Important research for a story I'm writing! Not real life, never real life.
You are transported back in time and into the body of a young noblewoman in the 1400s. Your parents have married you off to an awful, abusive, rapist husband whom literally no one else would marry despite him being very high nobility because he's that terrible. You successfully produce a baby boy and then plan to murder this man for the good of everyone and yourself. Here is the question: do you think you could murder him in a way that is undetectable to the historical people around you? Note: they aren't stupid, you are the prime suspect as the battered wife AND you can't just say poison. Where are you going to buy poison? Do you know anything about poison actually? NO GOOGLING! You were sent back without a plan!
Do you think you could murder someone in the 1400s and get away with it with your modern know-how?
Yes, I totally have a plan (tell me for research purposes)
No, I realize that I'm very uninformed about murder
I have some ideas but I'm not sure they would work
Edit: my notes are full of murder. I love you all
Edit: to clarify about the poison, you can use poison if you actually know how to identify it, I'm saying you can't just go "Poison!" with no knowledge about poison. Buying it probably means they know that poison and you're caught. Your personal knowledge when you read this post is all you have.
Another point of clarity: You went through all that trouble to have a baby without modern medicine so you could get the sweet house after your husband died. That's why you can't be caught. No disappearing.
Edit again: Air embolisms are going on a high shelf because the syringe won't be invented for 350 years. Prove to me that you could make one from scratch, lol
I promise to stop making edits (lol): I left the country vague because I just wanted to see ideas for modern vs. past. Whatever place you are most knowledgeable about
Hi, as someone who studies medieval poisons for fun and sanity, a lot of what was āpoisonā in Noble courts was people who just got sick from other stuff and died. No poison needed. Itās not like vaccines or antibiotics were a thing.
Most historical accounts of āpoisoningsā go along the lines of āgot sick, died three days later, poison.ā Which, if youāre trying to figure out which poisons might have been used, not helpful.
The accusation of poisoning was mostly used as a smear campaign, frequently to disgrace women, particularly those in positions of power. (Ie: Elizabeth Bathory, Lucrezia Borgia, Catherine de' Medici, heck even Cleopatra)
As far as which poison, thatās going to vary by location. Not every poisonous plant grows everywhere, plants that grow in the warmer Mediterranean climates arenāt going to be able to handle Scotland. And some like Curare wouldnāt available yet, although a form of Strychnine might be able to be imported. And if she can correctly identify a plant, dosage is going to very wildly on each plant and their growing conditions. Sheād need to be lucky to get a high enough dosage to kill and not just make ill.
⦠Although during that time period, diarrhoea could be fatal, although more for children than adults.
Honestly, my bet would be to skip the plants entirely and go for the tried and true minerals: Arsenic. Was used for murder at the time, the death looks like cholera (diarrhoea!). And it builds up in the system, slow dosing could work, itās tasteless and odourless. Could be requested for make up.
If you really want to embarrass him, get some imported Spanish fly, a.k.a. blister beetle. Yes, getting a stiffy is a side-effect, but itās killing the person the whole time. Even better if he can be found dead in somebody elseās bed. And can claim he did it to himself.
Although a bit of historical context to keep in mind if she does get caught, is Henry VIIIās 1530th Poisonerās Act, and poor Richard Roose, the first person to be executed by being boiled alive for being a poisoner.



















