Theyll try to degrade them by saying they must desperately fein for dick as an insult, and then theyll turn around and go fuck Jakey no.6

For example women who treat service workers like crap because they wont face consequences, women who pimp out their daughters to predators online, women who set up other women to be raped by moids, women who mock other victims of maIe violence + side with their abusers, racist women, female bosses that abuse their power to bully female subordinates, women that are physically violent to smaller women & girls, groups of women & girls ganging up to bully a woman or girl, those aunties (if you're a woc you'll know what I'm talking about) that wouldn't try that attitude to boys or white people, etc I'm sure y'all know.

There is no solidarity between women because women as a collective have no power. There's no interest to the average woman to defend another woman to the end because they dont see much benefit from it. Women are nicer to maIes even when they dont want to be not because women have endless empathy but because they lack power, if more women could physically rock moids shit they would do it.

Also, many women are sellouts and will be quick to throw other women under the bus for crumbs of power so you can't blindly trust women because they're women. They would be quiet on moids dirty laundry but a woman makes a small mistake and they become town crier.

Now i'm not exonerating moids of their evil but telling women (y'all) to look out because as it'll be more effort for women to fight against maIes, you will be a target if they perceive you as weak/easier to overpower. Usually when these topics are brought up it's a disingenuous attempt to pretend maIes are in danger because of women to detract from the conversation about maIe violence. However, as a woman it's important to be aware of how other women are threats especially if you're marginalised because if you try this feminist kumbaya shit in real life you're going to be burned. If other women sense weakness from you they will exploit it & you will be a target even if you dont provoke them. I dont care for a backstory overall for their actions; point is they are also a threat to be watched out for.

Also the fact that women turn their aggression to the powerless instead of those that generally hurt them should say it all. This is not an attack on women. The comparison is not between maIes & women behavior per se, it is about how women treat maIes & females. It's a hard pill to take down but it's essential for your survival to do so. This notion that of women being inherently good is something that gets exploited by sex traffickers (many of whom are women). Yes maIes are generally dangerous & in the end I'd rather physically take my chances dealing with an antagonistic woman than maIe but don't assume womens innocence either.

I stopped feeling bad for many women when I realised this. Women dont have better morals, women will gladly use others without a second thought to advance themselves, they'll happily punch down on others to secure what little status they have in society. They'll use the power they have to make other women & girls lives hell. I'm not saying women have to be overly empathetic, perfect or innocent to acknowledge how messed up misogyny is. In the end women are human too & most some humans suck. But it's misleading & dangerous pushing the narrative that women are these overly empathetic angels who do no wrong unless "influenced", when they are not that. Long story short, personally watch your backs and assess women on a case by case basis.

Edit: On the human side of things, this behaviour isn't just limited to women. Several marginalised people are this way including maIes which is something that made me stop caring about activism. (Link no longer works bc OP deactivated but it was an ask of someone outlining their experience helping out in homeless shelters and seeing homeless peoples bigotry up close; emphasising a disconnect against what those who advocate being around homeless people say and the reality of actually being around them).

Edit 2: found a screenshot of the ask in the link:

If I get hit by a truck, and I say, "I think part of the reason my injuries are so bad is because it was an 18-wheeler," are you going to say to me, "nooooooo it has nothing to do with the size and speed of the truck!! Don't take accountability away from the driver!!!"? Of course not.

You deny evolution when you insist that male biology has NOTHING to do with their dangerousness. It's nothing but male propaganda designed to silence women into not naming the problem. There is no reason that we cannot simultaneously acknowledge the problem AND hold men accountable -- but they've made it into a false dichotomy and you're so scared of having the wrong opinion that you fell for it. It's literally #notallmen logic repackaged with some sciencey words like "bioessentialism" to shut you up and keep your eyes closed.

The same reason men are less healthy than women is also why they're more intrinsically--biologically--evil and dangerous. The lack of a second X chromosome means there is a no backstop for a wide variety of disorders and neurocognitive impairments, many of which facilitate violence. If a female has a corrupted gene on one X chromosome, she's got a whole other one, doubling her chances of having healthy gene expression. XYs do not have this and that's why there are so many more males with profound intellectual disabilities, they die earlier and have more cancer and disease, etc. There's no backup, they're stuck with one X.

Do you know one of the main reasons why humans have sexual dimorphism? Because your forefathers were violent rapists. If men had not been oppressing women for millennia, they would not be so much larger than us on average. We would be the same size, like many species where males and females show similar levels of aggression.

it just shows that female and male positions in sex are different and since female one is vulnerable and servile then naturally women are the ones who get romance from men and gifts as an exchange for their service but nobody notices this intuitively lol they just deny that women GIVE men sex as an act of service,

Couldn’t have said it better thank you anon, from the female perspective it is absolutely not unconditional even if to us it may seem like she’s sacrificing more than she’s getting, but there is no such thing as an action without an incentive.

Even though many womens backlash against 4B is performative bs for maIe validation; If maIes were as great or worthy as many women pretended they were then things like 4B going mainstream should be excellent news - less competition for maIes right? Except one thing I've realised about female intrasexual competition is that it's not just about competing for the "good" maIes, it's about competing to not be with the bad ones aswell. I wrote a post about this before & received an excellent ask on the subject but women who want to date & reproduce with maIes require other women to be shields to keep the bad ones at bay as they cozy up with their nigels.

I've seen so many women seriously tweak out over 4B it cracks me up like why are you complaining? If it's terrible then keep engaging with moids lol their job is hypothetically made easier as more women remove themselves but no matter how maIe identified a woman is, she wont want to be the only or few women around a bunch of maIes that dont have access to other women.

Women that want to mate & reproduce with maIes cant just pick out the good ones and filter out the rest as an idle maIe is a dangerous one so if they want to get involved with maIes (or have to be around them) these women need scapegoats and this is where other women come in. The thing is when most women are sacrificing other women at some point they end up being another womans sacrifice. This leads to a lot of women suprised when they receive treatment they typically hear about other women receiving bc they do not expect it to be them. This is why discussion of not associating with maIes en masse scares these women because they dont want a solution to maIe violence that doesn't involve a life with maIes and many of these women are willing to sacrifice other women to save themselves.

Tbh I get that it's about survival & they're looking out for themselves but at the same time so are other women. Realise all of this made me look at women differently & not have much empathy or sympathy for them anymore bc a lot of women do not care until it happens to them. Many women believe they're above the evil maIes do until it blows up in their face, then they expect help & sympathy from the women they fucked over (or were willing to fuck over). Hillary crowder (as with many other trad women), anti choice women who get abortions, etc.

I've spoken about this concept of sacrifice a few times but this is why many women are okay with prostitution, especially a lot of wives out there. These women would rather their husbands use another woman for their sexual degeneracy instead of them. All of this clicked for me when I saw how women would talk about kiIIing themselves (& have done so) in situations where they're faced with being around unfamiliar maIes due to societal collapse or are forced to be around maIes who dont have access to other women so this isn't a case of "women don't know".

If these women truly believed most maIes were good or even 'safe' (until crossed) then it would be a good thing that women are removing themselves from the dating pool - less competition. But deep down they know most maIes are abusive and they need other women to be their fodder as they cozy with their nigels (or want to justify their suffering by wanting other women to suffer too).

Another reason why these women tend to be taken aback when I tell them to keep engaging w/ moids if it's so dangerous not to is because if it's not a thing where you're in the line of fire, it's being there to pick up the pieces when it goes wrong with their nigels. For example the whole "we need to prioritise mothers & women who partner with maIes" bs, they'll twist it into a female empowerment thing when they only care about themselves and just use other women. Like no wonder they get mad when other women wanna walk away, they wont have other women to clean up the mess their nigels make.

Now I'm not saying that refusing to associate with maIes means there's no chance of abuse occuring but even if it was straightforward to walk away from moids & not look back, many women would be against that for reasons I've mentioned above.

I'm no expert in female intrasexual competition but one thing I've realised is that women aren't just competing for the "good" maIes, they're also competing to not end up with the bad ones which they all know are a majority.

While maIe retaliation it's a valid concern to have, most of the women I've seen insistent on this "we can't leave or maIes will hurt us!1!" narrative as a way to dissuade other women are either new to this or women who partner with or are looking to partner with moids, in this case it's just a damn excuse to clip your own wings.

If you think I'm bullshitting just tell women who say the aforementioned that they can feel free to keep associating w/ maIes romantically + sexually then & watch as they start fumbling over what to say & try to make you out to be the bad guy for not being this "women supporting women" feminist. These women are just using women, besides last thing we need is fucking flakes given what's at stake here. These flakes will sell women out at the slightest hurdle.

Who cares if BPs say mean words? They're actually not harming any woman. I've never seen them brag about beating the shit out of a het-partnered woman, propose a political system where het-partnered women would get harmed, endlessly harass random het-partnered women, or share plans of shooting up a wedding venue. They're not doing anything. Even if they're posting while being the biggest edgelords imaginable, what does it actually matter? Who does it affect in any tangible way? That sounds like their own personal problem that nobody's forcing you to witness because the block button exists to shield you from posts you find triggering.

And that comparison to trad wives is just a thought-terminating cliché. "Anyone who resembles my enemy in any way must be automatically wrong about everything". Yeah, right.

We haven't "giving up on convincing anyone". Blackpill feminism isn't about convincing anyone. It's about giving women a space were they can vent about the misogyny of women, the female condition and feminism. It's about recognizing that women will never be liberated and that biology is the reason for it and all we can do is live our lives the best we can and focus on ourselves.

Just like other groups of people, we want a space were we can freely talk about our thoughts without being censored or tone policed. And like the deletion of the blackpill feminism reddit and the attacks on our spaces in other plaves have shown, it's difficult for us to even have a space of our own.

Blackpill spaces are mostly about venting. You can't talk about this topic with anyone in real life, so here we are. The same way you post or reblog something about how military/guns are needed for defense, because it's a topic you care about, we post about blackpill feminism.

Using insults like "cocksucker" or "whore" are not about being edgy by the way. They're about expressing pent up anger and frustration at feminists and women in general. Imagine seeing feminists do nothing but talk about women being victims and not having any agency and always defending them even when they harm other women or children by their choices. I have seen other women finally having had enough with feminists, when they defended a mother who let her boyfriend rape her daughter because she didn't want to break up with him. She is a cocksucker and a whore and much worse. Not giving a fuck anymore about being nice to women and just letting it out is freeing! I didn't use these insults when I was 20, but I' m 30 now and I had enough.

Blackpill women and separatists are a minority. We have no power. Some of us are poor or disabled. All we want is to vent and have a place to talk. Why do feminists even care about us? They're the ones who fuck men. They're part of the majority. Why can't they leave us alone?

I'm a disabled and poor woman, who is in fact nice, helpful and friendly to other people in real life. Me ranting about women on tumblr is not hurting them.

I don't give a fuck.

Did the males become pregnant? Did the women penetrate the males when having sex? Did the women have more physical power? Were women never raped?

No?

Feminists will never see the problem with sex and reproduction and that's why feminism will never liberate women. They're too busy coping about being fucked.

both men and women know "love" is not real but they keep playing pretend to feel better about themselves. all foids want is to feel "fuckable" enough and all moids want is to fuck. "desirability" or "fuckability" is very important for bihet foids, it's the reason why they spend most of their money and time on trying to make themselves look better and younger and judging other women's appearances (intra-sexual competition). moids spend time and money on whores, the more he is attracted to a whore the more money he spends on her and women know this. males only get offended at a woman who doesn't want to split the bill if he doesn't think she's "fuckable" enough, foids know this too and it's why they get offended when males don't spend their money on them

males complain about "gold diggers" because they can't afford them. foids complain about "beauty standards" because it's what's stopping them from being "spoiled". once a woman becomes "fuckable" she no longer cares if other women suffer, she doesn't even care if she herself suffers at the hands of a man, because she already "won" for being "desirable"/"fuckable" and that's enough for bihet foids

not sure if it's okay to send you this but i wanted to share my thoughts with a fellow minded woman. i don't know many blackpill accounts yet

anyway it's a bleak reality we live in

I agree with you. These women say so themselves. They want to feel desirable. It makes them feel "empowered" because they think being fuckable and desired makes them have power over men.

It seems like the ultimate goal for other sex attracted people is to find someone they want to fuck and have a relationship with. Sex is what a relationship is for, for them. Incels and these women are pathetic.

Love is not real, true. They conflate love with finding someone attractive.

It's bleak, but it's true.