IWTV/TVL isn't just a retelling of Anne Rice's Vampire Chronicles, it's a canon-divergence AU
I think as of TVL 3.05 I've seen enough data points to confidently say IWTV/TVL isn't just changing the canon selectively.
I think they picked a specific event in Lestat's life and had that one event go differently, and all the subsequent timeline changes are a result of this.
My hypothesis? The divergence point is Gabrielle convincing Lestat to kill the de Lioncourt family with her. (Though it could be something even earlier that that.)
Here's my take:
In the book, Lestat's family is killed during the French Revolution by a mob because they are aristocrats. Lestat's father barely escapes. Eventually, Lestat and Gabrielle part ways and then Lestat takes his father to New Orleans.
While in New Orleans in the late 1700s, he meets white plantation owner Louis de Pointe du Lac and befriends him for (among many reasons) his wealth so Lestat can look after his father in comfort during his old age.
But because Lestat's father is dead in the show at Lestat and Gabrielle's hands, this never occurred.
Because Lestat's family died earlier, he might have been around to see Nicki die instead of traveling at the time. It's not a direct cause/effect but it is possible.
Also because Lestat's family died, it might follow that his travels with Gabrielle were different so he didn't go looking for Marius the same way. Again, it's not a direct cause/effect but it is possible. They're still traveling together in 1802, when in book canon, Claudia was made in 1794 so this is much longer.
TVL 3.05 and book canon hint that Akasha was already growing tired of Enkil when she and Lestat met in the book canon.
But since they didn't meet at their original date in the late 1700s, by 1802 Akasha took matters into her own hands and mind-whammied Marius into leaving Enkil out in the sun (at least, that's my theory as to how Enkil died. You can't convince me that Mr. Martyr To Those Who Must Be Kept Marius would ever slip up that badly while transferring them to a new location. Nah, Akasha set it up, I'm convinced.)
But to go back to Lestat, at this point, he goes to the New World after 1900.
Because Lestat wasn't there to turn white, plantation-owner Louis de Pointe Du Lac, Book Louis's mortal descendants of mixed race instead inherited the plantation's wealth.
TV Show Louis in fact mentions that he had a plantation-owning great-something grandfather. In my opinion, that great-grandfather was the book!Louis, who TV!Lestat never met.
Because events played out this way (otherwise more or less the same as in book IWTV but staggered by ~100 year) Louis and Armand's relationship isn't quite the same. TV!Louis and TV!Armand don't drift apart soon after leaving Paris the way their book counterparts did, they stay together.
As a result, Armand isn't single when he meets fascinating young Daniel. He therefore is able to bring greater willpower to bear in denying young Daniel his demand to be turned into a vampire.
However, the love is real, so Armand continues to stalk and pine after Daniel and, eventually, we are brought full circle with now Old Daniel being brought to Dubai to interview Louis and save Armand from this emotionally stagnant relationship the two are stuck in.
From a Doylist standpoint, I think Daniel not being turned young was the first divergence point the show creators came up with, but I think once they decided that the show would be a canon-divergence AU, they went back through the in-story events to pick one which would delay Lestat's book canon biography by 100 years so they could have TV!Louis and have it set in the 1900s instead of the 1800s. Lestat and Gabrielle killing the de Lioncourts might be that original point of divergence.























