KIROKAZE

if i look back, i am lost

Kaledo Art
One Nice Bug Per Day
Show & Tell

oozey mess
NASA
ojovivo
RMH
macklin celebrini has autism

izzy's playlists!
we're not kids anymore.

blake kathryn
🪼
dirt enthusiast
will byers stan first human second
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Today's Document

seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from Tunisia

seen from Jordan
seen from United States

seen from Ukraine

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye
seen from India

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Türkiye
seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Uruguay
seen from T1
seen from Poland
@enron-intern-1998

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I don't think this is possible????
Hello Ryan I am here to help. So the first step is pretty easy: Three cheeseburgers are worth 18, so each one is worth 6. If these are dollars, that's a steal!
From the second equation we get that cheeseburger plus fries-squared is five. Subtracting cheeseburger, which is six, from both sides, we get that fries-squared is negative-one. Math fans will know that there are two solutions to this; either fries are the "imaginary unit" 𝒾 or they are its negative, -𝒾. We'll do the rest of the problem with 𝒾, keeping in mind that at the end we should also take the complex conjugates as solutions.
Finally, we have that cup to the power of fries, minus cup, equals three. Replacing fries with 𝒾, and moving a cup to the other side, we get that cup-to-the-𝒾 is equal to cup-plus-three.
Now, the weird part about this is the cup-to-the-i. The problem with this is that complex exponentiation is technically not a thing. That is to say, there is no one function which is mathematically equal to "input-to-the-power-of-𝒾". In fact, there are infinitely many such functions.
Fortunately, due to reasons that take about six pages to explain (trust me I've done it), there is one particular function that many people have agreed is "the most reasonable one". This is not a mathematical notion, but a human preference. Seeing as this question was presumably written by a human, I am comfortable with using this function.
So, what function is this? Well, given a complex number r∠θ written in polar form (if you don't know what that means don't worry), where -π < θ ≤ π, then (r∠θ)^𝒾 = e^(-θ)∠ln(r).
Applying this to our problem a value r∠θ will be a possible solution for cup if e^(-θ)∠ln(r) = r∠θ + 3. Splitting this into real and imaginary parts, we get two equations: e^(-θ) cos(ln(r)) = r cos(θ) + 3 and e^(-θ) sin(ln(r)) = r sin(θ). We can graph these equations on Desmos:
The possible values of cup are the intersections between the red, green, and purple. There are infinitely many of these which have an angle of around -π/3, and there are two weirdos: One which is a complex number very close to -2.98, and one which is somewhere around -25. The possible values for cup are all of these infinitely many solutions, and also all of their complex conjugates.
They were right, 99% of people can't solve it.
i've actually been working on some formulae to give all possible solutions to complex exponentiation problems recently, so here's my take on this:
let the value of the glass = z, for z ∈ ℂ:
z^(±i) = 3+z
let z = r·e^(iθ) for r,θ ∈ ℝ, -π < θ ≤ π
∴ z = r·e^i(θ+2πn) for all n ∈ ℤ
∴ (r·e^i(θ+2πn))^(±i) = 3+r·e^i(θ+2πn)
distribute powers (apologies for the use of ∓):
r^(±i)·e^(∓(θ+2πn)) = 3+r·e^i(θ+2πn)
convert to the same base:
e^i(±ln(r))·e^(∓(θ+2πn)) = 3+r·e^i(θ+2πn)
split into real and imaginary components:
re: cos(±ln(r))·e^(∓(θ+2πn)) = 3+r·cos(θ)
im: sin(±ln(r))·e^(∓(θ+2πn)) = r·sin(θ)
in effect, all this changes is the restriction on the domain of theta to be between -pi and pi, so you can just ignore that constraint.
every time i sit down 2 watch a horror movie i think of that one tweet :/
rb if you too sit down in ur room and watch horror movies alone
“It’s easy to assume”: someone’s misconception is about to be amiably corrected
“It’s tempting to assume”: someone’s assumption is about to be criticized
“It’s comforting to assume”: someone’s assumption is going to be read for filth
Im grading the final exams for the class I TA for and I'm checking the name of the one I've just graded so I can enter it in the gradebook when I notice that after the name it says in parentheses "just visiting ! =)". And that I do not know this student, they are not enrolled in this class, and they just showed up on the last day to take the final . Innovative use of free will
I did this in a history class and got the rest of the class in trouble for doing better on the test

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
AfD: We are not Nazis :)
Also AfD: Let's organize our 2026 Party Conference on the same day and in the same area as the NSDAP did theirs in 1926, 100 years later haha!
AfD voter type 1: Oh, that's just a coincidence, you're just trying to discredit them!!!! *conveniently forgets the party chairman in that state is a history teacher*
AfD voter type 2: *Hitler salute*
I will always care more about the supportive cishet boyfriend at pride than i will about the wannabe cop queer person interrogating every “straight looking” couple to make sure they’re “queer enough” to be there btw. Don’t worry about your cishet boyfriend, he’s sitting with me eating an ice cream wearing a homemade little pride bracelet around his arm and he is the happiest he’s ever been in his life :]
bitches be sucking farts there
Found the source of the infographic that explains how the results were obtained!
there’s sixteen Colorado counties that their most searched was “wolf furry”, plus thirty-odd counties (not counting either Arapahoe or any of the ones marked here as “Insufficient Data”) which may well have had plenty of searches for “wolf furry”, just fewer than for whatever they’re labeled here
and “skunk furry” searches in Arapahoe County outnumbered “wolf furry” searches in the entire state of Colorado
something tells me Skunks Georg
we did it, we created furry gerrymandering
wait, you're telling me some "boys" didn't grow up feeling like a lesbian trapped in the wrong body? i thought that was normal!
get peer reviewed, because fucking. yeah.
hey. hey bestie. i have some pronouns over here you might like, come with me. you can leave that "he/they" over there, you don't need it anymore.
GIRL THE EGG COLUMN IS NOT A GOOD IDEA. YOU DO NOT NEED CONVINCING YOU NEED CONVICTION.
LOOKING FOR REASONS IS REASON ENOUGH. BE A GIRL TODAY RIGHT NOW
LOOKING FOR REASONS
IS REASON ENOUGH. BE A
GIRL TODAY RIGHT NOW
Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
personally I think there is ONE thing the musical did better than the 1941 movie which it is based on. And it is that now every single other major character gets to see Jekyll getting shot by his best friend for sucking badly
Hyde in the 1941 movie: Motherfucker don’t shoot me I’m Dr. Jekyll and I’m so normal
Hyde in the musical: What are you going to do, shoot me with a gun in front of my girlfriend and father in law, which is what I have specifically asked you to do,
I just love it when Jekyll loses his marbles in front of everyone and his facade crumbles and he turns into Hyde and immediately goes “fuck it” and right then and there his best friend and also crucially the guy he’s instructed to take him down if he ever loses his marbles in front of everyone takes out the gun and suddenly he’s like “whoooa there hey buddy I have all my marbles right there” and he gets shot anyway. I think it’s important if his girlfriend watches and finds out what sort of man she was going to get married to.
well she had it coming
Here's the unedited comic for those curious:
The original is from June 18, 1959.
Some have called "they pay me in woims" Sluggo's catch phrase. It's not. He said it once, and folks on Bluesky loved it so much they say it all the time, especially in response to the Nancy Comics by Ernie Bushmiller account. Here's the original "they pay me in woims" from February 22, 1978:
And, another mention of woims from September 13, 1949:
And the Woims Wednesday (aka Woimsday) image that gets posted almost every week because of the popularity of the word:
ngl the most important thing i was taught growing up was that its not enough to just be anti racist but to also be pro black
hating racists is good ! but if youre only hating the oppressor and not uplifting the oppressed all you are doing is using a performative method to direct your anger at. being angry is good, but its not enough. you have to love too. uplift the ones that should be uplifted. celebrate black art and culture and people. celebrate blackness for the beauty it is
Sorry but i am rooting for Norway
why are you apologizing to me I’m watching this game in norway
is this because I’m sámi

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
So are we gonna do a thing about transmisogynists? anything? Or are we just gonna keep reblogging and it's okay if they do a bit of hal as their main job as long as their side job is funny
You can reblog this btw. I mean i won't get a thousandth of the notes but i'd quite like it if people were at least slightly inconvenienced when they tried to kill me.
Or you can just keep scrolling too
Trying to find an old tumblr post I used to see a lot.
It started with someone listing "places with uncanny energy," like gas stations on a road trip, empty movie theaters, etc.
Then someone reblogged it and said those are called "liminal spaces," defining liminal as in-between, neither one thing nor another.
It was the first time I'd seen the term "liminal" applied to places like that, and it's driving me crazy, I want to find and put a date on it so bad.
NEVER MIND, I FOUND IT!!!
Holy shit I just realized:
Tomorrow (July 4th, 2026) is the 10 year anniversary of the-crepes-of-wrath's comment, which:
Predates the 2020 spike in interest by four years
Predates the original backrooms post, and the the creation of r/liminalspaces by three years
Predates the earliest mention that KnowYourMeme attributes to Twitter by two years
I'm pretty sure this is the moment the term "liminal spaces" was attached to this sort of imagery, and it's TEN YEARS OLD TOMORROW!
LIMINAL SPACES TURN TEN TOMORROW! CELEBRATE BY GETTING LOST IN AN ABANDONED MALL!