Exactly, it's a pattern that have been lately adopted by a lot of institutions and politics, the same cycle the zi*onists and Israel use to be validated and it's extremely dangerous for the rights we being fighting for so long to have.
People get distracted by this little "battles of rightfulness" on the internet and skip through the important and urgent matters.
And in relation of Le Pen and other people that relativise holocaust and events like that it's so crazy for me, obviously I understand that's their agenda, but how can you see that and don't feel bad? I'm a German descendant and ever being born in another country extremely distant when I learned this in school I remember to feel a deep feeling of shame of having ancestors that did this kind of atrocities against the humanity. It's atrocious to see
Jean-Marie Le Pen has long been associated with a deeply reactionary, exclusionary ideology—one marked by racism, antisemitism, and Islamophobia. He founded the National Front, alongside former SS affiliates, within a broader postwar context in which elements of the far right sought to reconstitute themselves, and his own past—particularly his role during the Algerian War—remains highly controversial, including serious allegations regarding the treatment of Algerian prisoners. Numerous chilling testimonies state that he tortured them.
For decades, this political current was widely perceived across the French political spectrum as fundamentally incompatible with republican values. That perception was not arbitrary. France carries a profound historical memory of the Nazi Occupation of France—a period marked by collaboration under Philippe Pétain, and by the persecution of Jews, resistance fighters, LGBTQ+ individuals, and many others. Events such as the Vel' d'Hiv Roundup and the Oradour-sur-Glane massacre remain deeply embedded in the national consciousness, as do the atrocities committed under figures like Klaus Barbie. These are not distant memories; they are intergenerational traumas that have shaped France’s political and moral landscape for decades.
For a long time, this collective memory fostered a broad consensus—across political divides—against the far right. However, as generations have passed and direct witnesses to these events have gradually disappeared, that consensus has weakened.
Over the past decade, the so-called “liberal socialists” under François Hollande and the right-wing leadership of Emmanuel Macron have chosen to align—albeit discreetly—with the bourgeois far right represented by Marine Le Pen, the daughter of Jean-Marie Le Pen. This rapprochement has coincided with a broader effort to “normalize” or sanitize that political current, a process amplified by a media landscape largely controlled by wealthy owners.
As a result, for several years now, mainstream narratives have increasingly portrayed the far right as having softened or become more acceptable, while left-wing movements that openly challenge capitalism, government policies, or the actions of Israel are frequently marginalized or discredited.
At the same time, many people in France feel exhausted and economically strained, navigating a climate marked by rising inequality, social tension, and a constant flow of conflicting information. This environment fosters confusion and disillusionment, leaving a significant portion of the population feeling disconnected from political representation.
From this perspective, what has emerged resembles a consolidated “bourgeois bloc” within the current political structure—one that prioritizes the preservation of its own privileges above all else, even when this comes into tension with the broader will or well-being of the population.
The result is a climate in which historical memory, political responsibility, and media influence (own by far-right billionaires who bought 90% medias of the country, what a coincidence) intersect in complex—and often troubling—ways, leaving a significant portion of the population feeling disoriented and disillusioned about the direction of public life and representation.
This is precisely why education, historical memory, and a clear understanding of language—its definitions and its nuances—are absolutely essential. What we are witnessing is a deliberate exploitation of what is often described as a “post-truth” climate, popularized in recent years by figures such as Donald Trump. In such an environment, words are emptied of their meaning or made to signify their opposite, and once language itself becomes unstable, confusion takes root.
And when confusion prevails, control becomes far easier. From that elevated position—so to speak, an “ivory tower”—it becomes possible to shape narratives, influence perception, and ultimately steer public opinion with far less resistance.
To resist this, one must be informed and vigilant: to observe carefully, to think critically, to question rather than react impulsively. It requires understanding not only the definitions of words, but also the systemic mechanisms at play, and the recurring patterns that history has already shown us.
Because what we are seeing today—the consolidation of bourgeois blocs willing to align with far-right forces in order to preserve their privileges and avoid wealth redistribution—is not unprecedented. History offers clear examples of how such dynamics can unfold. The conditions that allowed Adolf Hitler to rise to power were not created in a vacuum; they were shaped by alliances, economic interests, and the gradual erosion of democratic and intellectual safeguards.
