It is a shame to fight over terminology, especially when there is a perfectly accurate and precise term that could be used: personal collections. Not only is âpersonal collectionsâ more accurate, in my experience it also draws studentsâ attention to a number of questions that they donât ask about the term âarchive.â When I discuss personal or special collections with students, they begin asking questions that âarchiveâ does not inspire, such as: Collected by whom? Collected why? For what purpose? These are the questions we are trying to teach as historians.
As many historians currently use the word âarchives,â they seem to imply that an archive is the natural state in which primary sources arrange themselves after being discarded or left by their creators. It creates the false impression that there is little to no work that goes into making primary sources available to researchers, andâmore dangerouslyâthat archives are even a neutral or unmoderated space. When archives and the historical record are used interchangeably in this way, we are unable to see what might be missing.