decided to remake this gifset to celebrate the season 2 announcement!! π

pixel skylines
RMH

#extradirty
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

β£ Chile in a Photography β£

PR's Tumblrdome
π
official daine visual archive
sheepfilms
Cosimo Galluzzi
π©΅ avery cochrane π©΅
wallacepolsom
todays bird
Not today Justin
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

Discoholic πͺ©
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
taylor price
untitled
Xuebing Du
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine

seen from India

seen from United Kingdom

seen from France
seen from Greece

seen from Malaysia
seen from TΓΌrkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from South Korea
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from United States
@katefathers
decided to remake this gifset to celebrate the season 2 announcement!! π

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
the earth watcher π
a little more of Doctor and Rose. I love them so much!!
truly the idea of "this scene is (un-)necessary to the story" is such a fundamentally uncurious and anti-art way of engaging with fiction. the story itself is unnecessary, in the sense that all art is unnecessary, because art is not a fucking optimization problem. that's the beauty of it
the idea that a sex scene in fiction is fundamentally useless/simply for audience titillation UNLESS theyβre fucking infodumping exposition while they bone or something is so funny and myopic to me. like, you really genuinely believe for real that there is NOTHING to be gained about your understanding of a story or characters simply from how they approach and engage in sex? really for real?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
Seeking the light in the shadowsβοΈβ¨
Kurt Wganer aka Nightclawer π
Calvin and Hobbes - Itβs July Already
there are places in the world today that are experiencing 40Β°C for the first time in recorded history. of course there's no way to know whether chucking billionaires into volcanos will appease the sun god but i feel we're doing the scientific method a disservice if we don't at least try
βThe LEGO Movie was my favorite movie of 2014, but it strikes me that the main character was male, because I feel like in our current culture, he HAD to be. The whole point of Emmett is that heβs the most boring average person in the world. Itβs impossible to imagine a female character playing that role, because according to our pop culture, if sheβs female sheβs already SOMEthing, because sheβs not male. The baseline is male. The average person is male. You can see this all over but itβs weirdly prevalent in childrenβs entertainment. Why are almost all of the muppets dudes, except for Miss Piggy, whoβs a parody of femininity? Why do all of the Despicable Me minions, genderless blobs, have boy names? I love the story (which I read on Wikipedia) that when the director of The Brave Little Toaster cast a woman to play the toaster, one of the guys on the crew was so mad he stormed out of the room. Because he thought the toaster was a man. A TOASTER. The character is a toaster. I try to think about that when writing new charactersβ is there anything inherently gendered about what this character is doing? Or is it a toaster?β
β Bojack Horseman creator Raphael Bob-Waksberg commenting on how weird gendered defaults in entertainment are, and why we should think twice about them. Excerpted from this longer original post. (via 360degreesasthecrowflies)
The Summer Edition of STARBURST MAGAZINE has arrived, and weβre bringing the heat with a first look at the brutal Evil Dead Burn courtesy of
A little late with this, but Starburst Magazine Issue 494 is out now!
In our Summer Edition, we take a look at EVIL DEAD BURN, as well as pay tribute to John Woo, introduce you to DC comics anti-hero Lobo, and examine the recently discovered "lost" episodes of Doctor Who!
As for me, over in the Book Wormhole, I review the Herman Raucher's fantastic 1980 horror novel Maynard's House. (How this hasn't been made into a film yet baffles me.) Meanwhile, in our 1001 Movies You've (Probably) Never Seen feature, I celebrate the spectacularly spooky Thai horror film Shutter.
Get your copy today!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
what really fucks me up about watching the truman show in 2025 is how it's not fictional. truman is fictional, but the truman show isn't.
there's thousands of truman shows. you find them on youtube, tiktok, instagram... family and mommy vloggers, sad beige moms and now the trend of neglectful moms showing the "reality" of parenting. all of them using their kids for entertainment. each child their own truman; living a life manufactured by their parents, a camera watching their every moment, broadcasted for the entire world to see.
tbh, i didn't even think about that when i made my post and holy shit you're so fucking right
The beautiful art of Thomas Blackshear II
i went to his website and saw even more great art! sharing some more which i particularly appreciated
Just watched Adam Conover (of Adam Ruins Everything) make such a solid point that I think we should spread far and wide. Yes, having AI write your emails is lazy, sure, but people love being lazy. We need to really emphasize that sending AI emails (or using AI responses on social media, or publishing AI flyers, or or or) is rude.
It's rude. You're making someone take their time to read something you couldn't bother to write. You're telling them they were so unimportant you couldn't be bothered to actually take the time to say something yourself. And frankly, you're lying about it while you're at it.
It's rude.
Dandelion shoot, 2026-05-11

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
Im listening to a podcast ep about AI usage and the guest is saying he completely understands why people refuse to use it out of fear because he shares the same fears, and it's just so weird to me that it's never ever acknowledged that some people don't use it not because they're afraid but because it just holds no appeal. There are things I'm sure learning models are very useful for but none of them have anything to do with me. Yes I'm a bit of a ludite but I completely failed to resist the lure of the phone, or social media, I've never used chatgpt because I have just never wanted to. I feel like the entire debate is instantly reframed once you acknowledge that it's not a necessary service that people either work to resist or avoid out of fear. For most people it's just an online tool, and for me and I know for lots of others too it's just not that important.
It's not that interesting or useful to me, it's holds no appeal, I am resisting nothing. I could already do everything I wanted I don't need a new tool. It really is that simple and I would feel this way even if it wasn't worrying and evil in various ways. We HAVE to resist this narrative that AI is everywhere because people want it, because it's necessary, because it's an improvement, because people can't live without it. AI is everywhere because tech CEOs and investors want to make something from their massive investments. It is incredibly resistable to me. Just don't have an interest in it. This needs to be part of the AI conversation if we have any hope of saving ourselves from the data mining clutches of big tech (AI specifics aside)
nightcrawler sketch' 26