Antis want attention, validation and legitimacy. The fewer people giving them any of that the better. How many times have there been anti posts that have single-figure notes, just their tiny circle jerk patting each other on the back, until a well-meaning person comes in trying to educate some 15 year old who thinks they know everything and it all blows up? And hyperbole about "their numbers are growing!" just makes them feel more powerful and important. It's a kids' clique. Ignore them.
RE: your fandom concern. Unfortunately, youâre mostly arguing with children; logical fallacies, thoughtless name-calling and zero common sense is kind of what they do. Most will grow out of it (we did) and the ones that wonât, no amount of gentle correcting will ever help. Donât bother engaging them; as youâve realized it leads precisely nowhere. Better to devote your energy to positivity and showing thereâs an alternative to those obnoxious voices without giving them any power or credability.
So I donât know whether these two anons are really the same person, but in any case, it makes sense to post these asks together.Â
Here is the thing: What youâre suggestng is an entirely valid approach if all you want is a pleasant, wank-free fandom experience. And itâs perfectly fine to want that.
But Iâm not convinced that this is a track that all of us should follow.Â
The problem is that many of these antis are not just fifteen year old teenagers, or malevolent trolls, though some of their posts might certainly look like it. These antis are also twenty-something US American college students, who claim to be knowledgeable and educated - leftists and liberals who think in all honesty that what they are doing, and the way they are doing it, is helping to make the world a better place.Â
On top of that, the lines are not as easily drawn. When I talk about antis, I also talk about fans, because there is no easy way to discern between an anti and a fan. Antis are not all alike, and many of the problems that I see when I look at their posts are also problems on a larger scale, a reflection of culture wars taken to the extreme.
Your posts make it seem as if this new generation of fans were not any better or worse than previous fan generations, and as if I were exaggerating their number.Â
But I donât think I am. I think that these people come from a different background than many older fans, they come from a society that has changed, and still changes, through liberal politics and social media. At the moment, it feels that for every head of the anti-Hydra that weâre cutting off, two more grow back. To use a different allegory: itâs like discovering a few bad apples now and then, rather randomly, and dismissing them as not all that relevant, but then suddenly, the stench of rot surrounds you and it affects everything you do.
Yes, part of it is classical trolling behavior. But the problem is that many of them come with convictions and opinions that are directly derived from a liberal, politically correct US American college culture, and they are difficult to counter becaus fandom, by and large, is also a mostly liberal space. âAnti behaviorâ does not only mean posting anon hate or replying to certain posts with âdie, you disgusting piece of shitâ. Thatâs only the most extreme for.  But typical âanti behaviorâ also contains a lot of things that the entirety of fandom has not yet acknowledged as a problem.Â
Partly, the backlash weâreexperiencing now is owed to the fact that fandom has gone mainstream.Add social media to the mix, in a highly dangerous combination of interconnectedness and anonymity, and suddenly you have a fandom space that is no longer separate from mainstream culture (it never entirely was, but that is beside the point), Of course there will be a reaction to it - one would exepct the outcry of the politically and religiously conservative, the moral outrage of sexual purists, homophobic Christians,and so on - but instead you get a segment of the left, only that they are suddenly using the same arguments as their conservative opponents and seek to ban certain kinds of content and tell people what they can or canât do if tey want to avoid being called racist, or misogynists, or apologists of any flavor.
There are many factors contributing to this, and Iâm going to list them as they come to my mind after some consideration.
A new generation of young people who wereshielded from upsetting or problematic things during childhood, and are now expecting theirenvironment to provide them with âsafe spacesâ - and to protectthem from offensive or disturbing content. An expectation that often results in a demand for trigger warnings or outright censorship.
A culture where identity â belongingto a certain minority or marginalized segment of the population - worksas an âappeal to authorityâ that is in turn used to dismiss otherpeopleâs arguments and have the final say in all kinds of matters related, if only vaguely, to thisminority.
Emotionalizing of discourse, wherefeelings and expression of feelings are considered more relevant than arguments, andwhere name-calling and personal attacks are excused as a valid expression ofrighteous anger - whereas attempts to argue rationally are dismissedor sometimes even discredited as a means of oppression and tone-policing.
The addictivness of call-out culture,supported by social media, where the person who states their opinionin an especially loud and aggressive fashion is celebrated for speaking out against any kind of injustice.
The tendency to ignore dissentingopinions and dismiss facts, while stating oneâs own opinion in an echochamber full of like-minded people who drown out any other voices.
Contemplating societal, historical, orother issues solely through a US-centric lense, e.g. âcultural appropriationâ, but also matters of representation in media, or fictional worldbuilding.
An unhealthy, paradox approach to anything sexual, where the importance of sex is greatly exaggerated, yet at the same time, it is still seen as something as something inherently dirty, degrading, and immoral.
The notion that since one is so clearly in theright, one doesnât have to explain oneâs own opinions, let alone make any kinds of concessions - also the idea that the problems and issues of a marginalized group always take precedence and other peopleâs concerns can be dismissed on the grounds that these people are privileged.
The widespread idea that works offiction influence reality, and that moral considerations should therefore trump the purpose of entertainment - or the authorâs creative freedom (and especially where the entertainment provided contains a sexual aspect, s.a.)
Black-and-white thinking, where everything that is even slightly problematic is immediately condemned in its entirety.
The use of certain words and terms to the point where they become mpty catchphrases; a special kind of rhetoric that disregards traditional meanings and definition and is often used to dismiss and discredit other peopleâs arguments.
The dismissal of freedom of expression where inconvenient; the opinion that freedom of expression is a tool of oppression and shouldnât apply to opponents.
There are more, and they overlap in a variety of ways, but I think that these are the most important aspects. Add to that the highly emotional fandom environment and you get what we have now.Â
This is also the reason why I donât think that blocking and moving on - a behavior that, if we were only dealing with common trolls, might be effective - will work well in the long run.
The problem here is that if we donât speak out, if we donât adress the issues the antis are raising, people who are new to the discussion, new to fandom, might not realize that they can have a different opionion at all.Â
If we donât stand up against censorship, how long until tumblr caves and starts to ban certain kinds of fandom content? If we donât make sure to point out why the AO3 was founded, and to what purpose, how long until the board members cave and introduce a new content policy? If we donât point out that trigger warnings are opitonal - here or elsewhere - how will antis understand that they are not entitled to them?Â
I donât want to wake up some day and realize that because I vastly underestimated the power of a certain group of people who didnât seem all that powerful at first - people I refused to take serious and decided to ignore - these people have now elected a new board for the AO3 and suddently the TOS are re-written to exclude dark fic, and make trigger warnings mandatory.
Not only that, but thereâs also more at stake. So many people were taken completely by surprise by the outcome of the US elections, because they hadnât truly thought that Trump might win. At the same time, these people are still incapable of seeing Trumpâs victory as a warning sign that the regressive left has alienated many people who might otherwise not have voted for Trump. Again, we see the tendency to ingore dissent, to dismiss other peopleâs perspective, and the refusal to acknowledge that if you donât manage to get people on board, theyâll stay behind, and at some point they might just try to sink the lifeboat, no matter the consequences.
The question, to me, is not whether we should address the anti problem. I donât think that the tactic of pretending that they donât exist, treating them like standard trolls, will work. Iâd rather work out a strategy to get them on board - to fight irrationality, ignorane. How do we deal with these people in fandom, when itâs pretty clear that their behavior is rewarded, reinforced, and rewarded in other areas of life? How do we fight a culture that ranks feelings, subjective experience, and identity politics higher than rational arguments, freedom of expression, and true tolerance?
In the past, Iâve occasionally made some scathing replies, or fought the occasional uphill battle, and maybe Iâve even changed the minds of a silent, undecided bystander or two. But Iâm wondering whether there isnât a better change, whether we couldnât find a smarter, more tactical approach.