Thingâ˘ď¸, and is first established in Philip Normanâs âShout!â (2004 edition)
the story is provided by Ted âKingsizeâ Taylor (of Kingsize Taylor and the Dominoes). presumably, Norman procured this via interview.
unfortunately, Norman is too busy and important for SILLY things like references and footnotes
i'm sure it wonât shock you when i tell ya that this story is not corroborated by anyone other than Taylor. nay, Taylor hasnât mentioned it in any other interview or print (that I can find). it also only appears in this edition of 'Shout!' and in the aforementioned 'Fab'
the differences between Norman and Souneâs versions are miniscule. Sounes helpfully references the âstar club sectionâ with âauthorâs background reading and interviews with, among others, Horst Fascher and Kingsize Taylor (quoted)â
now it *couldâve* been a new interview conducted by Sounes. but i doubt it given the similarities. the key differences include mention that Taylor was the next occupant of the flat, he 'nearly threw up', and the use of the word crap
looking at both versions, itâs not explicit whether Kingsize Taylor is a firsthand witness, or heard about it secondhand. tho implied firsthand with Sounes, i'd argue itâs unlikely Taylor was actually IN Hamburg when the bugs were living above maximâs club
from the interwebs, Taylor & the Dominoes had their first Hamburg residency at the star club in the 'summer' of 1962. the Beatles lived in the flat during their residency in april/may 1962
in Barry Milesâ âThe Beatles Diary Vol. 1â (2009) the Dominoes were not on the bill at the star clubâs rock n' roll event on may 28th. the Beatles left Hamburg june 2nd, and later played at the Cavern on june 20th with the Dominoes
so that gives us a good month gap between the Beatles leaving Hamburg, to the Dominoes going to Hamburg for the first time in the -summer-
maybe they were the first tenants in the flat post-bugs, but as far as witnessing the carnage firsthand? rather unlikely sir
ofc the Beatles returned to Hamburg in november and december '62, but they lived it up in hotels rather than the (alleged) shit infested maxim club flat
if true, Taylor wouldâve heard it secondhand, presumably from star club co-owner Manfred Weissleder, aka the fumigator of the shit flat. however, we don't know whether this was said at all, in jest, or as a warning to the Dominoes to not to mess up the gaff
the timing of when the story emerged - 40 years after the fact - does limit its credential. in general, Taylor didnât seem favourable toward the Beatles. in fact, some people may frame some of his comments in this interview as âbitterâ: https://classicbands.com/KingsizeTaylorInterview.html
he also had these lovely recollections in 1985: https://savoy.abel.co.uk/HTML/kingsize.html
all that to say, Kingsize Taylor does not appear to, perhaps, be a unbiased source regarding the Beatles
IN CONCLUSION: just how Digusting were those Beatles in Hamburg?
in short: they were disgusting randy young boys without parental oversight. The Thingâ˘ď¸ was maybe true. The shitting on the floorâ˘ď¸ was probably not true.
both originated from a single source
thus, when it comes to anecdotes (particularly those concerning puking and shitting) let us consider the wise words of Mark Lewisohn regarding The Thingâ˘ď¸: "beware of journalistic exaggeration"
(aside: lewisohn should maybe heed his own warning when splicing quotes together y'know...)
thanks for reading you disgusting bugs - i've provided page numbers where possible but the majority of me beatle books are e-books sowwyyy
Taylor & Dominoes whereabouts were sourced via random old websites: https://web.archive.org/web/20110928201454/http://www.center-of-beat.com/starclub/bands/starclub_bands_taylor.php https://tropeamagazine.it/thebeatles/mersey/ksize/kingsize.htm
if you have further information regarding these nasty stories then please share with the class - the pursuit of historical truth n' justice is communal âď¸
in this thread i will explore the Disgusting Hambu(r)gs, aka, just how Digusting were those Beatles in Hamburg? (part i: The Thing)
(part ii: the crap)
(hello, i come from yonder [beatlestwt] where i sometimes do silly threads deep diving into nonsensical things. i thought it might be worth pulling it over to tumblrspread the tomfoolery. this was formatted for a twitter thread so the paragraphs will be a bit funky - hope you enjoy!)
sex, drugs, and rock nâ roll aside, this thread will focus on two particularly gross hamburg anecdotes. thatâs right kids, weâre going pukinâ n shittinâ it is important to note that these anecdotes occur pre Ringo's induction into the band - ofc, Ringo has NEVER been gross or bad in his life (apart from all those gross and bad things he has done) the first and better known incident concerns The Thingâ˘ď¸ - if one searches âweird beatles facts', The Thingâ˘ď¸ will almost always make an appearance The Thingâ˘ď¸ refers to a pile of vomitus produced by George Harrison. The story goes that George puked, refused to clean it & the lads kept it as a âpetâ, discarding ciggies and what not on to it. y'know, just lad banter stuff. in the end, grown-ups got involved and it was removed so where did this fun tale originate? it first appeared in Pete Bestâs co-written memoir, âBeatle! The Pete Best Storyâ (pp. 157-158, 1985). Pete, the og drummer for the bugs, recalls the incident during the bandâs stint at the star-club in apr/may 1962
this story is then repeated in various biographies with different levels of detail. Howard Sounes 'Fab: An Intimate Life of Paul McCartney' (p. 61, 2010) gives a brief mention. in the footnotes, Sounes details the section was based on âauthorâs background readingâ
Mark Lewisohn includes the tale in pt. 2 of the extended edition of 'Beatles: Tune In' (2013). notably, it is absent in the regular edition, though there is a vague reference to extra activities such as puking:
in the extended edition, the story is retold in full. like a GOOD historian, Lewisohn attributes the anecdote to Best, in both the text and in footnotes. the one oddity in Lewisohnâs version is an additional detail about toothpicks being placed onto the 'pet'
The Thingâ˘ď¸ is given an entire -short- chapter in Craig Brownâs â1234âŚâ (2020). in the classic journo-biographer way, Brown doesn't include footnotes or refs, but gives general thanks to the books wot he read at the end. the story is identical to Best's with added verbosity
recently, Philip Norman includes the story in 'George Harrison: The Reluctant Beatle' (2023). as Norman is wont to do, he embellishes the story and provides next to no references - after all, why should you let sources limit your creative imagination in biographies!!
Normanâs story includes the addition of matchsticks and also quotes John referring to The Thingâ˘ď¸ as 'our pet hedgehog' - one presumes Norman procured this new information via oujie board now, dear reader, you have probably noticed that in stories of The Thingâ˘ď¸, the source material all comes back to one man: Pete Best. despite my best efforts (honestly my search history is full of beatles+puke) I have yet to find anyone else publicly remember The Thingâ˘ď¸ the main corroborators of this story would be the visiting bands and/or Horst Fascher (bouncer/Star Club co-runner) but, alas, nowt !
(side note: Fascher does have a biography 'Let the good times roll!' (2006) but i have not been able to source a copy. i also do not read german. so . if you do have a copy and can read german, help a girl out and search for vomit in that thing!!)
and so, much like the beatles in 1962, we must ask ourselves - can we trust Pete Best???
Best has the benefit of:
being involved in the story
telling it in his own memoir
however, it doesnât appear in his second book 'The Best Years' (1996). presumably, the co-writer did not deem it worthy of inclusion. dunno why.
Best retold the story in 2010 at Fab Forum. in his recollection there is a minor change (Fascherâs shovel is now a bin lid) but it is mostly consistent with his memoir. it does show us, however, that memory isnât always the best historical source:
now is there a reason for Best to embellish (or, indeed, lie)? well, we must keep in mind the story was first unleashed onto the world for monetary gain. being able to provide some grubby hamburg tales no doubt lubricated the publishing journey of the memoir Further, Best is painted as a bit of an outsider in the Beatles lore - he didnât pop them pillies with the others, and is often noted as going off on his own during the Hamburg days. one could argue this story subverts this by showing some old fashion lad bonding over some vomit the story is bizarre and gross for all involved - it doesn't paint Best nor the other bugs in the best (ha) light, so its not a hit piece per se. however, The Thingâ˘ď¸ has only been discussed by one soul, and so a level of wariness for all its nasty details is warranted

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
in this thread i will finally answer the question: Did Paul Treat Crabs with Sheep Dip?
(hello, i come from yonder [beatlestwt] where i sometimes do silly threads deep diving into nonsensical things. i thought it might be worth pulling it over to tumblr spread the tomfoolery. this was formatted for a twitter thread so the paragraphs will be a bit funky - hope you enjoy!) as the story goes, somewhen in the 1960s dear Paul contracted a STD/crabs/pubic lice, and while he was up at his remote Scottish farm he remedied it by using sheep dip aka a insecticide/fungicide solution for sheepâŚbut where did this story start? it first appears in Peter Brown & Steven Gaines âThe Love You Make: An Insiderâs Story of the Beatlesâ (1983, p. 210) Brown, PA for the Beatles/Epstein, relays the story from Alistair Taylor, Epsteinâs PA/'Mr Fixit'
and so the initial story is established as: Paul gets crabs â Asks Taylor to go to the pharmacy for meds â Pharmacist provides âsheep dipâ 20 odd years later, Taylor accounts the story in his own book, âWith the Beatlesâ (2003 edition, p. 132)
(side note - Taylor published âA Secret Historyâ in November 2001. âWith the Beatlesâ is a revised version of this book. sadly, i havenât been able to find a copy of it for me research so canât confirm if the anecdote appeared in 2001âŚ) Taylor's version (ha) of his anecdote: Paul gets an STD â Asks Taylor to get some meds â Taylor enlists the help of solicitor Bob Graham â pills arrive labelled âSheep Dipâ ...and so we have our first main quandary: was it literal sheep dip or âsheep dipâ? In 2024 Brown & Gaines released âAll You Need is Love: The Beatles in Their Own Wordsâ, which consisted of the transcripts & interviews used for their book in 1983. Taylorâs transcript is presented as follows:
the transcript is somewhat unclear if it's real sheep dip or not. Taylorâs comment of âit was lovelyâ seems odd if referencing actual sheep dip, but one can kinda see how Brown & Gaines presented the story as they did however, in 2024 Brown & Gaines also gave an interview with the Hollywood Report where they said the following:
so the 3rd iteration of the story is : Paul was at the farm with Linda (not Jane) â Paul sent âan assistantâ to get meds â the only thing they had was literal sheep dip⌠(bear in mind Brown was 87ish and Gaines 76ish in 2024, and age can do numbers on ya memory) overall, i think we can dismiss Brown/Gaines 'versions' for the main reason of not being present at the anecdote to begin with (and doing a piss poor job of being consistent with details) however, Taylor has some issues between his 2003 published story, and the one told in the c.1980 transcript: 1. overall unclear whether its literal sheep dip or not 2. liquid vs. pills discrepancy so, can we trust this source? short answer: not really. long answer⌠the anecdote comes from one source - the only other people who can verify it are Paul, Bob, and an unnamed pharmacist. It is not a âtrustworthyâ source on a surface level. thus are the usual pitfalls of biographical sources - they often come from one person & one person only Taylorâs published version is likely more âaccurateâ. he was present in the story, and published it on his own accord. he is consistent w/ his wider depictions of the farm in his books incl. âYesterday: My Life...â (1991 ed.) (although the STD story is omitted in this book) Brown/Gaines 2024 transcript of Taylor differs from the anecdote printed in 1983 - there is no mention of a pharmacist in the transcript, and no mention of Bob Graham in the 1983 book crucially, the transcript does not provide anything by way of *how* the story is told - Taylorâs âlovelyâ comment suggests, to me, it was not actually sheep dip (ie he thought it was lovely they covered up the STD meds with 'sheep dip') now, one of the ways we could bolster this anecdote as a historical source is establish a pattern of behaviour and explore the question - is there proof Paul has ever had an STD?
..i mean, the man was a well documented slag (complimentary). but, alas, we donât really have cold hard proof. Bob Spitz 'The Beatles: Biography' (2005) mentions that they all had gonorrhoea in the Hamburg days but doesn't cite a source to back it up (classic journo-biographer)
the closest we maybe get is the Itchy Dick episode of January 1969. Itching of the âpenisâ (latin for penis) can be a symptom of STDs such as the clap, it can also be infections of a less sexual kind (yeast, eczema, depression)
in conclusion - the answer to the question âDid Paul Treat Crabs with Sheep Dip?â is:
ok ok - it was probs not literal sheep dip, but maybe meds labelled âsheep dipâ to keep all that adultery under wraps - but, as with most of the beatle stories, it only comes from one source
The History of Paul McCartney's ID Bracelet (part v: CORRECTION)
(part i) (part ii) (part iii) (part iv)
hiii. me again. sorry. i have a correction to make. sorry. so remember the whole 'the bracelet reappeared for one day in '66' thing. well, as tumblr user toadbit rightfully pointed out...that ain't the same bracelet shape. doh. ('63 vs '66)
SO, the '63 bracelet drops off after dec '64. now we gotta ask...where did this '66 bracelet come from?? paul isn't wearing it, perhaps he borrwed it from someone & is using it as a retro fidget toy? or could've been a gift from a journo right there n then? maybe its ringos??
it could also be a replacement bracelet that he just didn't wear that often. its all a guessing game now. more pertinantly, is the '66 bracelet the same one from the 70s/90s?? well, lets look at the the updated comparative image
is it the same one? maybe?? idk??? to my eye the '66 looks a bit thicker and more curved (oo-er) than the 70s/90s, which looks a bit longer and thinner (oo..er?)
i think as it appears once in '66 and isn't worn consistently, there is some weight to it being a different bracelet to the one worn in the latter years. a temporary bracelet for a stressful time, perhaps.
maybe paul just had a different id bracelet for each decade. maybe he kept losing them. maybe he just really likes buying id bracelets. the man's greed for bracelets knows no bounds!!!
and, unless any new information emerges, i'll leave it there for bracelet watch. pls. PLS.