It’s interesting how the “rapists can be redeemed” crowd never says anything similar about radfems. I guess raping women is just a character flaw but being able to define what a woman is makes you an irredeemable monster. Ahhh feminism
taylor price

Product Placement

pixel skylines
h

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

titsay
almost home
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Sweet Seals For You, Always
DEAR READER
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Discoholic 🪩
🪼
NASA
Sade Olutola
Misplaced Lens Cap
Stranger Things
Three Goblin Art

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
seen from United States

seen from Italy

seen from Malaysia
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Poland
seen from T1

seen from Türkiye
seen from Belgium

seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from Poland

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Iraq
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
@maria-itla
It’s interesting how the “rapists can be redeemed” crowd never says anything similar about radfems. I guess raping women is just a character flaw but being able to define what a woman is makes you an irredeemable monster. Ahhh feminism

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
STOP! 🛑🤚 Before you claim a woman on the internet is policing your/anyone else's behavior, please consider the following.
-> Does she control government entities around us that can legally enforce her ideology? Can she actually suppress opinions or reduce people's freedom of expression?
-> Does she control your social position? Can she alienate you from your existing group on a whim?
-> Do her views/actions actually mirror the popular, widely accepted one in the contexts you frequent? Or is she an outlier?
-> Are you a member of a majority that she cannot control or escape?
-> Does she control your internet access or what you can post? Can she force you to read and follow her ideology?
-> Can she physically remove or suppress the media you/your group enjoy? Can she stop the production of such media? Does she occupy a powerful position in group that affects the existence of such media?
-> Can she actually physically, legally force you to stop whatever you are doing?
-> Does her opinion or criticism carry enough weight to directly, materially affect your life and wellbeing?
Chances are this is not the case. And chances are you have no idea what policing actually is. dumbasses
It’s not surprising a lot of the pro trans arguments directed towards gender critical women boil down to ‘why can’t you just be nicer??’ Even in 2026 one of the biggest crimes on earth is women not being nice enough to men
hey so you know even if the trans girl doesn't pass you still have to use her pronouns right?
even if she doesn't "try to pass" she still deserves the same basic respect you give everybody else.
even if she's done something bad that doesn't excuse you misgendering her on purpose.
i'm so sick of people treating trans people's pronouns as some kind of reward you get if you've been a good tranny.
this goes for those who use neopronouns too i dont care how "weird" you think it is especially if you're trans yourself.
it really is that easy :)
Remmeber when it was about "respect"? Yeah it was never about respect, but about obeying men and their whims. Grown ass man? Transgirl. Grown ass man? Well if he calls himself a woman he is one (but you still have to treat him like a man aka obey him). Rapist? Still gotta say "she" raped her 🤗. Males will ask for an inch and WILL take a mile. According to transgender ideology on a male's mere SAY SO you MUST oblige his fetsh- i mean- respect his pronouns on his word and his word alone. Of course there is no post about transmen aaaalways just transwomen. Odd. Coincidence.
in 2014 you could come on here and say “misogyny is bad and more ppl should consume media that includes women” and everyone would agree with you. nowadays you post something like “if you don’t care about women you might be a misogynist” and the reblogs are ppl saying “ummmmmm this take is actually problematic bc the only way i can escape misogyny is by pretending women don’t exist :/” we’re so cooked.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
TRAs will call you bioessentalist and then proceed to sincerely say that there’s a difference between male and female brains which impacts what gender stereotypes you prefer
"I'm a bi woman and my boyfriend is also bi, so we're a queer couple."
Hetero relationship.
"I'm a transman and I'm dating a transwomen, and since we're both trans, we're a queer couple."
Hetero relationship.
"I'm a transman dating a cisman and we're SO gay!"
Hetero relationship.
I'm a woman dating a transwoman and we're both lesbians!"
Hetero relationship.
"I'm a AFAB nonbinary person dating a AMAB nonbinary person and we're very queer!"
Hetero relationship.
"I'm a woman dating a man and we're very kinky, so we're queer!"
Hetero relationship.
"I'm a woman dating a man who likes painting his nails, so that means we're-"
Hetero relationship.
Female x Male = Hetero relationship. It doesn't matter how different and unconventional you think your relationship is from most hetero couples. It's primarily women I see insisting their hetero relationship is not like the others and is "queer" because it's not blatantly based on Christian tradcon values.
And yeah I get that bi people don't stop being bi when they're in a relationship with the opposite sex. But a female person dating a male person still makes the relationship itself hetero.
The devaluing of sex to the point that it’s no different than flipping burgers is rape culture rhetoric. If not explicit rape apologia.
If sex is nothing special or unique, rape is just like any other violent crime. If that’s the case, why should a rapist be punished more harshly than a person that punched someone on the street? Why should a rape victim be given any extra care or resources? Or sympathy?
If sex is no different than shaking hands, why shouldn’t that woman let her husband have sex with her even though she’s not in the mood? Why shouldn’t that 15 year old girl have sex she isn’t ready for when her boyfriend claims “blue balls”? She’d give him a hug if he was sad and that might as well be the same as sex. Why shouldn’t children be exposed to sex? If there’s nothing unique about sex, it’s basically the same as watching a sport or Animal Planet show.
So the fun part about GenZ slang being almost 100% AAVE is that I have a dictionary from 2001, from before I was old enough to even know how to use a dictionary, right? And this ain't that abridged shit this is the three columns 8 point font, pages made of tissue paper bound into a book that is 4-5 inches thick shit. You follow?
And there are all these reports on how new slang is and how to understand it and getting it wrong. BUT 2001 GOT ME
TWO THOUSAND AND ONE
if men r just biologically “like that” it fully removes the blame from them, it places the burden of expecting better on women bc if men “can’t help it” itd be like getting mad at a dog for licking its ass, “well hes a man ! u cant expect him to treat others as people hes just a man!” its just another way of coddling them, if men cant be held accountable for hurting women then it becomes the fault of women for wanting better, denying a man his personhood just allows him to never have to do better …
It doesn't actually. It's very telling that stating that men are just "like that" automatically places blame on women instead of... Placing blame on males. Dogs are just "like that" but we still put them down when they bite humans right?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
learning to notice an absence of people of color is crazy. you start seeing it everywhere. ill see a random pic of characters or people or whatever and be like "these are all white people. why"
banning trans women from the olympics is bad because they’re banning trans women from the olympics. full stop. really nothing else needs to be added to this sentence. it’s discriminatory and wrong to ban trans women from the olympics, and it would be regardless of how this might effect some cis women. why is every post about this focused on the cis women, instead of how alarmingly transmisogynistic this is?
trans women were not banned from the olympics. all males were banned from the female category. trans women are still absolutely welcome to compete in the male category, the category in line with their sex. this is how every athlete who wishes to compete in the olympics will be treated, regardless of identity or trans status.
they have not been wrongfully discriminated against and banned for their internal identity. the olypmics possess no mind-reading machines that can test for internal trans identity. they have been banned from the female category, on the basis of their maleness, which is easily testable, measurable, and tangible with a cheek swab.
a misogynistic society is so threatened by the concept of trans women - women that "had the opportunity" to be privileged men and chose not to - that they start making up privileges women have in order to explain why trans women exist. going into womens restrooms isnt a privilege, playing womens sports isnt a privilege, lesbianism isnt a privilege, yet they present them as such to try and explain why trans women are women for nefarious reasons. a misogynistic society will never understand that trans women have no ulterior motive for being women
Transwomen are women but how come these women were given the option to be privileged men? What made the patriarchy choose these women and not others? Is it because they aren't actually women? Female only spaces do not have to be "privileges" for women to have them and for no males to be allowed to invade them.
culture shock if you can call it that
Thank you for those sweet words guys.
You did it : you really cured by “terfism” and showed me how y’all are perfectly fine and sane individuals that should have access to women’s and children’s spaces with those ones. I don’t see you as a bunch of predatory rapey scrotes anymore now !

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Evidence of Transwomen’s crimes With particular emphasis on crimes against females in female spaces and what happens when males can self ID
this might be a common sense thought, but the reason that the world so readily accepted gender ideology isn't because the world suddenly became extremely concerned with inclusivty and trans rights.
the trans community has done all the work for institutional bigotry, while the bigots can disguise their hatred as progressivism.
let me give a few examples:
1. homophobes were condemned for hating gay people. discrimination on the basis of sexual attraction was made illegal. conversion therapy was classified as a human rights violation. it was understood that homosexuals were exclusively same-sex attracted.
under gender ideology, homosexuals are seen as bigots for their sexual orientation. homosexuals are pressured to perform sex acts on the opposite sex under the guise of inclusivity. rights organizations around the globe have replaced "sex" with "gender presentation", effectively erasing homosexuality.
2. misogynists were condemned for hating women. female-only spaces were integral to women's safety. women were encouraged to defy gender norms, to reject the beauty standards created to further oppress them. female oppression was acknowledged and fought against by feminists. threats of rape and violence against women used to be a heinous, unjustifiable act deserving of public outcry.
under gender ideology, noncomformity to female beauty standards and traditional roles means you aren't a woman. female-only spaces are seen as a form of bigotry. female oppression is now a made-up term used to perpetuate transmisogyny. feminists who exclude males deserve to be raped and murdered, and this violence against women is co-signed by politicians and celebrities and institutions alike.
my point is, the trans community is doing nothing special. nothing revolutionary. gender ideology has revived bigotry under a new name, with shiny new terms, but the bigotry remains the same and the bigots are fucking revelling in it. gone are the days of their persecution. as long as they use the perfect phrases and the correct terminology, they are free to make their laws, change our institutions, and share their hateful views on a worldwide stage to the applause of millions. while the world is none the wiser.
that's why this modern form of bigotry is much more insidious, because it manipulates human empathy and moral-correctness to reinstall oppressive systems in shadow. it weaponizes pre-existing oppression to further its goals. it uses fear tactics to discredit the groups bringing facts, statistics, and reality to the conversation. it rewrites history and forces its way into credible movements to bolster its reputability. it becomes a place of refuge, a shield for the most hateful.
it is a wolf in sheep's clothing. the wolf is calculated, deceptive, charismatic. the wolf wants to eat, and eat it shall.