Jasper Reviews: Thoth Tarot
Another deck review request from Lord, who exists solely to torment me. So mean. Anyway, this is the deck that I gave anxiety to. I will do my best to judge it based on its solo merits rather than my blinding hatred of Aleister Crowley as a person and a concept, but this will be an incredibly biased review.
Please note that there are things that I just do not know, so there will be things that I miss. Please check the tier list page on my blog for the categories and other decks that I have ranked. All six main categories are judged on a 1 to 5 scale, with 1 being the worst and 5 being the best.
ALEISTER. BITCHASS. CROWLEY. Okay, okay, it's fine, I'm fine, we're not here about my beef with Aleister Crowley, we're here about the Thoth Tarot.
This is a reprint of the Thoth Tarot from U.S. Games Systems, Inc. and consists of 78 cards in a cardboard box with a little white paper booklet. This version's booklet was written by James Wasserman and edited and updated by Lynn Araujo, with two essays written by Lady Frieda Harris (the original painter of the deck's artwork) and commentary by Stuart R Kaplan. It is also fundamentally a pip deck.
The project started in 1938 and ended in 1943 (listed on Wikipedia as a "citation needed", but we're giving it the benefit of the doubt because that exact range appears in the guidebook for this deck too), coming to life several years after the 1909 RWS Tarot and well after the 14th century to 15th century Tarot of Marseilles pattern, meaning that when we get down to the renamed cards section, I'll tell you which ones are different from the RWS and make the "new standard" for Thoth Tarot-based decks.
Appropriation VS Appreciation: 1
Look, when your goal is to combine every source of religion, mythology, and science down into "a singular truth", that's just straight up appropriation my guy. No amount of sucking Crowley's dick and reframing it as a cool and inspiring thing is going to make me give you a higher rating. Kick bricks.
Oh, and we can't forget the usage of the g-slur for Romani people. Because why not I guess.
I should also mention that the Kabbalah appropriation is the absolute strongest in this deck given the history of the Golden Dawn and unfortunately repeats across several cards.
The first page literally says, and I quote,
In April, 1904, in Cairo, Egypt, [Aleister Crowley] received voice transmissions from the Hierarchal Forces, which heralded the Age of Aquarius.
No further notes, the rest of the introduction is just as bad.
What's even more bullshit is how little information is offered in the guidebook about Lady Frieda Harris considering she had the unenviable job of taking Crowley's farts and actually making a deck out of it.
This is unfortunately where I must give the deck some points. For the most part, the overall border, titlings, and numberings are rather consistent through the deck; however, the Court cards that have an empty circle instead of any form of numbering/abbreviation up top. And while the Court and Majors have the name of the card overlayed in darker font above their suit/Trumps designation, the Minors instead have a keyword overlayed on their suit designation in darker font.
Lady Frieda Harris's work is pretty much what you assume when you think of ceremonial ritual magic illustrations, even though the figures themselves are not visually consistent; it's the type of art that would be accused of being AI-generated if you posted it without context in the year 2026. The pips vary quite a lot and have little connection between each of them in their own suit, to say nothing of other suits. The artwork is also chock-full of symbols from all over the place, necessitating the guidebook in order to even start figuring out where the hell they stole this particular part from.
You'd be able to guess that these were from the same deck, but once you start actually looking at the details, things get whacky real quick.
Let's do a little something together, shall we? Scroll back up to the top of the post and see if you can get a look at that 8 of Disks in the picture. It shows eight flowers with eight leaves growing off of a woody plant with the symbol for Virgo near the base and a symbol for the Sun up top.
What part of this says Prudence, a word which (according to Merriam-Webster) indicates "the ability to govern and discipline oneself by the use of reason" or "skill and good judgment in the management of affairs and the use of resources" or "caution or circumspection as to danger or risk"? What part of this signifies, to quote the guidebook, "intelligence applied to material matters"? What part of it implies the keywords of building, skill, cunning, industriousness, avarice, and meanness? What part of this points towards Mercury in Virgo, especially because it depicts the Sun symbol instead of the Mercury one?
You could argue that the depiction of this pip card as a plant ties into the keyword of agriculture. I could build off of that and say that you could stretch the meaning of Prudence to be about not wasting your resources. But everything else? This is the main problem I have with pip decks, even ones like these where you have more illustrative elements to them: how does a number of objects tie into the overall keywords you are adding to it?
Don't get me wrong, it sure sounds like Lady Frieda Harris did her best with what nothing Aleister Crowley gave her, and we only went in on one specific card. There are better ones, there are worse ones. Considering how deeply entrenched this deck is in something that can't be summarized by a little white booklet, it's a miracle we've gotten this much.
Gods, this fucking guidebook. So you have that dicksucking introduction that completely glosses over Lady Frieda Harris's contributions to actually make it functional, but then you get some mystifying bullshit about how you need to invoke "the higher forces" using the Golden Dawn invocation in order to actually read cards. It implies that you have to do this literally every. Single. Time. You. Read. Beyond that, there is no advice for a beginning reader.
After that, it gives you a 15 card spread that's "simpler" than the Celtic Cross as your starter tarot spread, and honestly wouldn't be bad if this were literally any other guidebook. I might excise that from this booklet and let it exist on its own somewhere.
Following the tarot spread are the keywords, which take up a relatively small chunk of the booklet. The writings from Lady Frieda Harris added to the back end and taking up most of it are passingly interesting because they go into the displays of the artwork that made the tarot cards, but it's filled with more ahistorical bullshit and more slurs, takes up way too many pages and doubles the thickness of the guidebook, and AAAA-
Okay. Okay. It's fine. I'm fine. Overall, due to how this deck's guidebook is written and the core of Aleister Crowley that remains in it makes it very difficult to actually use this deck's guidebook.
I think the rest of this review shows exactly how little I like this deck. The only thing saving it from the flames of the wood stove is that I knew going into buying it that I would hate it, and I have the urge to keep a copy among my collection for reference, but it lives SQUARELY in the Shame Corner.
As established, the Thoth Tarot comes after both the Tarot of Marseilles and the RWS Tarot, and given RWS's prevalence in the tarot market, this section is to tell you what is standardly different from an RWS.
High Priestess to just Priestess
Justice to Adjustment, also moved to 8 instead of 11
Wheel of Fortune to just Fortune
Strength to Lust, also moved to 11 instead of 8
The World to The Universe
The suit of Pentacles is named the suit of Disks in this deck.
The Court goes Princess-Prince-Queen-Knight instead of Page-Knight-Queen-King.
Final Ranking: 8/30, F Tier