
❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Sweet Seals For You, Always
taylor price
Show & Tell
noise dept.
One Nice Bug Per Day
we're not kids anymore.
macklin celebrini has autism

titsay

Discoholic 🪩
Cosmic Funnies
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Game of Thrones Daily
Claire Keane
ojovivo
Jules of Nature
RMH

Love Begins

JBB: An Artblog!
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Ukraine

seen from United Kingdom
seen from China

seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from Australia

seen from France

seen from United States
seen from Russia
@kyras-the-wise

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
My pet conspiracy theory is that the reason WotC quietly wrote Garruk out of the story despite him being a fan favorite is that, as a character, Garruk totally embodies nothing but purely masculine traits. He's a giant warrior-druid who communes with nature as a predator, hunts the biggest game he can find, and bonds with other animals to join him in hunts he leads as a their packmaster.
But all media narratives since the last two decades have written by women and faggots, and they have no idea what to do with him. You can't take a character like Garruk and force-fit him into shitty fanfiction-tier plots that all revolve around interpersonal drama, self-actualization, and superficial romance. It's more than likely that all of WotC's media team consider everything Garruk is as toxic. What are they supposed to do with a guy who doesn't talk out his problems and refuses to team up or make friends with the other characters?
They tried to remedy this issue by not-so-subtley attempting to replace Garruk with a cooler, more relatable, minority-coded (obviously) girlboss who conjured her own magical nature spirits for help, which is a lot nicer than those meanie hunts Garruk would do.
Literally nobody liked her, because everyone just wanted Garruk back. They printed like 6 or 7 of these Vivien cards, and all people kept asking over and over was "Where's Garruk?" There was a solid decade where WotC just pretended he'd never existed. And all along that period, they were vomiting out crappy story updates featuring Vivien girlbossing her way across the planes and putting the beatdown on bad guys without being antisocial enough to not remind the rest of the cast what a girlboss she is.
Eventually WotC gave up on her (the last one they printed was from like half a decade ago), but Garruk is still nowhere to be seen. And I unironically think the only reason is because they have no idea how to write a character that isn't just a woman with a Y chromosome.
some people on the internet have only been on here for five minutes
i will never get over this one i’m afraid

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
what the hell is going on
i believe in you Binface. you can do it. this could be your moment.
Please god it would be so funny
there is no downside to voting for Count Binface. its not taking away from other candidates bcos they aren't any and the more votes he gets the stupider Farage looks.
for people out of the loop:
Nigel Farage is the leader of Reform UK, a far right party who are currently in the process of a serious bid to become the UK government. they are just straight up evil.
Count Binface is an intergalactic space warrior with a bin on his head. he likes to run as a novelty candidate in general and mayoral elections. a big thing he likes to do is run as a candidate against the incumbent prime minister:
(Also pictured: Boris Johnson, Elmo)
Anyway, in brief:
Nigel Farage is currently in the midst of a big scandal about his finances
He has decided to deal with this by 1) making a show of nobly resigning from parliament and then 2) immediately running in the resulting by-election
He has stated that he is letting 'the people' judge his actions and implied that if he wins that will prove that he has been exonerated in the court of public opinion
His goal was presumably to get a big resounding win over the other parties, proving that The People still love him.
the other parties have thus far decided that this is a 'vanity election' and, well, there is one very easy way to ensure that he will not beat any of them, and that is simply not to play.
and as a result the only person who has so far confirmed they are running against him is Count Binface. no matter the outcome this makes Nigel Farage look like, u know, a fucking clown.
So what happens if Count Binface actually wins? Does he join Parliament? Does he have to take the bin off his face?
I've seen some people saying he would have to give up his title but it would seem that is no longer the case as of 1999; so, no, he can keep his ceremonial bin if he wishes.
Important to note also that Count Binface is the alter ego of comedian & political satirist Jon Harvey who seems to be an intelligent individual with reasonable politics. As I said no real downside.
The no hats rule clearly does not apply to him. He is not wearing a hat. It's a bin.
It's a sign of growing up when things being not serious enough bothers you.
I think the push towards medicalizing every aspect of human life is deliberately intertwined with that. If you care about things, you must be autistic. If you're serious about caring about anything. You're only supposed to care about things perfomatively, half assedly posting snarky memes on whatever social media you use. But if you're serious about anything, you're disturbed. Why do you care if Wall Street rapes the planet? How does that affect you?
#to have the confidence of a mediocre white man #speaking on matters he knows nothing about
Hey @adamtheredbeard did you notice the image suspiciously cut off before the end of the tweet? I wonder if that softlib had anything else to say...
I see a lot of tags from Communists gloating in the reblogs, very confident that they know better than this guy...
But I'd wager that basically none of them do. It isn't just a matter of historical knowledge, either. For instance, "#mediocre white men" is part of a push for a form of scientific racism (based on "correct" race ratios that are just made up), and you didn't notice.
They talk about it a lot in others, but they tend to be pretty weak in their ability to spot when they're giving in to hatred and it's distorting their thinking.
I'm really sick of people dissing on figures like MLK because they weren't violent activists. They assassinated MLK because his activism was actually fucking WORKING. And that only made him a martyr and furthered progress for black America. Black America owes a LOT of its success in the fight for civil rights to MLKs pacifist approach.
Also, maybe don't point to Haiti of all places as evidence of successful violent revolution. Things have historically not gone well for Haiti.
Don't look up the UN human rights report for Angola,
we already know how things went in Cuba with the Castro regime, and how it's still going. Such a paradise that right up until obama decided to change the rules in retaliation for them voting for trump (that's my theory at least) we had people on homemade rafts risking their lives to get to the US. Not a thing folks do if they're living in a place worth living in.
folks may not be up to speed on Vietnam's current level of human rights repression,
South Africa is in the news currently enough that you should be able to see how they're doing without any difficulty,
And honestly I think they included Haiti as a joke, because seriously now.
I can keep going too, how are things going in China and North Korea lately?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Do you think Michael Crichton had a deep-seated hatred of theme parks because he was too tall for all the rides?
Yes.
[tumblr] is a flat circle.
Damn, it sure is huh
We should do this more on this website.
Person 1: -posts-
Person 2: -pulls out the historical documents-
I have been brought before the scriptures and my heresies found canonical.
I accept the judgement "unoriginal" and "should have looked it up first" but, in my inadequate defence, Tumblr's search function does fucking suck.
Defense found perfectly cromulent. Let Baddywronglegs free, and let no mark be against said blog.
"I have been brought before the scriptures and my heresies found canonical" is an all-time banger line.
just casually leaving this here for no particular reason
You know what? Fuck it I'm adding more context. Sesame Street has talked about the topic of death more than once and it's done with such gentle carefulness without watering down or censoring the heaviness of the situations. It treats heavy subject matter with respect and dignity and has been for DECADES. From the early 1980s:
To 2025:
Hell, they even cover the devastating heaviness of MASS SHOOTINGS without censoring or watering anything down.
They've been doing this for YEARS, and it's ALWAYS handled with dignity, respect, seriousness, understanding, and love.
Whenever I see people censoring words because it "might offend" someone or the big ad companies that are currently trying to run everything? I just want to say to them: "What? Is Sesame Street too mature for you?" Because really...what the hell are we doing.
Mister Roger's Neighborhood also covered difficult topics with respect, age-appropriately, and without pulling a single punch. It's crazy that we've worked ourselves up so much that we're self-censoring like it's always been the norm.
This clip is from 1968 and discussed assassination after Bobby Kennedy died.
I'm not sure when this clip originally aired, but it was likely sometime in the 1980s. They talk about murder and, incredibly by today's standards, what sort of emotions (anger, fear, loneliness) might drive someone to hurt or kill other people + how we can manage our own difficult or painful feelings.
The ability to talk about hard and awful things
is the ability to process these things.
taking away the words for bad things
means when they HAPPEN- and bad things will still happen around us-
WE CAN'T TALK ABOUT THEM without the WORDS.
When the word is accurate, USE THE WORD. Say Death. Say Murder. Say Rape. Say Prison, say Riots, say War, Say Famines and Disease. Say Bigotry. Say Hate crime. Say Racism. Say Fascism. Say Abuse. Say Hurt. Say Pain. Say Grief. Say Fear.
We must not lose the Truth of what a word means.
All of these things need to be talked about. Do Not GIVE UP YOUR WORDS.
Twitter is sometimes worth keeping around because of posts like these
is it possible to learn this power?
how excellent! i shall view these moving pictures immediately and see how flatteringly they depict my royal image!
call li si i have a new crime to add to the law books

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming