🪼

Discoholic 🪩

titsay
Sade Olutola
cherry valley forever

pixel skylines

tannertan36
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Jules of Nature
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Today's Document
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
dirt enthusiast

One Nice Bug Per Day
DEAR READER

seen from Greece

seen from South Korea

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Lithuania
seen from United States

seen from China

seen from Kuwait
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Greece
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
@makiruz

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
This is better than any ATLA live action remake we could ever hope for
*katara teaching aang waterbeding*
katara: stay calm, we’ll go step-by-step. there isn’t a problem that you can’t—oh! ….you did it….
*toph teaching aang how to earthbend*
toph: fucking dammit!! move the damn rock before i flatten you and ruin your stupid life!!!
*zuko teaching aang how to firebend*
-calle 13’s “atreve-te-te” plays -
and the winner of superwholock is officially??? no one. we all lost. congrats team
happy pride
I've seen this clip many times, but never really appreciated the power of "what was her problem?" Just casually assuming that lesbians come in a wide variety of shapes and being inclusive. As a transbian who is probably still closer to Homer shaped than to my ideal, that's huge!
McSpirk

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
every time someone refers to penelope's suitors as having been hanging around for 10-20 years i laugh. in the odyssey they are explicitly in their 4th year camped out at the palace, so they waited until odysseus had been well and truly MIA to come a-courtin'. they did not come the moment odysseus left for troy; for one thing they would not have been old enough. eurymachus says that odysseus used to bounce him on his knee. because he was a toddler
Oddyseus was known to be alive for the duration of the siege so showing up while that was ongoing would have been pointless (can’t marry someone who is already married) - I’m assuming there was supplies/messages sent back and forth between the Greek cities and the forces attacking Troy for the duration as it wasn’t a major surprise when they got back (no one was convinced they’d all died)
Then they have to give a socially acceptable amount of time waiting for him to get home taking into account the high likelihood of shipwreck/blown off course etc.
So yeah 5 years post ending of the war would likely have been the first time anyone would make a move on Penelope. (And be as certain that he’s dead as they could be without seeing his corpse)
Remember my fic, So Close and Still so Far? Well, finally finished chapter 4.
It actually wasn't hard to write, I was just getting distracted,
An Archive of Our Own, a project of the Organization for Transformative Works
Another example of what I was talking about in that last post:
"The Soviet Union was an oppressive and imperialist force that, during its existence, committed multiple acts of forced displacement, imperialist warfare, environmental destruction, military suppression of protests, cultural erasure, and more" - while it can be used for nationalist/jingoist reasons, see American propagands from the Cold War, this is fact
"If one empire is cruel and oppressive, any empire opposed to it must be benevolent and free!" - complete bullshit that is pretty much exclusively used to make justifications for imperialist war
Guess which one of these the loudest parts of this site's userbase reject and which one they embrace
Again, we didn't spend 40+ years in a cold war with the USSR simply because we didn't agree on how money should work.
We had legit good reasons to oppose them. And nothing I've seen or read has convinced me otherwise.
well, that isn’t complete either. governments as entities do not really care about right or wrong; they are completely self-interested when it comes to especially global politics. whether something can be seen as “the right thing to do” is just a bonus. They need to be forced into doing the right thing by the people in global situations literally every time if it isn’t of political or economic interest to them. the cold war wasn’t really about economic systems (the ussr had to participate in global capitalism anyways), or what was right, it was about power. the USSR opposed the US because it wanted to have more control over the world, and the US opposed the USSR because it wanted more control over the world. And the US has done pretty much just as many evil things, the biggest difference is just that daily life might’ve been less oppressive if you lived in a good place, in a body that wasn’t maligned, in the US. That doesn’t mean the USSR was a good place, or that they were universally correct, either. Both were and are power-hungry empires
I can tell you're a gringx because you think the USSR evil actions are in any way comparable to the USA.
No, USA is the single most evil nation of the 20th Century, no other country compares, and yes, I am including WW2
Hey, i see you live in Costa Rica. I know that means you probably have very personal experiences with what the US has done. But the USSR also had done some truly horrible things to countries smaller than itself, and dismissing that is incredibly ignorant. It decimated, and continued the decimation of, the cultures of hundreds of peoples in the caucasus, Siberia, and western Asia. It invaded and oppressed the people of Kazakhstan, Ukraine, and the Baltics. They promoted the settling of the land they’d conquered by Russians—textbook colonialism. They starved and killed people not only within their borders but also in Mongolia. They kept countries in eastern Europe very under their thumb, in ways that allies do not do—rearranging their governments often enough. They forcefully relocated minorities. The USSR was only ever limited by being relatively new to the world, and in a region of the world that is harder to send navies and invasion forces out of. There is literally nothing that the US or USSR could do that the other wouldn’t also do.
The only reason some of this might be harder to see now is either because we as people of the American continent do not have much reason or ability to speak to people who can tell us about the lasting effects, or because the USSR fell and the countries it had a hold on were close enough to western Europe for it to be important for western nations to ensure they were more stable. You must remember, we both speak English for awful reasons. But people over there tend to speak Russian for awful reasons, and may never ever even meet someone who speaks English, for any reason. There are too many communication barriers for someone who hasn’t actively attempted to look into the transgressions of the USSR to actually know how it has affected people currently alive
Another thing I don't understand about Glowies, you use my location as some kind of gatcha; it's kinda racist to be honest
Anyway, in this case, my location is unhelpful for you because I know what colonialism actually is
Also we know for a fact that the USSR and USA aren't actually equivalent just by looking at history: For example, what did USA did to Cuba? 70 year-old economic blockade for the express purpose of starving the people and forced them to submit to US hegemony, multiple invasion attempts, multiple assassination attempts to the beloved president of Cuba and at present a literal siege on the island; what did the USSR do to Cuba? Trade, provide weapons and useful resources so the people could thrive even though the Island was blocked from trading with the vast majority of the world; and they did, even with the siege the literacy and health rates in Cuba are better than the USA
Also every time both sides were involved in a country USA was backing the right wing, often actual fascists
Another example of what I was talking about in that last post:
"The Soviet Union was an oppressive and imperialist force that, during its existence, committed multiple acts of forced displacement, imperialist warfare, environmental destruction, military suppression of protests, cultural erasure, and more" - while it can be used for nationalist/jingoist reasons, see American propagands from the Cold War, this is fact
"If one empire is cruel and oppressive, any empire opposed to it must be benevolent and free!" - complete bullshit that is pretty much exclusively used to make justifications for imperialist war
Guess which one of these the loudest parts of this site's userbase reject and which one they embrace
Again, we didn't spend 40+ years in a cold war with the USSR simply because we didn't agree on how money should work.
We had legit good reasons to oppose them. And nothing I've seen or read has convinced me otherwise.
well, that isn’t complete either. governments as entities do not really care about right or wrong; they are completely self-interested when it comes to especially global politics. whether something can be seen as “the right thing to do” is just a bonus. They need to be forced into doing the right thing by the people in global situations literally every time if it isn’t of political or economic interest to them. the cold war wasn’t really about economic systems (the ussr had to participate in global capitalism anyways), or what was right, it was about power. the USSR opposed the US because it wanted to have more control over the world, and the US opposed the USSR because it wanted more control over the world. And the US has done pretty much just as many evil things, the biggest difference is just that daily life might’ve been less oppressive if you lived in a good place, in a body that wasn’t maligned, in the US. That doesn’t mean the USSR was a good place, or that they were universally correct, either. Both were and are power-hungry empires
I can tell you're a gringx because you think the USSR evil actions are in any way comparable to the USA.
No, USA is the single most evil nation of the 20th Century, no other country compares, and yes, I am including WW2

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
the natural lifespan of a fandom is unlimited. when well tended a fandom can be functionally immortal. and yet everywhere you look you see newly bred fandoms withering and dying when they’re barely a year old. barely even six months old. fans are looking at their six month old fandoms and saying i think it’s on its last legs, should i euthanise it? when with the proper care that fandom could outlive them for decades. it’s sad. sad state of affairs we’re in.
TW: Rape
Woman: "This man raped me."
Prison System: "He has his whole future ahead of him. We don't want to ruin his life."
Woman: "I've read about the horrors of how prisoners are treated and about how the system is designed to create criminals in order to use them as a source of slave labor. Prison needs to be abolished."
Prison System: "But, what about rapists?"
A German regional court has ruled that Google is directly liable for the content of its AI search overviews. According to the court, previou
Let’s fucking go
This is HUGE.
1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.
2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.
3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."
4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.
TL;DR Google reeeeeally stepped in it this time.
Additional source and more details below. Absolutely thrilled to say that this is real. And yeah, it's huge.
For all the reasons above AND ALSO because this particular lawsuit is a defamation case
Privacy lawsuits are hard because most privacy laws are super super weak, and there's very rarely a lot of money or enforcement backing privacy laws for...twenty million reasons, really...
But defamation suits? Those have teeth.
(In large part because, at least in some countries and including in the US, defamation laws protect public figures the least - and "public figures" legally includes most if not all politicians, and a hell of a lot of other rich ppl too)
A Munich court ruled Google's AI Overviews are its own words, making it liable for false claims, a decision that, if it holds, could reach e
A German court has ruled that Google can be held directly liable for false claims made by its AI Overviews, a decision that could put a serious legal dent in the whole “the AI made me do it” defense. According to The Next Web, the Regional Court of Munich issued a temporary injunction after Google’s AI Overviews wrongly tied two Munich publishers to scams, subscription traps, and dubious business practices. The court treated those AI-generated summaries as Google’s own statements, not just ordinary search results pointing to third-party pages. That distinction matters. Search engines have traditionally had more protection because they index and link to other people’s content. AI Overviews changes the machinery. Google is not just showing the web anymore. It is summarizing it, rewriting it, and sometimes apparently hallucinating a tiny legal grenade into the results page.
-via Search Engine World, June 10, 2026
Creo que el hecho de que haya gente que no encuentre mutuals que hablen su idioma es una profecía autocumplida ("no hay gente que hable mi idioma acá" → entonces posteo solo en inglés → nunca encuentro gente que hable mi idioma → confirmo la idea inicial). He visto gente postear en francés, italiano, ruso, finés, húngaro (por poner ejemplos) sin buscar activamente posts en esos idiomas. Puede que haya muchos yanquis en Tumblr pero eso no significa que no se puedan crear comunidades en otros idiomas.
A esto me refiero. Cómo que "little Portuguese"? No conoce a la hermosa comunidad brasilera.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I don't know which of you needs to hear this but "narc" is not short for "narcissist" when someone calls you a "narc" for snitching they are calling you a "narcotics officer"
technically narc isnt even short for narcotics officer its just cant for Cop, I believe Roma in origin
I read years ago in a book that it was derived from nakk, Romani for nose, as in someone who always has their nose in other people's business
ITS DERIVED FROM "NARCO" AS IN "NARCOTICS" WHAT FUCKING BOOK
Okay you know what pulling back on my derision because i can see how this mistake would be made but narc and nark are etymologically unrelated
Etymology is always doing some shit like this
Convergent evolution.
Linguistic crab
Two entire linguistic traditions have merged to remind you not to be a fuckin narc
#my family does this thing#when we've majorly unfucked a room or done chore that we were putting off#or whatever. Any sort of household Improvement.#'Come brag on me.'#I means come look I cleaned/rearranged/did dishes/put away the laundry#and the scripted response is 'oh nice it looks SO much better in here now'#like my mom did this when we were kids.#'girls comr brag on the garage I finally organized it so I can get my car in there'#and we go and 'ooh' and 'aah' and tell her how nice it looked and how she did a good job#and we could have her 'come brag on' us for like doing the dishes or cleaning our rooms#I do it to my wife now too#it's a dialogue that means#'I did a chore and it feels like an Accomplishment even if it objectively wasn't a big thing. Please acknowledge this.'#and#'Wow you sure did do a thing. It has improved our material circumstance even if only in a small way. Thank you for doing it.'#like yeah scrubbing the pans is my Job and it's a Little Task but sometimes it feels like a Big Task#and it's nice to have an Accepted Script where I can just demand 'I have functioned as an independent adult praise me with great praise' - by @thepioden