And then where does the logic lead, that womens worth should be in pursuing a career, making dollars by creating exchange value (vs use value). Womens value becomes the exchange value she can acess.
This is the central problem for the marriage in capitalist economy, proletarian men work to access money to purchase resources (rather than say, a peasant land holding where husband and wife both do important work to maintain the home, land, and family and procure survival). Since men have more resources women are compelled to marry to acess those resources; womens worth becomes tied to her ability to marry a high earner and associated with the qualities that tend to serve that aim (beauty, charm, agreeableness etc).
The modern system says "the feminist thing now is that a woman's worth will be tied to her ability to earn money or credentials in a career" and what does the ideology lead to: earning money is feminist so sex work is feminist, credentials are feminist so sacrificing your integrity to climb institutional ladders is feminist, heading the state department and destabilizing Libya is feminist, and so on.
Second wave feminism identified a central issue in the capitalist family structure (ie that women lacked acess to resources that could promote autonomy and lead to consensual partnerships). But does the solution work? Is there a solution? Wages for house work? UBI? A shift in values?