"Not like Dachau, is it, Herr Mufti?" - New York Times, May 16, 1948
I love everything about this poster.
Source - https://www.nytimes.com/1948/05/16/archives/not-like-dachau-is-it-herr-mufti.html
Monterey Bay Aquarium
ojovivo
KIROKAZE
almost home
Misplaced Lens Cap

titsay

izzy's playlists!
Cosmic Funnies
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Mike Driver
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

â
sheepfilms

â

Kaledo Art

Janaina Medeiros

seen from Brazil

seen from Portugal

seen from United States

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from Sweden

seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Switzerland
seen from T1

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Russia
seen from Singapore
seen from Brazil
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
@humusboii2thereturnoftheking
"Not like Dachau, is it, Herr Mufti?" - New York Times, May 16, 1948
I love everything about this poster.
Source - https://www.nytimes.com/1948/05/16/archives/not-like-dachau-is-it-herr-mufti.html

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
From one Non-Jewish person to another,
If your activism for Palestine claims that Jewish people control the media, you're antisemitic.
If your activism for Palestine claims that Jewish people deserve to be killed, mass-evicted or sorted into "good" and "bad" Jewish people, you're antisemitic.
If your activism for Palestine claims that all Jewish people are Zionists, you're generalising and antisemitic.
If your activism for Palestine is antisemitic, you are actively harming Jewish and Palestinian populations worldwide with your rhetoric. You don't really support Palestine, you just hate Jewish people - and if that is what your activism is, it's not true activism and we don't need you in this movement.
If you're not a safe space for all, I'm not the blog to follow.
Boulder SJP really said "chickens coming home to roost" about a firebombing that murdered an 82-year-old woman.
These terrorist dick riders are out here deepthroating Molotovs. A guy burns Jews at a hostage rally, kills Karen Diamond, and they call it "the only sane response," demand his release, and donât even mention the dead grandma. This is some batshit insane death cult simping.
And the cherry on top: Boulder city council member Taishya Adams refused to sign a condemnation of the attack because it called it âantisemiticâ instead of âanti-Zionistâ. She literally wouldnât condemn the firebombing murder without shoehorning in her Jew-hate framing.
The whole operation is rotten. SJP and their political enablers arenât pro-Palestine. Theyâre just proudly pro-killing Jews. Fucking disgusting.
I could go fully into explaining how the "it was promised to them 3,000 years ago" jokes fundamentally are based on a misunderstanding of the Torah because the "joke" would not work otherwise.
However at the end of the day its just calling jews greedy. Like people whip it out about everything and anything that it literally is just the socially acceptable way to call jews greedy. Ya know, a stereotype shoved on us for decades.
At least come up with something original instead of reheating the same nachos that nazi Germany reheated.
Textbook example of the Horseshoe Theory.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
This âNakba Survivorâ is literally a âEuropean settlerâ
It turns out that the âNakba Survivorâ who stars in Mayor Mamdaniâs official NY City Hall Palestinian propaganda video yesterday, is literally a âEuropean settlerâ.
In the late 19th century, Muslim Bosnians (including Ineaâs grandparents), fled Bosnia to Ottoman Syria, after Austria-Hungary took control of Bosnia.
They feared that the Christians would seek revenge on Muslims after centuries of mistreatment by them.
The family then moved to Tulkarem which after 1948 was under Jordanian control, not Israeli. So there was no ânakbaâ there.
Because the Jewish population developed Jerusalemâs medical care under the British mandate, Inea herself was born in Jerusalem but the family remained in Tulkarem.
In the 1930âs, Ineaâs father was offered a Job in England, he returned to Mandatory Palestine after a few years, but in 1948 they decided to move back to England.
They were not expelled, and no one forced them to move to England. In any case, Tulkarem, and the old city of Jerusalem remained under Jordanian Arab control. No Arabs were forced to leave from Tulkarem in 1948.
So in summary, this is a European with no strong roots in the land of Israel, whose family made the decision to immigrate back to the continent of their grandparents instead of remaining under Arab control in what was part of Jordan after 1948.
Furthermore the âvisit Palestineâ poster on Ineaâs wall which is featured in the video is not a Palestinian Arab poster as Mayor Mamdaniâs video implies. It is a Zionist poster designed and drawn by the Jewish artist Franz Kraus to encourage Jewish tourism to the holy land.
Final Fun Fact: When Bushnaqâs European grandparents arrived on boats to the Levant, Jews were already the biggest Community in Jerusalem.
(The above text was originally written by this historian https://x.com/_j0sh_a_/status/2055732105200468431?s=20
When antizionists go âIsrael needs antisemitism to legitimise its settler colonial apartheid genocide state blah blah blah,â - if you really, truly, honestly believe that, then why the fuck are you doing its job for it? If you really, truly, honestly believe that, then why arenât you bending over backwards to make sure everywhere else is the safest, most welcoming place possible for Jews?
Could it possibly be youâre full of shit and you know it? Could it possibly be you donât want Jews in Israel but you donât want them anywhere else either? Thereâs a word for that and it begins with N.
The "Safe Space" is Dead, History is Repeating
If you aren't looking at what just happened in Midwood, youâre ignoring the moment pro-Palestinian "activism" turned into residential warfare. This wasn't a march on a government building but a siege on a Jewish neighborhood.
Quick recap for those unaware:
Park East Synagogue (May 5): The "warning shot". Under the pretext of protesting a real estate event on the Upper East Side, the crowd turned into a mob. They breached police barriers with such force that an NYPD officer was hospitalized with a severe leg injury.
Midwood (May 11): The "invasion." This moved from the sidewalk to the sanctuary of people's homes. While "protesting" the Young Israel synagogue, the mob spilled onto private porches. We watched an elderly man shoved to the ground, his head hitting a tree. Screaming "Death toâŚ" and "Fuck Israel" at families watching from their balconies is nothing short of terrorizing a demographic.
When you wave Hezbollah flags and Hamas target symbols (the red triangle) while screaming "Death to the IDF" into the windows of private family homes, you aren't "petitioning for peace." You are terrorizing people where they sleep.
So why did I say 'History is Repeating'? If you guessed Nazi Germany, you went too far back.
Forty years ago, this was the manual of the White Supremacist. In the 70s and 80s, mobs in Boston and Marquette Park marched through neighborhoods with intimidating symbols to tell Black families "You aren't safe here".
Seeing People of Color within these pro-Palestinian crowds using those same tactics today is a tragic, hollow irony.
It is the worst kind of racism, a "reboot" of the very oppression their parents and grandparents fought to dismantle. When the former underdog adopts the tools of the supremacist, the moral high ground is dead. You aren't "dismantling a system", youâre just the new face of an old, ugly hate.
But this isn't about calling a specific group out, this is about the pro-Palestinian movement as a whole. If we decide that residential neighborhoods are "fair game" for this level of intimidation, no one is safe. Not your street, not your home, not your family. Bigotry and racism won't disappear once Jews are gone, it'll only find a new target.
Don't let the "activist" label mask a pogrom. Call it out now, or don't be surprised when the mob decides your neighborhood is the next "territory" to be marked.
Julian Casablancas: A Case Study in "Edgelord" Erasure
Can we talk about the absolute intellectual bankruptcy of Julian Casablancas comparing October 7 to a "slave rebellion" in a recent SubwayTakes interview? Because the math ain't mathing.
Casablancas is doing that very specific thing where an ultra-privileged celebrity tries to regain cultural relevance by cosplaying as a "martyr" for the truth. He starts his rant with "It's been nice having a career with you," which is a total joke. Heâs not losing his career, heâs getting a standing ovation from the exact crowd that thinks "antisemitism" is just a buzzword used to silence them.
Julian's whole "Zionists have white privilege" bit is a textbook example of American-centric brain rot. Heâs trying to overlay a US racial dynamic onto a region where half the Jewish population is Brown or Black. Heâs erasing the memory of Yemenite Jews, Ethiopian Jews, and the 6 million European Jews who weren't "white enough" for the gas chambers. To Julian, Jews are only allowed to exist as "white oppressors" because if theyâre an indigenous, persecuted minority, his "slave rebellion" analogy crumbles.
Julian also stated: "Slave rebellions that were violent didnât mean that slavery is not bad." Cool. Who was the "slave holder" at the Nova Music Festival? Which plantation did 4-year-old Ariel Bibas run? Which "privilege" was the 80-year-old grandmother in the tunnel enjoying when she was kidnapped?
You wonât answer that because your analogy only works when it stays vague. The second you apply it to a baby or a murdered teenager, you aren't a "brave truth-teller" you're just a guy making excuses for a massacre.
While you smirk on a subway show about how "safe" you are to speak your truth, 70% of religious hate crimes in the US target Jews. You aren't the one in danger, Julian. Youâre the one feeding the fire.
Your career is fine. The people youâre talking about are not. Stop using a 1,500-year-old history of displacement and a modern massacre as a "shortcut" to being edgy. Itâs not "punk", it's just disgustingly bigoted.
Leftists made sexism ok as long as you put "white" in front of the woman you're about to insult, and they made antisemitism ok as long as you call the Jew a Zionist first.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The antisemitic left is so fucking weird for ostensibly agreeing that race is a social construct but acting like itâs immutable biology.
For them, the social construct of race canât be defined by the groups perpetuating racism, because white supremacists donât think Jews are white. And clearly the marginalized groups that are negatively impacted by racism arenât allowed to self-identify, because Jews on the whole donât think of ourselves as white.
Instead, race as a social construct is defined completely and entirely by⌠melanin content. If you look white, you must be white. Which at best is confusing white privilege with whiteness. At worst, itâs treating race as a biological reality.
Which is also why we have so many leftists being weird about lighter-skinned indigenous peoples, latinos, and mixed race people. If leftists want to be the champions of the marginalized, they really need to stop cannibalizing their own base and start learning what their buzzwords actually mean.
The thing is, when most goyische leftists say israeli, they are almost never including israeli arabs and israeli Palestinians in that. Or any other non jewish israeli.
And that is why a lot of the time you can tell when someone is being antisemitic despite saying israelis instead of jews.
Like when people say "all israelis need to be killed", 9/10 they are referring to jewish israelis only. Because if you pointed out that all israelis includes Palestinian israelis, often they go "well not them" or in the rare cases they do go "yes them too", its because they view Palestinian israelis as race traitors due to living in Israel, which is fucked up.
Did you know 20% of the Israeli populations are Arabs? I bet you those calling for all Israelis to be killed/burned/etc. sure didn't. This is actually such a solid, and ironically hilarious, point.
In the USSR there was an organization called the âAnti-Zionist Committee of the Soviet Public.â If a Jew (ie someone with âHebrewâ nationality in line 5 of their ID papers) wanted to get beyond a certain point professionally, he/she had to join the committee and denounce Israel. The parallels between the current situation and the Soviet Union are remarkable (including the need for Jews to ritually disavow Israel, Zionism and Jewish peoplehood in order to advance).
In western countries, the biggest threat to Jews isn't street level violence (although it's real) or being rounded up, rather it's a rapidly developing situation where admission to elite institutions for Jews will be subject to a political litmus test. And as the Overton window on Israel/Palestine has shifted significantly on the left in recent years, the nature of the litmus test gets more stringent.
There was a time when dissociating from the settlement movement and the Israeli right was sufficient for just about all possible needs in elite institutions. We're rapidly approaching a situation where that simply isn't true any more. Even democratic single statism isn't enough. Even opposing violence against Israeli Jews, or having ostensibly non-political connections with Israel, is becoming disqualifying.
Woops, guess someone's mask just slipped
For days, this specimen tried to cosplay as an intellectual. They lectured me on my own peoplehood, told me I "donât know what Judaism is," and acted as the "benevolent" protector of the tribe to hide a very old, very ugly obsession.
And the second their target refused to play the role of the quiet, powerless victim, the pseudo-intellectual mask shatters.
When they realized they couldnât use "good Jews" as a moral shield to win the argument, they dropped the facade and went straight to the genocidal reality: "israel will burn, the world will not cry".
This is the modern "anti-imperialist" movement in a nutshell. They wrap themselves in the language of justice until a minority refuses to be their moral puppet. Then the "activism" vanishes, replaced by a pathetic, schoolyard sadism that salivates over mass death and laughs at the pain of survivors.
You aren't a revolutionary but a bully who is furious that your target talks back. I won't be drowning your comment, instead I'll thank you for becoming the poster child for, and providing the definitive conclusion to, my field study.
Stay miserable, stay cruel, and stay blocked.
Do you also advocate for all other indigenous peoples in the world to take back their land by any means possible, including ethnic cleansing? Since you seem to think thatâs a reasonable response, I assume you believe the same thing for the Native Americans, the Aboriginals, the MÄori, the indigenous people of all Latin American countries, that they should just go kill all the colonizers, men, women, and children, and take their homes.
Youâre projecting your own violent fantasies onto me because your logical arguments failed. I never advocated for 'killing' anyone or 'ethnic cleansing', I advocated for the right of an indigenous people to return and defend themselves from those exact things.
The irony youâre ignoring is that Zionists accepted sharing the land in 1937 and 1947. It was the Arab leadership that chose a war of extermination. My position is that indigenous people have a right to sovereignty, your position is that they only have a right to exist if they remain powerless victims.
I want a state that protects my people from the next 2,000 years of pogroms, you want a pile of bodies to satisfy your moral posturing. We are not the same.
In the USSR there was an organization called the âAnti-Zionist Committee of the Soviet Public.â If a Jew (ie someone with âHebrewâ nationality in line 5 of their ID papers) wanted to get beyond a certain point professionally, he/she had to join the committee and denounce Israel. The parallels between the current situation and the Soviet Union are remarkable (including the need for Jews to ritually disavow Israel, Zionism and Jewish peoplehood in order to advance).
In western countries, the biggest threat to Jews isn't street level violence (although it's real) or being rounded up, rather it's a rapidly developing situation where admission to elite institutions for Jews will be subject to a political litmus test. And as the Overton window on Israel/Palestine has shifted significantly on the left in recent years, the nature of the litmus test gets more stringent.
There was a time when dissociating from the settlement movement and the Israeli right was sufficient for just about all possible needs in elite institutions. We're rapidly approaching a situation where that simply isn't true any more. Even democratic single statism isn't enough. Even opposing violence against Israeli Jews, or having ostensibly non-political connections with Israel, is becoming disqualifying.
A quick response to the tankies reblogging this...
Watching the âCommon Soviet Wâ reblogs roll in feels like watching a thesis paper write its own conclusion in real-time. Thereâs a grim comedy in seeing people unironically applaud the Anti-Zionist Committee (an organization that specialized in the spiritual hostage-taking of a minority) while believing theyâre making a progressive point.
These commenters have managed to turn a historical warning into a modern casting call. By celebrating a system that forces Jews to trade their peoplehood for professional survival, theyâve provided a vivid, live demonstration of the very litmus tests Iâm talking about. They aren't debating the parallel; they're inhabiting it. The Soviet script hasn't been discarded, itâs just being auditioned for by a new generation of basement dwellers.
The reblogs are serving as a perfect field study where the subjects are completely unaware theyâve become the data.
Oh, shut the fuck up, as if the institutionalization of Zionism in the west hasn't led to people losing their jobs, being deported, sanctioned, doxxed, imprisoned and murdered for speaking up against a genocide or saying one mean word towards the ethnosupremarcist state.
@humusboii2thereturnoftheking: donât assume all Jews support the âsettlement movementâ and israelâs far right government, but also itâs antisemitic to expect any Jewish person to vocally disavow them because theyâre crucial for the existence of Jewish personhood, but also itâs a political view thatâs shouldnât affect anyoneâs social standing or success, but also itâs a core part of the Jewish identity and Jews have the right to self-determine however they want (aka ethnically cleanse Palestine) and youâre an antisemite if you disagree!
The Field Study is Complete: A Summary of the Litmus Test in Action
If you want a live demonstration of the "Soviet Litmus Test" I wrote about, look no further than the notes on this post. I warned that we are entering an era where Jews are required to perform a ritual of self-erasure to be considered "acceptable" in elite spaces, and the comments section immediately stepped up to provide the evidence.
For the functional beings following along, the comment chains have become a perfect field study in modern ideological gatekeeping. Weâve successfully dismantled the following "hottakes" for the permanent record:
The DNA Deniers: Commenters who, in their desperation to frame Jews as "colonizers," have resorted to literal phrenology and the denial of peer-reviewed genetic and archaeological evidence tying Jews to the Levant.
The "History Started in 1948" Crowd: People who claim Zionism is a "British invention," ignoring the 1939 White Paper, the British blockade of Holocaust refugees, and the 3,000-year liturgical and indigenous connection to Zion that predates the British Empire by millennia.
The "Good Jew" Gatekeepers: The "benevolent" activists who claim to love Jews but demand we amputate our peoplehood and dismantle the only state protecting 7 million of us to satisfy their "moral" comfort.
The "Visibility = Safety" Fallacy: The logic that because some Jews have attained success, the systemic demand for our spiritual and professional submission is "fine."
The Verdict
The irony is hilariously overwhelming. These commenters believe they are "fighting for justice", yet they are unironically reciting the 1970s KGB playbook.
If you have the stomach for it, read through the responses. Youâll see exactly how the "Overton window" is being used to squeeze a minority until they either leave or agree to be lobotomized.
And to the tankies and bigots currently choking on your own obsession: may you continue to boil in the very hate you tried to disguise as activism.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
In the USSR there was an organization called the âAnti-Zionist Committee of the Soviet Public.â If a Jew (ie someone with âHebrewâ nationality in line 5 of their ID papers) wanted to get beyond a certain point professionally, he/she had to join the committee and denounce Israel. The parallels between the current situation and the Soviet Union are remarkable (including the need for Jews to ritually disavow Israel, Zionism and Jewish peoplehood in order to advance).
In western countries, the biggest threat to Jews isn't street level violence (although it's real) or being rounded up, rather it's a rapidly developing situation where admission to elite institutions for Jews will be subject to a political litmus test. And as the Overton window on Israel/Palestine has shifted significantly on the left in recent years, the nature of the litmus test gets more stringent.
There was a time when dissociating from the settlement movement and the Israeli right was sufficient for just about all possible needs in elite institutions. We're rapidly approaching a situation where that simply isn't true any more. Even democratic single statism isn't enough. Even opposing violence against Israeli Jews, or having ostensibly non-political connections with Israel, is becoming disqualifying.
A quick response to the tankies reblogging this...
Watching the âCommon Soviet Wâ reblogs roll in feels like watching a thesis paper write its own conclusion in real-time. Thereâs a grim comedy in seeing people unironically applaud the Anti-Zionist Committee (an organization that specialized in the spiritual hostage-taking of a minority) while believing theyâre making a progressive point.
These commenters have managed to turn a historical warning into a modern casting call. By celebrating a system that forces Jews to trade their peoplehood for professional survival, theyâve provided a vivid, live demonstration of the very litmus tests Iâm talking about. They aren't debating the parallel; they're inhabiting it. The Soviet script hasn't been discarded, itâs just being auditioned for by a new generation of basement dwellers.
The reblogs are serving as a perfect field study where the subjects are completely unaware theyâve become the data.
The Western delusion is officially peaking.
While European governments and Western TV anchors are busy demanding a ceasefire and undermining the fight against the Iranian regime, the actual Arab world, the people who actually have to live next to the IRGC monster, are cheering for the regimeâs collapse and admiring Israeli strength.
It is absolutely unhinged. The West has never been weaker or more submissive, failing to realize that the Middle East they refuse to understand is already conquering them from within. You cannot survive a Middle Eastern war using "Western politeness."
The reality? Israel is a flourishing Western democracy, but itâs physically located in a neighborhood with different rules and a different language. To exist here, you have to be two things at once: a prosperous, modern state and a lethal Middle Eastern power. If your "activism" requires you to ignore the people actually living under the IRGC's thumb just so you can feel morally superior in London or Paris, you aren't a humanitarian youâre just a useful idiot for a regime that laughs at your weakness while working to undermine your cozy existence.
Stop holding the only people fighting the IRGC to a standard of "politeness" that the regime uses as a weapon.