Hi, you can call me Binx.
Perhaps you followed bread crumbs here.
A map: my art, musings, field notes / scribbles / memos, & what I'm reading.
dear binx
art credit
Stranger Things

@theartofmadeline
Jules of Nature
almost home

shark vs the universe
Sade Olutola

PR's Tumblrdome
Monterey Bay Aquarium

★
One Nice Bug Per Day
Game of Thrones Daily

#extradirty
Three Goblin Art
Sweet Seals For You, Always

izzy's playlists!

Kaledo Art

Andulka
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

titsay
seen from South Africa
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from France

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Belgium
seen from Germany
seen from Germany
@ghostofbinx
Hi, you can call me Binx.
Perhaps you followed bread crumbs here.
A map: my art, musings, field notes / scribbles / memos, & what I'm reading.
dear binx
art credit

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
"In Merchants of Doubt, Oreskes, and Conway explain this blueprint in more detail. Indeed, the authors provide evidence not only that other science deniers followed the "tobacco strategy," but also that some of the same people were involved. Ever since the infamous internal memo written by a tobacco executive in 1969 which said that "doubt is our product since it is the best means of competing with the 'body of fact' that exists in the minds of the general public," it has been clear what needs to be done. Find and fund your own experts, use this to suggest to the media that there are two sides to the story, push your side through public relations and governmental lobbying, and capitalize on the resulting public confusion to question whatever scientific result you wish to dispute. As Oreskes and Conway explain, this strategy was successfully employed in later scientific "disputes" over Reagan's 'Strategic Defense Initiative,' nuclear winter, acid rain, the ozone hole, and global warming. Some of the funding for these campaigns even came from the tobacco industry. By the time climate change became a partisan issue in the early 2000s, the mechanism of corporate-funded science denial was a well-oiled machine: 'Paid experts produced fake research that was converted into talking points and memes, then repeated on television by paid shills and spread through social media and, when necessary, hammered into the public consciousness through paid advertising campaigns.' -- Post Truth, Lee McIntyre
Critical questions you should ask more often
Who said this was a rule?
Did they really say this?
Do you accept their authority? Why?
Who disagrees with this rule? What are their arguments against it?
trump’s Medicare plan for seniors
"porn brain" is a far right conspiracy theory, misogyny in porn is a result of structural societal misogyny and not the cause of it, the way to help sex workers is decriminalization and worker's rights, banning sexual expression is fascist. i will not be taking questions at the time.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
"The optimists, they died of a broken heart. This is a very important lesson. You must never confuse the faith that you will prevail in the end -- which you can never afford to lose -- with the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality, whatever they might be." -- The Stockdale Paradox, James Stockdale
― The Face of Another (1966) Okuyama: There are monsters who act like people, and people who act like monsters.
"A lie is told because the person telling it thinks there is a chance that someone will believe it. We might hope that the listener has enough common sense not to believe it, but in an age of partisan manipulation and fragmentation of our information sources, keyed to play on our motivated reasoning, we are no longer entitled to that assumption. The point of challenging a lie is not to convince the liar, who is likely too far gone in his or her dark purpose to be rehabilitated. But because every lie has an audience, there may still be time to do some good for others. If we do not confront the liar, will those who have not yet moved from ignorance to "willful ignorance" just slip further down the rabbit hole toward full-blown denialism, where they may not even listen to facts or reason anymore? Without a 'counter-narrative' from us, will they have any reason to doubt what the liar is saying? At the very least, it is important to at least witness a lie and call it out for what it is. In an era of post-truth, we must challenge each and every attempt to obfuscate a factual matter and challenge falsehoods before they are allowed to fester."
-- Post-Truth by Lee McIntire
I feel like I live in a different world than most people, more than ever.